Impacts of sewage waste water on feminization and vitellogenin expression in male fathead minnows.
Keywords: Feminization, fish, estrogens, wastewater, White River, Indiana
An expanding amount of research suggests that effluents from domestic wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) can contain natural (estrone, El; 17[beta]estradiol, E2; and estrone, E3) and synthetic (17[alpha]-ethinylestradiol, EE2) estrogens (see Limpiyakorn et al. 2011 for a review). The latter form of estrogen is the main ingredient of oral contraceptives and is considered to be the most potent environmental estrogen (Clouzot et al. 2008). Exposure of male fish to estrogens can result in a range of effects from complete sex reversal in the most severe cases to different degrees of 'feminization', including intersex (i.e. testes with oocytes) and decreased expression of secondary sex characteristics (Lange et al. 2012). In more extensive studies with fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) exposed to municipal wastewater, greatly reduced reproductive capacities were observed (Rickwood et al. 2008, Thorpe et al. 2009). Further, female-biased sex ratios have been observed in feral populations of other teleost species such as white suckers (Catostomus commersoni) exposed to WWTP effluents (Vajda et al. 2008). The estrogenic ecological effects of these types of effluents are not well understood and are a cause for concern.
A commonly used biomarker of exposure to estrogens in fish is vitellogenin (VTG). Vitellogenin is a phospholipoprotein synthesized in the liver of egg-laying females after estrogen stimulus and is essential in the production of egg yolk proteins and thus embryo survival (Specker and Sullivan 1993). While VTG receptors are present in male fish, the gene is silent unless triggered in the presence of sufficient estrogen concentrations (Maitre et al. 1985; Copeland et al. 1986; LeGuellec et al. 1988). Thus VTG can serve as an efficient marker of estrogenic contamination in aquatic systems (Sumpter and Jobling 1995). Furthermore, induction of VTG in male fish has been associated with decreased sperm quality and decreased fertility, potentially resulting in poor reproductive success (Kidd et al. 2007).
The only study evaluating the potential effects of effluents from a WWTP in Indiana was published by Doll (2011). In this study, free-ranging adult bluntnose minnows (Pimephales notatus) were sampled from the West Fork White River (hereafter White River) at different distances up-and downstream from the Muncie Water Pollution Control Facility (MWPCF), Delaware County, Indiana. This facility is a conventional activated sludge treatment plant that discharges an average of 18 MGD (million gallons per day) into the White River. The MWPCF is located at river kilometer 501.5 where the drainage area is ~ 635 [km.sup.2] (Hoggatt 1975). The MWPCF serves a population of 67,430 and includes one hospital and Ball State University. In addition, 13 combined sewer overflows are located on the White River within Muncie City limits. Secondary sex characteristics of male minnows collected downstream of the MWPCF had an average of 31.3% fewer tubercles and a 37.5% lower tubercle score compared to those sampled upstream of Muncie (Doll 2011). These results suggest that minnows were being exposed to estrogen-like compounds likely being released from the MWPCF and combined sewage overflows.
The main goal of our study was to further determine the potential estrogenicity of the MWPCF effluent. To do this we conducted an in situ exposure using fathead minnows, a commonly used species in ecotoxicology studies. We hypothesized that if estrogens are present at sufficient concentrations in this effluent, male fish caged downstream from the effluent discharge would respond with a decrease in expression of secondary sex characteristics and an induction of VTG.
Experimental design.--On June 1, 2011 adult fathead minnow males were exposed for 21 d to three different conditions: 1) caged (n = 4) located approximately 5 m below the MWPCF effluent; 2) caged (n = 3) 0.25 km upstream of the MWPCF (Fig. 1); or 3) kept indoors in the Bureau of Water Quality Laboratory (~ 38-L glass aquaria, n =4) containing reconstituted reverse osmosis water (APHA 2005) which was changed three times per week. Minnows in cages were allowed to eat naturally occurring food in the river whereas those in the tanks were fed 1 g of frozen brine shrimp every two days to keep stress at a minimum. These three conditions are referred herein to as downstream, upstream, and control, respectively. This exposure length and species were chosen because they are commonly used in ecotoxicology for assessing impacts of endocrine disrupting compounds (US EPA 2002). Cages were galvanized round minnow traps 419 mm long, 222 mm wide at center, 178 mm wide at ends, and 6 mm wire bar mesh. Openings of each trap were closed off with 3 mm bar mesh fiberglass screen. Minnow cages and tanks contained three to five male adult males each. Dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature, and conductivity (river samples only) were measured with a portable YSI[R] meter (model 556MPS); turbidity (river samples only) was measured with an Oakton[R] turbidity meter (model T-100); ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate (indoor tanks only) was measured using Hach[R] water quality test strips (Hach, Loeveland, CO, USA) daily Monday through Friday. Meters were calibrated and water quality was measured daily. At the conclusion of the exposure, fish were euthanized with MS-222 (300 mg/L) and processed for data collection.
Data collection.--All fish were measured (total length, mm), weighed (g), and gonads and livers dissected and weighed ([+ or-] 0.01 g) for determination of gonadosomatic index (GSI) and hepatosomatic index (HSI). These indices were calculated by dividing the weight of the organ by the weight of the fish multiplied by 100. A small section of each liver was placed in RNAlater (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and stored at-80[degrees]C for analysis of vtg expression as described below. Secondary sex characters were measured from each male fish as already described (US EPA 2002; US EPA 2007; Doll 2011), which included tubercle counts and tubercle and fatpad scoring. Tubercle counts were the total number of tubercles present. The size of each tubercle was qualitatively ranked as 1 = present, 2 = enlarged, and 3 = pronounced. The tubercle score was the sum of all individual tubercle ranks per individual fish. The fatpad score is a qualitative ranking and was assigned a 1 = no fatpad visible, 2 = small fatpad evident, 3 = fatpad is clearly visible and is just above body surface, 4 = fatpad is prominent and is clearly above the body surface but not overhanging, and 5 = fatpad is very prominent and overhangs the body surface.
Vitellogenin analysis.--The expression of the gene vtg, which codes for the VTG protein, was measured as a marker of estrogen exposure. RNA was extracted (TriSure, Bioline, Taunton, MA, USA), quantified (Nanodrop 1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), DNase-treated (Fermentas Inc., Glen Burnie, MD, USA) and reverse transcribed to cDNA (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The 260/280 ratio was used as an indicator of RNA quality, and only samples with a ratio of 1.8 or higher were used in gene analysis (33 samples of the 41 total). Elongation factor 1 (efl) was used as the housekeeping gene. Primers for vtg and efl were selected from primary literature (Biales et al. 2007; Mager et al. 2008) and purchased through Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, USA). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products were sequenced on an ABI 3700 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) at Purdue University's Genomics Core to validate specificity of gene amplification. Gene expression analysis was conducted by quantitative PCR (qPCR) on a Bio-Rad iQ5 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) using a DyNAmo[TM] SYBR[R] green qPCR kit (Ratastie 2, 01620 Vantaa, Finland). Reactions were comprised of 6.0 [micro]L 2X master mix, 360 nM primer, cDNA template synthesized from 45 ng of DNAse-treated total RNA, and molecular-grade water (12 [micro]L total). Conditions used to amplify samples were: 94[degrees]C for 15 sec, 60[degrees]C for 30 sec, and 72[degrees]C for 30 sec for 40 amplification cycles. No template controls, negative reverse transcriptase controls, and a melt curve analysis were performed for each primer to determine whether nonspecific products were being amplified. Samples were rerun if standard deviation of the Ct values between duplicates was > 0.5. Expression of target genes was normalized relative to the expression of elf1 ([DELTA]Ct = Ctvtg gene--Ctefl1). The relative expression of the target gene in experimental groups compared to the control group was quantified by the [2.sup.[DELTA][DELTA]Ct] method (Pfaffl 2001).
Data analysis.--Water-quality parameters, vtg hepatic expression, and all morphological measurements with exception of tubercle and fatpad scores, were compared across sites using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test. Tubercle and fatpad scores were compared across groups using chi-square. All tests were conducted using SAS 9.3, and significance was declared at a = 0.05.
Water quality.--There were significant differences in water temperature and DO across the three treatments; however, overall differences were relatively small (ranges of temperature 18-21[degrees]C and DO 6.6-8.9 mg/1) (Table 1). Conductivity was almost twice as high in the "downstream' site compared to the 'upstream' site (0.81 [+ or -] 0.18 [micro]S and 0.46 [+ or -] 0.06 [micro]S, respectively). Nitrogenous compounds were measured in the control tanks only. Nitrate and nitrites were not detected, and total ammonia averaged 0.44 [+ or -] 0.32 mg/L during the experiment.
Morphometric measurements.--There were no mortalities during this experiment. At the time of dissection, four fish from the 'downstream' and two fish from the 'upstream' site were classified as females and were eliminated from further analyses. The 'upstream' fish were larger than the other two groups, but not significantly (Table 2). The only parameter that differed among treatments was LSI, with males from the 'downstream' site having the largest value (upstream 1.38 [+ or -] 0.8; downstream 2.04 [+ or -] 0.8; control 0.96 [+ or -] 0.3).
Secondary sex characteristics.--Secondary sex characteristics of male fathead minnows are summarized in Table 2. No significant differences were observed across treatments. However, the 'control' group had the highest tubercle count, fatpad score and weight of all the groups.
Vitellogenin expression.--While upstream males showed no significant difference in vtg expression compared to control fish, downstream males displayed an up-regulation in the expression of this gene (Figure 2).
We documented a significant induction of vtg in male fathead minnows after a 21-d exposure to the MWPCF effluent. These males also had significantly higher LSI than the upstream and control group. However, secondary sex characteristics did not significantly differ among the three treatments. Although there were differences in water quality parameters between treatment groups, overall differences were relatively small (ranges of temperature 18-21[degrees]C and DO 6.6-8.9 mg/1; Table 1). These values fell well within acceptable limits for fish and would not have induced the differences in vtg expression and LSI observed. These results suggest presence and exposure of fish to estrogens or estrogen-mimic compounds. To our knowledge, the present study is only the second published evaluating the potential impacts of sewage effluents on fish in Indiana. The first study in Indiana also showed evidence of feminizing contaminants being released by the MWPCF, as wild bluntnose minnows exposed to effluent at the downstream site were observed to have reduced expression of secondary sex characteristics (Doll 2011).
Hundreds of studies around the country and the world have quantified natural and synthetic estrogens in effluents from sewage waste water treatment plants (Limpiyakorn et al. 2011). Although in most cases estrogens are found at very low concentrations (low ng/1), feminization and complete reproductive failure of male fathead minnows has been shown after chronic exposure to < 5 ng/1 to EE2 (Parrott and Blunt 2005; Filby et al. 2007; Kidd et al. 2007). This reproductive failure in males can result from alterations in testicular development, but it can also be the result of more subtle effects such as VTG production. Indeed, VTG production by males can lead to decreased fertility and even kidney pathology (Zha et al. 2008). Alterations in behavior have also been reported after exposure of male fish to estrogens (Dammann et al. 2011). Fathead minnow males caged downstream from the MWPCF also had enlarged livers. Since VTG is produced by the liver, this hepatomegalia is consistent with these fish being exposed to estrogens (Gunnarsson et al. 2009). VTG induction and LSI have been shown to have a positive relationship in fathead minnows (Barber et al. 2007).
Results of this study showed indications of feminization downstream from the MWPCF. The lack of feminization in male secondary sex characteristics indicates that the estrogenic contaminants are not potent enough to elicit feminizing effects after a relatively short exposure (i.e. 21 d). However, these contaminants are still of concern for chronic fish exposures, as seen with the decreased expression of secondary sex characteristics in feral fish found at this downstream site (Doll 2011).
In conclusion, effluents from the MWPCF are likely releasing estrogens into the White River. More studies are needed that measure the types(s) and concentrations of estrogens and potentially other types of contaminants from this effluent as well as the potential impacts on natural populations of fish and other aquatic organisms inhabiting this site.
We thank the Muncie Sanitary District Bureau of Water Quality for funding this project. We also thank Kelly Sudhoff, Tylenia Oliphant, and Brandon Hollsinger for their help in the field. We are grateful to Rick Conrad and the two anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions that greatly improved this manuscript.
Finally we thank Greg Bright, Commonwealth Biomonitoring, for providing the fathead minnows from their aquatic toxicity testing stock.
APHA (American Public Health Association), American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation. 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edition. APHA, Washington D.C.
Barber, L.B., K.E. Lee, D.L. Swackhamer & H.L. Schoenfuss. 2007. Reproductive responses of male fathead minnows exposed to wastewater treatment plant effluent, effluent treated with XAD8 resin, and an environmentally relevant mixture of alkylphenol compounds. Aquatic Toxicology 82:36-46.
Biales, A.D., D.C. Bencic, R.W. Flick, J. Lazorchak & D.L. Lather. 2007. Quantification and associated variability of induced vitellogenin gene transcripts in fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 26:287-296.
Clouzot, L., B. Marrot, P. Doumenq & N. Roche, N. 2008. 17 alpha-ethinylestradiol: An endocrine disrupter of great concern. Analytical methods and removal processes applied to water purification. A review. Environmental Progress 27:383-396.
Copeland, P.A., J.P. Sumpter, T.K. Walker & M. Croft. 1986. Vitellogenin levels in male and female rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri Richandson) at various stages of the reproductive cycle. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 38B487-493.
Dammann, A.A., N.W. Shappell, S.E. Bartell & H.L. Schoenfuss. 2011. Comparing biological effects and potencies of estrone and 17 (3-estradiol in mature fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas. Aquatic Toxicology 105:559-568.
Doll, J.C. 2011. Evaluation of morphology and secondary sexual characteristics of the bluntnose minnow: evidence of estrogenic compound exposure? Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 119:130-143.
Filby, A.L., K.L. Thorpe, G. Maack & C.R. Tyler. 2007. Gene expression profiles revealing the mechanisms of anti-androgen-and estrogen-induced feminization in fish. Aquatic Toxicology 81:219-231.
Gunnarsson, L., M. Adolfsson-Erici, B. Bjorlenius, C. Rutgersson, L. Forlin & D.G.J. Larsson. 2009. Comparison of six different sewage treatment processes- Reduction of estrogenic substances and effects on gene expression in exposed male fish. Science of the Total Environment 407:5235-5242.
Hoggatt, R.E. 1975. Drainage areas of Indiana streams. Indianapolis, Indiana, U.S. Department of the Interior, United States Geological Survey, Indianapolis, IN. 231 pp.
Kidd, K.A., P.J. Blanchfield, K.H. Mills, V.P. Palace, R.E. Evans, J.M. Lazorchak & R.W. Flick. 2007. Collapse of a fish population after exposure to a synthetic estrogen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 104:8897-8901.
Lange, A., m Y. Katsu, S. Miyagawa, Y. Ogino, H. Urushitani, T. Kobayashi, T. Hirai, J.A. Shears, M. Nagae, J. Yamamoto, Y. Ohnishi, T. Oka, N. Tatarazako, Y. Ohta, C.R. Tyler & C.R.T. Iguchi. 2012. Comparative responsiveness to natural and synthetic estrogens of fish species commonly used in the laboratory and field monitoring. Aquatic Toxicology 109:250-258.
LeGuellec, K., K. Lawless, Y. Valotaire, M. Kress & M. Tenniswood. 1988. Vitellogenin gene expression in male rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). General and Comparative Endocrinology 71:359-371.
Limpiyakorn, T., S. Homklin & S.K. Ong. 2011. Fate of estrogens and estrogenic potentials in sewerage systems. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 41:1231-1270.
Mager, E.M., H. Wintz, C.D. Vulpe, K.V. Brix & M. Grosell M. 2008. Toxicogenomics of water chemistry influence on chronic lead exposure to the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Aquatic Toxicology 87:200-209.
Maitre, J.L., L. Mercier, L. Dole & Y. Valotaire. 1985. Characterization of estradiol specific receptors and induction of vitellogenin mRNA in the rainbow trout liver (Salmo gairdneri). Biochemie 67:215-225.
Parrott, J.L. & Blunt, B.R. 2005. Life-cycle exposure of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) to an ethinylestradiol concentration below 1 ng/L reduces egg fertilization success and demasculinizes males. Environmental Toxicology 20:131-141.
Pfaffl, M.W. 2001. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT- PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 29:2002-2007.
Rickwood, C.J., M.G. Dube, L.P. Weber, S. Lux & D.M. Janz. 2008. Assessing effects of a mining and municipal sewage effluent mixture on fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) reproduction using a novel, field-base trophic-transfer artificial stream. Aquatic Toxicology 86:262-286.
Specker, J.L. & C.V. Sullivan. 1993. Vitellogenesis in fishes: status and perspectives. Perspectives in Comparative Endocrinology 1993:304-315.
Sumpter, J.P. & S. Jobling. 1995. Vitellogenesis as a biomarker for estrogenic contamination of the aquatic environment. Environmental Health Perspectives 103:173-178.
Thorpe, K.L., G. Maack, R. Benstead & C.R. Tyler. 2009. Estrogenic wastewater treatment works effluent reduce egg production in fish. Environmental Science and Technology 43:2976-2982.
U.S. EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 2002. A short-term test method for assessing the reproductive toxicity of endocrine-disrupting chemicals using the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). EPA/600/R-01/067. National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Mid-Continent Ecology Division, Duluth, MN. 170 pp.
U.S. EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 2007. Validation of the fish short-term reproduction assay: Integrated Summary Report. Version 12/15/2007. Washington D.C. 104 pp. http://www.epa.gov/endo/pubs/assayvalidation/fish_ pr.htm
Vajda, A.M., L.B. Barber, J.L. Gray, E.M. Lopez, J.D. Woodling & D.O. Norris. 2008. Reproductive disruption in fish downstream from an estrogenic wastewater effluent. Environmental Science and Technology 42:3407-3414.
Zha, J.M., L.W. Sun, P.A. Spear & Z.J. Wang. 2008. Comparison of ethinylestradiol and nonylphenol effects on reproduction of Chinese rare minnows (Gobiocypris rarus). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 71:390-399.
Manuscript received 15 December 2012, revised 18 May 2013.
Lexis R. Butler (1), Jason C. Doll (2,3), Jessica L. Leet (1), Jennifer L. Meyer (1), Paulina Moraga (1) and Maria S. Sepulveda (1) *: (1) Purdue University, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, 195 Marsteller St., West Lafayette, IN 47907; (2) Bureau of Water Quality, Muncie Sanitary District, 5150 W. Kilgore Ave., Muncie, IN 47304
(3) Present address, Biology Department, Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306.
* Corresponding Author: Maria S. Sepulveda, 195 Marsteller St., West Lafayette, IN, 47907; Ph. 765.496.3428; Fax 765.496.2422; Email mssepulv@ purdue.edu
Table 1.--Water quality taken from the White River in Muncie, Indiana, during the time of fathead minnow cage deployment (June 2-June 22, 2011). Different small letters denote significant differences between the means (t-test, p = < 0.05). * Not measured. Temperature([degrees]C) Conductivity([micro]S) Upstream (n = 13) Mean 20.8 (a) 0.46 (a) Median 19.9 0.48 Range 5.60 0.20 St. Dev. 1.76 0.06 Downstream (n = 14) Mean 18.9 (b) 0.81 (b) Median 18.7 0.79 Range 2.70 0.63 St. Dev. 0.83 0.18 Control (n = 15) Mean 22.0 (c) -- * Median 22.3 -- Range 3.41 -- St. Dev. 0.95 -- D.O.(mg/l) Turbidity(NTU) Upstream (n = 13) Mean 8.20 (ac) 63.5 Median 8.40 24.8 Range 2.50 283 St. Dev. 0.85 85.8 Downstream (n = 14) Mean 9.20 (b) 34.0 Median 9.10 15.1 Range 1.80 149 St. Dev. 0.53 43.7 Control (n = 15) Mean 8.50 (ac) -- Median 8.50 -- Range 1.52 -- St. Dev. 0.42 -- Table 2.--Means ([+ or -] SD) of morphological parameters measured in male fathead minnows at the end of the study. Gonadosomatic index (GSI), liver somatic index (LSI), interocular distance (ID), widest head width (HW), tubercle count (TC), fatpad score (FPS), and fatpad weight (FPW). * Indicates significance p = 0.0001. (a) = only one fish measured. Total Total GSI LSI ID Location weight (g) length (mm) (%) (%) (mm) Upstream 3.99 71.6 0.86 1.38 6.63 (n = 8) (0.8) (4.8) (0.4) (0.8) (0.9) Downstream 3.41 66.6 1.34 2.04 * 6.00 (n = 15) (0.6) (2.6) (1.0) (0.8) (0.7) Control 3.33 65.7 0.97 0.96 6.22 (n = 18) (1.1) (6.7) (0.4) (0.3) (0.8) HW FPW Location (mm) TC FPS (g) Upstream 8.5 12.1 1.25 0.04 (a) (n = 8) (0.8) (8.4) (0.5) Downstream 7.89 15.6 1.87 0.02 (n = 15) (0.7) (3.7) (0.8) (0.02) Control 8.00 16.1 2.00 0.08 (n = 18) (1.0) (5.9) (1.0) (0.08) Figure 2.--Mean [+ or -] SD of relative vtg gene expression from livers of male fathead minnows caged downstream and upstream from the Muncie Water Pollution Control Facility (MWPCF) for 21 d in relation to the controls which were kept indoors in aquaria for the same length of time. Males downstream responded with an up- regulation (denoted with an asterisk; p = 0.05) in vtg expression compared back to the control males (assigned a value of 1). Numbers on bars indicate sample sizes. Control 12 Upstream 6 Downstream 15 Note: Table made from bar graph.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Butler, Lexis R.; Doll, Jason C.; Leet, Jessica L.; Meyer, Jennifer L.; Moraga, Paulina; Sepulveda,|
|Publication:||Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science|
|Date:||Sep 20, 2013|
|Previous Article:||Indiana Academy of Science Council.|
|Next Article:||Temporal and size-related trends in food habits of introduced western mosquitofish and native topminnows.|