Printer Friendly

Impacts of Coil Treatment on Anxiety and Depression in Emphysema.

I. Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a frequently observed preventable and treatable disease that is characterized by permanent airway obstruction and respiratory symptoms mostly due to significant exposure to toxic particles and gases, airway, and/or alveolar anomalies [1]. The two primary components of COPD are chronic bronchitis and emphysema [2]. Estimated COPD prevalence is 11.2% [3], while estimated emphysema prevalence is 1.8% [4].

In addition to being a chronic physical disease, COPD also has mental, emotional, cognitive, social, and economic impacts on the individual resulting in many different issues and conflicts [5,6]. In addition to making its primary impact on the lungs, it is also known as a multicomponent disease most likely due to chronic systemic inflammation and comorbidities may be observed at every stage of the disease [7]. Mental disorders, especially anxiety and depression, are among the most frequently encountered comorbidities [6,8-10]. While anxiety prevalence in COPD varies between 2 and 96%, depression prevalence was determined to vary between 8 and 80% [8-11]. Studies indicate that this accompaniment yields significant results such as physical limitations, decrease in the quality of life, and increases in exacerbations and hospitalizations with impacts on treatment success, mortality, and morbidity [8-13]. Briefly, COPD affects peoples physically, emotionally, and socially. Anxiety and depression may occur due to the effects of COPD on brain functions, quality of life, and respiratory functions. Also symptoms of the disease like dyspnea can cause mental problems. While anxiety can be diagnosed earlier, depression is often noticeable late. Mental diseases adversely affect the prognosis in COPD and they are not adequately evaluated in patients unfortunately [14].

Emphysema is an advancing disease characterized by irrecoverable damages in the alveolar tissue. It manifests itself via reduction in pulmonary elastic recoil, hyperinflation, and increased air trapping. As a result, the lung can no longer flex in the rigid rib cage and fails to function [15,16]. Treatment approaches applied for COPD are quitting smoking, bronchodilator, anti-inflammatory, mucolytic agents, pulmonary rehabilitation, nutrition support, vaccination, and long-term oxygen treatment, however, with limited effects since the real issue in emphysema is hyperinflation due to damages in the elastic tissue [15,17]. This has led to the search for new kinds of treatment and lung-volume-reduction (LVR) treatments have come up especially for late stage emphysema patients [15,17]. LVR treatments were first applied in 1954 but failed to find sufficient use in clinical applications; however, their effectiveness was rediscovered during the 1990s [18]. The coil (Coil, PneumRx Inc. Mountain View, California, USA) as one of the bronchoscopic LVR methods involves the use of nitinol wires shaped into a coil shriveling the lung parenchyma; they are placed in thereby reducing the excessive ventilation and hyperinflation in the lungs [15,18]. It has been reported that decrease in hyperinflation reduces dyspnea, while increasing exercise capacity [19].

In the light of all these findings, we are of the opinions that coil treatment used especially on emphysema patients reduces dyspnea and disease severity and hence it may also reduce anxiety and depressive symptoms especially when the complex relationship between mental disorders and dyspnea is taken into consideration. The purpose of the present study was to examine the impact of coil treatment on accompanying anxiety and depressive symptoms in late stage COPD-emphysema diagnosed patients. There is only one study [20] in literature that examines psychiatric symptoms in patients treated with coil. In our study, the severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms was measured by using a different scale. Also we analyzed anxiety and depressive symptoms before and after the coil treatment among patients with and without psychiatric illness, respectively.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants. The study was designed as a prospective follow-up study (pretest and posttest design). Following the ethics council approval, between June and December 2019, a total of 27 patients followed up by University Faculty of Medicine Pulmonary Diseases polyclinic were included in the study. The inclusion criteria were severe and very severe airflow obstruction (i.e., Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) [1] stage 3, stage 4, [FEV.sub.1] 20-45%), patients who are highly symptomatic (grades C and D; Cognitive Ability test scores [greater than or equal to] 10, modified British Medical Research Council scores [greater than or equal to] 2; hyperinflation, i.e., residual volume (RV) [greater than or equal to] 175% or RV/total lung capacity [greater than or equal to] 0.58; a reduced 6-minute walk distance of 100-500 m) [16], and patients who have agreed to take part in the study. The exclusion criteria were postbronchodilator change in [FEV.sub.1] [greater than or equal to] 20%, frequent COPD exacerbation episodes (>2 hospitalizations per year), pulmonary artery pressure > 50mmHg, giant bullae > 1/3 of a single lung volume, bronchiectasis, lung cancer, or use of an oral anticoagulant [16]. Also during the process, two patients were excluded when they died with COPD exacerbation, one patient was excluded upon rejecting to attend the control, and three patients were excluded when they could not be contacted, thus completing the study with a total of 21 patients. Seven patients had a psychiatric diagnosis and were receiving treatment. No new psychiatric medications or psychotherapy was performed during the measurement process. Also the data of these patients are further analyzed. All patients had completed their pulmonary rehabilitation programs prior to the procedure. A survey form including sociodemographic data as well as data that may be related to the disease (COPD) and anxiety/depression prepared by the researchers was applied to the patients prior to the study. Beck anxiety inventories (BAI) and beck depression inventory (BDI-I) were applied face to face by specialist doctors on the patients prior to the coil treatment and during the one month controls after the procedure. Written consents were taken from all participants prior to the study.

2.1.1. Ethical Statement. This study was carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and approved by the University Ethics Council with the decree numbered 10 and dated 21.05.2019.

2.2. Procedure

2.2.1. Coil Application. The procedure is applied under general anesthesia in the accompaniment of fluoroscopy. At first, only one lobe is treated and the other targeted lobe in the opposite lung is treated 4-8 weeks later. First, the airway in the selected segment is determined bronchoscopically and its length is measured with the help of a guide wire. The coil is placed inside the targeted segment using a carrier catheter which takes on the original shape. The airway shrinks as the coil pulls the lobe and the lung collapses and shrinks. The targeted lobe is systematically treated with an average of 10-14 coils [21].

2.3. Tools of Measurement

2.3.1. Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). A Likert-type self-report inventory applied for determining the prevalence and intensity of the anxiety symptoms experienced by the individual: the BAI scale evaluates subjective anxiety and somatic symptoms like dizzy, difficulty in breathing, lightheaded, flushing, and heart pounding. The highest score that can be obtained from the inventory is 63 and covers 21 symptoms. The BAI showed a high internal consistency (alpha: 0.93) and the Turkish validity and reliability study was carried out by Ulusoy et al. [22].

2.3.2. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-I). A Likert-type self-report inventory for measuring the level and severity of depressive symptoms: the BDI-I (original version) scale evaluates somatic, emotional, cognitive, vegetative, and impulsive symptoms of depression. The scale comprised of four levels (between 0 and 3) and 21 items provides information on the severity of depressive symptoms through its total score. The validity and reliability study for the Turkish form was carried out by Hisli [23] and the Cronbach's alpha value of the BDI-I scale was found to be 0.80.

2.4. Statistical Analyses. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS v21, Chicago, Illinois, USA) software was used for the statistical analyses of the data obtained in our study. As a result of the power analysis conducted, it was calculated that when at least 17 patients were included in the study, a 95% confidence interval and 80% power could be obtained. Frequency (n), percentage (%), mean, and standard deviation (SS) were used as descriptive statistics. The chi square ([chi square]) test was used for examining the categorical variables. Compliance of the variables to normal distribution was examined via the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality and graphical methods. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for dependent group comparisons and Mann-Whitney U test used for independent group comparisons when parametric test assumptions could not be met. Spearman correlation coefficient was used for examining the relationship between the variables. Statistical significance was considered as p < 0.05 for all tests.

3. Results

The study was completed by collecting the data for the 21 patients subject to coil treatment with emphysema diagnosis. All patients were male with a mean age of 66.5 [+ or -] 5.5 (57-76). With regard to education status, 57.1% (n = 12) were primary school graduates, whereas 19.1% (n = 4) were high school and 23.8% (n = 5) were university graduates. All patients were married.

It was determined that when various parameters related to the disease were examined with regard to COPD, 4.8% (n = 1) start again smoking after coil treatment, whereas 95.2% (n = 20) were ex-smoker. Mean smoking rate was 58.4 [+ or -] 25.5 (30-100) pack-year. The duration of time that passed after COPD diagnosis was determined as 10.6 [+ or -] 7.3 (1-28) years. The psychiatric disease and treatment histories of the patients were recorded. Accordingly, while 33.3% (n = 7) of the patients were determined to be subject to treatment for a psychiatric disorder, a diagnosis could not be determined in 66.7% (n = 14). The diagnoses were as bipolar disorder in one patient, anxiety disorder in three patients, and depressive disorder in three patients. While one of the patients was using a mood stabilizer, others were subject to antidepressant treatment. Sociodemographic and health-related variables are shown in Table 1.

A relationship could not be determined between age, smoking pack-year and COPD duration (year), and BAI and BDI-I scores prior to the coil procedure (p > 0.05). Scores were compared with the same data following the coil procedure as a result of which a statistically significant relationship could not be determined (p > 0.05) (Table 2).

BAI and BDI-I scores comparisons of patients with and without psychiatric diagnosis were analyzed before and after the coil treatment and were found similar (Table 3).

BAI scores were compared before and after coil which were determined, respectively, as 12.1 [+ or -] 6.3 (4-26) and 11.2 [+ or -] 9.3 (0-28) in the patients without psychiatric diagnosis (W = -0.455; p = 0.649). BDI-I scores before and after coil were determined, respectively, as 13.5 [+ or -] 10.4 (1-31) and 8.8 [+ or -] 10.6 (0-34) with a statistically significant difference (W = -2.451; p = 0.014). While anxiety symptoms of the patients in our study decreased slightly after the procedure, the difference was not statistically significant; however, it was observed that depressive symptoms decreased at a statistically significant level. In the patients with psychiatric diagnosis, BAI scores were also compared before and after coil which were determined, respectively, as 15.0 [+ or -] 7.8 (3-23) and 9.2 [+ or -] 4.9 (2-17) (W = -2.201; p = 0.028). BDI-I scores were determined, respectively, as 15.1 [+ or -] 11.1 (4-31) and 7.1 [+ or -] 4.9 (2-16) (W = -1.782; p = 0.075). BAI scores of patients with psychiatric diagnosis were significantly decreased after the coil treatment. Also BDI-I scores decreased but were not statistically significant (Table 4).

4. Discussion

It was determined in our study that coil treatment on patients diagnosed with late stage COPD-emphysema has a positive impact on the accompanying anxiety and depressive symptoms and that the impact on depressive symptoms is more significant. Although anxiety and depressive symptoms decreased in cases with comorbid psychiatric diagnosis, the decrease in anxiety was found significant.

We think that the effects of comorbid psychiatric symptoms or diagnosis on mortality and morbidity in COPD may affect the adaptive skills to the treatments like coil as a promising and expensive treatment. There is only one study [20] in the literature on coil therapy and its effects on psychiatric symptoms. This study aims to present the authors' experience with endobronchial coils. They looked at anxiety and depression scores as well as many dependent variables in the study. In our study, comprehensive and valid scales were used to measure anxiety and depressive symptoms. Additionally, the hypothesis of our study is that anxiety and depressive symptoms of COPD are affected by coil therapy. So we think that our study is important in terms of providing us to look at coil treatment from a different perspective, as well as drawing attention to psychiatric conditions that are frequently accompanied and can be unheeded despite its importance.

Even though the mechanism for the association of COPD and anxiety and depression which are among the primary mental comorbidities cannot be explained clearly, it is considered to develop secondary to systemic inflation, dyspnea, smoking, hypoxia, oxidative stress, airway blockage, physical limitation, loss of control in the living area and the disease, reduced self-esteem, and self-confidence [5,10,14,24]. Dyspnea is the most frequently observed symptom in COPD causing significant problems and loss of functions as well as limitations. Dyspnea is observed in 82% of the patients regardless of stage [25]. While patients define the dyspnea-related symptoms experienced during periods of exacerbation as anxiety, they evaluate the increased anxiety symptoms as an indication that the disease will exacerbate [10].

A relationship could not be determined in our study between anxiety, depression scores prior to coil treatment, and smoking pack-year. The fact that all patients have a history of smoking does not enable us to evaluate the risk. Apart from smoking, a relationship could not be determined between anxiety and depression scores prior to the coil procedure between the disease durations which might be an indirect indication of symptoms such as physical limitation, function loss, and dyspnea due to the advancing nature of COPD. This may be explained by the fact that about one-third of the patients were on psychotropic medications with mental disorder diagnosis at the time they were included in the study.

Even though the decrease in the anxiety scale scores during evaluations before and after the procedure was not reflected in the statistics, a statistically significant decrease was observed in depression scores. The positive impact of the coil procedure on the lungs is shrinking the damaged emphysematous airways, thus reducing the lung volume leading to reduced hyperinflation and hence decreased dyspnea, decreased fast and surface respiration, reduction in airway resistance, and provision of air flow in healthy areas [26,27]. A decrease in both anxiety and depressive symptoms can be expected when the impacts of the procedure are considered on dyspnea and related factors thought to be factors of COPD and mental comorbidity. Even though the BAI and BDI-I used in our study are among inventories suggested for use in this patient group [28], the fact that the somatic symptoms (tachycardia, stomach discomfort, labored breathing, sense of suffocation, perspiration, trembling, dizziness, weakness, etc.) overlapping with the COPD symptoms are questioned by scoring in especially the BAI makes it difficult to distinguish. This similarity may have affected anxiety-related results. The impacts of the coil procedure and its results on dyspnea may have indirectly reduced depressive symptoms since they may lead to an increase in the sense of hope and functionality of the patient and decrease in pessimism and social isolation in addition to improved quality of life. Besides the biological effects of the procedure, we think that the psychosocial effects may have reduced depressive symptoms to a greater extent.

The results of the limited number of studies on the use of antidepressants and anxiolytic agents in the treatment of the anxiety and depressive disorders accompanying COPD are observed to vary [29]. It is observed that the use of benzodiazepine is frequently preferred, that the compliance with medication of the patients is generally low, and that the impacts of advanced age along with the impacts of other accompanying physical comorbidities are frequently observed and there are also conflicting data on the use of antidepressant treatments [29]. In our study, when the data of patients with psychiatric comorbid diagnoses were also evaluated, they were currently using antidepressant and anxiolytic therapies when they were included in the study. After coil treatment, both anxiety and depressive symptoms decreased and this reduction was statistically significant for anxiety symptoms. The complex and intertwined perceptions of patients about COPD symptoms and anxiety may have influenced this result. COPD symptoms were sometimes seen as anxiety, and anxiety symptoms were sometimes seen as a symptom of disease or exacerbation, and this may lead to anticipatory anxiety especially in psychiatric comorbid patients. Coil as a promising treatment may have had a positive effect on anticipatory anxiety and altered cognitive beliefs of patients with comorbid psychiatric diagnosis. Bostanci et al. found significant decrease in both anxiety and depression scores [20]. In this study, second measurements recorded six months later the coil treatment and it was not stated whether psychiatric comorbid diagnoses are excluded or not. Also pretreatment anxiety and depression scores were lower than our study. These may have affected the difference between the results. Additionally, the short follow-up period of our study may have caused the long-term effects not to be seen.

The fact that coil treatment is expensive requires further education on top of specialist skills; that can be applied only in a few centers in our country and only on a small group of patients that meet certain criteria reflected in our study as a low sample size which makes up the most important limitation of our study. Small sample size also reduces the statistical strength of the analyses. Secondly, the short follow-up period also restricts us from measuring whether treatment has a chronic effect on psychiatric symptoms.

In conclusion, coil treatment as a novel and current form of treatment for patients diagnosed with late stage COPD-emphysema has a positive impact on anxiety which is one of the prevalent comorbidities in this patient group, while reducing depressive symptoms at a statistically significant level. Moreover, coil treatment reduces anxiety and depressive symptoms in patients with comorbid psychiatric diagnosis too and this time its effect on anxiety is more significant. It is suggested to support the results by way of randomized controlled studies with larger sample sizes.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4270826

Data Availability

The sociodemographic and scales related data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article and are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest related to the submitted work.

Authors' Contributions

Tugce Toker Ugurlu contributed to study design, data analysis, and interpretation, administrative support, collection and assembly of data, manuscript writing, and final approval of manuscript. Erhan Ugurlu contributed to study design, provision of study materials or patients, data analysis and interpretation, administrative support, collection and assembly of data, manuscript writing, and final approval of manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr Nilufer YIGIT and Dr Nazli CETIN for their valuable contributions during data collection.

References

[1] D. Singh, A. Agusti, A. Anzueto et al., "Global Strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease: the GOLD science committee report 2019," European Respiratory Journal, vol. 53, no. 5, Article ID 1900164, 2019.

[2] A. F. Gelb, J. C. Hogg, N. L. Muller et al., "Contribution of emphysema and small airways in COPD," Chest, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 353-359, 1996.

[3] L. A. Morais, S. Y. I. E. S. Cavalcante, M. B. Conde, and M. F. Rabahi, "Evaluating the disease and treatment information provided to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at the time of discharge according to GOLD discharge guidelines," Einstein (Sao Paulo), vol. 18, Article ID eAO4706, 2019.

[4] F. J. F. Herth, D.-J. Slebos, P. L. Shah et al., "Protocol of a randomized controlled study of the pneumrx endobronchial coil system versus standard-of-care medical management in the treatment of subjects with severe emphysema (ELEVATE)," Respiration, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 512-520, 2019.

[5] T. Korkmaz and H. Tel, "Determination of the conditions of anxiety, depression and social support among the patients with COPD," Journal of Anatolian Nursing and Health Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 79-86, 2010.

[6] B. B. Afijar, M. Yalcinsoy, H. I Yakar et al., "Evaluation of individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in terms of disability, anxiety and depression," Cumhuriyet Medical Journal, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 260-267, 2012.

[7] N. A. Negewo, P. G. Gibson, and V. M. McDonald, "COPD and its comorbidities: impact, measurement and mechanisms," Respirology, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1160-1171, 2015.

[8] G. Hillas, F. Perlikos, I. Tsiligianni, and N Tzanakis, "Managing comorbidities in COPD," International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, vol. 10, pp. 95-109, 2015.

[9] M. Smith and J. Wrobel, "Epidemiology and clinical impact of major comorbidities in patients with COPD," International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, vol. 9, pp. 871-888, 2014.

[10] K. Hill, R. Geist, R. S. Goldstein, and Y. Lacasse, "Anxiety and depression in end-stage COPD," European Respiratory Journal, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 667-677, 2008.

[11] A. Cavailles, G. Brinchault-Rabin, A. Dixmier et al., "Comorbidities of COPD," European Respiratory Review, vol. 22, no. 130, pp. 454-475, 2013.

[12] O Gokcek, E. D. Huzmeli, and N. Katayifci, "The effect of dyspnea on quality of life and depression in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease," Acibadem Universitesi Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 84-88, 2019.

[13] A. Pooler and R. Beech, "Examining the relationship between anxiety and depression and exacerbations of COPD which result in hospital admission: a systematic review," International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, vol. 9, pp. 315-330, 2014.

[14] G. Dural and S. C Saritas, "The relationship between sleep quality, anxiety and depression in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease," Acibadem Universitesi Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 247-252, 2019.

[15] K. Bostanci, R. Eberhardt, and F. J. F. Herth, "The role of endoscopic lung volume reduction in the treatment of emphysema," Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 116-126, 2011.

[16] F. J. F. Herth, D.-J. Slebos, G. J. Criner, and P. L. Shah, "Endoscopic lung volume reduction: an expert panel recommendation--update 2017," Respiration, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 380-388, 2017.

[17] A. Gtilsen, "Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction : a 2018 review and update," Turkish Thoracic Journal, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 141-149, 2018.

[18] D. Gompelmann, R. Eberhardt, and F. Herth, "Endoscopic volume reduction in COPD--a critical review," Deutsches Arzteblatt International, vol. 111, pp. 827-833, 2014.

[19] M. Gordon, S. Duffy, and G. J. Criner, "Lung volume reduction surgery or bronchoscopic lung volume reduction: is there an algorithm for allocation?" Journal of Thoracic Disease, vol. 10, no. S23, pp. S2816-S2823, 2018.

[20] K. Bostanci, Z. Bilgi1, H. Omercikoglu et al., "Endobronchial coils in treatment of advanced emphysema: a single center experience," The Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 57-62, 2019.

[21] D.-J. Slebos, N. H. ten Hacken, M. Hetzel, F. J. F. Herth, and P. L. Shah, "Endobronchial coils for endoscopic lung volume reduction: best practice recommendations from an expert panel," Respiration, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2018.

[22] M. Ulusoy, N. H. Sahin, and H. Erkmen, "Turkish version of the beck anxiety inventory: psychometric properties," Jouranl of Cognitive Psychotheraphy An International Quarterly, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 163-172, 1998.

[23] N. Hisli, "Validity, reliability of beck depression inventory for university students," Turkish Journal of Psychology, vol. 7, pp. 3-13, 1989.

[24] M. F. Atacanli and N. Dilbaz, "Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and depression," Turkish Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 4, pp. 147-153, 2001.

[25] N. A. Hanania and D. E. O'Donnell, "Activity-related dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: physical and psychological consequences, unmet needs, and future directions," International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, vol. 14, pp. 1127-1138, 2019.

[26] J. B. A. Welling and D.-J. Slebos, "Lung volume reduction with endobronchial coils for patients with emphysema," Journal of Thoracic Disease, vol. 10, no. S23, pp. S2797-S2805, 2018.

[27] H. Yu, L. Wang, Z. Wu, and Z. Yang, "Status of and prospects for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction for patients with severe emphysema," BioScience Trends, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 344-356, 2016.

[28] A. M. Yohannes and G. S. Alexopoulos, "Depression and anxiety in patients with COPD," European Respiratory Review, vol. 23, no. 133, pp. 345-349, 2014.

[29] C. E. Pelgrim, J. D. Peterson, H. R. Gosker et al., "Psychological co-morbidities in COPD: targeting systemic inflammation, a benefit for both?" European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 842, pp. 99-110, 2019.

Tugce Toker Ugurlu (1) and Erhan Ugurlu [ID] (2)

(1) Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey

(2) Department of Pulmonology, Faculty of Medicine, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey

Correspondence should be addressed to Erhan Ugurlu; drerhanugurlu@gmail.com

Received 17 March 2020; Revised 24 April 2020; Accepted 29 April 2020; Published 12 May 2020

Academic Editor: Andrea S. Melani
Table 1: Sociodemographic and health-related variables.

                                                 n               %

Gender                  Male                     21            100.0
Marital status          Married                  21            100.0
                        Primary school           12            57.1
Education               High school              4             19.1
                        University               5             23.8
Smoking                 Ex-smoker                20            95.2
                        Start again              1              4.8
                        smoking after
                        coil treatment
The psychiatric         No                       14            66.7
disease and treatment   Yes                      7             33.3
histories
                                          Mean [+ or -] SD    Min-max

Age                                      66.5 [+ or -] 5.5     57-76
Mean smoking rate                        58.4 [+ or -] 25.5   30-100
The duration of time                     10.6 [+ or -] 7.3     1-28
that passed after
COPD diagnosis (year)

n, number; %, percentage; SD, standard deviation; min, minimum; max,
maximum; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Table 2: The relationship between age, smoking pack-year, and COPD
duration, beck anxiety, and beck depression scores before and after
coil treatment.

                   Test       BAI (pre)   BDI-I (pre)   BAI (post)

                Correlation     0.109        0.393        0.061
Age                  p          0.637        0.078        0.793
                     n           21           21            21
                Correlation     0.150        0.165        -0.060
Smoking              p          0.517        0.475        0.796
pack-year            n           21           21            21
                Correlation     0.291       -0.073        0.148
COPD duration        p          0.200        0.753        0.522
(year)               n           21           21            21

                   Test       BDI-I (post)

                Correlation      0.287
Age                  p           0.208
                     n             21
                Correlation      -0.057
Smoking              p           0.805
pack-year            n             21
                Correlation      -0.156
COPD duration        p           0.500
(year)               n             21

BAI (pre), precoil beck anxiety inventory; BDI-I (pre), precoil beck
depression inventory; BAI (post), postcoil beck anxiety inventory;
BDI-I (post), postcoil beck depression inventory.

Table 3: Comparisons of beck anxiety and beck depression scores before
and after coil treatment of patients with and without psychiatric
diagnosis.

                                    Mean [+ or -] SD      U        z

               Patients without    12.1 [+ or -] 6.3
BAI (pre)             PD                                39.500   -0.711
               Patients with PD    15.0 [+ or -] 7.8
               Patients without    11.2 [+ or -] 9.3
BAI (post)            PD                                49.000    0.000
               Patients with PD     9.2 [+ or -] 4.9
               Patients without    13.5 [+ or -] 10.4
BDI-I (pre)           PD                                42.500   -0.486
               Patients with PD    15.1 [+ or -] 11.1
               Patients without     8.8 [+ or -] 10.6
BDI-I (post)          PD                                43.500   -0.412
               Patients with PD     7.1 [+ or -] 4.9

                                     p

               Patients without
BAI (pre)             PD           0.488
               Patients with PD
               Patients without
BAI (post)            PD           1.000
               Patients with PD
               Patients without
BDI-I (pre)           PD           0.636
               Patients with PD
               Patients without
BDI-I (post)          PD           0.689
               Patients with PD

BAI (pre), precoil beck anxiety inventory; BDI-I (pre), precoil beck
depression inventory; BAI (post), postcoil beck anxiety inventory;
BDI-I (post), postcoil beck depression inventory; PD, psychiatric
diagnosis; SD, standard deviation; U, Mann-Whitney U test;
z, Mann-Whitney U test statistic.

Table 4: The comparison of beck anxiety and beck depression scores
before and after coil treatment for both patients with and without
psychiatric diagnosis.

                                            Precoil
                       Scale
                                Mean [+ or -] SD    Min-max

Patients without PD     BAI    12.1 [+ or -] 6.3     4-26
                       BDI-I   13.5 [+ or -] 10.4    1-31
Patients with PD        BAI    15.0 [+ or -] 7.8     3-23
                       BDI-I   15.1 [+ or -] 11.1    4-31

                                           Postcoil
                       Scale                                   z
                               Mean [+ or -] SD     Min-max

Patients without PD     BAI    11.2 [+ or -] 9.3     0-28     -0.455
                       BDI-I    8.8 [+ or -] 10.6    0-34     -2.451
Patients with PD        BAI     9.2 [+ or -] 4.9     2-17     -2.201
                       BDI-I    7.1 [+ or -] 4.9     2-16     -1.782

                       Scale    p

Patients without PD     BAI    0.649
                       BDI-I   0.014
Patients with PD        BAI    0.028
                       BDI-I   0.075

BAI, beck anxiety inventory; BDI-I, beck depression inventory;
SD, standard deviation; min, minimum; max, maximum; PD, psychiatric
diagnosis; z, Wilcoxon test statistic.
COPYRIGHT 2020 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2020 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Ugurlu, Tugce Toker; Ugurlu, Erhan
Publication:Canadian Respiratory Journal
Date:May 31, 2020
Words:4825
Previous Article:The Impact of Hyperoxia on Outcome of Patients Treated with Noninvasive Respiratory Support.
Next Article:Combination of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) Level and Asthma Control Test (ATC) in Detecting GINA-Defined Asthma Control in Treated...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |