Printer Friendly

Impact of Auxins on Vegetative Propagation through Stem Cuttings of Couroupita guianensis Aubl.: A Conservation Approach.

1. Introduction

Couroupita guianensis Aubl. (family Lecythidaceae) is commonly known as Cannonball tree, Nagalingam, Ayahuma, Kailaspati, Calabasse Colin, Bala de canon, and Carrion tree [1]. Due to its high medicinal value and absence of propagation system, the tree has been exploited indiscriminately, therefore facing a high risk of extinction, and was listed as threatened species worldwide in the IUCN red list [2, 3]. This large deciduous as well as evergreen tree grows to the height of 20 meters with simple clustered leaves at the juvenile part of the stem. The tree bears large cluster of cauliflorous racemose inflorescence with stunning fragrance. It produces amphisarcum, woody, indehiscent fruits with many seeds [4,5].

This plant gathers medicinal importance due to the presence of eugenol, fernesol, nerol, tryptanthrine, indigo, indirubin, isatin, linoleic acid, [alpha]- and [beta]-amirins, carotenoids, sterols, phenolic compounds, rutin, quercetin, kaempherol, famaricetin, luteolin, saponin, alkaloids, terpenoids, tannins, triterpenoids, anthocyanin, flavonoids, steroids, anthraquinones, citric acid, tartaric acid, couroupitine, and pelargonidin glycosides [6-8].

Traditionally the whole plant is used in various healing protocols of hemorrhage, piles, scabies, dysentery, scorpion sting, hypertension, tumors, malaria, odontalgia, inflammatory processes, kidney and stomach problems, allergies, ulcers, toothache, and skin diseases [9, 10]. The species has been explored for various biological life supporting properties like, antibiotic, antifertility, wound healing [11], immunomodulatory [12], anthelmintic [13], antinociceptive, antitumor [14], antipyretic, larvicidal, insecticidal, pesticidal [15], antiulcer, antiarthritic, antidiarrheal [16], antidiabetic [8], neuropharmacological, antioxidant, and anticancer activities [17].

The extraordinary medicinal properties coupled with poor reproduction ability and environmental disasters increased anthropogenic and livestock disturbances; the population of this species has been hampered in the study area [18]. The Government of Puducherry (India) has declared C. guianensis flower (Nagalingam flower) as the Official State Flower to conserve this valuable tree under natural habitats in the south India [19]. It has also been listed as rare flower and tree of India [5].

The conventional propagation of C. guianensis through seeds was hindered due to poor viability and germination frequency and recalcitrant nature of seeds [20,21]. Therefore, it is necessary to develop alternative methods of propagation for conservation of this tree species.

Vegetative propagation via stem cuttings offers production of true-to-type plants in a short period of time and availability of superior individuals for large scale commercial plantation with quick productive gains [22, 23]. The exogenous use of auxins on stem cuttings for vegetative propagation has been successfully developed in much conservation prioritized (rare, endangered, and threatened) and commercially valuable plants such as Pongamia pinnata [22], Ginkgo biloba [23], Hildegardia populifolia [24], Panax pseudoginseng [25], and Dillenia suffruticosa [26].

The species can moreover be raised by in vitro propagation methods but it is very difficult to develop efficient micropropagation protocol for tree species due to the recalcitrant nature of the explants [27]. Phenolic compounds leached out in the nutritional medium are another hindrance in the development of in vitro methods for woody tree species because these compounds block the absorption of nutrients by the tissues. With this background, the present study aimed at the development of farmer/gardener friendly propagation protocol to ensure the population survival of the threatened species C. guianensis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Preparation of Cuttings. Field surveys were conducted for selection of mature and superior plants of C. guianensis throughout the Coromandel coast of south India. The plants were identified with the help of "An excursion flora of Central Tamil Nadu and Carnatic" [28]. The stem cuttings of C. guianensis were harvested from the garden maintained healthy trees in the campus of the institute (Puducherry). The multinodal cuttings were harvested regularly with the help of sterilized wood cutter. Average length of the cuttings used for the study was 3035 cm with multiple (7-8) nodes. All the leaves were removed from stem cuttings, and the cuttings were dipped in 0.1% bavistin (fungicide, BASF Ltd, Mumbai) solution (w/v) for 5 min subsequently washed with distilled water, and treated with root promoting auxins.

2.2. Preparation of Planting Medium (Soil Mixture). Soil mixture plays important role in induction of roots from the cuttings. The planting medium is composed of a mixture of garden soil, red soil, vermicompost, and farm yard manure in equal ratio (1:1:1:1). All the four components of soil mixture were mixed properly to distribute nutrients uniformly to the growing cuttings and finally filled in the earthen pots.

2.3. Auxins Used in Roots and Shoots Induction. To induce roots and shoots, the basal end (3.0 cm) of the cuttings was immersed in solutions of different concentrations (50, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 mg[L.sup.-1]) of auxins, that is, IAA, IBA, and NAA, for 5 min. The pulse treated cuttings were transferred to earthen pots containing soil mixture (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). Homogenous nodal stem cuttings of comparable size were used for all the experiments.

2.4. Conditions of Adventitious Shoot Induction. Greenhouse plant growth unit lined with netted polysheets was used for adventitious shoot induction in all the stem cuttings selected in this study. The cuttings were maintained in the greenhouse at 28-30[degrees]C temperature and approximately 80-90% relative humidity. The cuttings were immersed for the same time in distilled water as control experiments.

2.5. Culture Methods. First irrigation to the pots containing stem cuttings was flooded and, thereafter, the cuttings were watered with fine jet sprayer once every day, until completion of the experiment. Cuttings were defined as "dead" when severely rotted and accompanied by discoloring, drooping, or bleaching. The propagation period for the experiment was 60 days.

2.6. Statistical Analysis. The experiments were conducted in randomized block design method with three replicates, each comprised of 5 cuttings. The phenotypic observations were taken periodically according to the time period of shoot induction for all the three treatments in greenhouse and in soil (control). The cuttings having at least one shoot were considered for various parameters such as rooting and shooting percentage and number and length of shoots. The data for shoots length were observed after 30 and 60 days of insertion of stem cuttings in the soil mixture. The data were analyzed statistically using SPSS v.16 (SPSS, Chicago, USA). The significance of differences among mean values was carried out using Duncan's multiple range test or paired sample T test at P < 0.05. The results are expressed as mean [+ or -] SE of three experiments.

3. Results and Discussion

The macropropagation techniques play an integral part of tree improvement programs and have been explored for the propagation of many economically valuable species particularly the rare, endangered, and threatened plant species [25]. The propagation system using stem cuttings can be a key step in vegetative propagation and minimizing the risk of declining the species. This is the first report which deals with the methods developed for proliferation of shoots and roots from stem cuttings of cannonball tree using auxins.

3.1. Regeneration Potential of Stem Cuttings. The results on response of shoot bud induction attributed to auxins were recorded after 60 days of planting in the soil mixture.

The stem cuttings without any treatment (control) were failed to induce shoots and roots. The effect of exogenous auxins treatments on shoot bud induction efficacy of stem cuttings of C. guianensis is presented in Table 1. All cuttings were checked periodically for emergence of shoots or shoot primordial. Though the shoot buds were induced on all the treatments except control, the percentage of response varies with the type and concentration of auxin used. The differential morphophysiological response of stem cuttings on various auxins has been ascribed to the chemical nature of auxins and the mode of treatments [29-31].

It was observed that almost all the treatments except control were able to induce shoot buds and roots in stem cuttings, and the application ofNAA was found to be effective than IBA and IAA in this study (Figures 1(c)-1(e)). Maximum shoot bud induction and rooting response were observed on woody cuttings pretreated with NAA at 400 mg[L.sup.-1] concentration followed by 300mg[L.sup.-1] concentration of IBA. Shoot bud initiation in majority of cuttings was noticed after 6 weeks on all the auxins tested with tremendous differences in number and percentage response between the concentrations. The lowest concentration of NAA (50 mg [L.sup.-1]) was found to be less effective than the higher concentration (400 mg [L.sup.-1]) (Figures 2(a)-2(c)). The results are contrast with the reports on Cedrus deodara [32] and Gingko biloba [23], which revealed that the IBA was more effective for root induction in stem cuttings.

In case of IBA, lower concentration of auxins induced shoot buds from the nodes and gradual increase in number of shoot buds observed till 300mg[L.sup.-1]; however, it was slightly less effective than the NAA. The exogenous application of IBA has been reported to enhance the speed of translocation and movement of sugar to the stem cuttings and promote root growth [33]. The response of cuttings on IAA was very poor with the values for average number of shoot buds, roots, and their length in comparison to other auxins (Table 2).

The stem cuttings maintained with the concentration of 400 mg[L.sup.-1] NAA responded with 4.8 [+ or -] 0.17 shoot buds with the average length of 3.5 [+ or -] 0.12 cm (Figures 3(a), 3(b), and 3(d)). Maximum 98% of rooting with 3.6 [+ or -] 0.10 roots (3.0 [+ or -] 0.27 cm length) per cuttings was achieved at this concentration. There was a gradual increase in response of shoots and roots from 50mg[L.sup.-1] to 400mg[L.sup.-1] (Tables 1 and 2). The concentrations of IBA from 50mg[L.sup.-1] to 300mg[L.sup.-1] showed a significant increase in the number of shoots from 1.4 [+ or -] 0.29 to 3.6 [+ or -] 0.31 and average shoot length (from 0.5 [+ or -] 0.11 to 2.0 [+ or -] 0.25 cm) (Figure 3(c)). Similar results were observed in rooting experiments also. However, further increase in the concentration of NAA and IBA showed a significant reduction in the number of shoots and roots and average length of shoots and roots. The results obtained with IAA treatments were not impressive in terms of root and shoot induction than NAA and IBA. This reveals that the application of IAA exhibits poor root and shooting ability and is unable to respond well. Poor development of roots inhibits the success of vegetative propagation via cuttings [34]. Hartmann et al. [35] mentioned that the higher concentration of auxins inhibits the induction and elongation of roots and stimulates plant cell to produce ethylene.

The emergence of shoot buds from the stem cuttings of C. guianensis characterizes developmental plasticity by auxins and allows response to external environmental conditions. Auxins have been reported as central mediator of organ developments by promoting cell division, cell elongation, and cell differentiation [36]. The plantlets maintained under greenhouse during the acclimation process avoid losses and ensure plant uniformity [37]. The stem cuttings have been slowly phased into greenhouse conditions due to high relative humidity, less temperature, and irradiance.

The stem cuttings with shoots were carefully taken out from the pots and transferred to the field under natural conditions. The further growth rate was measured in terms of increase in number of leaves/node, shoot length, and percent survival of cutting-raised plants in the field environment. About 92% rooted stem cuttings were successfully survived under natural field conditions.

4. Conclusion

A protocol for vegetative propagation of C. guianensis was optimized with subsequent development of plants using stem cuttings as source material. The stem cuttings pretreated with 400 mg[L.sup.-1] NAA for 5 min showed 100% response on planting medium containing garden soil, red soil, vermicompost, and farm yard manure after 60 days of planting in greenhouse conditions. The optimized protocol can be used to develop healthy and profuse root system with shoot bud development and further proliferation. This method can play key role in rapid supply of quality planting material of the Cannonball plants and help in minimizing the current challenge of its conservation.
Abbreviations

IAA:   Indole-3-acetic acid
IBA:   Indole-3-butyric acid
NAA:   [alpha]-Naphthalene Acetic Acid.


http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6587571

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Department of Science, Technology and Environment, Government of Puducherry, India, for providing financial support under Grant-In-Aid Scheme [no. 10/DSTE/GIA/RP/JSA-I/2013/213] for Couroupita guianensis Aubl.

References

[1] T. K. Lim, "Couroupita guianensis," in Edible Medicinal and Non Medicinal Plants Fruits, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2012.

[2] M. Mitre, "Couroupita guianensis," in IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.2,2012, http://www.iucnredlist.org.

[3] Y. Rai, "Early seedling growth status of threatened medicinal tree species Couroupita guianensis Aubl. in District Meerut, (U.P.) India," International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 252-255,2014.

[4] K. C. Sai, N. Gaddala, S. Vanamala, V. Naresh, and A. Elumalai, "A short review on therapeutic uses of Couroupita guianensis Aubl," International Research Journal of Pharmaceutical and Applied Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 105-108, 2011.

[5] R. Sundararajan and R. Koduru, "A complete profile on Couroupita guianensis-traditional uses, pharmacological activities and phytoconstituents," Pharmacophore, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 147-159, 2014.

[6] S. Manimegalai and G. Rakkimuthu, "Phytochemical screening of stem of Couroupita guianensis" International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 4434-4437, 2012.

[7] S. A. Shete, G. N. Shah, S. S. Walke, V. S. Patil, K. D. Patil, and S. G. Killedar, "Standardization and anti bacterial activity of Couroupita guianensis fruit shell extract," International Journal of Biology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 360-364, 2013.

[8] S. Swapnalatha and V. D. Rajeswari, "Antidiabetic activity of couroupita guianensis--a review," IOSR Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 41-43, 2014.

[9] V. H. Gupta and A. R. Juvekar, "Antistress and antioxidant activity of flower of Couroupita guianensis in rats," An International Journal of Advances in Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 76-83, 2013.

[10] S. Bhuvaneswari, S. Deepa, N. Sripriya, L. Prameela, and N. K. Udaya Prakash, "Antioxidant activity and phytochemistry of various flowers from Tamil Nadu, India," International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 40-45, 2014.

[11] S. P. Umachigi, K. N. Jayaveera, C. K. Ashok Kumar, and G. S. Kumar, "Antimicrobial, wound healing and antioxidant potential of Couroupita guianensis in rats," Pharmacology Online, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 269-281, 2007.

[12] D. Pradhan, P. K. Panda, and G. Tripathy, "Evaluation of the immunomodulatory activity of the methanolic extract of Couroupita guianensis aubl. flowers in rats," Natural Product Radiance, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 37-42, 2009.

[13] V. Rajamanickam, A. Rajasekaran, S. Darlin quine, M. Jesupillai, and R. Sabitha, "Anthelmintic activity of the flower extract of Couroupita guianensis " International Journal of Alternative Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 107-111, 2009.

[14] M. Premanathan, S. Radhakrishnan, and K. Kulangiappar, "Antioxidant and anticancer activities of isatin (1H-indole-2, 3-Dione), isolated from the flowers of Couroupita guianensis" Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 822-826, 2012.

[15] K. Baskar and S. Ignacimuthu, "Antifeedant, larvicidal and growth inhibitory effects of ononitol monohydrate isolated from Cassia tora L. against Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) and Spodoptera litura (Fab.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)," Chemosphere, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 384-388, 2012.

[16] A. Elumalai, M. C. Eswaraiah, N. K. Koppula, R. Kumar, A. Meruva, and C. Vidhyulatha, "Antidiarrhoeal activity of Couroupita guianensis leaves on castor oil induced diarrhoea in albino rats," International Journal of Pharmacology Research, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 42-44, 2013.

[17] S. K. Gupta, M. Ghosal, D. Choudhury, and P. Mandal, "Assessment of antioxidant activity and polyphenolic content of Couroupita guianensis during flower and fruit maturation," International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 940-947, 2014.

[18] M. S. Shekhawat, "Investigations on in vitro regeneration of Couroupita guianensis Aubl. (Nagalingam Tree)--a threatened but medicinally important tree," A Project Report, Department of Science, Technology and Environment, Government of Puducherry, 2014.

[19] H. R. Deepa, Puducherry Comes out with List of State Symbols, The Hindu, Chennnai, India, 2007.

[20] S. K. Gousia, K. K. Ashok, K. T. Vinay, and L. L. Naveena, "Biological activities and medicinal properties of Couroupita guianensis" International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 140-143, 2013.

[21] B. Muniswamy and H. L. Sreenath, "In-vitro development of plants from cultured embryos of cannon ball tree (Couroupita guianensis Aubl.)," Indian Journal of Forestry, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 202-204, 2000.

[22] V. Kesari, A. Krishnamachari, and L. Rangan, "Effect of auxins on adventitious rooting from stem cuttings of candidate plus tree Pongamia pinnata (L.), a potential biodiesel plant," Trees-- Structure and Function, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 597-604,2009.

[23] A. Pandey, S. Tamta, and D. Giri D, "Role of auxin on adventitious root formation and subsequent growth of cutting raised plantlets of Ginkgo biloba L," International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 142-146, 2011.

[24] M. Saradha and S. Paulsamy, "Effect of growth hormones on rooting attributes of stem cuttings of endangered plant species, Hildegardia populifolia (Roxb.) Schott and Endl. (Sterculiaceae)," International Journal of Biology, Pharmacy and Allied Sciences, vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 1145-1152,2012.

[25] S. L. Jamir, C. R. Deb, and N. S. Jamir, "Macropropagation and Production of Clonal Planting Materials of Panax pseudoginseng Wall," Open Journal of Forestry, vol. 06, no. 02, pp. 135-141, 2016.

[26] N. Abidin and F. Metali, "Effects of different types and concentrations of auxins on juvenile stem cuttings for propagation of potential medicinal Dillenia suffruticosa (Griff. ex hook. F. and Thomson) martelli shrub," Research Journal of Botany, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 73-87, 2015.

[27] M. S. Shekhawat and M. Manokari, "In vitro propagation, micromorphological studies and ex vitro rooting of cannon ball tree (Couroupita guianensis aubl.): a multipurpose threatened species," Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 131-142, 2016.

[28] K. M. Matthew, "Illustrations on the Flora of the Tamilnadu Carnatic," (Rapinat Herbarium: Tiruchirapalli), 1982.

[29] K. K. Nanda, "Investigation on the use of auxins in vegetative reproduction of forest plants," Final Report PL- 480, Research Project A7- Fs-11,1970.

[30] M. Pal, "Clonal Forestry: a feasible approach for yield improvement in forest plantations," in Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Silviculture and Research, Nainital, India, November 1998.

[31] N. Das, "Propagation prospects of dye yielding plant Rhinacanthus nausutus Kurz," Natural Product Radiance, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 42-43, 2006.

[32] S. K. Nandi, S. Tamta, and L. M. S. Palni, "Adventitious root formation in young shoots of Cedrus deodara" Biologia Plantarum, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 473-476,2002.

[33] B. E. Haissig, "Influences of auxin synergists on adventitious root primordium initiation and development," New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 311-323,1974.

[34] G.-J. de Klerk, "Rooting of microcuttings: theory and practice," In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology--Plant, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 415-422, 2002.

[35] H. T. Hartmann, D. E. Kester, F. T. Davies, and R. L. Geneve, Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices, Prentice Hall International, London, UK, 6th edition, 1997.

[36] F. A. Ditengou, W. D. Teale, P. Kochersperger et al., "Mechanical induction of lateral root initiation in Arabidopsis thaliana" Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States ofAmerica, vol. 105, no. 48, pp. 18818-18823, 2008.

[37] W. R. Schroeder and D. S. Walker, "Effect of cutting position on rooting and shoot growth of two poplar clones," New Forests, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 281-289, 1990.

Mahipal S. Shekhawat (1) and M. Manokari (2)

(1) Department of Plant Science, M.G.G.A.C., Mahe, Pondicherry, India

(2) Department of Botany, K.M. Centre for Postgraduate Studies, Pondicherry, India

Correspondence should be addressed to Mahipal S. Shekhawat; smahipal3@gmail.com

Received 2 August 2016; Revised 17 November 2016; Accepted 20 November 2016

Academic Editor: Marie-Aleth Lacaille-Dubois

Caption: Figure 1: (a) Stem cuttings pretreated with different concentrations of IBA. (b) Stem cuttings pretreated with different concentrations of NAA. (c) IBA pretreated cuttings after 4 weeks. (d) IAA pretreated cuttings after 4 weeks. (e) NAA pretreated cuttings after 4 weeks.

Caption: Figure 2: (a)-(c) NAA pretreated cuttings after 6 weeks.

Caption: Figure 3: (a), (b), and (d) Different stages in NAA pretreated stem cuttings. (c) IBA treated stem cuttings after 8 weeks.
Table 1: The effect of auxins on shoot bud induction in stem
cuttings of C. guianensis after 60 days of treatment under
greenhouse condition.

Concentration of         Shoot bud
auxins (mg [L.sup.-1]    induction
IAA    IBA    NAA        response (%)

50     --     --           33
100    --     --           48
200    --     --           56
300    --     --           62
400    --     --           75
500    --     --           70
--     50     --           59
--     100    --           64
--     200    --           72
--     300    --           79
--     400    --           70
--     500    --           67
--            50           66
--            100          71
--            200          87
--            300          92
--            400         100
--            500          96

Average number of             Average length of shoots
shoots per cutting            (mean [+ or -]  SE)
(mean [+ or -]  SE)
                              1.1 [+ or -] 0.17 (b)
1.0 [+ or -]  0.11 (a)        1.4 [+ or -]  0.00 (b)
1.9 [+ or -] 0.18 (ab)        1.5 [+ or -]  0.28 (c)
2.3 [+ or -]  0.20 (b)        2.2 [+ or -]  0.10 (d)
2.8 [+ or -]  0.12 (c)          1.8 [+ or -]  0.21 (c)
2.5 [+ or -]  0.00 (bc)       1.4 [+ or -]  0.19 (b)
2.0 [+ or -]  0.14 (b)        0.5 [+ or -]  0.11 (a)
1.4 [+ or -]  0.29 (a)        1.0 [+ or -] 0.14 (b)
2.2 [+ or -]  0.31 (b)        1.4 [+ or -]  0.00 (b)
3.0 [+ or -]  0.14 (d)        2.0 [+ or -]  0.25 (d)
3.6 [+ or -]  0.31 (d)        1.8 [+ or -]  0.10 (c)
3.1 [+ or -] 0.14 (d)         1.1 [+ or -] 0.15 (b)
2.6 [+ or -]  0.27 (c)          0.9 [+ or -]  0.10 (ab)
2.7 [+ or -]  0.12 (c)          1.2 [+ or -] 0.18 (b)
3.0 [+ or -]  0.20 (d)        2.0 [+ or -]  0.14 (d)
3.4 [+ or -]  0.16 (d)        2.8 [+ or -]  0.29 (e)
4.0 [+ or -]  0.00 (e)        3.5 [+ or -]  0.12 (g)
4.8 [+ or -] 0.17 (f)         3.2 [+ or -]  0.00 (f)
3.5 [+ or -]  0.24 (d)

Note: stem cuttings with at least one shoot bud were considered for
calculating percentage of shoot bud induction; SE: standard error;
level of significance P < 0.05. All values are an average of 10
replicates. The mean values represented in corresponding column
followed by the same alphabets are not significantly different.
Here "a" represents/considered as the lowest value and "g" as
highest value.

Table 2: The effect of auxins on rooting of C. guianensis
stem cuttings.

Concentration of auxins      Rooting
(mg L 1)                     response
IAA    IBA    NAA             (%)

50     --     --               42
100    --     --               49
200    --     --               54
300    --     --               69
400    --     --               79
500    --     --               72
--     50     --               64
--     100    --               67
--     200    --               76
--     300    --               81
--     400    --               77
--     500    --               60
--            50               73
--            100              86
--            200              91
--            300              93
--            400              98
--            500              91

Average number of            Average length of
roots per cutting            roots
(mean [+ or -]  SE)          (mean [+ or -]  SE)

1.6 [+ or -]  0.16 (a)       1.0 [+ or -]  0.23 (a)
2.1 [+ or -]  0.22 (b)       1.3 [+ or -]  0.20 (a)
2.5 [+ or -]  0.19 (b)       1.7 [+ or -]  0.12 (b)
2.9 [+ or -]  0.11 (c)         2.0 [+ or -]  0.16 (c)
3.0 [+ or -]  0.29 (c)         1.9 [+ or -]  0.20 (b)
2.6 [+ or -]  0.15 (b)       1.6 [+ or -]  0.11 (b)
1.9 [+ or -]  0.20 (a)       1.0 [+ or -]  0.27 (a)
2.3 [+ or -]  0.28 (b)       1.3 [+ or -]  0.10 (a)
2.8 [+ or -]  0.23 (c)         1.7 [+ or -]  0.12 (b)
3.3 [+ or -] 0.11 (d)        2.3 [+ or -]  0.20 (d)
3.0 [+ or -]  0.10 (c)         1.5 [+ or -]  0.15 (ab)
2.5 [+ or -]  0.15 (b)       1.0 [+ or -]  0.29 (a)
2.2 [+ or -]  0.19 (b)       1.9 [+ or -]  0.31 (c)
2.7 [+ or -]  0.27 (b)       2.0 [+ or -]  0.20 (c)
3.0 [+ or -]  0.00 (c)         2.7 [+ or -]  0.13 (d)
3.2 [+ or -]  0.10 (d)       2.7 [+ or -]  0.11 (d)
3.6 [+ or -]  0.10 (e)       3.0 [+ or -]  0.27 (e)
3.1 [+ or -]  0.00 (c)         2.4 [+ or -]  0.00 (c)

Note: stem cuttings with at least one root were considered for
calculating percentage of rooting; SE: standard error; level of
significance P < 0.05. All values are an average of 10 replicates.
The mean values represented in corresponding column followed by
same alphabets are not significantly different. Here "a"
represents/considered as the lowest value and "g" as highest value.
COPYRIGHT 2017 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Shekhawat, Mahipal S.; Manokari, M.
Publication:Scientifica
Article Type:Report
Date:Jan 1, 2017
Words:4157
Previous Article:An Investigation on the Aggregation and Rheodynamics of Human Red Blood Cells Using High Performance Computations.
Next Article:Incident Reporting Behaviours and Associated Factors among Nurses Working in Gondar University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |