Printer Friendly

Immunohistochemical study of androgen, estrogen and progesterone receptors in salivary gland tumors.

Introduction

Androgen, estrogen and progesterone, acting through specific receptors, play an important role in the growth and development of several tumors, including breast, endometrium, and prostate carcinomas. [1,2] Additionally, patients with breast carcinomas positive to estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) have been treated with antagonist hormones and shown decreased recurrences and higher survival rates. Similar results have been reported in patients with prostate cancer positive to androgen receptor (AR). [3,4]

In salivary gland tumors, ER, PgR and AR expression has been described in several studies. [2,5-11] However, there are great disparities in the literature, possibly because of the variations in the technique employed, which includes fixation of the tissue, antigen retrieval and scoring criteria, and/or in the type of antibodies used. We sought to investigate the immunohistochemical expression of ER, PgR and AR in a large sample of pleomorphic adenomas (PA), Warthin's tumors (WT), mucoepidermoid carcinomas (MEC) and adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACC) of salivary glands, regarding particularly the tumorigenesis role of these receptors.

Methods

Files of the Department of Pathology, Londrina Cancer Institute, Parana State, Brazil, from 1972 to 2001 were retrieved and 496 cases of salivary gland tumors were analyzed. [12] The last 41 cases of PA and the last 30 cases of WT, MEC and ACC were selected for immunohistochemical evaluation. PA were classified as stroma-rich, cell-rich and classic (balanced amount of epithelial and stromal components), [13] WT were classified as stroma-rich, stromapoor and classic, MEC were classified as low-grade, intermediate-grade and high-grade according to Ellis, Auclair [14] (1996), and ACC were classified as cribriform, tubular and solid.

Sections from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue were cut with 3 [micro]m thickness and mounted on glass slides. The tissues were deparaffinized, rehydrated through graded concentrations of alcohol to distilled water. For antigen retrieval of progesterone receptor, the slides were transferred to a sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0), and heated twice for 12 min in a 750 W microwave oven. For estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, a Tris-EDTA pH 9.0 solution was used in a pressure cooker for antigen retrieval. Slides were cooled at room temperature for 20 min. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked by incubation in a 0.05% solution of hydrogen peroxide for 30 min. The sections were incubated overnight at 4[degrees]C with the following primary antibodies: anti-Androgen receptor (clone AR441, 1/50 dilution, Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA), antiEstrogen receptor (clone 1D5, 1/50 dilution, Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) and anti-Progesterone receptor (clone PgR 636, 1/50 dilution, Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA). The slides were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated with a dextran polymer reagent conjugated with peroxidase and secondary antibody (Envision+, Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) for 1 h and subsequently reacted with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine and counterstained with Carazzi's hematoxylin. Positive and negative controls were included in all reactions.

Immunoreactivity was evaluated semiquantitatively under a light microscope and scored as negative (0-5% of positive cells), weak (6-50% of positive cells) and strong (> 50% positive cells). Statistical comparisons between variables were performed with Fisher's exact test and the chi-square test.

This study was approved by the ethical committee of the Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas.

Results

From 41 cases of PA, 25 (61%) were females and 16 (39%) males, with a mean age of 46.4 years, granging from 16 to 75 years. Thirty cases were located in the parotid gland, 6 in the submandibular and 5 in minor salivary glands. The majority of WT were in males (24 cases, 80%), all cases were located in the parotid gland and the mean age was 56 years, ranging from 42 to 78 years. Sixteen cases (53.3%) of MEC were in males and 14 (46.7%) were in females, the mean age was 51.3 years, ranging from 5 to 81 years. Nineteen cases of MEC were located in the parotid, 3 in the submandibular and 8 in minor salivary glands. Regarding the 30 cases of ACC, 15 (50%) were in males, the mean age was 52.4 years, ranging from 28 to 88 years. Eight ACC cases were located in the parotid, 2 in the submandibular and 20 in minor salivary glands (Table 1).

According to the histopathological examination, 22 cases (55%) of PA were classified as stroma-rich, 13 (30%) as cell-rich and 6 (15%) as classic. Seventeen cases (56.7%) of WT were classified as classic, 10 (33.3%) as stroma-poor and 3 (10%) as stromarich. Fifteen cases (50%) of MEC were classified as low-grade, 3 (10%) as intermediate-grade and 12 (40%) as high-grade. Cribriform pattern was the most common subtype of ACC with 15 cases (50%), followed by the solid subtype with 8 cases (26.7%) and by the tubular pattern with 7 cases (23.3%).

Immunohistochemistry for ER and PR were negative in all cases studied. AR was positive in only 2 of 41 cases of PA (Figure 1--A,D), negative in all WT, positive in 2 of 30 cases of MEC (Figure 1 B,E), and in 2 of 30 cases of ACC (Figure 1--C,F). Of the 2 cases positive for AR in PA, one was classified as classic and the other as cell-rich. Both MEC positive cases were high-grade tumors and both ACC were of the cribriform type.

Discussion

It's well known that hormonal therapy is very useful in the treatment of breast and prostate cancer. [3,4] However, in spite of the confirmed expression of sex hormone receptors in other types of cancer such as endometrial carcinomas, [15] carcinomas of the thyroid, [16] renal cell carcinomas, [17] malignant melanoma, [18] and meningiomas, [19] the efficacy of hormonal therapy in these tumors has not yet been established.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

Studies with ER, PgR and AR in salivary gland tumors are conflicting (Tables 2 and 3). ER expression was detected by Jeannon et al. [10] (1999) in 3 of 10 MEC, 3 of 6 ACC and in 4 of 10 PA, while Nasser et al. [2] (2003) reported 1 of 10 MEC positive for ER, and, in a study by Glas et al. [1] (2002), 19% of PA demonstrated immunoreactivity for ER. On the other hand, several studies, [8,9,21-24] including ours, did not reveal ER expression in the cases studied.

PgR has been reported more frequently than ER. Shick et al. [9] (1995) and Dori et al. [22] (2000), study ing ACC, found 50% and 6.9% of PgR positive cases, respectively. Jeannon et al. [20] (1999) related one positive case out of 10 cases of PA, but all 10 cases of MEC and 6 of ACC were negative. Nasser et al. [2] (2003) related one positive MEC, but all ACC, PA and WT were negative. Teymoortash et al. [24] (2001) found 6 cases positive for PgR in 9 cases of WT, but all 5 cases of PA were negative. Glas et al. [1] (2002) reported 60 positive cases of PA out of 69 studied, and also suggested that PgR could be a prognostic factor in recurrent PA of the parotid gland. In the present study, we did not find PgR expression in PA, WT, MEC and ACC.

There are few studies of AR in PA, WT, MEC and ACC. Moriki et al. [25] (2001) related that all these tumors were negative for AR. Nasser et al. [2] (2003) did not find AR expression in benign salivary gland tumors, but related 2 of 10 MEC and 2 of 10 ACC positive for AR. In our study, AR was seen in only 2 cases each, of 41 PA, 30 MEC and 30 ACC. In contrast to the low or absent AR expression in PA, MEC, WT and ACC, it has been described to be positive in almost all salivary duct carcinomas [2,10,25] and therefore potentially useful for their diagnosis in biopsy or cytological samples. [25,26] Additionally, Locati et al. [27] (2003) reported a complete remission with androgen-deprivation therapy in a recurrent adenocarcinoma of the parotid gland that expressed AR. Considering this data of remission with an androgen-deprivation therapy, some cases that are positive for AR, particularly the recurrent ones, should be better studied and considered as potential targets for treatment with anti-androgen drugs. On the other hand, although AR has been described in salivary gland tumors, particularly in malignancies, it's not known if this fact is due to a role of androgen in the pathogenic process or if it simply represents an epiphenomenon of the malignant transformation. [2]

Conclusions

Our results suggest that ER and PgR seem to be not important to the tumorigenesis of PA, WT, MEC and ACC. Nevertheless, androgen receptors may play a role in a small group of salivary gland tumors, and should be better investigated specially correlating with their clinico-pathological features.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the State of Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, 03/12658-9), the National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPQ), and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES).

We would also like to thank Ana Cristina do Amaral Godoy for the assistance with the immunohistochemical reactions.

Received for publication on Oct 01, 2008

Accepted for publication on Sept 22, 2009

References

[1.] Glas AS, Hollema H, Nap RE, Plukker JT. Expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and insulin-like growth factor receptor-1 and of MIB-1 in patients with recurrent pleomorphic adenoma of the parotid gland. Cancer. 2002;94(8):2211-6.

[2.] Nasser SM, Faquin WC, Dayal Y. Expression of androgen, estrogen, and progesterone receptors in salivary gland tumors. Frequent expression of androgen receptor in a subset of malignant salivary gland tumors. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;119(6):801-6.

[3.] Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the

randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;365(9472):1687-717.

[4.] Berthelet E, Pickles T, Lee KW, Liu M, Truong PT. Long-term androgen deprivation therapy improves survival in prostate cancer patients presenting with prostate-specific antigen levels > 20 ng/mL. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63(3):781 7.

[5.] Barnes L, Rao U, Contis L, Krause J, Schwartz A, Scalamogna P. Salivary duct carcinoma. Part II. Immunohistochemical evaluation of 13 cases for estrogen and progesterone receptors, cathepsin D, and c-erbB-2 protein. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994;78(1):74-80.

[6.] Gaffney EV, Pinkston JA, Eidson JJ. Estrogen receptors in parotid tumors. Endocr Res. 1995;21(3):635-43.

[7.] Dimery IW, Jones LA, Verjan RP, Raymond AK, Goepfert H, Hong WK. Estrogen receptors in normal salivary gland and salivary gland carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113(10):1082-5.

[8.] Pires FR, da Cruz Perez DE, de Almeida OP, Kowalski LP. Estrogen receptor expression in salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma. Pathol Oncol Res. 2004;10(3):166-8.

[9.] Shick PC , Riordan GP, Foss RD. Estrogen and progesterone receptors in salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;80(4):4404.

[10.] Fan CY, Melhem MF, Hosal AS, Grandis JR, Barnes EL. Expression of androgen receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor, and transforming growth factor alpha in salivary duct carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(9):1075-9.

[11.] Kapadia SB, Barnes L. Expression of androgen receptor, gross cystic disease fluid protein, and CD44 in salivary duct carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 1998;11(11):1033-8.

[12.] Ito FA, Ito K, Vargas PA, de Almeida OP, Lopes MA. Salivary gland tumors in a Brazilian population: a retrospective study of 496 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;34(5):533-6.

[13.] Seifert G, Langrock I, Donath K. A pathological classification of pleomorphic adenoma of the salivary glands. HNO. 1976;24(12):415-26.

[14.] Ellis GL , Auclair PL. Tumors of the salivary glands. Atlas of Tumor Pathology, fascicule 17. Bethesda: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1996. p. 163-7.

[15.] De Cicco Nardone F, Benedetto MT, Rossiello F, Bongiorno M, Iacobelli S, Mancuso S et al. Hormone receptor status in human endometrial adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 1989;64(12):2572-8.

[16.] Lewy-Trenda I. Estrogen and progesterone receptors in neoplastic and non-neoplastic thyroid lesions. Pol J Pathol. 2002;53(2):67-72.

[17.] Langner C , Ratschek M, Rehak P, Schips L, Zigeuner R. Steroid hormone receptor expression in renal cell carcinoma: an immunohistochemical analysis of 182 tumors. J Urol. 2004;171(2 Pt 1):611-4.

[18.] Chaudhuri PK, Walker MJ, Briele HA, Beattie CW, Gupta TK. Incidence of estrogen receptor in benign nevi and human malignant melanoma. JAMA. 1980;244(8):791-3.

[19.] Chen J, Chen G. Expression of androgen receptor in menin giomas. J Tongji Med Univ. 2001;21(2):140-2.

[20.] Jeannon JP, Soames JV, Bell H, Wilson JA. Immunohistochemical detection of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in salivary tumours. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1999;24(1):52-4.

[21.] Miller AS, Hartman GG, Chen SY, Edmonds PR, Brightman SA, Harwick RD. Estrogen receptor assay in polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary gland origin. An immunohistochemical study. Oral

Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994;77(1):36-40.

[22.] Dori S, Trougouboff P, David R, Buchner A. Immunohistochemical evaluation of estrogen and progesterone receptors in adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary gland origin. Oral Oncol. 2000;36(5):450-3.

[23.] Lamey PJ, Leake RE, Cowan SK, Soutar DS, McGregor IA, McGregor FM. Steroid hormone receptors in human salivary gland tumours. J Clin Pathol. 1987;40(5):532-4.

[24.] Teymoortash A, Lippert BM, Werner JA. Steroid hormone receptors in parotid gland cystadenolymphoma (Warthin's tumour). Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2001;26(5):411-6.

[25.] Moriki T, Ueta S, Takahashi T, Mitani M, Ichien M. Salivary duct carcinoma: cytologic characteristics and application of androgen receptor immunostaining for diagnosis. Cancer. 2001;93(5):344-50.

[26.] Hungermann D, Roeser K, Buerger H, Jakel T, Loning T, Herbst H. Salivary duct carcinoma. Pathologe. 2005;26(5):353-8.

[27.] Locati LD, Quattrone P, Bossi P, Marchiano AV, Cantu G, Licitra L. A complete remission with androgen-deprivation therapy in a recurrent androgen receptor-expressing adenocarcinoma of the parotid gland. Ann Oncol. 2003;14(8):1327-8.

Fabio Augusto Ito (a)

Kazuhiro Ito (b)

Ricardo Della Coletta (c)

Pablo Agustm Vargas (c)

Marcio Ajudarte Lopes (c)

(a)DDS, PhD; (b) MD, Professor--Department of Pathology, Londrina State University, Londrina, PR, Brazil.

(c) DDS, PhD, Professor, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.

Corresponding author: Marcio Ajudarte Lopes

Semiologia, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, UNICAMP

Av. Limeira, 901

Caixa Postal: 52

CEP: 13414-903

Piracicaba--SP--Brazil

E-mail: malopes@fop.unicamp.br
Table 1--Demographic data of 41 cases of pleomorphic adenoma (PA), 30
cases of Warthin's tumor (WT), 30 cases of muco-epidermoid carcinoma
(MEC) and 30 cases of adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC).

                                  Age            Gender

                            Mean
                             age    range    Male    Female

Pleomorphic Adenoma         46.4    16-75     16       25
Warthin's Tumor             56.0    42-78     24        6
Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma    51.3     5-81     16       14
Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma    52.4    28-88     15       15

                                         Location

                            Parotid   Submandibular    Minor

Pleomorphic Adenoma           30            6            5
Warthin's Tumor               30            0            0
Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma      19            3            8
Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma       8            2            20

Table 2--Summary of the reports of estrogen receptor (ER),
progesterone receptor (PgR) and androgen receptor (AR) in
pleomorphic adenoma (PA) and Warthin's tumor (WT).

                                                  PA

        Authors            Year    No. of
                                    cases    ER +    PgR +   AR +

Lamey et al. (23)          1987       4        0       0
Jeannon et al. (20)        1999      10        4       1      np
Moriki et al. (25)         2001      10       np      np       0
Teymoortash et al. (24)    2001       5        0       0      np
Glas et al. (1)            2002      69       13      60      np
Nasser et al. (2)          2003      10        0       0       0
Our study                  2009      41        0       0       2

                                          WT

        Authors            No. of
                            cases    ER +    PgR +   AR +

Lamey et al. (23)                     np      np
Jeannon et al. (20)                   np      np      np
Moriki et al. (25)           10       np      np       0
Teymoortash et al. (24)       9        0       6      np
Glas et al. (1)              np       np              np
Nasser et al. (2)            10        0       0       0
Our study                    30        0       0       0

np: not performed.

Table 3--Summary of the reports of estrogen receptor (ER),
progesterone receptor (PgR) and androgen receptor (AR) in muco-
epidermoid carcinoma (MEC) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC).

Authors                                       MEC

                       Year    No. of
                                cases    ER +    PgR +   AR +

Miller et al. (21)     1994               np      np      np
Shick et al. (9)       1995               np              np
Jeannon et al. (20)    1999      10        3       0      np
Dori et al. (22)       2000               np      np      np
Moriki et al. (25)     2001       6       np      np       0
Nasser et al. (2)      2003      10        1       1       2
Pires et al. (8)       2004      136       0      np      np
Our study              2009      30        0       0       2

Authors                               ACC

                       No. of
                        cases    ER +    PgR +   AR +

Miller et al. (21)        5        0              np
Shick et al. (9)         12        0       6      np
Jeannon et al. (20)       6        3       0      np
Dori et al. (22)         29        0       2      np
Moriki et al. (25)        8       np      np       0
Nasser et al. (2)        10        0       0       2
Pires et al. (8)         72        0      np      np
Our study                30        0       0       2

np: not performed.
COPYRIGHT 2009 Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontologica - SBPQO
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Oral Pathology
Author:Ito, Fabio Augusto; Ito, Kazuhiro; Coletta, Ricardo Della; Vargas, Pablo Agustin; Lopes, Marcio Ajud
Publication:Brazilian Oral Research
Date:Oct 1, 2009
Words:2838
Previous Article:Color alteration of the paint used for iris painting in ocular prostheses.
Next Article:An in vitro comparison of nickel and chromium release from brackets.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |