Printer Friendly

Illinois districts say NCLB conflicts with IDEA.

In a first of its kind, a state Board of Education and two Illinois school districts are suing the U.S. Department of Education saying the No Child Left Behind sections that apply to special education students are in direct conflict with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

Under IDEA, schools must develop Individualized Education Plans, or IEPs, for each special education student. The IEP sets attainable learning goals based on a particular student's disabilities.

Under NCLB, adequate yearly progress requires that students pass standardized tests without allowances for most disabilities.

The Illinois Board of Education, Ottawa Elementary School District 140, Ottawa Township High School District 141, and parents of four students in those districts filed the suit in February.

Ottawa Township High School District Superintendent Thomas Jobst says IEP trumps everything for special education students. "Our request is that those [NCLB] sections in conflict [with IDEA] be declared invalid," Jobst says.

The Illinois standardized test is named the Prairie State Achievement Exam which has two parts, including ACT, a college entrance exam. It's a catch-22, Jobst says. "It's impossible for [all of] them to follow IEP and be in a college prep program," he adds.

This is the first challenge of its kind, according to Tom Hutton, staff attorney for the National School Boards Association. "At a minimum, whether or not you agree with the legal argument the districts are making, there is a huge philosophical difference between the one-size-fits-all in No Child Left Behind ... and the very individualized education plan which is about what's best and what's most appropriate for a particular student" based on what the parents, principal and teachers on the IEP team decide.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Professional Media Group LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining No Child Left Behind
Author:Pascopella, Angela
Publication:District Administration
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Apr 1, 2005
Words:278
Previous Article:Utah close to cutting loose from NCLB.
Next Article:Stu's clues: the secret to this superintendent's success is good humor and a focus on kids.
Topics:


Related Articles
No child brings every lawyer out. (Inside the law: analyzing, debating and explaining no child left behind).
NCLB & IDEA make room for creative learning tools and alternate approaches: federal mandates alert educators of a shift from process to student...
Some Hispanic student gains, but why?
NEA sues over NCLB: the bucks are big, but the case is weak.
Making up the rules as you play the game: a conflict of interest at the very heart of NCLB.
Cheating on NCLB tests? Maybe.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |