Printer Friendly

If Kosovo, why not Palestine?

By John V. Whitbeck

On July 22, the International Court of Justice issued an advisory opinion on the following question posed to it by Serbia: AoIs the unilateral declaration of independence by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government of Kosovo in accordance with international law?Ao By a 10-4 majority, the court ruled that,

because Aogeneral international law contains no applicable prohibition of declarations of independenceAo, KosovoAAEs declaration of independence in February 2008, coordinated with and supported by the American and most EU governments and subsequently recognized by 69 countries, Aodid not violate general international law.Ao The clear implication is that no declarations of independence violate international law and that all are therefore AolegalAo.

Because the courtAAEs majority chose to rephrase the question before the court (addressing violation of, rather than accordance with, international law in circumstances in which international law is silent) and to respond with wording which has permitted the supporters of Kosovo independence to claim an unequivocal victory and the American government to call publicly on all countries to recognize Kosovo as a sovereign state, not only Kosovars and the American and most EU governments will be celebrating this advisory opinion as a vindication of their positions. So will the peoples and governments of Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Transniestria, Nagorno-Karabakh, BosniaAAEs Republika Srpska, the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus and Iraqi Kurdistan. Discontented minorities and potential separatists elsewhere (including Alaska, Hawaii and Vermont) may also find cause for encouragement in this opinion.

Might the Palestinian people also find reason to celebrate, cause for encouragement or grounds for hope in this opinion?

The American and EU impatience to amputate a portion of a UN member state (universally recognized, even by them, to constitute a portion of that stateAAEs sovereign territory), ostensibly because 90% of those living in that portion of the stateAAEs territory supported separation, contrasts starkly with the unlimited patience of the US and the EU when it comes to ending the 43-year-long belligerent occupation of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Virtually every legal resident of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip seeks freedomAuand has for over 40 years. For doing so, they are punished, sanctioned, besieged, humiliated and, day after endless day, killed by those who claim to stand on the moral high ground.

In American and EU eyes, a Kosovar declaration of independence from Serbian sovereignty should be recognized even if Serbia does not agree. However, their attitude was radically different when Palestine declared independence from Israeli occupation on November 15, 1988. Then the US and the EU countries (which, in their own eyes, constitute the Aointernational communityAo, to the exclusion of most of mankind) were conspicuously absent when over 100 countries recognized the new State of Palestine, and their non-recognition made this declaration of independence purely AosymbolicAo in their own eyes and, unfortunately, in most Palestinian and other eyes as well.

For the US and the EU, any Palestinian independence, to be recognized and legally effective, must still be directly negotiated, on a wildly unequal bilateral basis, between the occupying power and the occupied peopleAuand must be agreed to by the occupying power. For the US and the EU, the rights and desires of a long-suffering and brutalized occupied people, as well as international law, are irrelevant.

For the US and the EU, Kosovar Albanians, having enjoyed almost nine years of UN administration and NATO protection, could not be expected to wait any longer for their freedom, while the Palestinians, having endured over 40 years of Israeli occupation, can wait forever.

With the Aopeace processAo effectively brain-dead, the Kosovo precedent offers the Ramallah-based Palestinian leadership, accepted as such by the Aointernational communityAo because it is perceived as serving Israeli and American interests, a golden opportunity to seize the initiative, to reset the agenda and to restore its tarnished reputation in the eyes of its own people.

If this leadership truly believes, despite all evidence to the contrary, that a decent Aotwo-state solutionAo is still possible, now is an ideal moment to reaffirm the legal existence, and to call on all those countries which did not extend diplomatic recognition to the State of Palestine in 1988Auand particularly the US and the EU statesAuto do so now.

Of course, to prevent the US and the EU from ignoring such an initiative or treating it as a joke, there would have to be a significant and explicit consequence if they were to do so. The consequence would be the end of Palestinian adherence to the Aotwo-stateAo illusion.

The Palestinian leadership would make clear that if the US and most EU states, having recognized a second Albanian state on the sovereign territory of a UN member state and having called on all other states to do likewise, will not now recognize one Palestinian state on a tiny portion of the occupied Palestinian homeland, it will dissolve the AoPalestinian AuthorityAo (which, legally, should have ceased to exist in 1999, at the end of the five-year Aointerim periodAo under the Oslo Accords) and the Palestinian people will thereafter seek justice and freedom through democracyAuthrough the persistent, non-violent pursuit of full rights of citizenship in a single state in all of Israel/Palestine, free of any discrimination based on race and religion and with equal rights for all who live there, as in any true democracy.

Palestinian leaderships have tolerated Western hypocrisy and racism and played the role of gullible fools for far too long. It is time to kick over the table, constructively, and to shock the Aointernational communityAo into taking notice that the Palestinian people simply will not tolerate unbearable injustice and abuse any longer.

If not now, when?John V. Whitbeck, an international lawyer who has advised the Palestinian negotiating team in negotiations with Israel, is author of AoThe World According to WhitbeckAo.


2009 Jordan Press & publishing Co. All rights reserved.

Provided by an company
COPYRIGHT 2010 Al Bawaba (Middle East) Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2010 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:The Star (Amman, Jordan)
Date:Jul 26, 2010
Previous Article:Mountains and memory: A Quest to find the source of a beloved family painting.
Next Article:VietnamAAEs forgotten war victims.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters