Printer Friendly

Identificacion de dano criogenico sobre la integridad de la membrana plasmatica del espermatozoide de toro y su relacion con la fertilidad en campo.

IDENTIFICATION OF CRYODAMAGE ON PLASMA MEMBRANE INTEGRITY IN BULL SPERMATOZOA AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH FIELD FERTILITY

INTRODUCTION

Laboratory assessment of sperm quality is an essential procedure in many aspects of reproduction in domestic species [21]. Standard diagnostic evaluation of sperm is primarily based on physiological parameters such as progressive motility, sperm morphology and sperm concentration, however, these parameters are insufficient to predict fertility [12, 28]. Due to the great importance of sperm membrane in fertiliza tion, considerable attention is given to membrane integrity in sperm evaluation. To evaluate plasma membrane integrity, two simple basic test are used: supravital staining (eosin/nigrosin) and hypo-osmotic sweelling test (HOST/HOS) assay [10].

The HOS test for investigating the functional integrity of the mammalian sperm membrane was introduced as an useful assay in the diagnosis of human infertility [18]. The principle of the HOS assay is based on fluid transport across the sperm tail membrane under hypo-osmotic conditions until equilibrium is reached. Due to this influx of fluid, the tail expands and bulges and expresses a characteristic pattern, considered as a hyposmotic response, which can readily be identified with phasecontrast microscope [5] or by using supravital staining [6]. Such spermatozoa are denoted as swollen or HOS reactive (HOS +), signifying functionally intact membranes. Spermatozoa with functionally defected membrane do not swell (HOS -) and their tails do not invaginate [30]. The osmolarity of the solution should be sufficient to provoke the best effect without lysing the sperm membrane [24]. Fertilization of oocytes will not occur if the sperm membrane is biochemically inactive, even if it remains structurally intact. Supravital staining is based on the fact that the membrane of dead spermatozoa permits the passage of the red stain (eosin) into the cytoplasm, but the membrane of live spermatozoa does not permit that. This means that all dead spermatozoa in ejaculate will be coloured, while live spermatozoa will remain colourless [15]. The HOS test has been known to be a better indicator of fertilization potential than supravital staining [26]. however, the combination of sperm viability and HOS test have demonstrated to have advantages in comparison with the two methods evaluated individually on cryopreserved sperm [30]. These researches integrated the two methods into a single test to make the whole assay more convenient and introduced the HOS-EY test. In this trial, the HOS test was used together with eosinnigrosin staining, and introduced the HOS-EN test [30].

The sperm plasma membrane is the primary site at which lesions occur during freezing-thawing of semen [13, 17, 19]. However, only a few attempts were made to evaluate the effect of cryodamage on head and tail sperm membranes. Attempts have been made to correlate sperm plasma membrane integrity to fertility, but great variation is seen between studies and methods used [8, 23]. The World Health Organization [27] recommends the eosin Y (EY) exclusion and the hyposmotic swelling test (HOS) as integral parts of sperm assay.

The object of this study was to estimate the effect of cryopreservation on plasma membrane integrity in the head and tail regions of individual spermatozoa, and the relationship between intact cryopreserved spermatozoa and field fertility (FF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Semen collection and cryopreservation

Five ejaculates during succesive weeks from four fertile Bos indicus-taurus bulls (two Brahman, and two Brahman- Holstein) in regular service were obtained from the artificial insemination plant of VIATECA[R] at Machiques, Zulia State, Venezuela. The ejaculates were collected between 6:00 am and 8:00 am with artificial vagina. After semen collection by using an artificial vagina, sperm concentration and subjective scores of motility (wave motion) were performed. The sperm concentration of each sample was determined by photometer (SpermaCue, Minitub[R], Germany). After semen collection sperm concentration and subjective scores of motility (wave motion) were evaluated. In addition, ejaculates were diluted and used to assess individual sperm motility. The sperm suspension was also used to assess acrosome integrity and sperm viability by using eosin-nigrosin stain [2]. Only samples with an initial sperm motility and sperm with normal apical ridges (NAR) greater than 70-75% were used for freezing.

Ejaculates were diluted with a skim milk-egg yolk diluent (EYD), contained 1% EYD. In particular, the base solution (Solution A) containing skim milk (15%), EYD (1%) and antibiotics (Tilosin 0.56%, Linco-Espectin 0.56%, Gentamicin 0.74%). Sperm dilution was performed in a two-step procedure, first adding at 30[grados]C the base extender up to two times the final desired sperm concentration and then a second extender (Solution B) at 5[grados]C to achieve a final concentration of ~ 30x[10.sup.6] sperm/straws. Sperm samples in solution A were slowly cooled to 5[grados]C. Cooling down to 5[grados]C lasted for about 2 h. The second extender differed from the base diluent in the replacement of water (14%, v/v) with the same volume of glycerol (final concentration = 7%). Then, extended samples were held for equilibration at 5[grados]C for an additional time of 2 h. After equilibration, the extended sperm was loaded in straws of 0.5 mL each containing 30x[10.sup.6] spermatozoa. Subsequently, straws were frozen immediately in nitrogen vapors, 4 cm above the surface of liquid nitrogen for 10 min and then plunged into liquid nitrogen. Frozen semen was thawed in a water bath (37[grados]C) (Gemmy industrial corp., modelo YCW-03S, Taiwn) for 30 s and sperm was allowed to equilibrate for 5 min before evaluation. Five straws per bull were assessed to evaluate the individual motility and morphological examination.

The HOS-EN test

The HOS-EN test is a modification of HOS-EY test introduced by Zhu and Liu [30] whose designed a combination of the HOS test [18] and the EY method [11]. Zhu and Liu [30] stained the smear with eosin stain; whereas, in this trial were used eosin-nigrosin stain. A hypo-osmotic solution (150 mOsm/mL) consisting of sodium citrate (1.47 g/ 100 mL) and fructose (2.7 g/ 100 mL) as employed. The eosin-nigrosin solution was prepared by dissolving 1.67 g eosin and 10 g nigrosin in 100 mL.

The HOST-EN test was performed as follows: 0.1 mL of fresh and cryopreserved semen was mixed with 1.0 mL hyposmotic solution and incubated at 37[grados]C for 30 min. After incubation, slides were prepared from each sample by placing 10 [micron]l of semen and mixed with 10 ul of eosin-nigrosin stain mixture. The sperm head stained red (EY positive) or unstained (negative) was observed. The swelling response of sperm tail irrespective of the types of tail coiling, type b to g described by Jeyendran et al. [18] was determined. Two hundred spermatozoa per slide were evaluated under light microscope (x 1000) (Globe, LEM 1600, Germany) and classified into the four clusters described bellow according to morphological changes of membranes at both the head and the tail regions.

Type I head-red (EN +) and Tail-non-swollen (HOS -)

Type II head-white (EN -) and Tail-non-swollen (HOS -)

Type III head-red (EN +) and Tail-swollen (HOS +)

Type IV head-white (EN -) and Tail-swollen (HOS +)

Field fertility evaluation

Data from artificial insemination records with pregnancy diagnosis were analyzed to evaluate the relationship between HOS-EN test results and FF. One hundred and fifty crossbred heifers from three farms located in sub-humid tropical forest in Perija, Zulia State, Venezuela were inseminated according to AM-PM rule and after natural estrus. Pregnancy diagnosis was verified by rectal palpation 45 days after service. Correlations between HOS-EN test and FF were studied evaluating the relationship between the MI in five cryopreserved semen straws by bull (n=20), and FF by each semen straw.

Statistical analysis

All data recorded were analyzed with Statistical Analysis System for Windows, software 8.2 (SAS Inst. Inc.; Carry, NC. USA). The Student s t-test was used to compare fresh and frozen-thawed samples for HOS-EN test score. Correlation between HOS-EN test and FF was verified by Spearman rank test. For all statistical analysis, significance was established at P<0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The fresh semen showed high quality with normal sperm morphology ([greater than or equal to] 85%) and good motility ([greater than or equal to] 3, scale: 1-5). Sperm motility in frozen-thawed samples was > 30%.

The eosin nigrosin exclusion and the hyposmotic swelling test were combined to a form a single test (HOS-EN test) to identify four types of spermatozoa according to membrane integrity and function. TABLE I, shows that significant differences in HOS-EN test scores exist between fresh and cryopreserved semen samples (P<0.01). After cryopreservation, there was a marked decline (21.93%) in the percentage of spermatozoa with head membrane intact/ tail membrane intact (Type IV), and a significant increase (14.15%) in those with head membrane damaged/ tail membrane damaged (Type I) (P<0.001), whereas type II (head membrane intact /tail membrane damage) and type III (head membrane damage/ tail membrane intact) ocurred sparingly.

Field fertility ranged between 33.33 and 60 % (u= 51.32%). The number of inseminated heifers for each bull and their FF results were 27 and 47.05%; 29 and 60%; 47 and 52.08% and 47 and 33.33%, respectively. A high correlation was observed between the percentage of Type IV integrity and FF (r=0.49, P<0.014).

In this trial, the combination of HOS test with EN method permitted identify four patterns of sperm membrane integrity in fresh and frozen-thawed bull semen. The HOS-EN test has the advantage to diffenciate if the sperm damage is in the sperm head, tail, or both. Using only the HOS test, the sperm are clustered in two cathegories: tails swollen and tails non swollen, meanwhile, a EN method alone can only identify live and dead spermatozoa according the staining characteristics. Additionally, the combined HOS-EN test could avoid the overstimation in the percentage of spermatozoa with intact membrane observed with the use of eosin-nigrosin or trypan blue [3].

After cryopreservation, the percentage of types I was significantly increased. This sperm subpopulation represents the group of non-viable sperm with membrane defects in head and tail regions. The sperm plasma membrane is the primary site where lesions occur during freezing-thawing of semen [13, 19] and disruption to sperm head and tail membrane affected the normal sperm function. Sperm Type II was represented by live sperm with tail membrane damaged. Type III membrane integrity showed in frozen-thawed semen that 2.25% spermatozoa were non-viable but still HOS reacted. This may be explained by the fact that prolonged hypo-osmotic stress may lead to irreversible effects on the cell membrane and cell death [25]. Alternatively, non-viable sperm may exibit spontaneous swelling before exposure to the HOS solution and therefore be counted as HOS reacted when in fact they were already non-viable [9]. After cryopreservation, the percentage of type IV integrity decreased by 22%, which indicated that the frozen-thawed procedure increased the damage in the sperm membrane (head and tail regions). Sperm with type IV membrane integrity is the group of viable spermatozoa with intact membrane.

The use of HOS ENY test in this trial is supported in prevoius investigations in humans [4, 6, 18, 22, 25] and bull sperm [1, 7, 8, 20] where significant correlation between HOS test and viability by using eosin-nigrosin stain were observed. Jeyendran et al. [18] found a good correlation between the percentage of human spermatozoa sweeling and spermatozoa alive (r=0.52, P<0.01), and Nagy et al. [20] found a hight correlation coefficient between the percentage of stained sperm tails and the percentage of sperm tail that remained straight under hypo-osmotic conditions in bull and ram semen (0.81 and 0.94, respectively; P<0.05). Correa and Zavos [7] determined the efficacy of HOS test for bull sperm together with supravital staining and emphatized that the HOS test is a simple, inexpensive and readily technique wich could prove useful in addition to the standard semen analysis as a means to evaluate fertility.

The present study showed a significant correlation between sperm with intact membrane (Type IV) and FF in cryopreserved sperm. Attemps have been made to correlate sperm plasma membrane integrity to fertility, however, great variation is seen among methods used [8, 17, 23] and positive correlation between membrane integrity assessed by fluorometric methods and fertility has been observed [16]. However, many researchers consider the evaluation of the functional status of sperm membrane by the HOS test as a better indicator of fertilization capacity [14, 29], but Bacinoglu et al. [1] did not observe a relationship between simple HOS test response and fertility. Therefore, the positive correlation observed in the present study suggest that hypo-osmotic swelling together with eosin-nigrosin test may be useful in assessing changes in the functional integrity of sperm membrane during freezing-thawing procedures and explain reproductive potential of bull.

CONCLUSION

Plasma membrane integrity in head and tail sperm was compromised during freezing and thawing process, and there was relationship between intact cryopreserved spermatozoa and field fertility. However, if this trial was designed with a larger set of bulls and larger number of inseminated heifers could be a practical tool to predict fertility. The combination of HOS test and eosin-nigrosin stain (HOS-EN test) is a tool to evaluate the effect of cryopreservation process on sperm membranes integrity. Additionally, the HOS-EN test has a practical value for laboratories that are not equipped with phase-contrast microscope and for those unable to carry out fluorometric measurements.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was sponsored by Council of Scientific and Humanistic Development of Zulia University (CONDES-LUZ, project: CC-0860-07).

Recibido: 01/06/2010. Aceptado: 25/05/2011.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES

[1] BACINOGLU, S.; TAS, M.; CIRIT, U.; OZDAS, O.; AK, K. The potential fertility estimation capacity of the hypoosmotic swelling test, the thermal stress test and a modified cervical mucus penetration test in the bovine. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 104:38-46. 2008.

[2] BAMBA, K. Evaluation of acrosomal integrity of boar spermatozoa by bright field microscopy using an eosinnigrosin stain. Theriogenol. 29:1245-1251. 1988.

[3] BRITO, L.F.C.; BARTH, A.D; BILODEAU-GOESEELS, S.; PANICH, P.L.; KASTELIC, J.P. Comparison of methods to evaluate the plasmalemma of bovine sperm and their relationship with in vitro fertilization rate. Theriogenol. 60:1539-1551. 2003.

[4] BUCKETT, W.M. Predictive value of hypo-osmotic swelling test to identify viable non-motile sperm. Asian J. Androl. 5:209-212. 2003.

[5] CABRITA, E.; ALVAREZ, R.; ANEL, E.; HERRAEZ, M.P. The hypo-osmotic swelling test performed with coulter counter: a method to assay functional integrity of sperm membrane in rainbow trout. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 55:279-287. 1999.

[6] CHAN, P.; TREDWAY, D.R.; SU, B.C.; CORSELLE, J.; REN, S. Combined supravital staining and hypo-osmotic swelling test. Hum. Reprod. 6:1115-1118. 1991.

[7] CORREA, J.R.; ZAVOS, P.M. The hypo-osmotic swelling test: its employment as an assay to evaluate the functional integrity of the frozen-thawed bovine sperm membrane. Theriogenol. 42:351-360. 1994.

[8] CORREA, J.R.; PACE, M.M.; ZAVOS, P.M. Relationships among frozen-thawed sperm characteristics assessed via the routine semen analysis, sperm functional tests and fertility of bulls in an artificial insemination program. Theriogenol. 48:721-731. 1997.

[9] CORREA-PEREZ, J.R. Testing for "life"- how predictable? Fertil. Steril. 77:426-427. 2002.

[10] CURRY, M.R.; WATSON, P.F. Osmotic effects on ram and human sperm membranes in relation to thawing injury. Cryobiol. 31:39-46. 1994.

[11] ELIASSON, R.; TREICHL, L. Supravital staining of human spermatozoa. Fertil. Steril. 22:134-135. 1971.

[12] GADEA, J.; SELLES, E.; MARCO, M.A. The predictive value of porcine seminal parameters on fertility outcome under commercial conditions. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 39:303-308. 2004.

[13] HAMMERSTEDT, R.H.; GRAHAM, J.K.; NOLAN, J.P. Cryopreservation of mammalian sperm: what we ask them to survive. J. Androl. 11:73-88. 1990.

[14] HENKEL, R.; MULLER, C.; MISKA, W.; GIPS, H.; SCHILL, W.B. Fertilization and early embryology: Determination of the acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa is predictive of fertilization in vitro. Hum. Reprod. 8:2128-2132. 1993.

[15] HERAK, M. Umjetno osjemenjivanje domaaeih ivotinja; reprodukcija domaaeih ivotinja U. Veterinarski priruenik. str:181-209. 1991.

[16] JANUSKAUSKAS, A.; JOHANNISSON, A.; RODRIGUEZ-MARTINEZ, H. Subtle membrane changes in cryopreserved bull semen in relation with sperm viability, chromatin structure, and field fertility. Theriogenol. 60:743-758. 2003.

[17] JANUSKAUSKAS, A. Assessment of viability and function of post-thaw spermatozoa from Swedish dairy AI bulls. Uppsala, Sweden: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU). Grade Thesis. 176 pp. 1999.

[18] JEYENDRAN, R.S.; VAN DER VEN, H.H.; PEREZ-PELAEZ, M.; CRABO, B.G.; ZANEVALD, L.J.D. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. J. Reprod. Fertil. 70:219-228. 1984.

[19] KROGENAES, A.; ANDERSEN-BERG, K.; HAFNE, A.L. Membrane alterations in bull spermatozoa after freezing and thawing and after in vitro fertilization. Acta Vet. Scan. 35:17-26. 1994.

[20] NAGY, SZ.; HAZAS, G.; BALI-PAPP, A.; IVANCSICS, J.; SZASZ, F.; SZASZ, JR.; KOVACS, A.; FOOTE, R.H. Evaluation of sperm tail membrane integrity by light microscopy. Theriogenol. 52:1153-1159. 1999.

[21] PETRUNKINA, A.M.; WABERSKI, D.; GUNZEL-APEL, A. R.; TOPFER-PETERSEN, E. Determinants of sperm quality and fertility in domestic species. Reprod. 134:3-17. 2007.

[22] RAMIREZ, J.P.; CARRERAS, A.; MENDOZA, C. Sperm plasma membrane integrity in fertile and infertile men. Androl. 24:141-144. 1992.

[23] REVEL, S.G.; MRODE, R.A. An osmotic resistance test for bovine semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 36:77-86. 1994.

[24] ROTA, A.; PENZO, N.; VINCENTI, L.; MANTOVANI, R. Hypo-osmotic swelling (HOS) as a screening assay for testing in vitro fertility of bovine spermatozoa. Theriogenol. 53:1415-1420. 2000.

[25] SMIKLE, C.B.; TUREK, P.J. Hypo-osmotic swelling can accurately assess the viability of nonmotile sperm. Mol. Reprod. Develop. 47:200-203. 1997.

[26] TAMULI, M.K.; WATSON, P.F. Effects of temperature of incubation on the development of resistance to cold stress and hypo-osmotic stress in boar spermatozoa incubated for up 24 hours. Proceeding 12th International Congress on Animal Reproduction (ICAR). The Hague. 08/23-27. The Netherlands. Pp. 1484-1486. 1992.

[27] WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO). Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Mucus Interaction, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom. Pp 68-70. 1999.

[28] ZANEVELD, L.J.D.; JEYENDRAN, R.S. Biochemical analysis of seminal plasma and spermatozoa. In: Handbook of the laboratory diagnosis and treatment of infertility. Keel BK and Webster BW (Eds). Boston, USA: CRC Press. Pp. 79-96. 1990.

[29] ZAVOS, P.M. The use of hypo-osmotic swelling test (HOS) to assess functional integrity of equine sperm membrane. J. Assist. Reprod. Tech.-Androl. 2:215-216. 1991.

[30] ZHU, W.; LIU, X.G. Cryodemage to plasma membrane integrity in head and tail region human sperm. J. Androl. 2:135-138. 2000.

Armando Quintero-Moreno (1) *, Jorge Rubio-Guillen (1), Decio Gonzalez-Villalobos (1), Juan Carlos Gutierrez (2), Ninoska Madrid-Bury (1,3) y Jose Julian Garde Lopez-Brea (4,5)

(1) Laboratorio de Andrologia/ Unidad de Investigacion en Produccion Animal. (2) Unidad de Investigacion en Reproduccion Animal. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. (3) Departamento de Zootecnia. Facultad de Agronomia. Universidad del Zulia. Venezuela. (4) IDR, Seccion de Recursos Cinegeticos y Ganaderos. Campus Universitario, 02071. Albacete, Spain. (5) IREC (UCLM-SSIC-JCCM). * arturo93@cantv.net
TABLE I
MEMBRANE INTEGRITY (TYPE I-IV) BEFORE AND AFTER CRYOPRESERVATION

Semen samples (40)           Types of membrane integrity (%)

                               I                        II

Fresh (20)           6.50 [+ or -] 4.4 (a)    22.10 [+ or -] 3.2 (a)
                          (4.13-9.01)             (15.42-28.82)

Thawed (20)          20.65 [+ or -] 2.6 (b)   28.5 [+ or -] 2.3 (a)
                         (14.93-26.06)            (23.43-33.21)

Thawed- fresh               + 14.15                    +6.4

Semen samples (40)          Types of membrane integrity (%)

                              III                      IV

Fresh (20)           0.87 [+ or -] 0.1 (a)    70.53 [+ or -] 3.6 (b)
                          (0.51-1.23)            (63.43-78.51)

Thawed (20)          2.25 [+ or -] 0.3 (a)   48.60 [+ or -] 4.0 (a)
                          (1.56-2.93)            (40.19-56.95)

Thawed- fresh                +1.38                   -21.93

Results are expressed as means [+ or -] error standard (confidence
interval) from semen samples analysed from 4 different bulls. Values
with different superscripts (a, b) in the same column were
significantly different (P<0.01).
COPYRIGHT 2011 Universidad del Zulia, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Quintero-Moreno, Armando; Rubio-Guillen, Jorge; Gonzalez-Villalobos, Decio; Gutierrez, Juan Carlos;
Publication:Revista Cientifica de la Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias
Date:Sep 1, 2011
Words:3320
Previous Article:Rendimiento de la canal y desarrollo de los organos toracicos y abdominales de los 25 a los 45 kg en cerdos criollos pelones.
Next Article:Evaluacion del propoleo como promotor de crecimiento en la carpa comun (Cyprinus carpio).
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters