Printer Friendly

IRS rules on extended warranties.

The IRS recently issued its long-awaited rule setting forth a method for income recognition by automobile dealers on the sale of extended warranty contracts to the purchasers of automobiles. Under this method, the entire amount received from sales of extended warranties would not have to be reported as income in the year of receipt, which would avoid a cash flow problem for the dealer. This same method would also be used by dealers in other durable goods.

To take advantage of this method, the dealer must meet specific requirements. The extended warranty contract must qualify as a true service arrangement separately priced by the dealer. In addition, the dealer must purchase true insurance to protect against the risk of having to provide the required service. If all of the requirements are met, the income to be reported by the dealer in the year of the sale of the contract is - the excess of the contract price received over the amount of the insurance premium paid, and - a pro rata portion of the amount paid for insurance increased by an imputed income amount.

This method of accounting allows dealers to recognize in income, generally over the period of the warranty contract, a series of equal payments, the present value of which equals the amount received in the year the contract is written.

The new method is effective for tax years beginning on or after June 12, 1992. The Service has also issued a procedure to automatically change the method of accounting for the treatment of the deduction for the purchased insurance; dealers must deduct the amounts paid to insurers ratably over the term of the insurance coverage.
COPYRIGHT 1993 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1993, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Devlin, Frank C., Jr.
Publication:The Tax Adviser
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:Mar 1, 1993
Words:276
Previous Article:Timing passthrough items when the S election terminates during a fiscal year.
Next Article:Personal residence as charitable contribution.
Topics:


Related Articles
TEI files friend-of-court brief on deductibility standard, comments on QSLOB and section 9100 regulations.
Auto dealers: extended service contracts.
Simplified disaster-loss rules, backed by AICPA, become law.
Rev. Rul. 96-62: a lump of coal or a nicely wrapped present?
TEI tells Supreme Court ... revenue rulings are mere litigating positions and not entitled to deference.
Was it something we said? The government's defensive reply to TEI's amicus brief in Mead strikes a nerve.
Auto manufacturer may not deduct estimated future warranty costs.
Winter activities confirm institute's expertise as TEI slaloms way to center platform with golden liaison meetings, amicus brief. (TEI's Own Olympic...
Portland Chapter update. (Chapter News).
IRS liberalizes interest suspension rule.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters