Printer Friendly

IRS deficiency thrown out due to "gross ineptitude."

The Mathernes filed a joint 1982 federal tax return. The IRS mailed it back to them; no one knows why. The IRS had stamped the return "received March 1984." The IRS kept a copy of the first page only, which showed the filing status and the number of exemptions.

Mr. Matherne died in late 1984; later the IRS began an audit of the Mathernes' 1982 tax liability. It asked for a copy of the 1982 return, which now could not be found. In 1986, Matherne's attorney gave the IRS a "reconstructed" version of the 1982 return.

In late 1987 and early 1988, the IRS issued notices of transferee liability to Matherne's heirs. The notices were based on married-filing-separately rates and said Mr. Matherne had not filed a 1982 return. Penalties also were asserted. The heirs contested the deficiencies in Tax Court, arguing no proper "determination" was made, and therefore the deficiency was invalid. The Tax Court held in the IRS's favor.

To be valid, a deficiency notice must be preceded by a "determination" of a deficiency [IRC section 6212(a)]. A notice of transferee liability is governed by the same standards as a notice of deficiency [IRC section 6901(a)]. Case law says a determination means a "thoughtful and considered determination" that more tax is owed.

Result: For the Matherne's transferees. There was no valid determination of a deficiency; it is clear the IRS did not make a "thoughful and considered determination." With what the court termed "gross ineptitude," the IRS disregarded the fact a 1982 return had been filed, despite supporting evidence in its own files (the copy of the first page); it also disregarded information to which it had access. Thus, the statute of limitations on assessment of transferee liability [IRC section 6901(c)] having run, the opportunity to assert deficiencies against the transferees was apparently lost.
COPYRIGHT 1992 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1992, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Wagenbrenner, Anne
Publication:Journal of Accountancy
Date:Jan 1, 1992
Words:309
Previous Article:A case of "chutzpah" - court limits how far IRS must go for "last known address." (Tax Court rules on notices of deficiency)
Next Article:Sexual harassment settlement not deductible.
Topics:


Related Articles
A case of "chutzpah" - court limits how far IRS must go for "last known address." (Tax Court rules on notices of deficiency)
Innocent-spouse relief can be granted as to Form 1045.
SOL for assessing gift tax extended.
Favorable court decision on FTC carrybacks may necessitate immediate action - refund potential.
Return to sender.
IRS not permitted to credit overpayments against subsequent year's potential deficiency.
Offsetting by the IRS can save money.
Overpayments credited to estimated tax.
Tax Court denies jurisdiction on underlying tax liability.
Payment strategy to reduce interest costs on IRS settlements.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters