Printer Friendly

IRS can't invalidate return after accepting it.

In 1996 after 15 years of marriage and of filing joint federal income tax returns, a husband and wife divorced. Shortly thereafter, a professional tax preparer filed a joint 1995 return on their behalf, without either the husband's or wife's signature. The IRS accepted and processed the return, and the husband began making payments toward the couple's joint tax obligation.

A year later, the wife filed for bankruptcy and, on the advice of the IRS, filed and signed a 1995 return as married, filing separately. This released her from the joint and several liability of the original 1995 return. The IRS then issued a new notice of deficiency to the husband based on his changed 1995 status.

The husband objected and argued that the initial 1995 joint return was valid and that the wife's separate return should be rejected. According to the husband, the manual signature requirement had been eliminated or had become more relaxed under IRC section 6061(o).

The Tax Court sided with the government, stating that IRC section 6061(o) applied only to electronic filings. Furthermore, it held that a return without signatures submitted on behalf of a couple was not valid, regardless of whether the intent had been to file a joint return.

The husband then turned to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals for relief. The court noted that the IRS's normal practice when it received an unsigned return was to either return it to the taxpayer for signature or request the signature on a separate declaration. Instead, in the present case, the IRS repeatedly refused to allow the husband to sign the original return.

The court followed Dowell v. Commissioner 614 (F2d 1263 (10th Cir., 1980)) and stated that the IRS processed, audited and used the couple's joint return to calculate their liability and its claim against the wife's bankrupt estate. These actions prevented the service from later declaring the return invalid. The court then held the husband intended to and was eligible to file a joint return for 1995 (Nathan T. Olpin v. Commissioner, no. 00-9003 (10th Cir., 1-25-01)).

Home is Where the Tax Bite Is, Part 1

In 1999 the amount of state taxes and fees a person paid, on average, was $1,899. Connecticut taxpayers paid the most--an average of $2,936--while New Hampshire taxpayers paid the least--$897.
Connecticut $2,936/person
U.S. average $1,899/person
New Hampshire $897/person


[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Source: Tax Foundation, www.taxfoundation.org.

Home is Where the Tax Bite Is, Part 2

If states were ranked by how much tax they collected in 1999 per $1,000 of personal income, Hawaii would come in first with an average of $98.24, while New Hampshire would be last with $29.51.
Hawaii $98.24/$1,000
New Hampshire $29.51/$1,000


[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Source: tax Foundation, www.taxfoundation.org.

--Michael Lynch, Esq., professor of tax accounting at Bryant College, Smithfield, Rhode Island.
COPYRIGHT 2001 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:tax returns
Author:Lynch, Michael
Publication:Journal of Accountancy
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Jul 1, 2001
Words:489
Previous Article:Taking the complexity out of simplified LIFO.
Next Article:Passive losses and LLC Members.
Topics:


Related Articles
IRS reverses controversial procedural notice.
IRS issues temporary regulations on automatic extensions of time to file.
The failure-to-file penalty: nuances every tax practitioner should know.
When may a taxpayer's agent sign returns?
IRS unveils initiative to solve processing problems.
IRS-prepared form 4549 was "return" for bankruptcy code purposes.
"Homemade" income tax forms may constitute valid returns.
Unsigned return claiming joint filing status was valid; 10th Cir. reverses TC.
IRS discusses documents on change in marital status.
Tax Court strikes down timely filing requirement for foreign taxpayers.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters