Printer Friendly

IRS Sec. 165 classification.

Bart H. Siegel's article ("Tax Benefits of IRC Sec. 165," September 2004) may need clarification of two points.

First, Mr. Siegel stated that a taxpayer does not have any tax basis in a traditional IRA. This isn't always true. A taxpayer may have been an active participant in an employer's plan and have an AGI high enough to eliminate the deduction (Sec. 219(g)), or may have made nondeductible contributions reported on Form 8606.

Second, Mr. Siegel stated that a loss attributable to theft is deductible in the year during which the taxpayer discovers the loss, and he is correct (Sec. 165(e)). Mr. Siegel said that this may result in the extension of the statute of limitations for a taxpayer who discovers a loss and later learns that it was due to theft.

I know of no provision that will extend the statute of limitations for claiming a theft loss. Mr. Siegel may have meant that where a taxpayer discovers a loss in one year, and later discovers that the loss was due to theft, the deduction is postponed to the later year.

For example, a taxpayer who discovers on Dec. 31 that the amount he invested with a broker is gone, but after investigating, discovers that the broker stole the money, the theft loss is deductible in the later year.

Court cases support this concept: Elliott, 40 T.C. 304 (1963, Acq.)--theft loss deductible in earlier year that theft was discovered, not in later years when additional items were discovered to have been stolen; McKinley, 34 T.C. 59 (1960)--taxpayer could not establish whether the year in which the theft occurred, or the subsequent year, was the year in which he discovered the loss; Cramer, 55 T.C. 1125 (1971, Acq.)--taxpayer who reported a loss of jewelry to police in one year could deduct theft loss in later year after police investigation.

A forum for your comments, suggestions and reactions. Fire off your succinct missive to: editor@calcpa.org.

David M. Fogel, CPA

Sacramento
COPYRIGHT 2004 California Society of Certified Public Accountants
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Speak Out
Author:Fogel, David M.
Publication:California CPA
Geographic Code:1U9CA
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Words:339
Previous Article:Litigation Sections.
Next Article:A quick disaster-related tax tip.
Topics:


Related Articles
Insured business losses; if they are unclaimed they may still be deductible.
An update on the "check-the-box" proposal to entity classification.
Check-the-box final regs. simplify entity classification.
New IRS procedures for worker classification disputes.
Abandonment loss deduction denied for branching rights obtained in FSLIC-assisted thrift acquisition.
New refund opportunities for prior casualty and theft losses.
Employment taxes assessed in SMLLC's name and EIN were valid assessments against company's sole owner.
TAM blesses plan "inoculation" language.
IRS updates late-election procedures.
Final check-the-box rules terminate certain grandfathered status.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters