Printer Friendly

IRS's letters to physician's patients were not unlawful disclosure.

Barrett, a plastic surgeon, was under civil investigation by the IRS. Two confidential informants-- both disgruntled ex-employees-- told the IRS Barrett kept cash patient fees off the books. The IRS referred the case to the Criminal Investigations Division (CID).

The special agent conducting the investigation at CID issued administrative summonses to the hospitals where Barrett had admitting privileges and got the names of Barrett's patients. The agent sent these patients 386 form letters asking whether they had paid Barrett in cash. The letters contained Barrett's name and address and the fact CID was investigating him.

Barrett sued the IRS under IRC section 7431, which gives taxpayers the fight to sue the United States for a U.S. employee's knowing or negligent disclosure of "tax return information" (a violation of IRC section 6103). Section 6103 generally provides tax returns and "tax return information" are to be kept confidential and outlines exceptions to the rule. One exception, in section 6103(k)(6), allows IRS employees to disclose return information for investigative purposes, but only to the extent the disclosure is necessary to obtain information not otherwise reasonably available. Barrett's name, address and the fact he was being investigated were all items of return information under the statute.

Barrett argued the information should have been obtained by other means, namely by examining bank statements and detailed cross-referencing between bank statements and other taxpayer documents.

Result: For the IRS. The disclosures were lawful under section 6103(k)(6). The disclosures were necessary to obtain information not otherwise reasonably available. * Barrett (DC S. Tex., 1993).
COPYRIGHT 1993 American Institute of CPA's
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1993, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Barrett
Publication:Journal of Accountancy
Article Type:Brief Article
Date:Jul 1, 1993
Words:260
Previous Article:Half of settlement money is excludable.
Next Article:Attempt to avoid golden parachute rules fails.
Topics:


Related Articles
Hidden traps in document requests.
IRS program helps find missing taxpayers.
Memorandum of Tax Executives Institute, Inc. as Amicus Curiae in Opposition to Plaintiff Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.'s Motion for Summary...
Toward increased accountability.
Disclosing False or Unfiled Tax Returns to the IRS.
Failure to comply with tax shelter disclosure regulations: what's at stake?
Tax accrual workpapers: IRS efforts to obtain them, corporate strategies to protect them.
Circular 230: is the hysteria over?
IRS treats protective disclosures inconsistently.
TEI opposes public disclosure of corporate tax returns.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters