Printer Friendly

IRAQ - Saddam's Nuclear Ambition.

"Saddam, the bomb and me" was the headline of an article by Iraqi scientist, Mahdi Obeidi, published on Sept. 28 by the New York Times (NYT). Obeidi is the author of "The Bomb in My Garden: The Secrets of Saddam's Nuclear Mastermind". Kurt Pitzer, who collaborated on the book, assisted with this article (with underlining by APS):

"While the final report from Charles Duelfer, the top American inspector of Iraq's covert weapons programs, won't be released for a few weeks, the portions that have already been made public touch on many of the experiences I had while working as the head of Saddam Hussein's nuclear centrifuge program.

"Now that I am living in the United States, I hope to answer some of the most important questions that remain. What was really going on in Iraq before the American invasion last year?

"Iraq's nuclear weapons program was on the threshold of success before the 1991 invasion of Kuwait - there is no doubt in my mind that we could have produced dozens of nuclear weapons within a few years - but was stopped in its tracks by UN weapons inspectors after the Gulf war and was never restarted.

"During the 1990s, the inspectors discovered all of the laboratories, machines and materials we had used in the nuclear program, and all were destroyed or otherwise incapacitated. By 1998, when Saddam Hussein evicted the weapons inspectors from Iraq, all that was left was the dangerous knowledge of hundreds of scientists and the blueprints and prototype parts for the centrifuge, which I had buried under a tree in my garden.

"In addition to the inspections, the sanctions that were put in place by the United Nations after the Gulf war made reconstituting the program impossible.

"During the 1980s, we had relied heavily on the international black market for equipment and technology; the sanctions closed that avenue. Another factor in the mothballing of the program was that Saddam was profiting handsomely from the UN oil-for-food program, building palaces around the country with the money he skimmed. I think he didn't want to risk losing this revenue stream by trying to restart a secret weapons program.

"Over the course of the 1990s, most of the scientists from the nuclear program switched to working on civilian projects or in conventional-weapons production, and the idea of building a nuclear bomb became a vague dream from another era. So, how could the West have made such a mistaken assessment of the nuclear program before the invasion last year?

"Even to those of us who knew better, it's fairly easy to see how observers got the wrong impression. First, there was Saddam's history. He had demonstrated his desire for nuclear weapons since the late 1970s, when Iraqi scientists began making progress on a nuclear reactor. He had used chemical weapons against his own people and against Iran during the 1980s.

"After the 1991 war, he had tried to hide his programs in weapons of mass destruction for as long as possible (he even kept my identity secret from weapons inspectors until 1995). It would have been hard not to suspect him of trying to develop such weapons again. The Western intelligence services and policy makers, however, overlooked some obvious clues.

"One was the defection and death of Saddam's son-in-law, Hussein Kamel (Al-Majid), who was in charge of the unconventional weapons programs in the 1980s. As my boss, Kamel was a brutal taskmaster who forced us to work under impossible deadlines and was the motivating force for our nuclear effort.

"The drive for nuclear weapons began in earnest when he rose to a position of power in 1987. He placed a detail of 20 fearsome security men on the premises of our centrifuge lab, and my staff and I worked wonders just to stay out of his dungeons. But after he defected to Jordan in 1995, and then returned months later only to be assassinated by his father-in-law's henchmen, the nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs lost their top promoter.

"In addition, the West never understood the delusional nature of Saddam's mind. By 2002, when the United States and Britain were threatening war, he had lost touch with the reality of his diminished military might.

"By that time I had been promoted to director of projects for the country's entire military-industrial complex, and I witnessed firsthand the fantasy world in which he was living. He backed mythic but hopeless projects, like one for a long-range missile that was completely unrealistic considering the constraints of international sanctions. The director of another struggling missile project, when called upon to give a progress report, recited a poem in the dictator's honor instead. Not only did he not go to prison, Saddam applauded him.

"By 2003, as the American invasion loomed, the tyrant was alternately working on his next trashy novel and giving lunatic orders like burning oil around Baghdad to "hide" the city from bombing attacks.

"Unbelievably, one of my final assignments was to prepare a 10-year plan for military-industrial works, even as tens of thousands of troops were gathering for invasion. To the end, Saddam kept alive the Iraqi Atomic Energy Commission, staffed by junior scientists involved in research completely unrelated to nuclear weapons, just so he could maintain the illusion in his mind that he had a nuclear program.

"Sort of like the emperor with no clothes, he fooled himself into believing he was armed and dangerous. But unlike that fairy-tale ruler, Saddam fooled the rest of the world as well.

"Was Iraq a potential threat to the United States and the world? Threat is always a matter of perception, but our nuclear program could have been reinstituted at the snap of Saddam's fingers.

"The sanctions and the lucrative oil-for-food program had served as powerful deterrents, but world events - like Iran's current efforts to step up its nuclear ambitions - might well have changed the situation.

"Iraqi scientists had the knowledge and the designs needed to jumpstart the program if necessary. And there is no question that we could have done so very quickly.

"In the late 1980s, we put together the most efficient covert nuclear program the world has ever seen. In about three years, we gained the ability to enrich uranium and nearly become a nuclear threat; we built an effective centrifuge from scratch, even though we started with no knowledge of centrifuge technology.

"Had Saddam ordered it and the world looked the other way, we might have shaved months if not years off our previous efforts.

"So what now? The dictator may be gone, but that doesn't mean the nuclear problem is behind us.

"Even under the watchful eyes of Saddam's security services, there were worries that our scientists might escape to other countries or sell their knowledge to the highest bidder.

"This expertise is even more valuable today, with nuclear technology ever more available on the black market and a proliferation of peaceful energy programs around the globe that use equipment easily converted to military use.

"Hundreds of my former staff members and fellow scientists possess knowledge that could be useful to a rogue nation eager for a covert nuclear weapons program.

"The vast majority are technicians who, like the rest of us, care first about their families and their livelihoods. It is vital that the United States ensure they get good and constructive jobs in postwar Iraq. The most accomplished of my former colleagues could be brought, at least temporarily, to the West and placed at universities, research labs and private companies.

"The United States invaded Iraq in part to end what it saw as a nuclear danger. It is now vital to reduce the chance of Iraq's dangerous knowledge spilling outside of its borders.

"The nuclear dangers facing the world are growing, not decreasing. My hope is that the Iraqi example can help people understand how best to deal with this threat".

The Dangers Ahead: (This is somewhat reminiscent of the situation towards the end of World War Two, when German scientists were absorbed by the US and the Soviet Union to help them develop nuclear bombs. This time, however, Iraqi scientists might be absorbed by rogue states in which dictators are willing to pay whatever it takes for them to stay in power. Atomic bombs and other weapons of mass destruction would be the types of guarantee they need. Dr. Obeidi's warning is compelling).
COPYRIGHT 2004 Input Solutions
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:APS Diplomat Operations in Oil Diplomacy
Geographic Code:7IRAQ
Date:Oct 4, 2004
Words:1396
Previous Article:IRAQ - Shift To Short-Term Security Needs.
Next Article:IRAQ - Focusing On The Non-Oil Sector - Part 6E - Preparing For Elections.
Topics:


Related Articles
IRAQ - Sept. 24 - Blair Says Baghdad 2 Years From Nuclear Bomb.
Feeding the "axis of evil". (Insider Report).
Iran's Theocracy Is Getting Close To An Abyss Combining Atomic & Islamic Traps.
The US Readies The Next Move On Iran After Hossein Khomeini's 'Regime Change' Invite.
IRAQ - Sept. 14 - Scientists Say N-Programme Ended.
Libyan Capitulation On WMD Sets The Tone For Arab-US Relations In 2004 & Beyond.
PAKISTAN - The Saudi Factor.
IRAN - Sep 6 - Tehran Seen As At Least 5 Years From Bomb.
The UN and Iran: here we go again! An influential U.S. senator has urged the UN Security Council to impose strict sanctions on Iran. As in Iraq, if...

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters