INGTHORSSON, R., D., McTaggart's Paradox.
Ingthorsson begins by challenging the widely held assumption that "McTaggart's argument for the unreality of time is a stand-alone argument that does not rely on any metaphysical assumptions." For Ingthorsson, McTaggart's paradox is not asserted as a discrete argument, to be understood and assessed in isolation; Ingthorsson asserts that the paradox must be understood alongside McTaggart's methodological and ontological idealism, keeping in mind his views on, for example, "the general nature of the existent in Absolute Reality." Thus, the task of chapter 2--before the argument is introduced and dissected in chapter 3--is to present some of the key points of McTaggart's idealist metaphysics, the points that Ingthorsson takes to be crucial for a proper understanding and appreciation of the paradox. One illuminating aspect of chapter 2 is the statement of McTaggart's metaphysical system in axiomatic form. That is: existence and reality coincide and do not permit degree; existence (reality) is constituted by substances, their qualities, and relations between them; a substance is something that bears qualities and stands in relations without being a quality or a relation; qualities and relations (characteristics) depend for their existence on the existence of substances; and, substances are individuated by their characteristics. From these axioms, Ingthorsson asserts that McTaggart derives three surprising consequences: there are no abstract entities like propositions or possibilities; if time is real, it must exist and be part of "existent reality" rather than a condition upon it; and, if the past or future are real, they must exist in the same way as the present. Philosophers with little or no knowledge of McTaggart's system will likely find chapter 2 to be extremely illuminating.
Chapter 3 is a focused discussion of McTaggart's argument for the unreality of time (as it appears in "Time," chapter 33 of McTaggart's The Nature of Existence). Ingthorsson offers a step-by-step analysis of the argument, working through the relevant sections of The Nature of Existence ([section][section]303-33), providing a general commentary on the argument and a sense of how it all hangs together. This chapter is largely exegesis, but even readers familiar with McTaggart's paradox will find some interesting insights contained within. Chapter 4 continues the exegesis and deals briefly with the under-discussed "C series." Ingthorsson holds that a comprehensive discussion of the nature of the C series is beyond the scope of the book. Even so, the brief discussion is very welcome.
The rest of the book concerns reactions and responses to McTaggart's paradox. Chapter 5 focuses on defenses of the paradox, specifically the main way that some propose to defend one element of it, that is, that the A series involves a contradiction. Ingthorsson asserts that many misconstrue McTaggart's positions and don't succeed in defending the paradox. Chapter 6 surveys a variety of prominent and important objections to the paradox. Once again, Ingthorsson's considered view is that the objections to the paradox all rest upon misunderstandings. Chapters 7 and 8 focus on how B theorists and A theorists, respectively, encounter particular difficulties with McTaggart's paradox (that is, the paradox properly understood). Ingthorsson concludes in chapter 7 that the paradox makes special trouble for the B theory of time, namely, "there is no good answer to McTaggart's argument against the B series," and goes on to offer a partial defense of a specific version of the A theory, presentism (the view that "only the present exists") in chapter 8. For Ingthorsson, McTaggart's paradox doesn't show that all A theories in general are inherently contradictory, and so this family of views is where success against the paradox will be found. As I see it, some of the arguments and insights in chapters 7 and 8 will likely be of interest to anyone working in the metaphysics of time and not just those thinking about McTaggart's paradox.
Ingthorsson's McTaggart's Paradox is a valuable and well-researched addition to the literature on McTaggart's infamous argument, and scholars interested in the paradox will benefit from careful study of it.--David Ingram, University of York
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||The Review of Metaphysics|
|Article Type:||Book review|
|Date:||Sep 1, 2018|
|Previous Article:||HOFFMANN, Thomas S., editor. Johann Gottlieb Fichtes Wissenschaftslehre von 1812. Vermachtnis und Herausforderung des transzendentalen Idealismus.|
|Next Article:||MURRAY, Malcolm. Morals and Consent: Contractarian Solutions to Ethical Woes.|