Printer Friendly

Human rights, cultural, and scientific aspects of abstinence-only policies and programs.

Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 2008;5(3), John S Santelli and Leslie M Kantor (guest editors)

This special edition of the journal Sexuality Research and Social Policy, is on the impact of abstinence-only programmes and policies, which have received up to $1.5 billion in US federal funding. It shows that most abstinence programmes did not delay initiation of sex, and only three of nine had any significant positive effects on sexual behaviour, compared with two-thirds of comprehensive programmes which include condom and contraceptive information. Abstinence-only programmes violate the human rights of young people and provide inaccurate information on condom effectiveness. States in the USA are abandoning abstinence-only education because they feel it is ineffective and inaccurate.

Available from:

National Sexuality Resource Center, San Francisco, USA

E-mail: nsrcinfo@sfsu.edu

Web: <www.nsrc.sfsu.edu/Index.cfm?DSN=nsrc_dsn&Page=153>
COPYRIGHT 2008 Reproductive Health Matters
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:ROUND UP: Publications
Publication:Reproductive Health Matters
Article Type:Brief article
Date:Nov 1, 2008
Words:143
Previous Article:Compendium of key documents relating to human rights and HIV in Eastern and Southern Africa.
Next Article:Guidance for the introduction of HPV vaccines in EU countries.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters