# How to decide on purchasing new medical equipment: These nonfinancial and financial tools can facilitate your analysis.

Providing state-of-the-art health care for women often requires the use of various types of medical equipment, and decisions regarding their purchase can be complicated. With rising costs and reduced reimbursements, capital expenditures must be made with great care. Some equipment may not generate revenue but is required at a basic care-giving level: examination tables, procedure instruments, autoclaves, etc. Conversely, other equipment may not be necessary but strongly desired to offer a full complement of care. Unfortunately, sometimes a decision to buy expensive equipment is based more on a sales representative's ability to rationalize the purchase as a sound investment than on its necessity or practicality. This article focuses on tools to help you make a decision to obtain revenue-generating medical equipment.First consideration: Nonfinancial evaluation

Nonfinancial criteria should be your first concern. They may have a greater impact on your practice than any financial consideration.

Does this investment align with your overall goals?

If your focus is to provide the best and most efficient obstetric care in the community, it may not make sense to purchase urodynamic equipment, even if using the equipment could be profitable. (1) If the equipment begins to distract the practice from its strategic focus, then complications from managing this new equipment might be more harmful than helpful.

What are the pros and cons of the investment?

Concern that the equipment may not be effective or may become obsolete in a few years would preclude having to consider the financial purchase in the first place. (1)

Consider a PESTLE analysis

Before starting a new project, use a PESTLE analysis to assess external factors that are political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental. Its purpose is to identify issues that are beyond the control of the organization and have some level of impact on the organization. (2,3)

If you are considering the purchase of a laser hair removal machine, what could be the political considerations, such as your reputation among peers or other physicians who refer patients to your practice? What are the economic (financial) considerations? How would the social (or marketing) message be communicated, and do you have the organizational skills to implement a marketing strategy? What are the technical challenges required for maintaining this machine, and how much skill and training would be required to safely use it? What are the legal ramifications for implementing this service? Does your malpractice insurance cover it? And finally, what kind of environment (physical space) would be required?

What alternative investment opportunities might compete?

When considering a significant investment, other opportunities may no longer be feasible. Think about other ways your practice could use the money and which investment prospects would be the best fit. (1) For instance, purchasing equipment that is very time intensive may not necessarily be the most profitable decision, especially if it takes the provider away from other services with higher margins. Could investing in expensive equipment delay bringing in another provider who might have a higher financial impact?

Next stage: Financial evaluation

To begin a basic cash flow analysis of the new investment, gather your practice's financial data. Estimate the cash flow resulting from the equipment investment, including any additional expenses and revenues. Here are some steps:

1. Identify the revenue generated by each use of the equipment.

2. Estimate the variable costs (costs that increase with each incremental unit of activity). Variable costs include expenses associated with each use, such as disposable accessories. For a hysteroscope, the variable cost may be the tubing and fluid used. Some procedures, such as office hysteroscopic sterilization, require the purchase of intratubal occlusion devices.

Also consider the cost of your time. One way to determine this is to investigate the hourly rate you would be paid if you were hypothetically hired by a third party to perform the procedure.

3. Estimate the step costs. Step costs are constant over a narrow range of activity but shift to a higher level with increased activity. One example is staffing costs. If the number of these procedures significantly increases, additional staffing will be required. Include the hourly pay for your medical assistants in the analysis.

4. Determine the contribution margin. Subtract the revenue from the sum of the variable and step costs to find the contribution margin (dollar contribution per unit) to your practice. (4,5)

5. Estimate the approximate volume of procedures. It is hard to predict future demand, but a good rule of thumb is to estimate the best, expected, and pessimistic volumes. Then average the 3 scenarios and use that figure as the anticipated volume. Multiply the volume by the contribution margin to calculate profit.

Additional financial tools

Once the basic cash flow analysis of the new investment is undertaken, add these methods to your analysis:

Net Present Value (NPV) is the difference between the present value of cash inflows and the present value of cash outflows. (6) NPV takes into consideration the time value of money, where money in the present is worth more than the same value sometime in the future due to inflation and earning capacity. NPV is used in capital budgeting to analyze the profitability of a projected investment or project. (1,4,5)

Consider the discount rate as the expected rate of return or cost of capital. By discounting the future cash flow each year by the discount rate, you can get the present value of cash flow. Subtract the present value of cash flow from the original investment to get the NPV for the equipment's investment. A positive value is a favorable analysis to purchase the equipment; a negative value may suggest that the equipment may be a poor investment.

The NPV can be calculated in a spreadsheet using the following NPV command formula: NPV(rate,value1,[value2], ...). This formula gives you the present value of cash inflows. The rate is the discount rate and the values are the series of cash flows occurring over a period of time. The NPV command formula in Excel, despite its misleading name, only gives the present value of cash flows. (7) Therefore, it is important that the present value of cash inflows is subtracted from the initial capital investment to get the NPV.

For example, a piece of equipment may require a $14,000 initial investment in Year 0. Each year the use of the equipment generates $25,300 per year through year 5. Assign a discount rate of 11%, about what you would expect for a stock market investment.

Consider other investment opportunities. The historical rate of return for a stock index fund is 11.5%. (8) Using this discount rate, you can compare whether the money would be better invested in the medical equipment or stock.

Internal rate of return (IRR) is a metric used in capital budgeting to measure the profitability of potential investments. The IRR determines if the discount rate at which the present value of expected net cash inflow is equal to the cash outlay. In other words, the IRR is the discount rate that makes the net present cash flows from a project equal zero. The decision rule related to the IRR criterion is to accept a project in which the IRR is greater than the required rate of return (cutoff rate). The formula for the IRR is the same as the NPV formula, except that the NPV is set at zero and the discount rate is calculated through iterative calculation. The IRR can be calculated in a spreadsheet using the following command formula: IRR(values, [guess]). (1,5,9)

The IRR is somewhat different from return on investment (ROI). ROI is the percent of return on the initial investment over a period of time. Each piece of equipment has a different ROI over a different time period. ROI does not take into account the time value of money (TVM). Incorporating the IRR (or the TVM) allows for equal comparison between 2 pieces of equipment in the analysis. (10)

If you are not comparing 2 different types of equipment for purchase, then using the cutoff of 11.5% may be helpful (the historical average stock market return). If the IRR is less than 11.5%, then in theory, it would be better to put your money in the stock market than in new equipment. (7)

Breakeven analysis calculates the volume of procedures that would be needed to break even or make a profit. It can also determine if there is enough demand to meet the volume required to break even or profit. Unlike the first 2 methods, where you have to guess at future volume, this method calculates the volume required to break even, but does not specify a time period. Your practice would have to use subjective experience to determine how long it would take to reach that volume, given your patient population and the ability to reach the targeted market segment.

Fixed costs are costs that do not change with the varying volume of units of service or products sold. After calculating the contribution margin, divide the fixed costs of the equipment by the contribution margin. Then you will have the volume required to break even (FIGURE). Add the dollar amount of profit you would like to attain to the fixed costs, then divide that total by the contribution margin, and you'll have the volume required to meet those specifications. (1,4,5)

Even though the calculations described above relate to medical equipment, you can use this same method to analyze the cost of adding new providers or any other business development project to determine the required volume to break even on the capital outlay.

CASE New equipment requests

A new ObGyn in your practice requests that you purchase a hysteroscope so that she can start performing office-based hysteroscopic sterilization. Another partner would like to acquire urodynamic equipment instead of referring urinary incontinent patients to a urogynecologist. How do you decide what to purchase?

First calculate the contribution margins for each product. Next, since you do not know for certain the volume you might achieve for each procedure, create 3 scenarios for the best, expected, and pessimistic situations. Assume equal probability for each of these categories and average the volumes of the estimates. Even though you may keep the equipment longer, estimate the financial analysis over 5 years. In this example, we assume a discount rate of 11% for the NPV calculation for both pieces of equipment.

Calculate the IRR using a spreadsheet based on the cash flow for each piece of equipment. Say that the practice anticipates doing 23 hysteroscopic sterilizations per year. If the reimbursement is $2,600 per procedure, and the variable costs are $1,500, the contribution margin is $1,100. So 23 procedures multiplied by $1,100 equals an annual profit of $25,300. Then discount the $25,300 for each year. In this example, we use a discount rate of 11%. The TABLE shows the amount discounted each year.

The sum of the discounted cash flows is $93,506. However, we have to subtract the initial investment of $14,000, so the final NPV equals $79,506.

Apply the same financial NPV and IRR calculations used to assess the hysteroscope to the urodynamic equipment. From the analysis, both purchases would be financially successful. However, it appears that the urodynamic equipment is a superior investment over the hysteroscope, with a higher NPV ($115,877 vs $81,880, respectively) and IRR (336% vs 180%, respectively). This is likely due to the higher anticipated volume of use with the urodynamic equipment and lower cost of initial investment, despite having a lower contribution margin than the hysteroscope.

Caveats

For simplicity, this analysis does not account for the fact that the hysteroscope could be used for other revenue-generating procedures such as diagnostic hysteroscopy. Factoring in these potential additional services using the same hysteroscope might change the decision analysis in favor of the hysteroscope.

Remember that, although the financial analysis is very helpful in decision making, nonfinancial evaluations should also influence your choice. In this example, while there may be a financial advantage to purchasing the urodynamic equipment over the hysteroscopic equipment, nonfinancial considerations can help you decide which purchase would be a better aligned with the goals and strategies of your practice.

These tools for nonfinancial and financial analysis can be used for any investment in your practice, whether it is in medical equipment, personnel, or development of other profit centers.

FAST TRACK

Net Present Value (NPV) is used to analyze the profitability of a projected investment or project

FAST TRACK

Accept a project in which the internal rate of return (IRR) is greater than the required rate of return

FAST TRACK

Use the same calculations to analyze the cost of adding new providers or any other business development project

ON THE WEB

Additional figures are found in the web version of this article at mdedge.com /obgmanagement

David, S, Kim, MD, PhD, MBA

Dr. Kim is Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, and Associate Clinical Professor, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles.

Dr. Kim reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.

References

(1.) Willis DR. How to decide whether to buy new medical equipment. Fam Pract Manag. 2004;11(3):53-58.

(2.) PESTLE Analysis Strategy Skills. http://www.free management-ebooks.com/dldebk-pdf/fme-pestle-analysis. pdf. Published 2013. Accessed March 2,2018.

(3.) What is PESTLE analysis? A tool for business analysis, http:// pestleanalysis.com/what-is-pestle-analysis/. Published 2018. Accessed March 2,2018.

(4.) Nowicki M, ed. Introduction to the Financial Management of Healthcare Organizations. 6th ed. Chicago, Illinois: Health Administration Press; 2014:150-151,299-316.

(5.) Ross SA, Westerfield RW, Jaffe J. Corporate Finance. 8th ed. New York, New York: McGraw Hill; 2008:271-288.

(6.) Net Present Value--NPV Investopia. https://www .investopedia.com/terms/n/npv.asp. Accessed April 10,2018.

(7.) NPV function. Microsoft Office Support. https://support ? office.com/en-us/article/npv-function-8672cb67-25764d07-b67b-ac28acl2a568. Accessed April 10,2018.

(8.) Damodaran A. Annual Returns on Stock, T. Bonds and T. Bills: 1928--Current, http://pages.stem.nyu.edu/~adamodar /New_Home_Page/datafile/histretSP.html. Updated January 5,2018. Accessed March 2,2018.

(9.) IRR lunction. Microsoft Office Support. https://support. office.com/en-us/article/irr-lunction-64925eaa-9988-495bb290-3ad0cl63clbc. Accessed April 10,2018.

(10.) Time Value of Money (TVM). Investopedia. https:// www.investopedia.com/terms/t/timevalueofmoney.asp. Published 2018. Accessed March 2,2018.

TABLE Present value of cash flows for hysteroscopic sterilization Years Calculation Result 1 $25,300 x 1/(1.11) $22,793 2 $25,300 x 1/(1.11) (2) $20,534 3 $25,300 x 1/(1.11) (3) $18,499 4 $25,300 x 1/(1.11) (4) $16,666 5 $25,300 x 1/(1.11) (5) $15,014 FIGURE Breakeven analysis for hysteroscope purchase for use in tubal sterilization Breakeven Enter Revenues generated $2,600.00 Variable cost per unit $1,500.00 ($1250 per intratubal occlusion device, $50 for 30 min MD time, $200 for staffing & disposable accessories) Fixed cost-Hysteroscope $14,000.00 Calculated = $14,000/$1100 Contribution Margin $1,100.00 Breakeven Point 12.7 Breakeven + Profit Enter Revenues generated $2,600.00 Variable cost per unit $1,500.00 ($1250 per intratubal occlusion device, $50 for 30 min MD time, $200 for staffing & disposable accessories) Fixed cost-Hysteroscope $14,000.00 ROI (percent)desired 200.00% Calculated=($14K + $28K)/$1100 Contribution Margin $1,100.00 Vol needed 38.2 Abbreviations: MD, medical doctor; ROI, return on investment; Vol, volume.

Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback | |

Title Annotation: | BUSINESS OF MEDICINE |
---|---|

Author: | Kim, David S. |

Publication: | OBG Management |

Date: | May 1, 2018 |

Words: | 2579 |

Previous Article: | Two good apps for management of cervical cancer screening results: Clinical decision making made easier. |

Next Article: | Deep infiltrating endometriosis: Evaluation and management: Deep endometriosis is successfully diagnosed with clinical signs and symptoms and... |

Topics: |