Printer Friendly

How discrete are oak species? Insights from a hybrid zone between Quercus grisea and Quercus gambelii.

Over the past 20 years, the study of hybrid zones has grown from a backwater of systematics to one of the most dynamic areas in evolutionary biology and ecology. The growth can be attributed to demonstrations via molecular genetic surveys of natural populations that hybrid zones are a common phenomenon (Feder 1979; Patton et al. 1979; Harrison 1986; Howard 1986; DePamphilis and Wyatt 1990; Rieseberg et al. 1991; Arnold 1997). Also, there is a heightened. awareness among evolutionists that hybrid zones can provide insight into the role of natural selection in the speciation process (Butlin 1989; Howard 1993), the genetic architecture of reproductive isolation (Harrison 1990; Barton and Gale 1993), and the properties of the species boundary (Harrison and Rand 1989; Harrison 1993). Ecologists have also begun to study hybrid zones, spurred on by interests in the effect of hybridization on the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of associated organisms (Whitham 1989; Boecklen and Spellenberg 1990; Floate and Whitham 1993, 1994; Gaylord et al. 1996), the effect of hybridization on the demographic success of field populations (Stucky 1985), the potential role of hybrid zones as centers of biodiversity (Martinsen and Whitham 1994; Whirham et al. 1994), and the importance of hybridization in the origin and conservation of rare taxa (Rieseberg et al. 1989).

It is widely understood that hybridization and hybrid zones are common among oaks (Trelease 1924; Palmer 1948; Muller 1952; Tucker 1961; Cottam et al. 1982; Spellenberg 1995); and oaks have played a central role in the debate over the importance of introgression in plant evolution (Anderson 1949; Whittemore and Schaal 1991; Rieseberg and Wendel 1993), stimulated thinking on the role of ecological factors in limiting hybridization (Stebbins et al. 1947; Muller 1952; Rushton 1993), and served as model organisms in the development of species concepts that rely on ecological criteria (Van Valen 1976). Despite the perception that hybrid zones are a well-documented phenomenon among oaks, few genetic analyses of oak hybrid zones exist. The presence of hybridization typically is inferred on the basis of morphological characters (Rushton 1993), attributes that may be quite plastic and easily misinterpreted (Jones 1959; Rieseberg 1995). Indeed, estimates of the level of hybridization between two well-studied European oaks Quercus robur and Q. petraea, based on morphology, vary widely (Aas 1993).

Quercus gambelii Nutt. and Q. grisea Liebm. are members of different subsections of the white oaks (Nixon 1993). In general, Q. gambelii has a more northerly distribution than Q. grisea, ranging from Utah and Colorado into northern Mexico (Little 1976), and is typically found at higher elevations, often associated with ponderosa pines. Quercus grisea reaches the northern limits of its range in Arizona and New Mexico (Little 1976), and is a codominant in the pinyonjuniper zone. The two taxa are sympatric at various sites, particularly in New Mexico. Where they occur together, they exhibit varying levels of hybridization, according to morphological classification of trees (Tucker 1961; R. Spellenberg, pers. comm.). In general, hybrids appear to be more common on xeric mountain slopes and much less common in more mesic valleys. A lessening of the quantity and quality of male gametes produced by Q. gambelii on xeric hillsides may account for this pattern (Williams et al., unpubl. data).

To better understand patterns of gene exchange between Q. grisea and Q. gambelii, as well as the structure of local hybrid zones, we undertook the development of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers that could differentiate between the two taxa. In this paper, we describe the markers and their patterns of inheritance, examine the multivariate association between the RAPD markers and a suite of morphological characters, document the structure (clinal or mosaic) of a zone of overlap and hybridization in the San Mateo Mountains of New Mexico, and assess the effect of hybridization on the genetic distinctness of the two species.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Sites and Organisms

We collected Q. gambelii leaves from three sites at which Q. grisea did not occur (henceforth called "isolated sites"): [TABULAR DATA FOR TABLE 1 OMITTED] a site near Boulder, Colorado, far north of the range of Q. grisea, a site in the Black Range Mountains of New Mexico, and a high elevation site in the Chiricahua Mountains of Arizona. We collected Q. grisea from three isolated sites, as well: two sites in Mexico far south of the range of Q. gambelii and a site in the Peloncillos Mountains of New Mexico. Figure 1 shows the locations of the collecting sites and Table 1 provides additional information about collections, including sample sizes.

To document levels of hybridization and patterns of gene exchange in an area of sympatry, we collected from five populations situated in the Mount Withington area of the San Mateo Mountains of central New Mexico. All sites are located near Forest Road 549 and distances between sites given below represent the distances along the road. From the first site (low site), we collected leaves from trees that were classified as Q. grisea on the basis of morphology. The low site is a dry and exposed, relatively flat area. The nearest Q. gambelii occurred approximately 400 m away at the bottom of a small runoff-fed valley. The second site (Gaylord's site) is 15.5 km west of the low site. Gaylord's site occupies an east-facing slope of Mount Withington at an elevation of 2460 m. The area is dominated by Q. grisea, although a few morphologically intermediate trees occur as well. The third site (mixed site) occurs 2.0 km farther along the road, as one ascends the mountain, at an elevation of about 2590 m. The area, which crosses a ridge top, is dry and exposed and contains both parental species and a broad array of intermediates. Trees were not sampled randomly; instead, we attempted to obtain several representatives of each morphological type. The fourth site (Monica Saddle) is 2.2 km from the mixed site. The Monica Saddle site is on a north-facing slope at 2760 m in the mixed conifer zone. All oaks at this site are morphologically Q. gambelii. The fifth and highest site was Grassy Lookout, which is 11.6 km from Monica Saddle. Grassy Lookout is on a west-facing ridge at 2895 m in the spruce-fir zone. All oaks at this site are Q. gambelii in appearance. All sampled leaves were stored at -80 [degrees] C prior to isolation of DNA.
TABLE 2. Summary of scoring procedure for the calculation of
character index scores. Each tree was characterized for each
primer. A character state typical of Q. grisea was assigned a score
of -1. A character state typical of Q. gambelii was assigned a score
of +1. The score of a tree could range from -6 to +8.

Primer          Fragment                 Character
             Sequence         size         state       Score

111        AGT AGA CGG G     712 bp        Absent       +1
                             871 bp        Present      +1
                                           Absent       -1

285        GGG CGC CTA G     636 bp        Present      -1
                                           Absent       +1

290        CCG CGA GCA C     906 bp        Present      +1
                                           Absent       -1

438        AGA CGG CCG G     1066 bp       Present      -1
                                           Absent       +1
                             1193 bp       Present      +1

471        CCG ACC GGA A      517 bp       Present      +1
                                           Absent       -1

540        CGG ACC GCG T      926 bp       Present      +1
                                           Absent       -1




To better understand the geographic structure of the zone of sympatry in the San Mateo Mountains, we identified trees as Q. grisea, Q. gambelii, or hybrid on the basis of morphology along a 6.9~km transect stretching down the side of Mount Withington from Monica Saddle to the mouth of Monica Canyon. To sample, we followed Forest road 549, stopping every 0.3 km to visually inspect all accessible oaks that were within 50 m of the stopping point. The trees were categorized as Q. gambelii, Q. grisea, or hybrid based on a suite of morphological characters described by Aguilar and Boecklen (1992). Morphological descriptions of both species can be found in the Appendix.

RAPD Analysis

To identify diagnostic or species-specific RAPD markers we surveyed individuals of Q. grisea and Q. gambelii from isolated populations. "Diagnostic markers" are markers that occur in all individuals of one species and no individuals of a second species. "Species-specific markers" are markers that are unique to one species but not necessarily found in all individuals. Individuals were characterized with 700 10-hp primers. Six primers provided a total of 14 markers that appeared to be specific (or almost specific) to one species or the other. The markers were used to construct character index scores for individuals from sites of allopatry and from sites within the zone of overlap in the San Mateos.

Character index scores provide a good way to visualize the genotypic composition of a population, and hence the level of isolation and gene exchange between two taxa (Howard and Waring 1991). To construct character index scores for the trees characterized via RAPD analysis, a marker specific to Q. grisea (the presence or absence of a particular fragment) was assigned a score of - 1. A marker specific to Q. gambelii was assigned a score of + 1. The character index score of an individual represented the sum of its scores over all six primers (a summary of the scoring procedure can be found in Table 2).

For the RAPD assays, standard DNA extraction procedures for plants were used (Whittemore and Schaal 1991). Genomic DNA was stored in TE solution at -20 [degrees] C. Amplification reactions were performed in volumes of 25 [[micro]liter] containing 5 ng of genomic DNA; 10.4 [[micro]liter] of sterile water; 2.5 [[micro]liter] of 10X amplification buffer; 10.0 [[micro]liter] of a mixture of dNTPs with equal volumes of 1 mM dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP; 1.0 [[micro]liter] of a 10-bp primer (15 ng/[[micro]liter]); and 0.1 [[micro]liter] of DNA taq polymerase (5 units/[[micro]liter]). The thermal cycler was programmed for one cycle of 3 min at 92 [degrees] C (denaturation), 1 rain at 36 [degrees] C (annealing), and 2 min at 72 [degrees] C (extension), followed by 45 cycles of 1 rain at 94 [degrees] C, 1 min at 36 [degrees] C, and 2 rain at 72 [degrees] C. Amplification products were separated by electrophoresis in a 1.4% agarose gel and were detected by staining with ethidium bromide. Bands containing as little as 1 ng of DNA can be detected by direct examination of such a gel in ultraviolet light. The sizes of amplification products were estimated using methods described in Cain and Murray (1994).

Inheritance Patterns of RAPD Markers

We investigated the pattern of inheritance of markers by amplifying the DNA of parental and [F.sub.1] individuals from two hybrid crosses. The first cross was carried out at Monica Canyon, a site between Gaylord's site and the low area. The second cross was performed at the mixed site. We began by stripping male buds from branches of Q. gambelii and bagging the branches with number 6 white paper bags before female flowers became receptive. Pollen from Q. grisea was gathered by picking catkins from a tree and allowing the catkins to dry and dehisce in paper bags for up to 24 hours. To pollinate female flowers, we temporarily removed bags and touched wet stigmatic surfaces with a pollen dipped plasti-filamented touch-up paint brush. The bags were then replaced on the branches until natural pollination was no longer a possibility.

Mature acorns were allowed to fall into protective screens placed around each branch. Acorns were planted in a greenhouse in a 5:1 mixture of standard potting soil (Sunshine Mix; Fison's Horticulture Inc., Bellevue, WA) and native soil. Pots were watered every four days, and temperature was held to a daily maximum of 25.5 [degrees] C. Leaves from seedlings with more than two leaves were sampled four months after planting. Samples were placed on ice for several hours and then frozen at -80 [degrees] C.

Morphological Analysis

We quantified patterns of leaf morphology of trees from the mixed site by haphazardly sampling 10 leaves from each of the 88 trees and measuring perimeter, area, length, width, petiole length, number of lobes, and depth of lobes. We then subsampled three leaves and measured the densities of upper-surface and lower-surface hairs, the number of rays per lower-surface hair, and the number of rays per upper-surface hair. Finally, we calculated means for each tree, and natural-log transformed the means.

We used canonical correlation analysis (Dixon et al. 1990) to test for a linear association between our RAPD markers and the set of morphological variables described above. Canonical correlation analysis is an extension of linear regression and correlation analysis and is a common multivariate technique used to examine patterns of covariation between two sets of variables.
TABLE 3. Frequencies of RAPD fragments in isolated populations of
Q. grisea and Q. gambelii.

                   Q. grisea
                                            Q. gambelii
                             Pelen-
          South     North    cillos                        Black
Primer   Durango   Durango   Mts.     Col.(1)   Chir.(2)   Range

111

n           5         4      11         18         12       11
712        1.00      1.00    1.00      0.16       0.25     0.27
871         -         -       -        0.94       1.00     1.00

285

n           5         4      11         18         12       11
636        1.00      1.00    1.00      0.06        -        -

290

n           5         4      11         18         12       11
906         -         -      0.09      0.94       1.00     0.91

438

n           5         4      11         18         12       11
1066       0.80      1.00    1.00      0.11        -        -
1193        -         -       -        0.61       0.67     0.73

471

n           5         4      11         18         12       11
517         -         -      0.27      1.00       1.00     1.00

540

n           5         4      11         18         12       11
926        0.40       -       -        1.00       1.00     1.00

1 Colorado.

2 Chiricahua Mountains.




RESULTS

The 10-bp primers 111,285,290, 438, 471, and 540 from the University of British Columbia (Biotechnology Laboratory, Vancouver) provided character states (the presence or absence of particular fragments) specific to either Q. grisea or Q. gambelii. The DNA fragments and their frequency of occurrence in isolated populations of the two species are shown in Table 3. To understand how species-specific markers were identified, consider primer 111. Primer 111 provided three markers: (1) an 871-bp fragment unique to isolated Q. gambelii; (2) the absence of this fragment, which was considered unique to isolated populations of Q. grisea (although one Q. gambelii individual from Colorado lacked the fragment); and (3) the absence of a 712-hp fragment, a character state found only in isolated populations of Q. gambelii.

Although some of the so-called species-specific markers were not unique to one species or the other, in most cases the presence of a marker in the "wrong" species was limited to a single population. For example, we considered the 926-bp fragment amplified by primer 540 to be a marker of Q. gambelii, even though it occurred in Q. grisea, because its occurrence was limited to a single population quite distant from the area of sympatry. On the other hand, we did not consider the 712-hp fragment, amplified by primer 111, a Q. grisea marker because it occurred in all three isolated populations of Q. gambelii at moderate frequencies.

From the 14 markers provided by the six primers we constructed character index profiles of each population. The character index score of an individual tree represented the sum of its scores over all six primers. Because there were more Q. gambelii (+ 1) markers than Q. grisea (-1) markers the score of a tree could range from -6 to +8 [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 2 OMITTED]. Scores of trees from the three isolated populations of Q. gambelii ranged from +5 to +8. Scores of trees from the three isolated populations of Q. grisea ranged from -6 to -2. The scores of trees from the mixed population, in which we sampled the full range of morphological types, ranged from -6 to +8, with the majority of scores clustered from -2 to +3. Thus, the character index scores support the contention that extensive hybridization occurs at this site. Because we did not sample randomly at the mixed site, we cannot provide an estimate of the percentage of hybrids in the mixed population. However, 89% of the trees sampled harbored markers of both species and hence showed evidence of mixed ancestry. Table 4 shows the frequency of RAPD fragments in trees sampled at the mixed site, as well as in other populations near or within the zone of sympatry.

Quercus grisea from Gaylord's site, which is 2 km from the mixed site and contains some morphologically intermediate trees, also displayed evidence of mixed ancestry. All but one tree from this site contained markers of both species. Quercus grisea farther from the mixed site also manifested evidence of introgression. At the low site, 80% of the trees had genotypes indicative of mixed ancestry. Despite the evidence of introgression at both sites, the preponderance of markers in most trees were typical of Q. grisea. Indeed, most of the trees from the two sites had character index scores that fell within the range found in isolated populations of Q. grisea [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 2 OMITTED]. This reflects the fact that isolated trees sometimes lacked one or more species-specific markers and occasionally harbored a marker considered typical of the other species.
TABLE 4. Frequencies of RAPD fragments in populations from a zone of
sympatry between Q. grisea and Q. gambelii.

                            Populations

           Low      Gaylord's     Mixed     Monica     Grassy
Primer     site       site        site      Saddle     Lookout

111

n           20         10          88         18         17
712        1.00       1.00        0.68       0.28       0.35
871        0.65       0.10        0.81       1.00       1.00

285

n           20         10          88         18         17
636        1.00       0.90        0.82       0.11       0.12

290

n           20         10          88         18         17
906        0.25       0.60       0.93        1.00       1.00

438

n           20         10          88         18         17
1066       0.95       1.00       0.83          -        0.12
1193        -         -          0.15        0.94       0.59

471

n           20         10          88         18         17
517        0.05       0.30       0.65        1.00       1.00

540

n           20         10          88         18         17
926        0.15       0.60       0.69        1.00       1.00




Quercus gambelii from Monica Saddle and Grassy Lookout showed less evidence of introgression. Eleven percent of the trees sampled from Monica Saddle and 24% of the trees from Grassy Lookout harbored markers of both species and were considered to have mixed ancestry. The character index profiles of these populations closely resembled the character index profiles of isolated Q. gambelii, with only two trees (both from Grassy Lookout) exhibiting scores outside the range seen in isolated populations [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 2 OMITTED]. Thus, gene flow between the two species appears to be asymmetrical. Genomic elements of Q. gambelii occur more frequently in trees that are morphologically Q. grisea than vice versa.

Table 5 displays the phenotypes of the parents and offspring of two crosses between Q. gambelii and Q. grisea. In general, the inheritance patterns of the species-specific RAPD markers of Q. gambelii and Q. grisea could be accommodated within a Mendelian framework that assumes amplified fragments are dominant character states and each fragment represents a different locus. For example, consider primer 285. In the second cross, both parents displayed the 636-bp fragment, as did all 14 offspring. These patterns are consistent with the idea that one or both parents were homozygous for this fragment. In the first cross, only the Q. grisea parent displayed the 636-bp fragment and the fragment occurred in three of 13 offspring. These observations are consistent with the idea that the Q. grisea parent was heterozygous for the 636-bp fragment (Chi-square = 3.769, df = 1, P [greater than] 0.05).
TABLE 5. Fragment patterns of parents and [F.sub.1] individuals in
two crosses between Q. grisea and Q. gambelii. The four trees used
in the crosses were from the zone of sympatry in the San Mateo
Mountains. Quercus grisea was the pollen donor in both crosses.
Numbers in parentheses under the [F.sub.1] column give the number of
offspring displaying a particular fragment pattern.

                       Parents

Cross     Primer     gris      gam             [F.sub.1]

1          111        712       712    712/871(10), 712(1), 871(2)
                      871       871
           285        636        -     636(3), -(10)
           290        -         906    906(13)
           438       1066        -     1066(11), -(2)(a)
           471        -         517    517(12)
           540        -         926    926(13)

2          111        712       871    712/871(6), 712(8)
           285        636       636    636(14)
           290        906       906    906(14)
           438       1066      1066    1066/1193(12), 1066(2)(b)
                               1193
           471        -         517    517(14)
           540        926       926    926(14)

* Statistically significant deviation (P [less than] 0.05) from
random segregation expectations.

* Statistically significant deviation (P [less than] 0.01) from
random segregation expectations.




The patterns of inheritance that could not be accommodated within this framework were those involving primer 438. In the second cross, the female parent exhibited the 1066-bp fragment and the 1193-bp fragment, whereas the male parent displayed only the 1066-bp fragment. All of the offspring exhibited the 1066-bp fragment, and 12 of 14 displayed the 1193-bp fragment. The first result is consistent with the hypothesis that one or both parents were homozygous for the 1066-bp fragment. However, the second result deviates significantly from a model that assumes the female parent was heterozygous for the 1193-bp fragment (Chi-square = 7.14, df = 1, P [less than] 0.01). The patterns of inheritance in the first cross, in which the female parent exhibited neither fragment and the male parent displayed the 1066-bp fragment, suggests that the male parent was heterozygous for the fragment. But again, a greater than expected number of offspring displayed the fragment (Chi-square = 6.230, df = 1, P [less than] 0.05).

The irregular segregation reported here for the products of primer 438 does not preclude the use of this primer in the analysis of the Q. grisea-Q. gambelii hybrid zone. Despite the segregation distortion, all of the phenotypes displayed by the offspring could be inferred to have occurred in the parents. In other words, the banding patterns associated with the primer do not appear to represent artifacts.

Canonical correlation analysis of trees from the mixed site indicated a highly significant linear association between the presence or absence of RAPD markers and the set of morphological variables (Table 6). A single pair of canonical variables was significant (Chi-square = 187.5, df = 88, P [less than] 0.001) and exhibited a canonical correlation of 0.89 [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 3 OMITTED]. The first canonical variable representing leaf morphology chiefly corresponded to decreasing leaf size and increasing numbers of rays per leaf hair, while the first canonical variable representing the RAPD markers largely corresponded to markers generated by four primers: 285 (636-bp fragment); 438 (1066-bp fragment); 111 (712-bp fragment); and 471 (absence of 517-bp fragment) (Table 6). The canonical variable generally ordinated individuals from those resembling Q. gambelii (lower left in [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 3 OMITTED]) to those resembling Q. grisea (upper right in [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 3 OMITTED]).
TABLE 6. Canonical variable (CV) loadings for the set of RAPD
markers and for the set of morphological variables. RAPD markers are
indicated by primer number and fragment size. Variable loadings are
correlations between the canonical variables and the original
variables.

RAPD markers                      Morphological
(primer: fragment)     CV1          variables             CV1

285:636 bp              0.784     Perimeter             -0.953
290:906 bp             -0.225     Area                  -0.890
471:517 bp             -0.682     Length                -0.813
438:1066 bp             0.662     Width                 -0.898
438:1193 bp            -0.354     Petiole length        -0.709
111:871 bp             -0.318     Number of lobes       -0.591
111:712 bp              0.685     Lobe depth            -0.903
540:926 bp             -0.452     Density of hairs      -0.591
                                    (lower surface)
                                  Rays per hair          0.867
                                    (lower surface)
                                  Density of hairs      -0.406
                                    (upper surface)
                                  Rays per hair          0.903
                                    (upper surface)




The set of RAPD markers faithfully represented variation in the set of morphological variables, as all squared multiple correlation coefficients between the morphological variables and the set of RAPD markers were significant (Table 7). The RAPD markers explained over 50% of the variation in leaf area, perimeter, length, width, petiole length, lobe depth, and rays per leaf hair (see R.sup.2 column, Table 7). The morphological variables with the weakest associations with RAPD markers were numbers of lobes, density of lower surface hairs, and density of upper surface hairs. RAPD markers explained approximately 35% of the variation in the first two variables and approximately 19% of the variation in the last variable (Table 7).

The set of morphological variables significantly predicted the presence or absence of some RAPD markers, but not others (Table 7). For example, the set of morphological variables explained approximately 39-53% (P [less than] 0.001) of the variation in the presence of the 636-bp fragment amplified by primer 285, the 517-bp fragment amplified by primer 471, and the 712-bp fragment amplified by primer 111. However, the set of morphological variables explained less than 16% (P [greater than] 0.32) of the variation in the presence of the 906-bp fragment amplified by primer 290.

The fact that RAPDs and morphology generally agree with regard to the identification of Q. gambelii, Q. grisea, and hybrids means that it is reasonable to rely on morphology to assess the structure of the zone of contact between the two taxa on the slopes of Mount Withington. Table 8 shows the taxonomic composition of oaks at sites along a 6.9-km transect stretching from Monica Saddle near the top of the mountain to Monica Canyon at the base of the mountain. Quercus gambelii clearly predominates at sites near the top and Q. grisea clearly predominates at sites near the base. In between, the two species form a mosaic with Q. grisea predominating on open, south-facing slopes, and Q. gambelii predominating on north-facing slopes and in draws. Wherever the two species occur together, intermediates also occur, but hybrids do not appear to outnumber morphologically "pure" individuals at any of the sites surveyed.
TABLE 7. Squared multiple correlations between each morphological
variable and the set of RAPD markers, and between each RAPD marker
and the set of morphological variables.

Morphological
variable             [R.sup.2]   [F.sub.8,74]             P

Perimeter              0.724        24.27       [less than] 0.001

Area                   0.655        17.55       [less than] 0.001

Length                 0.556        11.57       [less than] 0.001

Width                  0.666        18.47       [less than] 0.001

Petiole length         0.513         9.75       [less than] 0.001

Number of lobes        0.350         4.96       [less than] 0.001

Lobe depth             0.663        18.16       [less than] 0.001

Density of hairs       0.346         4.89       [less than] 0.001
(lower surface)

Rays per hair         0.618         14.98       [less than] 0.001
(lower surface)

Density of hairs      0.190          2.17                  -0.040
(upper surface)

Rays per hair         0.651         17.25       [less than] 0.001
(upper surface)

RAPD marker
(primer: fragment)   [R.sup.2]   [F.sub.11,71]            P

285:636 bp             0.533         7.38       [less than] 0.001
290:906 bp             0.154         1.17                   0.328
471:517 bp             0.482         6.01       [less than] 0.001
438:1066 bp            0.385         4.04       [less than] 0.001
438:1193 bp            0.221         1.83                   0.085
111:871 bp             0.226         1.88                   0.078
111:712 bp             0.456         5.40       [less than] 0.001
540:926 bp             0.236         1.99                   0.060
TABLE 8. The percentage of Q. grisea, Q. gambelii, and hybrids
present at a series of sites extending from Monica Saddle near the
top of Mount Withington to the base of the mountain. Sites are
separated by 0.3 km. All accessible trees (to a maximum of 20)
within 50 meters of the stopping point were examined and categorized
on the basis of a suite of morphological characters.

                               % hy-
Site     n    % gam   % gris   brids   Description of site

Monica   20    100       -       -     North-facing slope

0.3 km   20    100       -       -     East by northeast-facing
                                       slope

0.6 km   20    100       -       -     East-facing slope

0.9 km   20    100       -       -     North side of draw

1.2 km   20     55      10      35     East-facing slope

1.5 km   20     15      60      25     East by southeast-facing
                                       slope

1.8 km    0     -        -       -     East by southeast-facing
                                       slope

2.1 km   20     90       -      10     Northeast-facing slope
                                       (within 100 m of
                                       southern border of
                                       mixed site)

2.4 km   20     30      20      50     East by northeast-facing
                                       slope (on northern bor-
                                       der of mixed site)

2.7 km   20      75      -      25     North-facing slope

3.0 km   20     90       -      10     North to south-facing
                                       outcrop

3.3 km    1    100       -       -     Southeast-facing slope

3.6 km    1     -       100      -     Southeast-facing slope

3.9 km   20    100       -       -     North by northeast-fac-
                                       ing slope

4.2 km    0     -        -       -     Southeast-facing ridge

4.5 km   20    100       -       -     North-facing slope

4.8 km    6     -       100      -     Southeast-facing slope

5.1 km    9     -        78     22     South-facing slope

5.4 km    9     -        89     11     Northeast by east-facing
                                       slope

5.7 km    0     -        -       -     Southeast-facing, almost
                                       flat

6.0 km    0     -        -       -     Almost flat

6.3 km    0     -        -       -     Almost flat

6.6 km    0     -        -       -     Almost flat

6.9 km   11     -       73      27     Almost flat




DISCUSSION

Quercus grisea and Q. gambelii are clearly quite similar genetically. In our survey of 700 10-bp primers, only six provided character states that were consistently associated with one species or the other. We hasten to note that many primers failed to amplify any DNA fragments and others amplified poorly and inconsistently. Moreover, we ignored some potentially diagnostic markers because the intensity of banding was weak. Therefore, six of 700 should not be interpreted as a genetic distance measure. Nevertheless, the two species were similar genetically and this similarity contrasts rather sharply with their morphological distinctness and their placement in separate subsections of the white oaks. The small number of species-specific markers tends to support the inference of Stebbins (1950) that the number of genes that differ between species of oaks is considerably smaller than is the case with most other plant species. Stebbins based this inference on the finding, unusual among plants, that trees resembling parentals could be recovered from the progeny of hybrid oaks, even when the number of progeny was quite small. Electrophoretic data also support Stebbins - genetic distances between species of oaks tend to be relatively small (Guttman and Weigt 1989; Kim et al. 1993).

Although the number of markers that separate Q. gambelii and Q. grisea is relatively small, the fact that these markers demonstrated geographic consistency indicates that each species is distinct and each has some genetic cohesion. Perhaps the most compelling evidence for the cohesion of the species emerges from a consideration of their genetic interactions in the San Mateo Mountains. At the mixed site, on the north side of Mount Withington, both parentals as well as a full suite of intermediate individuals occur, according to the genetic as well as morphological evidence [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURES 2, 3 OMITTED]. Moreover, other morphologically intermediate trees occur at numerous sites along a transect stretching from Monica Saddle to Monica Canyon (Table 8). Despite the hybridization, trees that appear to be 'pure' on the basis of morphology predominate at most sampling sites on Mount Withington. Moreover, the character index scores of these trees based on RAPD genotypes, with only a few exceptions, fall within the range of scores found in isolated populations of Q. grisea and Q. gambelii [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 2 OMITTED]. As suggested by this finding, the correspondence between morphological variables and genetic markers is quite high among trees from the mixed site (canonical correlation of 0.89), and the degree of intermediacy in morphological characters agrees well with the degree of intermediacy in RAPD markers [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 3 OMITTED].

Although both Q. grisea and Q. gambelii remain distinct in areas of sympatry, evidence of introgression exists. By this we mean that individuals that appear to be pure species on the basis of morphology harbor RAPD markers characteristic of the other species. This is particularly true of Q. grisea. At Gaylord's site, which is near the mixed site and at which some morphologically intermediate trees occur, all but one Q. grisea harbored at least one RAPD marker typical of Q. gambelii. The markers present were more than a small subset of Q. gambelii markers. Every marker considered unique to Q. gambelii occurred in at least one individual, with the exception of the 1193-bp fragment amplified by primer 438 (Table 4).

Even at a site lacking intermediate individuals (the low site), the majority of Q. grisea harbored one or more markers associated with Q. gambelii. However, the array of introgressant markers was smaller than at Gaylord's site. Absent, or largely absent, was the 1193-bp fragment amplified by primer 438, as well as Q. gambelii character states associated with primers 285 and 471 (Table 4). These results indicate that some Q. gambelii RAPD markers do not flow across the Q. grisea species boundary with the facility of others.

Introgression appears to be more limited in Q. gambelii. Eleven percent of individuals sampled from Monica Saddle and 24% of individuals from Grassy Lookout harbored markers of Q. grisea. The introgressant markers were limited to two primers, 285 and 438 (Table 4). It is of interest that these were two of the three primers that gave little evidence of gene flow in the opposite direction. The asymmetry in gene flow between the two species may reflect the remnants of past hybridization as Q. grisea moved up the slopes of Mount Withington with the gradual drying out of the southwestern United States (Van Devender and Spaulding 1979). Alternatively, Q. grisea markers or genes closely linked to them, may be more strongly selected against in Q. gambelii, than are Q. gambelii markers in Q. grisea.

Lack of evidence for extensive marker exchange between Q. gambelii and Q. grisea is consistent with studies of nuclear gene markers in other oak species (Guttman and Weigt 1989; Ducousso et al. 1993) and stands in contrast to patterns of variation in chloroplast DNA in white oaks from the eastern United States. Whittemore and Schaal (1991) reported that a cladogram derived from chloroplast DNA polymorphisms among five white oak species was concordant not with species boundaries, but with the geographical locations of the populations. They noted that the same species were well differentiated morphologically, isozymically, and with regard to a ribosomal DNA marker. The latter results, as well as the results reported here, suggest that, among white oaks, nuclear DNA is not exchanged as freely as organellar DNA.

The abrupt genetic and morphological discontinuity between Q. gambelii and Q. grisea, despite areas of hybridization, indicates that selection acts to maintain coadapted complexes of alleles in the two species. Whether these alleles are spread throughout the genome, or localized in a few regions, is not clear. But it should be noted that the genetic similarity of the two taxa may reflect the long-term effects of introgression and may be an indication that the co-adapted alleles are quite localized.

Although hybrid zones are often interpreted as clines (Barton and Hewitt 1985), an ever-increasing number of empirical studies describe zones in which patterns of variation do not resemble simple monotonic clines (Harrison 1986; Howard 1986; Rand and Harrison 1989; Howard and Waring 1991; Shoemaker et al. 1994). Instead, these mosaic zones are characterized by patches of pure species populations and mixed populations scattered across a zone of overlap. This broken pattern of distribution can be considered prima facie evidence for the importance of environmental gradients in determining the position, width, and maintenance of the zone (Barton and Hewitt 1985).

The zone of overlap between Q. grisea and Q. gambelii in the San Mateo Mountains of New Mexico can be added to the list of mosaic hybrid zones. There is not a gradual transition from Q. gambelii to Q. grisea as one moves down the northeastern slope of Mount Withington. Rather the distribution of the two taxa and hybrids is decidedly patchy, with sites where Q. grisea predominate sometimes occurring above sites where Q. gambelli predominate (Table 8). In general, Q. grisea appear to be associated with drier sites facing the southeast and Q. gambelii appear to be associated with more mesic sites facing the northeast (Table 8). This pattern is consistent with the habitat association patterns of the two taxa outside areas of overlap and suggests that mosaicism within the zone of sympatry reflects mosaicism in the environment.

At virtually all sites where Q. grisea and Q. gambelii coexist in the San Mateo Mountains, morphologically intermediate individuals occur as well. At most sites, hybrids represent a minority of the population, but occasionally they predominate (e.g., at the mixed site in this study). Despite the varying levels of hybridization, the two taxa tend to remain distinct both within and outside areas of sympatry. The factors responsible for this genetic isolation remain unclear. Selection may play a role, but other factors, such as conspecific pollen precedence (Williams, unpubl. data), may also be important.

The lines between oak species are often presumed to be quite fuzzy by the biological community, but our results suggest that oak species that hybridize in nature can remain distinct over at least part of their genomes. These results are in accord with other genetic studies of oaks (Bacilieri et al. 1993) and indicate that oaks may not represent a greater challenge to traditional concepts of species than many other plant and animal taxa that form hybrid zones with close relatives.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank R. Spellenberg and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. This research was supported by National Science Foundation grant BSR-9208109 to WJB and DJH.

LITERATURE CITED

AAS, G. 1993. Taxonomical impact of morphological variation in Quercus robur and Q. petraea: A contribution to the hybrid controversy. Ann. Sci. For. Suppl. 1 (Paris) 50:107s-113s.

AGUILAR, E M., AND W. J. BOECKLEN. 1992. Patterns of herbivory in the Quercus grisea x Quercus gambelii species complex. Oikos 64:498-504.

ANDERSON, E. 1949. Introgressive hybridization. Wiley, New York.

ARNOLD, M. L. 1997. Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

BACILIERI, R., G. ROUSSEL., AND A. DUCOUSSO. 1993. Hybridization and mating system in a mixed stand of sessile and pedunculate oak. Ann. Sci. For. Suppl. 1 (Paris) 50:122s-127s.

BARTON, N.H., AND K. S. GALE. 1993. Genetic analysis of hybrid zones. Pp. 13-45 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

BARTON, N.H., AND G. M. HEWITT. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:113-148.

BOECKLEN, W. J., AND R. SPELLENBERG. 1990. Structure of herbivore communities in two oak (Quercus spp.) hybrid zones. Oecologia 85:92-100.

BUTLIN, R. 1989. Reinforcement of premating isolation. Pp. 158179 in D. Otte and J. A. Endler, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.

CAIN, M. L., AND L. W. MURRAY. 1994. Non-linear regression models to estimate the size of DNA fragments. Comp. Appl. Biosci. 10:677-680.

COTTAM, W. P., J. M. TUCKER, AND F. S. SANTAMOUR. 1982. Oak Hybridization at the University of Utah. State Arboretum of Utah Publ. No. 1. Salt Lake City, UT.

DEPAMPHILIS, C. W., AND a. WYATT. 1990. Electrophoretic confirmation of interspecific hybridization in Aesculus (Hippocastanaceae)and the genetic structure of a broad hybrid zone. Evolution 44:1295-1317.

DIXON, W. J., M. B. BROWN, L. ENGELMAN, AND R. I. JENNICH, EDS. 1990. MDP Statistical software manual. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.

DUCOUSSO, A., H. MICHAUD, AND R. LUMARET. 1993. Reproduction and gene flow in the genus Quercus L. Ann. Sci. For. Suppl. 1 (Paris) 50:91s-106s.

FEDER, J. H. 1979. Natural hybridization and genetic divergence between the toads Bufo boreas and Bufo punctatus. Evolution 33:1089-1097.

FLOATE, K. D., AND T. G. WHITHAM. 1993. The 'hybrid bridge' hypothesis: Host shifting via plant hybrid swarms. Am. Nat. 141: 651-662.

-----. 1994. Aphid-ant interaction reduces chrysomelid herbivory in a cottonwood hybrid zone. Oecologia 97:215-221.

GAYLORD, E. S., R. W. PRESZLER, AND W. J. BOECKLEN. 1996. Interactions between host plants, endophytic fungi, and a phytophagous insect in an oak (Quercus grisea x Q. gambelii) hybrid zone. Oecologia 105:336-342.

GUTTMAN, S. I., AND L. A. WEIGT. 1989. Electrophoretic evidence of relationships among Quercus (oaks) of eastern North America. Can. J. Bot. 67:339-351.

HARRISON, R. G. 1986. Pattern and process in a narrow hybrid zone. Heredity 56:337-349.

-----. 1990. Hybrid zones: Windows on evolutionary process. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 7:69-128.

-----. 1993. Hybrids and hybrid zones: Historical Perspective. Pp. 3-12 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

HARRISON, R. G., AND D. M. RAND. 1989. Mosaic hybrid zones and the nature of species boundaries. Pp. 111-133 in D. Otte and J. Endler, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.

HOWARD, D.J. 1983. Electrophoretic survey of eastern North American Allonemobius (Orthoptera: Gryllidae): Evolutionary relationships and the discovery of three new species. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 76:1014-1021.

-----. 1986. A zone of overlap and hybridization between two ground cricket species. Evolution 40:34-43.

-----. 1993. Reinforcement: The origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. Pp. 46-69 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

HOWARD, D. J., AND G. L. WARING. 1991. Topographic diversity, zone width, and the strength of reproductive isolation in a zone of overlap and hybridization. Evolution 45:1120-1135.

JONES, E. W. 1959. Biological flora of the British Isles: Quercus L. J. Ecol. 47:169-222.

KIM, Z. S., S. W. LEE, AND J. O. HYUN. 1993. Allozyme variation in six native oak species in Korea. Ann. Sci. For. Suppl. 1 (Paris) 50:253-260.

LITTLE, E. L., JR. 1976. Atlas of United States trees. Minor Hardwoods. US Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publication 1314.

MARTINSEN, G. D., AND T G. WHITHAM. 1994. More birds nest in hybrid cottonwood trees. Wilson Bull. 106:474-481.

MULLER, C. H. 1952. Ecological control of hybridization in Quercus: A factor in the mechanism of evolution. Evolution 6:147161.

NIXON, K. C. 1993. Infrageneric classification of Quercus (Fagaceae) and typification of sectional names. Ann. Sci. For. Suppl. 1 (Paris) 50:25s-34s.

PALMER, E. J. 1948. Hybrid oaks of North America. J. Arnold Arbor. Harv. Univ. 29:1-48.

PATTON, J. L., J. C. HAFNER, AND M. E SMITH. 1979. Hybrid zones in Thomomys bottae pocket gophers: Genetic, phenetic, and ecologic concordance patterns. Evolution 33:860-876.

RAND, D. M., AND R. O. HARRISON. 1989. Ecological genetics of a mosaic hybrid zone: Mitochondrial, nuclear, and reproductive differentiation of crickets by soil type. Evolution 43:432-449.

RIESEBERG, L. H. 1995. The role of hybridization in evolution: Old wine in new skins. Am. J. Bot. 82:944-953.

RIESEBERG, L. H., AND J. E WENDEL. 1993. Introgression and its consequences in plants. Pp. 70-109 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.

RIESEBERG, L. H., S. ZONA, L. ABERBOM, AND W.D. MARTIN. 1989. Hybridization in the island endemic, Catalina mahogany. Conserv. Biol. 3:52-58.

RIESEBERG, L. H., H. C. CHOI, AND D. HAM. 1991. Differential cytoplasmic versus nuclear introgression in Helianthus. J. Hered. 82:489-493.

RUSHTON, B. S. 1993. Natural hybridization within the genus Quercus L. Ann. Sci. For. Suppl. 1 (Paris) 50:73s-90s.

SHOEMAKER, D. D., K. G. ROSS, AND M. L. ARNOLD 1994. Development of RAPD markers in 2 introduced fire ants, Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri, and their application to the study of a hybrid zone. Mol. Ecol. 3:531-539.

SPELLENBERG, R. 1995. On the hybrid nature of Quercus basaseachicensis (Fagaceae, Sect. Quercus). Sida 16:427-437.

STEBBINS, G. L., JR. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

STEBBINS, G. L., E. B. MATZKE, AND C. EPLING. 1947. Hybridization in a population of Quercus marilandica and Q. ilicifolia. Evolution 1:79-88.

STUCKY, J. M. 1985. Pollination systems of syrupattic Ipomoea hederacea and Ipomoea purpurea and the significance of interspecific pollen flow. Am. J. Bot. 72:32-43.

TRELEASE, W. 1924. The American oaks. Mem. Nat. Acad. Sci. 20:1-255.

TUCKER, J. M. 1961. Studies in the Quercus undulata complex I. A preliminary statement. Am. J. Hot. 48:202-208.

VAN DEVENDER, T. R., AND W. G. SPAULDING. 1979. Development of vegetation and climate in the southwestern United States. Science 204:701-710.

VAN VALEN, L. 1976. Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon 25:233-239.

WHITHAM, T. G. 1989. Plant hybrid zones as sinks for pests. Science 244:1490-1493.

WHITHAM, T. G., P. A. MOROW, AND B. M. POTTS. 1994. Plant hybrid zones as centers of biodiversity: The herbivore community of two endemic Tasmanian eucalypts. Oecologia 97:481490.

WHITTEMORE, A.T. AND B. A. SCHAAL. 1991. Interspecific gene flow in sympatric oaks. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 88:25402544.

APPENDIX

Quercus gambelii is a tree composed of multiple raTers that are 1.85.0 m tall. Leaves are winter deciduous, green, 6.0-11.0 cm long, 3.06.0 cm wide, obovate, heavily lobed, shiny and minutely stellate on the upper surface, and dull green and scarcely stellate on the lower surface. Quercus grisea is a shrub composed of multiple raTers that are 0.31.5 m tall. Leaves are evergreen (or under extreme conditions deciduous), leathery, pale green, 2.0-4.0 cm long, 1.0-1.5 cm wide. lanceolate or oblong, entire, sometimes wavy, dull and moderately stellate on the upper surface, and densely covered with stellate pubescence on the lower surface. The F.sub.1 hybrid Q. undulata Torr. is a shrub composed of multiple ramets that are 1.0-2.5 m tall. Leaves, which wither and brown in the winter but are retained for varying amounts of time, are dull green or pale green, 3.5-5.5 cm long, 1.5-2.5 cm wide, obovate to oblong, slightly lobed to serrate, sublustrous to dull and scarcely to moderately stellate on the upper surface, and dull green and moderately stellate to pale green and densely covered with stellate pubescence on the lower surface.
COPYRIGHT 1997 Society for the Study of Evolution
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1997 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Howard, Daniel J.; Preszler, Ralph W.; Williams, Joseph; Fenchell, Sandra; Boecklen, William J
Publication:Evolution
Date:Jun 1, 1997
Words:7648
Previous Article:The effect of inbreeding in diploid and tetraploid population of Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceau): implications for the genetic basis of...
Next Article:Models of reticulate evolution in the coral genus Acropora based on chromosome numbers: parallels with plants.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |