Printer Friendly

How Does the Knowledge of Subgroup Membership of Examinees Affect the Prediction of True Subscores? Research Report. ETS RR-11-43.

To read the full text of this article, click here: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED528982

Subscores are reported for several operational assessments. Haberman (2008) suggested a method based on classical test theory to determine if the true subscore is predicted better by the corresponding subscore or the total score. Researchers are often interested in learning how different subgroups perform on subtests. Stricker (1993) and Livingston and Rupp (2004) found that the mean difference between the subgroups was not the same for the different subscores. We suggest new methods to investigate whether the quality of prediction of the true subscore improves if the investigator knows about the subgroup membership. We applied our suggested method to data from 4 operational testing programs. We found that the quality of prediction of the true subscore does not improve if the investigator knows the subgroup membership. We also found that whether the subscores have value added does not depend on the subgroups. (Contains 7 tables, 10 figures and 3 notes.)

COPYRIGHT 2011 U.S. Department of Education
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Haberman, Shelby J.; Sinharay, Sandip
Publication:ERIC: Reports
Article Type:Author abstract
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Nov 22, 2011
Words:219
Previous Article:Computer Games Functioning as Motivation Stimulants.
Next Article:New Hampshire Charter Schools Parent Study 2011.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |