Printer Friendly

Horowitz, Irving Louis. Hannah Arendt: Radical Conservative.

HOROWITZ, Irving Louis. Hannah Arendt: Radical Conservative. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2012. 100 pp. Cloth, $29.95--Irving Horowitz's Hannah Arendt: Radical Conservative collects into one volume eight essays and reviews that he wrote over a span of several decades (1964-2012). Taken together, these essays offer both an outline and a defense of Arendt's thought, as well as an argument for the import of her contribution. "There are few people who in their writings and person could face with such clear determination the highs and lows of European Civilization in the last century. Hannah Arendt serves as a metaphor for all of that." As he critiques her critics, Horowitz presents an account of Arendt as a political philosopher, "a severe rationalist," "a dedicated ... writer about specifically Jewish causes," "an advocate of German values," "a person whose very name is identified with anti-Nazism," and "a single-minded crusty advocate of the measured uses of power in a world of fanatics and ideologues." His goal is to convey to the reader Arendt's "monumental contribution" to "the world of political affairs" and to "the world of real philosophical discoveries."

The book consists of three parts. Chapters one and two address some of the more personal criticisms that have been leveled against Arendt: that, in writing of the Holocaust, she "blames the victim" rather than the Nazis (chapter one), and that she is simply a "child of Heidegger," a mistress and acolyte, rather than a thinker in her own right (chapter two). Chapters three through seven offer discussions of particular works, interlaced with examinations of what kind of thinker Arendt was: chapter three explains and defends The Origins of Totalitarianism as well as Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (for which choice of subtitle Arendt has been excoriated); chapter four examines On Revolution, and chapter six discusses The Life of the Mind; chapters five and seven present arguments for why Arendt is properly understood as a political philosopher. Chapter eight offers a synopsis and conclusion to the volume as a whole, placing Arendt in context for the past, present, and future.

Throughout the book, Horowitz returns repeatedly to Arendt's signal achievement: her understanding of totalitarianism. "Arendt's theoretical construct of totalitarianism united party structure and government, and the brutality of modern dictatorship." What Arendt saw, and articulated, was that "totalitarianism concerns an illicit fusion of power and personality." While many have pointed to the differences between Nazism and Communism, Arendt understood that beneath the differences lay a very real similarity. In The Origins of Totalitarianism, argues Horowitz, Arendt saw the "differences between National-Socialism and Communism as of lesser significance than the organizational and cultural linkages that such systems have with each other." These linkages include "single-party politics based on mass mobilization" and "a nearly insatiable desire to expand from nation to empire."

Because Arendt examined Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia as "a philosopher of political systems" rather than as sociologist or historian, she understood genocide not "as a special property of Germans or Austrians (or any other people)" but rather as going hand in hand with totalitarianism. "The single-most important element in The Origins of Totalitarianism as it pertains to genocide is the idea that the prospects for mass murder ... are embodied in the structure of totalitarianism as a system rather than the special national characteristics of any particular people" claims Horowitz. "She saw and understood in her heart and soul the unified nature of political evil as wrapped in the word totalitarianism." It was because of this understanding that Arendt argued that "the physical extermination of the Jewish people was a crime against humanity, perpetrated upon the body of the Jewish people, one instance of many "in the long history of human savagery," rather than a unique event.

For students of political philosophy, as well as for those who are mildly familiar with Arendt's work and have wondered if they should study her further, Horowitz's book offers a compelling apologia and overview of Arendt's key works and thought, an argument for why she should continue to be read and studied. The one jarring element for this reader was the surprisingly large number of typographic errors.--Evanthia Speliotis, Bellarmine University.
COPYRIGHT 2013 Philosophy Education Society, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2013 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Speliotis, Evanthia
Publication:The Review of Metaphysics
Article Type:Book review
Date:Mar 1, 2013
Words:697
Previous Article:Falque, Emannuel. The Metamorphohosis of Finitude: An Essay on Birth and Resurrection.
Next Article:Kitcher, Philip. The Ethical Project.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters