Hindu Mahasabha suggests 3 names as mediators in Ayodhya title dispute case.
New Delhi [India], Mar 6 (ANI): After the Supreme Court asked the parties in Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute case to suggest the name of a mediator or panel of mediators, Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha (ABHP) on Wednesday suggested three names for mediators-- Ex-Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dipak Misra, former CJI Jagdish Singh Khehar and former SC Judge A K Patnaik.
A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoisaid the parties concerned could suggest the name of a mediator or panel of mediators who could be considered if it decides to refer the matter formediation.
Earlier in the day, theSupreme Court reserved its order on the issue of referring Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute case to court-appointed and monitoredmediationfor a "permanent solution".
A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said, "We intend to pass the order soon."
After the hearing, Vishnu Shankar Jain, the lawyer of Hindu Mahasabha, said, "The Supreme Court reserved the order onmediation. TheHinduMahasabha has taken a clear stand on thatmediationcannot happen since it is Lord Ram's land and public notice has to be issued. While (advocate) Rajeev Dhavan and Nirmohi Akhada agreed onmediation, otherHinduparties, includingHinduMahasabha and Ram Lalla Virajmaan, clearly stated thatmediationshould not be attempted."
"Justice Bobde had said that this is a matter of faith for the people. If a public notice is issued, then every individual will be called formediationand the case could be further delayed," he added.
The bench had on February 26 had suggested an amicable resolution in the case through mediation and reserved its order for March 6. The bench, which also comprised Justices SA Bobde, DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, had told the parties, "We're seriously giving a chance formediation."
During today's hearing, Justice Bobde said, "There need not be one mediator but a panel of mediators. When themediationis on, it should not be reported on. It may not be a gag, but no motive should be attributed to anyone when themediationprocess is on."
WhileMuslimside and Nimrohi Akhada from theHinduside in the case agreed formediation, the counsel appearing for deity Ram Lalla Virajman, Akhil BharatHindu Mahasabha and Mahant Suresh Das were opposed to it saying court-appointed mediation had failed on earlier occasions.
The bench had recorded that apart from Nirmohi Akhada, Hindu sides in the case were not agreeable to mediation and that it could invoke its power under Section 89 of Civil Procedure Code for alternate dispute mechanism.
"We are considering a possibility of healing relationship," the bench had observed.
There are fourteen appeals before the top court against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgment trifurcating the disputed site at Ayodhyafor Ram Lalla, Nimrohi Akhara and the original Muslim litigant.
Several other appeals have also been filed in the court relating to the issue. (ANI)
Copyright [c] 2019 aninews.in All rights reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. ( Syndigate.info ).
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Asian News International|
|Date:||Mar 6, 2019|
|Previous Article:||AP: Farmers protest against power grid construction, demand adequate compensation.|
|Next Article:||Every drop of my blood, every breath, every second is for India and its 130 crore people: PM Modi.|