Printer Friendly

Hillary vs. sharks.

Upon reading the blurb at the bottom of the page detailing how you might plan to properly take a picture of Hillary Clinton about to get eaten by a shark (Pistolsmithing, Sept/Oct) I was appalled at the flippant attitude with which Hillary's potential drowning and consequent devouring by the shark was approached. Anyone would know, you obviously go for the clearest picture you can get, and I'm appalled you would even discuss a "blurry action shot" as being a good idea. At least you didn't stoop to even joke about throwing a life preserver. That would be crossing the line. I mean, who'd ever even contemplate that idea? If you had, I'd cancel my subscription--if I wasn't required by union by laws to have one. Please make my Hawaiian shirt in 3x at least!

Joe Diaz

Via e-mail

COPYRIGHT 2008 Publishers' Development Corporation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:SPEAK OUT: YOUR FORUM TO PONTIFICATE, PONDER AND PROBE
Author:Diaz, Joe
Publication:American Handgunner
Article Type:Letter to the editor
Date:Jan 1, 2008
Words:139
Previous Article:The old guys.
Next Article:I'm not runnin': so forget about it, okay?

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters