High cost of devolution.
The North East is represented in Parliament by a large number of Labour MPs, including the Prime Minister, several MPs who were previously Cabinet Ministers, and we therefore have a substantial voice in Westminster.
If this voice is not being heard then surely the criticism should be of the representatives, not to set up a separate body with all the ongoing costs which supporters of the Assembly will not disclose at the moment.
However, the article by Bill Jamieson on the costs of the Scottish Parliament make interesting reading. One wonders what would have been the reaction of Scottish voters for devolution if they had known what costs they were going to be involved and the resulting bureaucracy.
J HENDERSON, Ashleigh Grove, Tynemouth.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Evening Chronicle (Newcastle, England)|
|Date:||Jun 30, 2003|
|Previous Article:||Mayor's barge was a rare delight.|
|Next Article:||USA's courts too powerful.|
|You can't have your news.|
|netprophet: Football sites that hit the net.|
|Record View; Costs could demolish devolution.|
|Wilson quits to back assembly.|
|74% of businesses say no to assembly.|
|Scottish Parliament can change the law.|