Hexaprotodon (Mammalia: Hippopotamidae) from the Pinjor Formation of Bhimber, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan.
The Siwalik Plio-Pleistocene faunas are characterized by the sporadic presence of a hippopotamid taxon, referred to the genus Hexaprotodon and the species Hex. sivalensis. Due to rarity of this taxon, its morphological characters are incompletely known. Hippopotamid material recently excavated in the middle Pleistocene locality of Bhimber (Azad Kashmir, Pakistan) includes an almost complete mandible that provides a better knowledge of the taxon morphology. Hexaprotodon sivalensis is reported for the first time from the Bhimber Pleistocene locality of Azad Kashmir, Pakistan.
Palaeontology, Hippopotamids, Pliocene, Pleistocene, Siwaliks.
Fossil mammal remains are very abundant in the Siwalik Group (Colbert, 1935; Akhtar, 1992; Khan et al., 2010, 2012, 2015, 2016, 2017), and most notably in the Pleistocene deposits of the Upper Siwalik Subgroup. The Pleistocene mammalian faunas represent the end of the record of the Siwalik vertebrate faunas (Nanda, 2002, 2008; Dennell et al., 2006, 2008; Dennell, 2008). The Pinjor Formation (Pleistocene) yielded the geologically youngest fauna of the Siwaliks, including Proamphibos, Bubalus, Boselaphus, Indoredunca, Axis, Elephas, Stegodon, Rhinoceros, Sivatherium and Equus (Colbert, 1935; Akhtar, 1992; Nanda, 2002; Basu, 2004; Ghaffar et al., 2012, 2017).
Hippopotamid fossils are rare in the Upper Siwalik Subgroup of the Indian subcontinent. Falconer and Cautley (1836) described Hexaprotodon as a subgenus for the Siwalik primitive hippopotamids of the subcontinent, and Owen (1845) elevated Hexaprotodon to genus rank. Hexaprotodon comprises most of the extinct Eurasian and African species, and one extant Liberian species Hex. liberiensis. Hexaprotodon sivalensis is the only species recorded so far from the Siwalik Group of Pakistan (Lydekker, 1884; Colbert, 1935; Hooijer, 1950). The oldest record of the Siwalik hippopotamid dates from the boundary of the late Miocene - early Pliocene boundary and comes from the Tatrot Formation (Barry et al., 2002).
This article describes a mandible of a primitive hippopotamid, the first such specimen belonging to the group to be discovered from the Pleistocene deposits of the Bhimber locality, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan (Fig. 1). The aim of the present work is to present a descriptive account of the hippopotamid material from the Pinjor Formation in the Bhimber district, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan. As the specimen is complete, it provides additional information about the anatomy of Hex. sivalensis. Since earlier reports on the fossil hippopotamids from the Siwalik Group were merely based on a brief description (Colbert, 1935). The recovery of new material from the Bhimber locality provides an opportunity to present a more comprehensive description of Hex. sivalensis.
Hippopotamidae Gray, 1821
Hexaprotodon Falconer and Cautley, 1836
Hexaprotodon sivalensis Falconer and Cautley, 1836
BMNH M2269, a partial skull.
Like Hippopotamus amphibius, but with six incisors of subequal size. First premolar large, brain case relatively small, well developed sagittal crest, lachrymal in contact with orbit but separated from nasal by an extension of the frontal. The anterior premolars diverge from each other (Colbert, 1935, p. 279).
Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, Indonesia and Ethiopia (Lydekker, 1884; Colbert, 1935; Hooijer, 1950; Boisserie and White, 2004; Siddiq, 2015).
Late Miocene - Pleistocene (Colbert, 1935; Barry et al., 2002).
AZKB 01, a mandible with incisors, canines, premolars and molars (AZKB-Azad Jammu and Kashmir, district Bhimber).
The specimen has been stored in the house of Master Riaz, a schoolteacher from Bhimber, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan who was so kind to allow us the publication.
Kas Chanater, district Bhimber, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan (Fig. 1). The outcrops consist of pale-pinkish to brown claystone, brown gray siltstone and fine to medium grained siltstones (Dennell et al., 2006).
Horizon and age
Upper Siwalik Subgroup, Pinjor Formation; middle Pleistocene, ca 1.8 Ma (Dennell et al., 2006).
The mandibular corpus is relatively thick, robust and the anterior root of the ascending ramus originates opposite to m3. The mandibular corpus height increases posteriorly. The mandibular symphysis is wide and massive, with strong incisor alveolar process (Fig. 2A, B). The symphyseal plane is inclined sagitally. The symphysis is higher posteriorly. The symphysis sagittal section is robust. Laterally, the ramus height is gradually decreased (Fig. 2C). The gonial angle of the mandible is well developed and bears no hook. The canine process is comparatively compact. The canine has a shallow lingual groove. The canine and incisors are placed in sub-rectilinear pattern with a short diastema. The premolar row is almost equal in length to the molar row (Fig. 2D, E).
Table I.- Mandible Measurements (in mm) of Hex. sivalensis from the Pinjor Formation of Bhimber, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan. The measurements follow Rakotovao et al. (2014).
Caudal Gonion Infradentale###547
Caudal Gonion Alveolus###529
Body height at m3###138
Body height at m1###144
Body height at p2###152
External Width canine teeth###415
Width mesial level p1###120
Width distal level m3###100
Grand Canine diameter###56.0
Alveolus diameter i2###40.0
Alveolus diameter i3###48.0
Smallest mandible width###207
Height of vertical ramus###241
Length of right mandible###249
Length of left mandible###249
Most of the incisors are missing (Fig. 2A). The preserved incisors are subequal. The poorly preserved incisors are fragile and stout, with variable crown height. The crown appears chisel-shaped and the apical cutting edge points lingually. The enamel is smooth and thin. The irregular cingulum is present at the base of the crown. The central incisor is lower than the lateral one. The incisors reflect tip to tip wear pattern. The i3 is larger than the i2. The root is long and circular in cross section. The incisors alveoli are thick.
The canines are bilaterally compressed and recurved backwardly (Fig. 2B). The canines present a D-shaped cross section. The lateral face is convex and the medial face is slightly concave. The crown is posterolaterally furnished with a shallow longitudinal groove. The enamel is fine and shiny, covering the anterior, medial and lateral sides. The canines are in early wear, which are concentrated posteriorly.
The premolar series starts from p2 (Fig. 2A, D), p1 being absent. The p2 is a single conical tooth with early wear. The premolar is recurved posteriorly. The crown is anteroposteriorly long and narrow. A well-developed cingulum is present, forming a continuous shelf around the crown base. A prominent accessory cusp is present posterolingually. The anteroposterior crests are pustulated. The p3 resemble the same version of the p2. The p3 is labiolingually waisted on the posterior side. The p4 is a molariform tooth with a relatively broad crown unlike p2 and p3. A shelf-like cingulum around the crown is prominent in the premolars. The hypoconulid is present posteriorly. An accessory tubercle is present labioposteriorly. The premolars are triangular with continuous cingulum.
The mandible preserves the complete molar series (Fig. 2A, E). The molars are long, narrow and in early to moderate wear stages. The molars are brachydont. The main conids are low and conical with exposed dentine. The conids represent simple trefoil shape owing to the wear. The anterior lobe is larger and more elevated than the posterior lobe. The main conids are linked by low, rounded crests that pass obliquely. The m3 has a prominent hypoconulid, which is low. The hypoconulid is labio-lingually furnished by two accessory cuspules. The labiolingual cingula are well developed.
The premolars and molars are brachydont and the conids are bunodont (Fig. 2D, E). The anterior lobe conids, protoconid and metaconid are almost equal in size. The preprotocristid and premetacristid are united anteriorly. The postprotocristid and postmetacristid extend linguo-labially. The trigonid and talonid are connected to the prehypocristid and preentocristid by the postprotocristid and the postmetacristid with prehypocristid and preentocristid, respectively. A notch appears at the point where two cristids are fused together.
The studied mandible differs from suoids in having more trenchant conids and in lacking minor grooves. Hexaprotodon presents a wide and robust symphysis with poorly differentiated canine processes as in the mandible observed (Fig. 2). The presence of smooth enamel is a typical for Hexaprotodon (Geze, 1985) as is the tip to tip wear pattern (Hooijer, 1950). Hexaprotodon sivalensis, the species reported from the Siwalik Group, is closely related anatomically to two African species: Hex. garyam and Hex. bruneti (Boisserie, 2005). The i2 and i3 are larger than i1 in Hex. sivalensis, unlike Hex. garyam, where i2 is the largest (Boisserie, 2005). The incisors seen in the specimen described here are, therefore, similar to those of Hex. sivalensis.
The continuous incisor series between the two canines forms an overhang relative to the frontal face of the symphysis, representing a character of Hex. sivalensis. The symphysis is inclined anterodorsally. The frontal and ventral faces of the symphysis show a gentle angle, feature shared with Hex. sivalensis (Boisserie, 2005).
The canines are comparable to Hex. sivalensis in their size, general structure and degree of bilateral compression, contrary to Hex. garyam and Hex. bruneti (Boisserie and White, 2004). The premolars are like those of Hex. sivalensis in being large, bearing accessory tubercles, and diverging anteriorly, unlike in Hex. garyam. The lower molars seen in the specimen described here are indistinguishable from those of Hex. sivalensis. The molars are comparable in size to Hex. sivalensis from the Upper Siwalik Subgroup (Colbert, 1935). The mandibular symphysis proportions, ratio of i3 to i1, length of premolar row, hypoconulid with two anterior lobes, thick incisor and canine processes assess the studied specimen to Hex. sivalensis from the Bhimber locality of Azad Kashmir, Pakistan.
Hexaprotodon is a hippopotamid genus first reported from the late Miocene of Eurasia that reached a wide geographic range in a short period of time, mostly due to the availability of the unoccupied niche for large semiaquatic herbivores (Falconer and Cautley, 1836; Colbert, 1935; Hooijer, 1950; Barry et al., 2002). The weak extension of the canine process and short diastema in Hexaprotodon can be considered the primitive characters of hippopotamids, occurring in taxa known from the late Miocene and early Pliocene (Coryndon, 1977, 1978; Geze, 1980; Harris, 1991). The oldest occurrence of Hex. sivalensis is recorded from the late Miocene (Barry et al., 2002) from the Siwaliks. Moreover, it was recorded from the Tatrot Formation of the Upper Siwalik Subgroup, dated 3.4-2.6 Ma, prevailing through to the late Pleistocene (Barry and Flynn, 1989).
Hexaprotodon has been restricted to the Asian lineage and approved to be a peculiar lineage of hippopotamids in Asia (Falconer and Cautley, 1836; Lydekker, 1884; Colbert, 1935; Hooijer, 1950; Coryndon, 1978; Boisserie and White, 2004). Hexaprotodon sivalensis is one of the best-flourished species of the genus Hexaprotodon (Colbert, 1935; Hooijer, 1950; Barry et al., 2002). Hexaprotodon sivalensis is a comparatively large species of hippopotamid, with retention of six irregular incisors (Falconer and Cautley, 1847; Colbert, 1935; Hooijer, 1950). The species represents the sole member of Hippopotamidae in the Siwaliks of Pakistan. Hexaprotodon sivalensis was recovered from all of the major stratigraphic units of Tatrot-Pinjor formations, although it occurs less frequently than other associated groups.
The discovered mandible can be referred to Hex. sivalensis, as the specimen is morphometrically indistinguishable from Hex. sivalensis. This fossil record provides additional information of the primitive Siwalik hippopotamid, previously known only from the upper jaw and neurocranium, and isolated fragments of the lower jaw (mostly dental specimens). The species is restricted to the late Miocene to Pleistocene in the Siwalik Group of Pakistan.
I thank University of the Punjab authorities for supporting this research. I am thankful to Master Riaz for allowing me to publish the material, Dr. Abdul Qayyum Nayyer and Chaudhary Sahib for their assistance in Bhimber, Mr. Adeeb for photographs and Mr. Khalid for his help in formatting the article.
Statement of conflict of interest
Authors have declared no conflict of interest.
Akhtar, M., 1992. Taxonomy and distribution of the Siwalik bovids. Ph. D. Diss., University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Barry, J.C. and Flynn, L.J., 1989. Key biostratigraphic events in the Siwalik sequence. In: European neogene mammal chronology (eds. E.H. Lindsay, V. Fahlbusch and P. Mein), NATO ASI Series, New York, Plenum, 180, 557-571.
Barry, J.C., Morgan, M.E., Flynn, L.J., Pilbeam, D., Behrensmeyer, A. K., Raza, S.M., Khan, I., Badgely, C., Hicks, J. and Kelley, J., 2002. Faunal and environmental change in the Late Miocene Siwaliks of Northern Pakistan. Paleobiology, 28: 1-72. https://doi.org/10.1666/0094-8373(2002)28[1:FAECIT]2.0.CO;2
Basu, P.K., 2004. Siwalik mammals of the Jammu Sub-Himalaya, India: An appraisal of their diversity and habitats. Quart. Int., 117: 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6182(03)00120-4
Boisserie, J.R., 2005. The phylogeny and taxonomy of Hippopotamidae (Mammalia: Artiodactyla): A review based on morphology and cladistic analysis. Zool. J. Lin. Soc., 143: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2004.00138.x
Boisserie, J.R. and White, T.D., 2004. A new species of Pliocene Hippopotamidae from the Middle Awash, Ethiopia. J. Verteb. Paleont., 24: 464-473. https://doi.org/10.1671/2475
Colbert, E.H., 1935. Siwalik mammals in the American Museum of Natural History. Trans. Am. Phil. Soc., 26: 1-401. https://doi.org/10.2307/1005467
Coryndon, S.C., 1977. The taxonomy and nomenclature of the Hippopotamidae (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) and a description of two new fossil species. Proc. Konin. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. B, 80: 61-88.
Coryndon, S.C., 1978. Hippopotamidae. In: Evolution of African mammals (eds. V.J. Maglio and H.B.S. Cooke), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MJ, pp. 483-495.
Dennell, R.W., 2008. The taphonomic record of Upper Siwaliks (Pinjor stage) landscapes in the Pabbi Hills, northern Pakistan, with consideration regarding the preservation of hominin remains. Quart. Int., 192: 62-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2007.06.024
Dennell, R., Coard, R. and Turner, A., 2006. The biostratigraphy and magnetic polarity zonation of the Pabbi Hills, northern Pakistan: An Upper Siwaliks (Pinjor Stage), Upper Pliocene-Lower Pleistocene fluvial sequence. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol., 234: 168-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.10.008
Dennell, R., Coard, R. and Turner, A., 2008. Predators and Scavangers in early Pleistocene southern Asia. Quart. Int., 192: 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2007.06.023
Falconer, H. and Cautley P.T., 1836. Note on the fossil hippopotamus of the Siwalik Hills. Asiatic Res. Calcutta, 19: 39-53.
Falconer, H. and Cautley P.T., 1847. Fauna Antiqua sivalensis. Smith, Elder and Co., London.
Geze, R., 1980. Les Hippopotamidae (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) du Plio-Pleistocene de l'Ethiopie. PhD dissertation, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris VI, Paris, pp. 116.
Geze, R., 1985. Repartition paleoecologique et relations phylogenetiques des Hippopotamidae (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) du neogene d'Afrique Orientale. In: L'environnement des hominides au Plio-Pleistocene (eds. M. Beden, A.K. Berhensmeyer, N.T. Boaz, R. Bonnefille, C.K. Brain, B. Cooke, Y. Copens, R. Dechamps, V. Eisenmann, A. Gentry, D. Geraads, R. Geze, C. Guerin, J. Harris, J. Koeniguer, F. Letouzey, G. Petter, A. Vincens and E. Vrba), Foundation Singer-Polignac-Masson, Paris, pp. 81-100.
Ghaffar, A., Akhtar, M., Khan, M.A., Khan, A.M., Samiullah, K. and Iqbal, M., 2012. Discovery of antler from a new site in the Pinjor Formation (Pleistocene) of Pakistan. J. Geol. Soc. India, 80: 119-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-012-0125-9
Ghaffar, A., Siddiq, M.K., Akhtar, M., Khan, M.A., Khan, A.M. and Azeem, M.I., 2017. Antler remains (Cervidae, Artiodactyla, Mammalia) from a new locality in the Pinjor Formation (1.6-0.8 Ma), Pakistan. Rev. Brasil. Paleontol., 20: 23-30.
Harris, J.M., 1991. Family Hippopotamidae. In: The fossil Ungulates: Geology, fossil artiodactyls (ed. J.M. Harris). Koobi Fora Research Project, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 3, 31-85.
Hooijer, D.A., 1950. The fossil Hippopotamidae of Asia, with notes on the recent species. Zool. Verhand., 8: 1-124.
Khan, M.A., Akhtar, M. and Iqbal, M., 2010. The late Miocene artiodactyls in the Dhok Pathan type locality of the Dhok Pathan formation, the Middle Siwaliks, Pakistan. Pakistan J. Zool. Suppl. Ser., 10: 1-87.
Khan, M.A., Akhtar, M. and Ikram, T., 2012. True ungulates from the Nagri type locality (Late Miocene), northern Pakistan. J. Anim. Pl. Sci. Suppl. Ser., 22: 1-59.
Khan, M.A., Aziz, H., Gul, S., Babar, M.A., Mahmood, K. and Akhtar, M., 2015. New Hipparionine (Equidae) remains from Dhok Pathan Formation of Siwaliks, Pakistan. Pakistan J. Zool., 47: 1617-1624.
Khan, M.A., Babar, M.A., Akhtar, M., Iliopoulos, G., Rakha, A. and Noor, T., 2016. Gazella (Bovidae, Ruminantia) remains from the Siwalik Group of Pakistan. Alcheringa: An Australasian J. Palaeontol., 40: 182-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/03115518.2016.1103152
Khan, M.A., Abbas, S.G., Babar, M.A., Kiran, S., Riaz, A. and Akhtar, M., 2017. Dorcatherium (Mammalia, Tragulidae) from Lower Siwaliks of Dhok Bun Amir Khatoon, Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan J. Zool., 49: 883-888. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2017.49.3.883.888
Lydekker, R., 1884. Siwalik and Narbada bunodont Suina. Mem. Geol. Surv. India, 10: 35-104.
Nanda, A.C., 2002. Upper Siwalik mammalian faunas of India and associated events. J. Asian Earth Sci., 21: 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1367-9120(02)00013-5
Nanda, A.C., 2008. Comments on the Pinjor mammalian fauna of the Siwalik group in relation to the Post-Siwalik faunas of Peninsular India and Indo-Gangetic Plain. Quart. Int., 192: 6-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2007.06.022
Owen, R., 1845. Odontography. Bailliere Hyppolyte, London, pp. 655.
Rakotovao, M., Lignereux, Y., Orliac, M. J., Duranthon F. and Antoine P.O., 2014. Hippopotamus lemerlei Grandidier, 1868 et Hippopotamus madagascariensis Guldberg, 1883 (Mammalia, Hippopotamidae): anatomiecranio-dentaire et revision systematique. Geodiversity, 36: 117-161. https://doi.org/10.5252/g2014n1a3
Siddiq, M.K., 2015. Taxonomic studies of mammalian remains from the Siwalik Hills of Sardhok, Punjab, Pakistan. Ph.D. Diss., University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Khan, Muhammad Akbar|
|Publication:||Pakistan Journal of Zoology|
|Date:||Aug 31, 2018|
|Previous Article:||Prevalence of Avian influenza H9N2 Virus among Wild and Domesticated Bird Species across Pakistan.|
|Next Article:||Characterization of Dual and Homeostatic Chemokine Expression and Response to Bacterial Infection in Large Yellow Croaker, Larimichthys crocea.|