Heterogeneity among mycobacterium ulcerans isolates from Africa.
Buruli ulcer (BU), the third most common mycobacterial disease after tuberculosis and leprosy, is a major health problem in several West and Central African countries (1). Although endemic in Central America and subtropical climates of Southeast Asia and Australia, countries in Africa in the past decade have recorded increased incidence rates in some communities exceeding that of tuberculosis (2).
Mode(s) of transmission, natural reservoir(s) and other key aspects of the epidemiology of BU are not fully understood, a situation partly complicated by an apparent lack of genetic diversity of Mycobacterium ulcerans, as shown by several independent genetic markers (3-6). Conventional and molecular data suggest that M. ulcerans is an environmental pathogen because of the selective association of BU-endemic foci with wetlands and overflowed fiver banks and the detection of M. ulcerans-specific sequences in water, mud, aquatic insects, and plants (7-9). Specific reservoirs of the etiologic agent cannot be definitively assigned; however, we have cultivated M. ulcerans from a single aquatic insect from Benin (10).
Extensive molecular typing of M. ulcerans isolates recovered from patients in many endemic foci has been undertaken to further the understanding of the epidemiology of BU. A set of robust genotyping methods has already been applied to M. ulcerans: IS2404 restriction fragment length polymorphism (11), amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis (AFLP) (12), multilocus sequence typing (13), variable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) (3), mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit (MIRU)-VNTR (6), IS2426 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (5), and IS2404-Mtb2 PCR (4). All methods, except AFLP, resulted in geographically related genotypes for China, Japan, Mexico, Suriname, French Guiana, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea II and Papua New Guinea III, Australia Victoria, Australia Queensland, and Africa. Current typing methods have established a striking geographic and temporal homogeneity in African isolates from Angola, Benin, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Ghana, Cote d'Ivoire, and Togo (3-6). Even M. ulcerans cultured from the insect collected in Benin showed an identical African genotype (6). Recently, however, Hilty et al., using a VNTR typing method and sequence analysis, described 3 genotypes in Ghana (14). The development of more discriminating typing methods may unravel the source and mode of transmission of M. ulcerans and other epidemiologic aspects of BU.
Improved understanding of the molecular biology of M. ulcerans will likely help elucidate observed differences in clinical manifestations. Reported disease recurrence rates vary from 6% to >20% (15). To what degree this recurrence is attributable to exogenous reinfection or dissemination of the pathogen from previous lesions is unknown. The relative contribution of variations in pathogen and host factors to progression and severity of disease likewise remains obscure.
We report the first evidence of genetic diversity in M. ulcerans samples from 3 African countries: DRC, Sudan, and Uganda. Previously, we identified tandem repeat loci, MIRUs (6), and VNTRs (3) in the genome of M. ulcerans. A selection of these MIRUs and VNTRs were used in this study to analyze M. ulcerans extracts from tissue specimens from Benin, Togo, Gabon, Uganda, and Sudan, and from previous isolates from patients from Cameroon, DRC, Uganda, and Congo-Brazzaville (Table 1). Results were compared with those of a geographically diverse collection (n = 39) that were typed in our previous study (6).
To investigate the MIRU polymorphism, whole genomic DNA was prepared from bacterial cultures or clinical specimens. The specimens were tissue fragments from patients with nonulcerated (plaques and edematous forms) or ulcerated forms. DNA extraction from pure cultures was performed by heating the colonies in Tris-EDTA at 95[degrees]C for 10 minutes. Clinical specimens from laboratory confirmed cases of BU were decontaminated by using the reversed Petroff method, and mycobacterial DNA was extracted from the decontaminated solution as previously described (6). Smears of the suspensions were stained by the Ziehl-Neelsen method.
PCR was run as previously described (6). The Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer system (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) was used to separate 1 [micro]L of PCR product electrophoretically.
Comparison of MIRU-VNTR copy numbers using 4 loci showed 11 different profiles. M. ulcerans isolates from DRC and Uganda and tissue extracts from patients from Sudan (Nzara) and Uganda (Nakasongola) showed distinct profiles (Central Africa: 1222 and East Africa: 4111), different from the originally homogeneous African genotype (Atlantic Africa: 3113; Table 1). In DRC, 3 different genotypes exist, corresponding to 3 different provinces: Bas-Congo, Maniema (Kasongo), and Orientale (Bunia). The isolate from Orientale was from near the Ugandan border (Lake Albert). Isolates from Gabon, Congo-Brazzaville, and Cameroon had the typical African genotype, now designated the Atlantic African genotype. Identical MIRU-VNTR profiles were observed by using DNA extracted from tissues or cultures from patients residing in the same area. The specificity of the MIRU-VNTR method was tested on 14 different Mycobacterium spp. Only M. marinum, M. shottsii, and M. liflandii tested positive, but they were distinguished from M. ulcerans by exhibiting different profiles (data not shown). Sequencing of the concerned loci showed the conserved MIRU sequence at locus 1 and 9 in M. ulcerans. Locus 6 (3) and locus 33 contain respectively a 56-bp and a 58-bp tandem repeat (Table 2).
Although M. ulcerans isolates from Africa are relatively homogeneous, this study demonstrates more heterogeneity between strains than previously reported. All isolates from West Africa (Cote d'Ivoire, Ghana, Togo, Benin) and Central Africa (Cameroon; Gabon; Congo-Brazzaville; DRC Bas-Congo; Angola) have the identical MIRU-VNTR profile, and all originate from regions (i.e., Bas-Congo) or countries that border the Atlantic Ocean. The isolates that come from regions or countries in the Nile River basin (i.e., Orientale in DRC, Sudan, and Uganda) or the Congo River basin (i.e., Maniema) have distinct profiles.
These results demonstrate for the first time heterogeneity among M. ulcerans from different African countries. The 3 African profiles are the Atlantic African profile, the Central African Congo River basin profile, and the East African Nile River basin profile. This is also the first detection of MIRUs and VNTRs in clinical specimens, even in smear-negative specimens.
These data show that MIRUs and VNTRs are helpful tools in genotyping M. ulcerans. Further detailed differentiation of this etiologic agent will lead to an understanding of the epidemiology of BU. As in tuberculosis, better discriminatory typing methods help assess the efficacy of antimycobacterial treatment of BU patients by differentiating reactivation from reinfection. Although M. ulcerans appears to be quite monomorphic, full sequencing of this organism will permit detection of genes specific for M. ulcerans, and more discriminatory VNTR should become available.
We thank J. Noeske for providing M. ulcerans isolates from Cameroon and K. Fissette and E. Keijmel for maintaining cultures.
This work was partly supported by the Directorate-General for the Development Cooperation (Brussels, Belgium) Project: Lutte contre la tuberculose et l'ulcere de Buruli au Benin); by the Damien Foundation (Brussels, Belgium), and by the European Commission, project no. INCO-CT-2005-051476-BURULICO "Buruli ulcer: multidisciplinary research for improvement of control in Africa."
Mr Stragier is a doctoral student at the Mycobacteriology Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine in Antwerp, Belgium. His research focuses on molecular microbiology and epidemiologic and environmental aspects of M ulcerans. He is currently engaged in the Burulico project of the European Union to improve control of BU in Africa.
(1.) Portaels F. Epidemiology of mycobacterial diseases. In: Schuster M, editor. Mycobacterial diseases of the skin. Clinics in dermatology. New York: Elsevier Science Inc.; 1995. p. 207-22.
(2.) Debacker M, Aguiar J, Steunou C, Zinsou C, Meyers WM, Guedenon A, et al. Mycobacterium ulcerans disease (Buruli ulcer) in rural hospital, southern Benin, 1997-2001. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10: 1391 8.
(3.) Ablordey A, Swings J, Hubans C, Chemlal K, Locht C, Portaels F, et al. Multilocus variable-number tandem repeat typing of Mycobacterium ulcerans. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:1546-51.
(4.) Ablordey A, Kotlowski R, Swings J, Portaels F. PCR amplification with primers based on IS2404 and GC-rich repeated sequence reveals polymorphism in Mycobacterium ulcerans. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:448-51.
(5.) Stinear T, Davies JK, Jenkin GA, Hayman JA, Portaels F, Ross BC, et al. A simple PCR method for rapid genotype analysis of Mycobacterium ulcerans. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:1482-7.
(6.) Stragier P, Ablordey A, Meyers WM, Portaels F. Genotyping Mycobacterium ulcerans and At marinum by using mycobacterial interspersed repetitive units. J Bacteriol. 2005; 187:1639-47.
(7.) Marsollier L, Stinear T, Aubry J, Andre JPS, Robert R, Legras P, et al. Aquatic plants stimulate the growth of and biofilm formation by Myeobacterium ulcerans in axenic culture and harbor these bacteria in the environment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:1097-103.
(8.) Portaels F, Elsen P, Guimaraes-Peres A, Fonteyne PA, Meyers MW. Insects in the transmission of Mycobacterium ulcerans infection. Lancet. 1999;353:986.
(9.) Portaels F, Chemlal K, Elsen P, Johnson PDR, Hayman JA, Kirkwood R, et al. Mycobacterium ulcerans in wild animals. In: Collins MT, Manning B. Mycobacterial infections in domestic and wild animals. Paris: Office International des Epizooties; 2001. p. 252-64.
(10.) Chemlal K, Huys G, Laval F, Vincent V, Savage C, Gutierrez C, et al. Characterization of an unusual Mycobacterium: a possible missing link between Mycobacterium marinum and Mycobacterium ulcerans. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:2370-80.
(11.) Chemlal K, De Ridder K, Fonteyne PA, Meyers WM, Swings J, Portaels F. The use of IS2404 restriction fragment length polymorphisms suggests the diversity of Mycobacterium ulcerans from different geographical areas. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;64:27-3.
(12.) Huys G, Rigouts L, Chemlal K, Portaels F, Swings J. Evaluation of amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis for inter- and intraspecific differentiation of Mycobacterium bovis, M. tuberculosis, and At ulcerans. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:3675-80.
(13.) Stinear T, Jenkin GA, Johnson PD, Davies JK. Comparative genetic analysis of Mycobacterium ulcerans and Mycobacterium marinum reveals evidence of recent divergence. J Bacteriol. 2000; 182:6322-30.
(14.) Hilty M, Yeboah-Manu D, Boakye D, Mensah-Quainoo E, Rondini S, Schelling E, et al. Genetic diversity in Mycobacterium ulcerans isolates from Ghana revealed by a newly identified locus containing a variable number of tandem repeats. J Bacteriol. 2006; 188:1462-5.
(15.) Debacker M, Aguiar J, Steunou C, Zinsou C, Meyers WM, Portaels F. Buruli ulcer recurrence, Benin. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:584-9.
Pieter Stragier, * Anthony Ablordey, * L. Manou Bayonne, ([dagger]) Yatta L. Lugor, ([double dagger]) Ireneaus S. Sindani, ([section]) Patrick Suykerbuyk, * Henry Wabinga, ([paragraph]) Wayne M. Meyers, # and Fran(;oise Portaels *
* Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium; ([dagger]) Centre Hospitalier de Libreville, Libreville, Gabon; ([double dagger]) Yambio Hospital, Eldoret, Kenya; ([section]) World Health Organization South Sudan Office, Gigiri, Nairobi, Kenya; ([paragraph]) Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda; and # Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC, USA
Address for correspondence: Francoise Portaels, Department of Microbiology, Mycobacteriology Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium; email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Table 1. MIRU-VNTR profiles of Mycobacterium ulcerans and origin of specimens (BK no.) or culture isolates * ITM no./loci l ([double 6 ([double 9 ([double 33 ([double ([dagger]) dagger]) dagger]) dagger]) dagger]) 5142 1 1 1 2 9540 1 1 1 3 98-0912, 8756 1 2 1 3 BK03-0621 2 1 1 3 BK02-2487 2 1 1 1 BK04-0296 2 1 1 1 84 NA 1 2 1 7922 2 2 2 1 5114 1 2 2 1 5116 1 2 2 2 9099 1 2 2 2 5150 3 1 1 3 94-0662 3 1 1 3 96-0658 3 1 1 3 97-0483 3 1 1 3 BK04-0875 3 1 1 3 BK04-1396 3 1 1 3 02-0280 3 1 1 3 02-1081 3 1 1 3 05-0303 3 1 1 3 05-0304 3 1 1 3 BK05-0027 3 1 1 3 BK04-1591 4 1 1 1 BK04-1601 4 1 1 1 05-0861 4 1 1 1 05-1459 4 1 1 1 BK04-0513 4 1 1 1 BK05-0614 4 1 1 1 ITM no./loci ([dagger]) Genotype Origin 5142 Victoria Victoria, Australia 9540 Southeast Asia Queensland, Australia, PNG; Malaysia 98-0912, 8756 Asia China, Japan BK03-0621 PNGII PNG BK02-2487 PNGIII PNG BK04-0296 PNG 84 Suriname Suriname 7922 French Guiana French Guiana 5114 Mexico Mexico 5116 Central African Maniema, DRC Congo River Basin 9099 Maniema, DRC 5150 Atlantic Africa Bas-Congo, DRC 94-0662 Cote d'Ivoire 96-0658 Angola 97-0483 Ghana BK04-0875 Togo BK04-1396 Benin 02-0280 Cameroon 02-1081 Cameroon 05-0303 Congo-Brazzaville 05-0304 Congo-Brazzaville BK05-0027 Gabon BK04-1591 East African Sudan Nile River BK04-1601 Basin Sudan 05-0861 Orientale, DRC 05-1459 Uganda (NCTC no. 10445) BK04-0513 Uganda BK05-0614 Uganda ITM no./loci Ziehl-Neelsen ([dagger]) staining ([section]) Year ([paragraph]) 5142 1967 9540 1978 98-0912, 8756 1998 BK03-0621 3+ 2003 BK02-2487 1+ 2002 BK04-0296 1+ 2004 84 1984 7922 1990 5114 1953 5116 1962 9099 1964 5150 1962 94-0662 1994 96-0658 1996 97-0483 1997 BK04-0875 4+ 2004 BK04-1396 -- 2004 02-0280 2002 02-1081 2002 05-0303 1979 05-0304 1979 BK05-0027 1+ 2005 BK04-1591 4+ 2004 BK04-1601 -- 2004 05-0861 1959 05-1459 1964 BK04-0513 1+ 2004 BK05-0614 4+ 2005 * MIRU, mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit; VNTR, variable-number tandem repeat; PNG, Papua New Guinea; DRC, Democratic Republic of Congo; NA, no amplification; NCTC, National Collection of Type Cultures. Shaded fields represent results from our previous study (6). ([dagger]) ITM numbers (Institute of Tropical Medicine). These numbers are representative members for the genotype each belongs to (6). ([double dagger]) Numbers in columns 2 through 5 represent the number of repeats at the specific locus. These numbers form a pattern that divides M. ulcerans into genotypes. ([section]) Scale of the American Thoracic Society. Ziehl-Neelsen staining has not been done on culture isolates, since identifying acid-fast bacilli in a culture is an obsolete practice. ([paragraph]) The date represents the year of isolation. Table 2. Primer sequence and location in Mycobacterium ulcerans and amplicon length at loci 1, 6, 9, and 33, resulting from a polymorphism in tandem repeat copy numbers Primer sequence Locus Forward primer (5'-3') Reverse primer (5'-3') Location 1 GCTGGTTCATGCGTGGAAG GCCCTCGGGAATGTGGTT mu0115C04F 6 GACCGTCATGTCGTTCGATCC GACATCGAAGAGGTGTGCC mu0019B07G TAGT GTCT 9 GCCGAAGCCTTGTTGGACG GGTTTCCCGCAGCATCTCG mu0113D07F 33 CAAGACTCCCACCGACAGGC CGGATCGGCACGGTTCA mu043E11R Amplicon length Locus 1 copy 2 copies 3 copies 4 copies 1 380 433 486 539 6 500 556 -- -- 9 435 488 -- -- 33 720 778 836 --
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Emerging Infectious Diseases|
|Date:||May 1, 2006|
|Previous Article:||Rickettsia felis in fleas, Western Australia.|
|Next Article:||Human Bocavirus infection, Canada.|