Printer Friendly

Helminth parasite communities of two Physalaemus cuvieri Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leiuperidae) populations under different conditions of habitat integrity in the Atlantic Rain Forest of Brazil/Comunidade de helmintos parasitos de duas populacoes de Physalaemus cuvieri Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leiuperidae) sob diferentes condicoes de integridade de habitat da Mata Atlantica, Brasil.

1. Introduction

The Atlantic rain forest harbours the greatest diversity of anurans in Brazil, approximately 180 species of amphibians (Haddad, 1998; Haddad and Prado, 2005). However, due to the constant environmental degradation and forest fragmentation this high diversity is threatened (Young et al., 2001; Eterovick et al., 2005; Lips et al., 2005), which makes this biome one of the 10 hotspots of world biodiversity (Myers et al., 2000; Mittermeier et al., 2005). The Atlantic rain forest in Sao Paulo State has been substantially affected by forest fragmentation because prolonged intense exploitation of natural resources (Myers et al., 2000; Mittermeier et al., 2005). Nevertheless, continuous strips of forest still exist in state parks such as the Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar--Nucleo Santa Virginia (Fundacao SOS Mata Atlantica, 2008).

In this context of habitat fragmentation, parasites and predators are some of the first species to be affected by habitat fragmentation, mainly in relation to their distribution and abundance (Gibb and Hochuli, 2002; Laurance et al., 2002); however, the knowledge of those the dynamics of these changes is not well poorly known understood (McCallum and Dobson, 2002). According to McCallum and Dobson (1995), the parasites, like their hosts, also have great ecological importance and contribute to the maintenance of diversity.

Apart from habitat fragmentation (Hartvigsen and Halvorsen, 1994; Poulin and Morand, 1999), factors such as host biology (Aho, 1990; Hamann et al., 2006) and the composition of the host fauna can influence the composition of parasite communities (Poulin and Mouillot, 2003).

In anthropogenic environments, characterized by low biodiversity, parasites with heteroxenic life cycles have little chance of finding the host and completing their life cycle. In this case, it is expected that parasites with monoxenic life cycles are more prevalent. On the other hand, in preserved environments, with high biodiversity, the parasites with heteroxenic life cycles parasite species can be biologically successful because of the presence of hosts that are necessary for their life cycle (Gibb and Hochuli, 2002; Laurance et al., 2002; McKenzie, 2007).

Physalaemus cuvieri, popularly known as "Frog-dog", is an anuran species of small size (approximately 2.75 cm) and widely distribution, ranging from northeastern to mid-western and southern Brazil, and parts of Uruguay, Paraguay and Argentina (Haddad et al., 2008; Frost, 2013). It is mainly nocturnal and reproduces in small water bodies of water within open areas, present in all Brazilian biomes (Dixo and Verdade, 2006; Pombal and Haddad, 2007).

This study aims to characterize the composition of helminth communities associated with populations of Ph. cuvieri from two Brazilian Atlantic rain forest sites under different conditions of habitat integrity: a rural area with pastures and forest fragments and a preserved forest area.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study area and collection of amphibian hosts

In November 2009 and January 2010, 43 specimens of Ph. cuvieri were collected (permission granted through SISBIO, the Brazilian Biodiversity Information System--license no. 18240-1) at two contrasting areas of Atlantic rain forest in Sao Paulo State, Brazil: 21 specimens in the disturbed area and 22 in the preserved area. The disturbed area is located in the Sao Luiz do Paraitinga (SLP) municipality (23[degrees]13'S; 45[degrees]18'W) and it is characterized by a mosaic of pastures and forest fragments. The preserved area is located in the Serra do Mar State Park--Nucleo Santa Virginia (NSV) (23[degrees] 24' S; 45[degrees] 03' W), belonging to the municipalities Sao Luis do Paraitinga, Cunha, Ubatuba and Natividade da Serra. Both locations are in the Serra do Mar region known as Alto do Rio Paraiba--between the Paraiba do Sul river valley and the northern coast of Sao Paulo State. The region has a mean altitude of about 742 m and is characterized by a humid temperate climate with a dry winter and hot summer (CEPAGRI, 2008). The frogs were captured during visual searches at night; afterwards, they were killed with sodium thiopental solution (Thiopentax[R]), necropsied and all organs were examined in search of helminths.

2.2. Parasitological procedures

The helminths found were collected, fixed in alcohol-formaldehyde-acetic acid solution and preserved in 70% ethyl alcohol. The monogenoids were fixed under coverslips, applying slight pressure. For species identification, nematodes were cleared with lactophenol and monogenoids and acanthocephalans were stained with carmine and cleared with creosote, and analysed in a computerized image analysis system (Qwin Lite 3.1; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Identification was based on Vaucher (1990), Vicente et al. (1991), Smales (2007), Anderson et al. (2009) and Gibbons (2010). The helminth parasites were deposited in the Helminthological Collection of the Biosciences Institute in Botucatu (CHIBB), Department of Parasitology, Universidade Estadual Paulista.

2.3. Data analysis

The ecological descriptors of parasitism--prevalence, mean abundance (MA) and mean intensity of infection (MII)--were calculated according to Bush et al. (1997). The importance index, an integrated index, was calculated by the sum of the prevalence value and relative abundance followed by multiplication by 100 (Bursey et al., 2001). This index is an overall estimate of the influence of a species within a community. The dominance frequency of each component from parasite infracommunities was calculated according to Rohde et al. (1995) and it is represented by the number of times that a parasite species is dominant in the total of hosts analysed. The Z test was used to compare the prevalences and the Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the abundances and the MII between populations. Both tests were calculated using Sigma-Stat 3.1 software. The Brillouin index was used for helminth fauna diversity where we excluded from the calculation the immature helminths, such as unidentified larvae and cysts, and female specimens of cosmocercid nematodes, since we could not identify all these nematodes at the species level. The diversity index was used calculated for helminth fauna associated with the two populations of anurans with Past software--2.15 version.

3. Results

The overall prevalence was 90.9% in the NSV sample (20 individuals were infected by at least one parasite), and 85.7% (18 individuals were parasitized) in the SLP sample, and did not differ between localities (Z = 0.056; p = 0.956).

The frog population in the preserved area (NSV) had an MII of 4.9 [+ or -] 0.8 (range 1-13), an MA of 4.4 [+ or -] 0.8 (range 0-13) and mean helminth richness per host (MR) of 1.5 [+ or -] 0.1, whereas frogs from the disturbed area (SLP) had an MII of 5.7 [+ or -] 1.1 (range 2-19), an MA of 4.9 [+ or -] 1.0 (range 0-19) and an MR of 1.4 [+ or -] 0.2 (Table 1). There were no differences between the two areas for either in MII (Mann-Whitney U = 367.5; p = 0.64), MA (U = 466.5; p = 0.90) or MR (U = 341.0; p = 0.78) between the two areas.

The Ph. cuvieri specimens collected in NSV were parasitized by nematodes and an acanthocephalan: one Aplectana sp., 10 Cosmocerca parva Travassos, 1925 and 49 unidentified females of cosmocercids (Cosmocercidae), 17 Physaloptera sp. (Physalopteridae), three Rhabdias sp. (Rhabdiasidae), 17 unidentified cysts and larvae and one Acanthocephalus saopaulensis Smales, 2007 (Centrorhynchidae) (Table 2).

The SLP specimens were parasitized by nematodes and a monogenoid: five Aplectana sp., seven C. parva, 65 unidentified females of cosmocercids, 14 Physaloptera sp., four Rhabdias sp., three Oswaldocruzia subauricularis (Rudolphi, 1819) (Molineidae), and four Polystoma cuvieri Vaucher, 1990 (Polystomatidae) (Table 3). Among the samples in which male specimens were present, C. parva and Aplectana sp. were identified; the remaining cosmocercids were females that could not be identified to species due to the difficulty in distinguishing diagnostic morphological characters in females of this nematode group. Physaloptera sp. was found only in larval stages.

Cosmocercid nematodes had the highest importance index (I) values in both host populations studied ([I.sub.NSV] = 142.8 and [I.sub.SLP] = 155.9), followed by Physaloptera sp. with [I.sub.NSV] = 58.3 and [I.sub.SLP] = 28.0 (Tables 2 and 3). The cosmocercids were dominant over the other species of the helminth communities, with dominance frequencies of 16 and 15 in NSV and SLP, respectively.

The richness of helminth fauna associated with anurans from NSV was at least five species, and the anurans from SLP presented a richness of at least six helminth species. According to the Brillouin index, the helminth community diversity (H) from NSV frogs (H = 0.97) was lower than that from SLP frogs (H = 1.42).

The helminths shared by the two Ph. cuvieri populations were cosmocercid nematodes, Physaloptera sp. larvae and Rhabdias sp. So, we applied the Z test and the Mann-Whitney test to compare the ecological parameters of shared parasites between localities, and we did not find significant differences between prevalence, MII and MA of parasites associated with these Ph. cuvieri populations (Table 4).

4. Discussion

The Ph. cuvieri populations studied presented a relatively high parasite richness (four taxa from the preserved area and five taxa from the disturbed area) when compared with the helminth faunas associated with other species of Physalaemus, such as Physalaemus signifer (Girard, 1853), with three nematode species, and Physalaemus soaresi Izecksohn, 1965, with two nematode species (Fabio, 1982). On the other hand, Hamann and Gonzalez (2009) and Gonzalez and Hamann (2010) studied the helminths associated with Physalaemus santafecinus Barrio, 1965 and found three digenean taxa (in tadpoles) and four nematode taxa (in adults), respectively. For Physalaemus albonotatus (Steindachner, 1864), Gonzalez and Hamann (2012) reported six nematode taxa.

Of all helminths recorded in the present study, only the monogenoid Polystoma cuvieri and the nematode Cosmocercaparva were previously reported in Ph. cuvieri (Vaucher, 1990; Santos and Amato, 2012, 2013). Aplectana sp. and Physaloptera sp. were previously reported in other species of this genus (Fabio, 1982; Gonzalez and Hamann, 2010, 2012), corroborating the generalist pattern of the helminth communities associated with anurans (Aho, 1990; Bursey et al., 2001). There are no previous records of the occurrence of Rhabdias sp., O. subauricularis and A. saopaulensis parasitizing anurans of the genus Physalaemus in the South American continent. Physalaemus cuvieri is thus a new host for all helminth taxa found in the present study, excluding the monogenoid Po. cuvieri and the nematode C. parva.

Among the helminths found in both Ph. cuvieri populations, the acanthocephalanA. saopaulensis and the monogenoid Po. cuvieri are the least frequently reported in amphibians (Vaucher, 1990; Smales, 2007). The acanthocephalan transmission to anurans occurs by ingestion of invertebrates parasitized with cystacants that infect the gastrointestinal tract (Kennedy, 2006), making the anuran a definitive or paratenic host (Smales, 2007; Pinhao et al., 2009; Santos and Amato, 2010). The monogenoids, parasites of amphibian urinary bladders, have monoxenic cycles and high specificity with the host. They infect the individual by the gills when they are still in the tadpole phase. After the host's metamorphosis, they migrate to the urinary bladder and reproduce (Smyth, 1994).

Cosmocerca parva and O. subauricularis are transmitted directly via infective larvae that penetrate actively in the host's tegument, and adults later can reach the gastrointestinal tract (Anderson, 2000). The lung infection by Rhabdias spp. occurs similarly, but only by parthenogenetic females that alternate between free-living and parasitic life cycles in anurans (Anderson, 2000). Aplectana spp. are also transmitted directly, but the infection occurs by the ingestion of eggs containing infective larvae that reach the gastrointestinal tract and then mature (Anderson, 2000). Physaloptera sp. larvae are found in the stomach mucosa of anurans that ingest insects infected by larvae; the anuran can be a definitive or paratenic host (Anderson, 2000; Gonzalez and Hamann, 2006).

In the helminth communities associated with the two Ph. cuvieri populations, cosmocercid nematodes had the highest prevalence, MA and dominance frequency (Tables 1 and 2), corroborating the generalist pattern of these anuran helminths (Bursey et al., 2001). This is associated with the fact that these species can easily infect a host in a direct way, not requiring intermediate hosts to complete their biological cycle (Anderson, 2000; Hamann et al., 2006).

The high prevalence and abundance of Cosmocercidae, Physaloptera sp. and Rhabdias sp. may have been responsible for the observed similarity between the two parasite communities (Poulin, 2007), which presented no statistical difference between the overall prevalence, MAs and MIIs of component communities. Among the helminths found in anurans from SLP and NSV, only Physaloptera sp. and A. saopaulensis have heteroxenic life cycles, in which parasites complete their biological cycle by trophic transmission, requiring an invertebrate as an intermediate host (Anderson, 2000; Kennedy, 2006). The importance of parasites as indicators of environmental quality has been shown in some studies (Gibb and Hochuli, 2002; Laurance et al., 2002; Hamann et al., 2006; McKenzie, 2007) and only richness is not a decisive indicator of environmental conditions (Aho, 1990). The component community and the biology of helminths allow the understanding of the dynamics among parasites, hosts and environment (Poulin, 2007). The frogs from the preserved area (NSV) had a lower helminth richness than those from the disturbed area (SLP), but were parasitized with two species that require invertebrates as the intermediate host. Preserved environments may have a more diverse invertebrate fauna, increasing the chances of the parasite finding its host.

There were no significant differences between the descriptors of parasitism and the helminth fauna composition associated with the two populations of Ph. cuvieri; however, according to the Brillouin diversity index, the helminth community associated with frogs from the disturbed area (SLP) had higher diversity than that of the preserved area (NSV). This can be related to the low immune system of the anurans from the disturbed area (SLP), making them more susceptible to parasitism, or the long exposure of the host to the parasites, or the different selection pressures that regulate the helminth community (Aho, 1990; Rollins-Smith, 2001; Todd, 2007; Poulin, 2007).

This research is the first report concerning helminth community associated with Ph. cuvieri, an anuran with wide distribution in South America, living in the Atlantic rain forest and other biomes such as Brazilian savanna (Cerrado), representing an important study about this anuran species.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.03614

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisado Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) for financial support (2008/50417-7, 2008/58180-6, 09/15104-0).

References

AHO, J.M., 1990. Helminth communities of amphibians and reptiles: comparative approaches to understanding patterns and processes. In: G.W. ESCH, A.O. BUSH and J.M. AHO, eds. Parasite communities: patterns and processes. London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 157-190.

ANDERSON, R.C., 2000. Nematode parasites of vertebrates: their development and transmission. 2nd ed. London: CABI International.

ANDERSON, R.C., CHABAUD, A.G. and WILLMOTT, S., 2009. Keys to the nematode parasites of vertebrates. London: CABI Publishing.

BURSEY, C.R., GOLDBERG, S.R. and PARMELEE, J.R., 2001. Gastrointestinal helminths of 51 species of anurans from Reserva Cuzco Amazonico, Peru. Comparative Parasitology, vol. 68, pp. 21-35.

BUSH, A.O., LAFFERTY, K.D., LOTZ, J.M. and SHOSTAK, A.W., 1997. Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. The Journal of Parasitology, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 575-583. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3284227. PMid:9267395.

CENTRO DE PESQUISAS METEOROLOGICAS E CLIMATICAS APLICADAS A AGRICULTURA--CEPAGRI, 2008 [viewed 29 October 2008]. Clima dos municipios paulistas: Sao Luis do Paraitinga [online]. Available from: http://www.cpa.unicamp. br/outras-informacoes/clima_muni_562.html.

DIXO, M. and VERDADE, V.K., 2006. Herpetofauna de serrapilheira da Reserva Florestal de Morro Grande, Cotia (SP). BiotaNeotropica, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ S1676-06032006000200009.

ETEROVICK, P.C., CARNAVAL, A.C.O.Q., BORGES-NOJOSA, D.M., SILVANO, D.L., SEGALLA, M.V. and SAZIMA, I., 2005. Amphibian declines in Brazil: an overview. Biotropica, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 66-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00024.x.

FABIO, S.P., 1982. Helmintos de populacoes simpatricas de algumas especies de anfibios anuros da familia Leptodactylidae. Arquivos da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, vol. 5, pp. 69-83.

FROST, D.R., 2013 [viewed 25 January 2013]. Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. Version 5.5. Electronic database [online]. New York: American Museum of Natural History. Available from: http://research.amnh. org/vz/herpetology/amphibia/.

FUNDACAO SOS MATA ATLANTICA, 2008 [viewed 10 October 2008]. Atlas dos remanescentes florestais da Mata Atlantica, periodo de 1995-2000 [online]. Available from: http://www. sosmatatlantica.org.br.

GIBB, H. and HOCHULI, D.F., 2002. Habitat fragmentation in an urban environment: large and small fragments support different arthropod assemblages. Biological Conservation, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 91-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00232-4.

GIBBONS, L.M., 2010. Keys to the nematode parasites of vertebrates. London: CABI Publishing.

GONZALEZ, C.E. and HAMANN, M.I., 2006. Helmintos parasitos de Leptodactylus bufonius Boulenger, 1894 (Anura: Leptodactylidae) de Corrientes, Argentina. Revista Espahola de Herpetologia, vol. 20, pp. 39-46.

GONZALEZ, C.E. and HAMANN, M.I., 2010. First report of nematode parasites of Physalaemus santafecinus (Anura: Leiuperidae) from Corrientes, Argentina. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 81, pp. 677-687.

GONZALEZ, C.E. and HAMANN, M.I., 2012. First report of nematode parasites of Physalaemus albonotatus (Steindachner, 1864) (Anura: Leiuperidae) from Corrientes, Argentina. Neotropical Helminthology, vol. 6, pp. 9-23.

HADDAD, C.F.B. and PRADO, C.P.A., 2005. Reproductive modes in frogs and their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Bioscience, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 207-217. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0207:RMIFAT]2.0.CO;2.

HADDAD, C.F.B., 1998. Biodiversidade dos anfibios no Estado de Sao Paulo. In: R.M.C. CASTRO, ed. Biodiversidade do Estado de Sao Paulo, Brasil: sintese do conhecimento ao final do seculo XX. Sao Paulo: FAPESP, pp. 15-26. Vertebrados, 6.

HADDAD, C.F.B., TOLEDO, L.F. and PRADO, C.P.A., 2008. Anfibios da Mata Atlantica. Sao Paulo: Editora Neotropica.

HAMANN, M.I. and GONZALEZ, C.E., 2009. Larval digenetic trematodes in tadpoles of six amphibian species from northeastern Argentina. The Journal of Parasitology, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 623-628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1645/GE-1738.!. PMid:19045934.

HAMANN, M.I., KEHR, A.I. and GONZALEZ, C.E., 2006. Species affinity and infracommunity ordination of helminths of Leptodactylus chaquensis (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in two contrasting environments from Northeastern Argentina. The Journal of Parasitology, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 1171-1179. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1645/GE-862R1.1. PMid:17304791.

HARTVIGSEN, R. and HALVORSEN, O., 1994. Spatial patterns in the abundance and distribution of parasites of freshwater fish. Parasitology Today (PersonalEd.), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 28-31. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-4758(94)90354-9. PMid:15275564.

KENNEDY, C.R., 2006. Ecology of the Acanthocephala. New York: Cambridge University Press.

LAURANCE, W.F., LOVEJOY, T.E., VASCONCELOS, H.L., BRUNA, E.M., DIDHAM, R.K., STOUFFER, PC., GASCON, C., BIERREGAARD, R.O., LAURANCE, S.G. and SAMPAIO, E., 2002. Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigation. Conservation Biology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 605-618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01025.x.

LIPS, K.R., BURROWES, P.A., MENDELSON, J.R. and PARRA-OLEA, G., 2005. Amphibian declines in Latin America: widespread population declines, extinctions, and impacts. Biotropica, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 163-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.17447429.2005.00023.x.

MCCALLUM, H. and DOBSON, A., 1995. Detecting disease and parasite threats to endangered species and ecosystems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 190-194. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89050-3. PMid:21237000.

MCCALLUM, H. and DOBSON, A., 2002. Disease, habitat fragmentation and conservation. Proceedings. Biological Sciences, vol. 269, no. 1504, pp. 2041-2049. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/ rspb.2002.2079. PMid:12396504.

MCKENZIE, V.J., 2007. Human land use and patterns of parasitism in tropical amphibian hosts. Conservation Biology, vol. 137, no. I, pp. 102-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.01.019.

MITTERMEIER, R.A., GIL, PR., HOFFMANN, M., PILGRIM, J., BROOKS, J., MIITERMEIER, C.G., LAMOURUX, J. and FONSECA, G.A.B., 2005. Hotspots revisited: earth's biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. Washington, D. C.: Conservation International. vol. 4, 392 p.

MYERS, N., MITTERMEIER, R.A., MITTERMEIER, C.G., FONSECA, G.A.B. and KENT, J., 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, vol. 403, no. 6772, pp. 853-858. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35002501. PMid:10706275.

PINHAO, R., WUNDERLICH, A.C., ANJOS, L.A. and SILVA, R.J., 2009. Helminths of toad Rhinella icterica (Bufonidae) from the municipality of Botucatu, Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Neotropical Helminthology, vol. 3, pp. 35-40.

POMBAL, J.P., and HADDAD, C.F.B., 2007. Estrategias e modos reprodutivos em anuros. In: L.B. NASCIMENTO and PM.E. OLIVEIRA, eds. Herpetologia no Brasil II. Sao Paulo: Sociedade Brasileira de Herpetologia, pp. 101-116.

POULIN, R. and MORAND, S., 1999. Geographical distances and the similarity among parasite communities of conspecific host populations. Parasitology, vol. 119, no. Pt 4, pp. 369-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182099004795. PMid:10581615.

POULIN, R. and MOUILLOT, D., 2003. Parasite specialization from a phylogenetic perspective: a new index of host specificity. Parasitology, vol. 126, no. Pt 5, pp. 473-480. http://dx.doi. org/10.1017/S0031182003002993. PMid:12793652.

POULIN, R., 2007. Are there general laws in parasite ecology? Parasitology, vol. 134, no. Pt 6, pp. 763-776. http://dx.doi. org/10.1017/S0031182006002150. PMid:17234043.

ROHDE, K., HAYWARD, C. and HEAP, M., 1995. Aspects of the ecology of metazoan ectoparasites of marine fishes. International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 945-970. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/0020-7519(95)00015-T. PMid:8550295.

ROLLINS-SMITH, L.A., 2001. Neuroendocrine-immune system interactions in amphibians: implications for understanding global amphibian declines. Immunologic Research, vol. 23, no. 2-3, pp. 273-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/IR:23:2-3:273. PMid:11444392.

SANTOS, V.G.T. and AMATO, S.B., 2010. Rhinella fernandezae (Anura, Bufonidae) a paratenic host of Centrorhynchus sp. (Acanthocephala, Centrorhynchidae) in Brazil. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 81, pp. 53-56.

SANTOS, V.G.T. and AMATO, S.B., 2012. Polystoma cuvieri (Monogenea, Polystomatidae) in Physalaemus cuvieri (Anura, Leiuperidae) in Southern Brazil. Neotropical Helminthology, vol. 6, pp. 1-7.

SANTOS, V.G.T. and AMATO, S.B., 2013. Species of Cosmocerca (Nematoda, Cosmocercidae) in Anurans from Southern Santa Catarina State, Brazil. Comparative Parasitology, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 123-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1654/4608.1.

SMALES, L.R., 2007. Acanthocephala in amphibians (Anura) and reptiles (Squamata) from Brazil and Paraguay with description of a new species. The Journal of Parasitology, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 392-398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1645/GE-937R.1. PMid:17539424.

SMYTH, J.D., 1994. Introduction to animal parasitology. London: Cambridge University Press. TODD, B.D., 2007. Parasites lost? An overlooked hypothesis for the evolution of alternative reproductive strategies in amphibians. American Naturalist, vol. 170, no. 5, pp. 793-799. http://dx.doi. org/10.1086/521958. PMid:17926300.

VAUCHER, C., 1990. Polystoma cuvieri n. sp. (Monogenea: Polystomatidae) a parasite of the urinary bladder of the Leptodactylid frog Physalaemus cuvieri in Paraguay. The Journal of Parasitology, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 501-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3282828. PMid:2380858.

VICENTE, J.J., RODRIGUES, H.O., GOMES, D.C. and PINTO, R.M., 1991. Nematoides do Brasil--parte II: Nematoides de anfibios. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 549-626. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81751990000400015.

YOUNG, B.E., LIPS, K.R., REASER, J.K., IBANEZ, R., SALAS, A.W., CEDENO, J.R., COLOMA, L.A., RON, S., LA MARCA, E., MEYER, J.R., MUNOZ, A., BOLANOS, F., CHAVES, G. and ROMO, D., 2001. Population declines and priorities for amphibian conservation in Latin America. Conservation Biology, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1213-1223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046Zj.15231739.2001.00218.x.

A. Aguiar (a) *, G. M. Toledo (a), L. A. Anjos (b) and R. J. Silva (a)

(a) Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Biociencias, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho"--UNESP, Campus de Botucatu, Distrito de Rubiao Junior, s/n, CEP 18618-970, Botucatu, SP, Brazil

(b) Departamento de Biologia e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho"--UNESP, Campus Ilha Solteira, Rua Moncao, 226, Zona Norte, CEP 15385-000, Ilha Solteira, SP, Brazil

* e-mail: aline.aguiarr@gmail.com

Received: March 12, 2014--Accepted: July 25, 2014--Distributed: November 30, 2015
Table 1. Prevalence, mean abundance and mean intensity
of infection (expressed as means with standard error), total
richness and mean richness per host of helminth parasites
of Physalaemus cuvieri from Nucleo Santa Virginia (NSV)
and from Sao Luis do Paraitinga (SLP), in Sao Paulo State,
Brazil.

Parameters             NSV (n = 22)         SLP (n = 21)

Prevalence (%)             90.9                 85.7
Mean abundance       4.4 [+ or -] 0.8     4.9 [+ or -] 1.0
Mean intensity of    4.9 [+ or -] 0.8     5.7 [+ or -] 1.1
  infection
Total richness               5                    6
Mean richness per    1.44 [+ or -] 0.2    1.38 [+ or -] 0.2
  host

Table 2. Prevalence (P), mean intensity of infection (MII) and
mean abundance (MA) with standard error (SE), importance index
(I), dominance frequency (DF) and site of infection of helminth
parasites of Physalaemus cuvieri (n = 22) from Nucleo Santa
Virginia, Sao Paulo State, Brazil.

Parasite                P (%)   MII [+ or -] SE      MA [+ or -] SE

Nematoda
  Cosmocercidae         81.8    3.3 [+ or -] 0.5    2.7 [+ or -] 0.5
  Unidentified cysts     9.1    7.5 [+ or -] 3.5    0.7 [+ or -] 0.5
  Unidentified larvae    4.5           2            0.1 [+ or -] 0.1
  Physaloptera sp.      40.9    1.9 [+ or -] 0.3    0.8 [+ or -] 0.2
  Rhabdias sp.           9.1    1.5 [+ or -] 0.5    0.1 [+ or -] 0.1
Acanthocephala
  Acanthocephalus        4.5           1           0.04 [+ or -] 0.04
  saopaulensis

Parasite                  I     DF   Site of infection

Nematoda
  Cosmocercidae         142.8   16   SI, LI, CAV, LUN
  Unidentified cysts    24.4    1           STO
  Unidentified larvae    6.6    0         SI, LI
  Physaloptera sp.      58.3    1           STO
  Rhabdias sp.          12.1    1           LUN
Acanthocephala
  Acanthocephalus        5.6    0           CAV
  saopaulensis

SI--small intestine; LI--large intestine; CAV--body cavity; LUN--lungs;
STO--stomach.

Table 3. Prevalence (P), mean intensity of infection (MII) and
mean abundance (MA) with standard error (SE), importance index
(I), dominance frequency (DF) and site of infection of helminth
parasites of Physalaemus cuvieri (n = 21) from Sao Luis do
Paraitinga, Sao Paulo State, Brazil.

Parasite                            P (%)   MII [+ or -] SE

Nematoda
  Cosmocercidae                     80.9     4.5 [+ or -] 1
  Physaloptera sp.                  14.3    4.7 [+ or -] 3.2
  Rhabdias sp.                       9.5      2 [+ or -] 0
  Oswaldocruzia subauricularis       4.8           3
Monogenea
  Polystoma cuvieri                 14.3    1.3 [+ or -] 0.3

Parasite                             MA [+ or -] SE      I     DF

Nematoda
  Cosmocercidae                     3.7 [+ or -] 0.9   155.9   15
  Physaloptera sp.                  0.7 [+ or -] 0.5   28.0    2
  Rhabdias sp.                      0.2 [+ or -] 0.1   13.4    0
  Oswaldocruzia subauricularis      0.1 [+ or -] 0.1    7.7    0
Monogenea
  Polystoma cuvieri                 0.2 [+ or -] 0.1   18.3    1

                                      Site of
Parasite                             infection

Nematoda
  Cosmocercidae                     STO, SI, LI
  Physaloptera sp.                      STO
  Rhabdias sp.                          LUN
  Oswaldocruzia subauricularis          SI
Monogenea
  Polystoma cuvieri                   GB, UB

STO--stomach; SI--small intestine; LI--large intestine;
LUN--lungs; GB--gall bladder; UB--urinary bladder.

Table 4. Comparison of mean abundance (MA) and mean intensity of
infection (MII) (presented with standard error; SE) and
prevalence of helminths of Physalaemus cuvieri from Nucleo Santa
Virginia (NSV) and Sao Luis do Paraitinga (SLP).

                           NSV                SLP            Test
Cosmocercidae
  MA [+ or -] SE     2.7 [+ or -] 0.5   3.7 [+ or -] 0.9   U = 489.5
  MII [+ or -] SE    3.3 [+ or -] 0.5   4.5 [+ or -] 1.0   U = 335.5
  Prevalence (%)           81.8               80.9         Z = -0.3
Physaloptera sp.
  MA [+ or -] SE     0.8 [+ or -] 0.2   0.7 [+ or -] 0.5   U = 403.5
  MII [+ or -] SE    1.9 [+ or -] 0.3   4.7 [+ or -] 3.2   U = 25.5
  Prevalence (%)           40.9               14.3          Z = 1.6
Rhabdias sp.
  MA [+ or -] SE     0.1 [+ or -] 0.1   0.2 [+ or -] 0.1   U = 464.0
  MII [+ or -] SE    1.5 [+ or -] 0.5    2.0 [+ or -] 0     U = 8.0
  Prevalence (%)           9.1                9.5          Z = -0.5

                              P
Cosmocercidae
  MA [+ or -] SE             0.51
  MII [+ or -] SE            0.34
  Prevalence (%)             0.75
Physaloptera sp.
  MA [+ or -] SE             0.16
  MII [+ or -] SE            0.50
  Prevalence (%)             0.11
Rhabdias sp.
  MA [+ or -] SE             0.97
  MII [+ or -] SE            0.40
  Prevalence (%)             0.64
COPYRIGHT 2015 Association of the Brazilian Journal of Biology
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Original Article
Author:Aguiar, A.; Toledo, G.M.; Anjos, L.A.; Silva, R.J.
Publication:Brazilian Journal of Biology
Date:Nov 1, 2015
Words:4709
Previous Article:Hematological, morphological and morphometric characteristics of blood cells from rhea, Rhea Americana (Struthioniformes: Rheidae): a standard for...
Next Article:Biology and fertility life table of Eriopis connexa, Harmonia axyridis and Olla v-nigrum (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)/Biologia e tabela de vida de...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters