Printer Friendly

Hart v. Sheahan.

U.S. Appeals Court




Hart v. Sheahan, 396 F.3d 887 (7th Cir. 2005). Female pretrial detainees brought an action against a county and jail superintendent alleging deprivation of liberty without due process. The district court dismissed the case and the detainees appealed. The appeals court reversed and remanded, finding that the detainees stated a claim upon which relief could be granted. The detainees alleged that during monthly lockdown searches of the jail, they were confined for 48 to 50 hours at a time to their cells, where they were not under observation or within hailing distance of correctional officers. The detainees alleged that serious injuries resulted from their inability to get the officers' attention during a crisis. The court noted that an alternative procedure was available to the jail that would allow inmates in each locked tier to be released from their cells after that tier was searched, resulting in shorter lockdown periods. (Cook County Jail, Illinois)
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U3IL
Date:May 1, 2005
Previous Article:Lingenfelter v. Bd. Of County Com'rs of Reno Cty.
Next Article:Koutnik v. Brown.

Related Articles
Is the cash method dead?
Information Management Issues in Mergers and Acquisitions: A Manager's Briefing.
From Patrick Sheahan re October article by Msgr. Foy. (Letters to the Editor).
U.S. district court media access. (Free Speech, Expression, Association).
From Dalton McIntyre. (Letters to the Editor).
Charitable giving: government workers are stuffing money into the campaign coffers of their bosses.
From Norman W. Lower re contraception.
Hart v. Sheahan.
Hart v. Sheahan.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters