Hans Kung on his reply from Pope Francis.
On March 9, my appeal to Pope Francis to give room to a free, unprejudiced and open-ended discussion on the problem of infallibility appeared in the leading journals of several countries. I was thus overjoyed to receive a personal reply from Francis immediately after Easter. Dated March 20, it was forwarded to me from the nunciature in Berlin.
In the pope's reply, the following points are significant for me:
* The fact that Francis answered at all and did not let my appeal fall on deaf ears, so to speak;
* The fact that he replied himself and not via his private secretary or the secretary of state;
* That he emphasizes the fraternal manner of his Spanish reply by addressing me as Lieber Mit bruder ("Dear Brother") in German and puts this personal address in italics;
* That he clearly read the appeal, to which I had attached a Spanish translation, most attentively;
* That he is highly appreciative of the considerations that had led me to write Volume 5 of my complete works, in which I suggest theologically discussing the different issues that the infallibility dogma raises in the light of holy Scripture and tradition with the aim of deepening the constructive dialogue between the "semper reformanda" 21stcentury church and the other Christian churches and postmodern society.
Francis has set no restrictions. He has thus responded to my request to give room to a free discussion on the dogma of infallibility. I think it is now imperative to use this new freedom to push ahead with the clarification of the dogmatic definitions, which are a ground for controversy within the Catholic church and in its relationship to the other Christian churches.
I could not have foreseen then quite how much new freedom Francis would open up in his postsynodal exhortation, Amoris Laetitia. Already in the introduction, he declares, "Not all discussions of doctrinal, moral or pastoral issues need to be settled by interventions of the magisterium."
He takes issue with "cold bureaucratic morality" and does not want bishops to continue behaving as if they were "arbiters of grace." He sees the Eucharist not as a reward for the perfect but as "nourishment for the weak."
He repeatedly quotes statements made at the episcopal synod or from national bishops' conferences. Francis no longer wants to be the sole spokesman of the church.
This is the new spirit that I have always expected from the magisterium. I am fully convinced that in this new spirit a free, impartial and open-ended discussion of the infallibility dogma, this fateful key question of destiny for the Catholic church, will be possible.
I am deeply grateful to Francis for this new freedom and combine my heartfelt thanks with the expectation that the bishops and theologians will unreservedly adopt this new spirit and join in this task in accordance with the Scriptures and with our great church tradition.
[Fr. Hans Kung, Swiss citizen, is professor emeritus of ecumenical theology at Tubingen University in Germany. The sixth volume of his complete works, Church Reform, is expected later this year from Herder. This statement was translated from the German by Christa Pongratz-Lippitt.]
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||National Catholic Reporter|
|Date:||May 6, 2016|
|Previous Article:||'We need to get practical': Cardinal and bishop urge prayer, aid and advocacy for Iraqi Christians.|
|Next Article:||Thousands protest as Poland's ruling party moves toward authoritarianism.|