Hand-propping demystified: yes it's risky, but so is flying meanwhile, we still have to start the engines on airplanes tacking an electrical system.
Of course, hand-propping may not be for you. In which case, you need to get either a fully charged battery or a different airplane. If neither are an option, the key to safely hand-propping and airplane engine is proper training and good technique. The best thing about learning the art of hand-propping is that it puts you in touch with some of the finest people in aviation--old timers--and their airplanes.
The best and safest planes to hand-prop are ones that require it by design. Old-school planes like Champs, Cubs, Luscombes and Taylorcraft of a certain vintage fall into this category, as do a number of ultralights and even some modern light sport models. If you want to learn how to hand-prop a plane, this is the category to start with.
Aircraft designed to be hand-propped have specific procedures to follow, a description in the owner's manual or POH for that particular aircraft. More importantly, for a given make and model, there is a wealth of tribal knowledge and prospective teachers with experience to show you the way. Given the consequences of doing it wrong, natural selection thins the herd of bad teachers pretty quickly.
The difficulty in hand-propping an engine increases with its displacement and compression ratio: It's easier to hand-prop a smaller four cylinder engine with low compression than a six- or nine-cylinder one with higher compression. Additionally, as the engine gets bigger, the number of people with experience in the procedure quickly drops.
You will find more people comfortable flinging the prop on a Continental C-65 than you will with experience propping an 10-550, Lycoming -540 or a Jacobs radial. Some would argue the bigger behemoths can still be hand-propped in theory, but it gets less and less advisable because it requires more and more umph. "Umph" in this instance is defined as the combination of muscle, weight, leverage and momentum. Not only will you find umph in short supply on larger engines, you will also find a dearth of teachers. Finding a good teacher may not be as easy as finding a CFI, but it is much better than trying to teach yourself.
HOW IT WORKS
When it comes to lighting the fires, most certified piston aircraft engines remain firmly entrenched in technology's Paleolithic era. While the automobile industry abandoned the magneto-driven ignition systems back in the days when rock music was still scandalous, most aircraft engines still rely on magnetos. While archaic, there is a reason: Magnetos fire even when the battery and alternator are dead. If you are among the hai polloi with magnetos, your engine was designed to be started by turning the prop with the magnetos "hot."
In flight, a typical dual magneto-driven ignition system is set so the spark from both magnetos fires when the piston is 25 or so degrees before top dead center of its stroke. At high rpm, this is what you need to develop optimum power. At high rpm, magnetos are also spinning fast enough to generate lots of electrical potential.
Because the prop is at low rpm during startup, the magnetos can't provide enough juice to fire the plugs and start the engine. One way of overcoming this problem is installing an impulse coupling on at least one magneto. Another way is the so-called "shower of sparks" technology, which dates from early automobiles and generates the needed extra spark via a device powered by the ship's battery. Of course, if there is no battery, or it's dead, you're not going anywhere.
The impulse coupling, instead, is designed to load spring energy as you rotate the prop. This energy is released at the proper time--late, or "retarded"--to generate spark to light the fires. When you pull a prop through, you may hear the click of the impulse coupling. If the magnetos are off, this will be a click; if they're are hot, it should be a bang and start.
When the engines reaches a few hundred rpm, the impulse coupling disconnects and timing goes back to the fixed value specified. At this point, your job is simply to stay clear of the spinning blade of death to which you are uncomfortably close.
During engine start, however, the right magneto is usually grounded, making the left magneto the "firing magneto" during startup. This is not universally true, but is the standard configuration for most aircraft engines. During start up, the left magneto uses an impulse: coupling with timing retarded to fire on or near top dead center. This allows the engine to catch at low rpm. For hand-propping, it is important to know which magneto has the impulse coupling and use that magneto position for the "hot" position during the start sequence. My Continental C-90 actually has dual impulse couplings, so I start on both.
There are almost as many techniques for hand-propping as there are types of airplanes. Okay; not really, but there are too many variables to give a cookie-cutter answer other than, "It depends." But let's start with some basics. First, whenever you touch a prop, assume the magnetos are hot. A finely tuned engine at the right temperature will fire up on that first click. It will never hurt to verify the mags are in the off position.
Front or Back: When I bought my Cub, I learned to prop it from the front. This became the most comfortable process for me. After refinishing the prop, I repositioned it so it was loaded and ready to pop at the 11 o'clock position when standing in front the aircraft. I did so to facilitate propping from behind the aircraft. Why is this important? Two answers: skis and floats.
Standing in front of a plane that doesn't have brakes is a clear violation of rule #3 in the sidebar on page 17. Also, it's much safer to be behind a spinning propeller than in front of it. It took awhile to get used to, but it is now my go-to approach. It may not work for shorter pilots.
Proper Engine Setting: One of the most common causes for violating rules #1 and #2, listed in the page 17 sidebar, is an engine with an overly aggressive throttle setting. My Cub is set to start with the throttle at idle. If an airplane needs a bit of forward throttle, you are asking for it. If it needs a lot of throttle tampering to get started, you are playing with fire.
The Right Grip: You obviously have to have a good enough grip to impart the energy and momentum into the prop, but every recommendation is to avoid any fingertip wrap around the prop edge. One reason is to avoid the sharp pain that comes when the prop kicks back in the opposite direction. If your fingertips are wrapped around the prop, they will feel the full brunt of this kick back. It stings--a lot. If you over-wrap your fingers, you will eventually get "calibrated."
Another good reason to avoid overgripping the prop is to negate the tendency of using your grip on the object in front of you to assist in your balance. If you have to hold on to the prop to have good balance, you are itching for a violation of rule #1. If you are on an icy/muddy ramp that requires holding onto the prop to maintain your footing, you are already violating rule #3.
Another variable on grip is distance from the prop's hub. The further out you go, the more leverage; the closer in you go, the more speed you can impart with a single downstroke. The physics for this varies with your body size and strength in relation to the aircraft/propeller size and the umph needed to get it through the compression. Most people find the sweet spot about midway down the propeller blade. For high-compression beasts, you will be heading further out toward the tip.
Good Footing, No Loose Clothing and Smooth Movements: You want to start in a comfortable position with no loose or uneven surfaces. If propping from the front, you also want wheels chocked, someone on the brakes and an exit path without tripping hazards. Though sometimes dashing in appearance, avoid scarves and other loose clothing. The most important thing is your motion needs to be smooth and stable. If the motion feels awkward and imbalanced, it's likely you're doing it wrong.
As important as the right footing is, having enough momentum during the swing is perhaps more important. The key is to control the direction of your body's CG when in and immediately after the snap down on the prop. I have seen oldtimers use a leg to help kick their momentum away. This motion starts with one leg lifted and forward. As you pull the prop down, the leg swings back. I have also seen two-handed side throws that attempt to impart side momentum away from the prop.
There are too many body types for me to critique style and it is something kinesthetic that one should witness and feel; it is not the kind of thing you learn from reading about it. After the engine starts, the prop disc is invisible. Don't walk into it when you see the wheel chocks still need to be removed.
The Right Plane: There are too many NTSB reports that involve electrical failures, gear-up landings and other mayhem that begin with hand-propping an aircraft that should have stayed on the ground. These are not "hand-propping" accidents per se, but the one link in the accident chain involves hand-propping an aircraft successfully in order to briskly fly it to the location of the accident. This is the true reason for rule #3. It is stupid to hand-prop an airplane that a reasonable pilot would deem not airworthy.
As stated earlier, the best plane to hand-prop is one without a starter. Taildraggers are considered easier to hand-prop because the angle you are pulling the prop down also takes your momentum away from the soon to be spinning blade. Planes with three-blade props are eschewed because you have significantly less room between your downstroke and the next hand chopping blade swing when the engine catches. It doesn't mean it can't be done, but the further away from the norms you go, the more alone you will find yourself until you become a single outlier or--worse yet--a natural-selection event.
A SAFE PARTNER
The sidebar on the opposite page excerpts some guidance from the FAA's Airplane Flying Handbook (AFH) regarding how--and how not--to hand-prop with a partner. While it's nice to have another pilot helping out, it's not always practical. Regardless of who helps, he or she must be thoroughly familiar with the controls and must be seated in the airplane with the brakes set.
Like other aviation procedures, the technique involves read backs to assure proper procedure. The AFH provides the standard hand-propping procedure in better detail than my Cub's POH, which simply says, "Start engine by pulling the propeller through with a snap."
If the person sitting in the plane doesn't have the training or competence, you have violated the procedure in the AFH, as well as our rule #3. At this point, you are at risk of getting your pilot certificate revoked, not by the FAA, but by the person you have just put in charge of a 1000-rpm chopping machine you're standing in front of. Rules #1 and 2 also are at risk of being violated. If you have to explain what magnetos, throttle and mixture control are to the person sitting between you and the death disk, you're guilty of multiple violations of rule #3.
It's hard to find any reference in which solo propping is recommended, yet it is equally hard to find a Cub, Champ or Taylorcraft pilot who hasn't done it. My Cub's owner's handbook says, "Chock wheels OR have occupant who is familiar with controls set brakes in cabin."
The reason solo propping can't be ignored comes back to skis and floats. You don't need someone holding the brakes on an aircraft that doesn't have them. The biggest risk for solo propping is violation of rule number #2, and turning your plane into a UAV.
When solo propping, you need to have a bomb-proof solution to assure that rules #1 and #2 remain inviolable. There are techniques using glider tow hooks, slip knots, chocks and propping from the rear. You can also turn off the fuel shut valve at the outset. This allows enough gas in the lines to keep an engine running briefly after startup, but not long enough to self-launch your new UAV conversion into the next county. Still, solo hand-propping is best accomplished from behind the prop, perhaps standing on a float.
STARTING FOR KEEPS
An electrical system with a starter is a luxury some airplanes don't offer. Learning to hand-prop is as much a requirement as, say, knowing the airplane's systems, limitations and airspeeds. For these operators, hand-propping accidents are rare, but do happen. For the rest of us, hand-propping might be an anachronism, a leftover from bygone days when goggles and scarfs were used alongside roadmaps in open cockpits. Until the battery fails at some remote airstrip, at least. Then hand-propping becomes a necessity.
The takeaway here is the procedure can be quite risky, of life, limb and sheetmetal. But with some knowledge, some practice and some safeguards, it also can be routine.
While much can be said about the proper technique for hand propping, every single procedural detail and every single accident report supports two, make that three, inviolable rules:
#1--Don't get hit by the prop.
#2--Don't let the airplane get away.
#3--Don't be stupid.
Failure to comply with rule #1, renders rule #2 moot. Based on my reading of NTSB reports, one should be very mindful of #3 as well:
JUNE 30 2012: TAYLORCRAFT BC12-D
The used small chocks around the tires and did not tie down the tail before attempting to hand-prop the engine. The engine subsequently started, taxied out of the small chocks and began turning in circles. The airplane continued to circle, dragging the pilot, and struck a parked airplane before coming to rest.
JANUARY 25, 2011: PIPER PA-28R-201T TURBO ARROW III
The pilot shut down the engine on a remote dirt airport but the battery was too weak to restart it. The pilot hand-propped the engine, which started but accelerated before the pilot could enter the airplane, first hitting a berm and then continuing over a cliff.
MAY 31, 2010: CESSNA 172K SKYHAWK
The pilot moved the propeller and the engine started immediately; however, the hand brake did not hold and it started to accelerate. The pilot was unable to catch the airplane as it crossed the taxiways and interposed grass before it finally stopped when it collided with terrain prior to the runway.
RELATED ARTICLE: Hand-Propping Checklist
The FAA's Airplane Flying Handbook (AFH), FAA-H-8083-3A, includes a discussion of hand-propping, admonishing its readers, "this method of starting should be used only when absolutely necessary and when proper precautions have been taken." This article's main text covers the major points raised in the AFH, but the following items are worth emphasizing.
An engine should not be hand-propped unless two people, both familiar with the airplane and hand propping techniques, are available to perform the procedure. The person pulling the propeller blades through directs all activity and is in charge of the procedure. The other person, thoroughly familiar with the controls, must be seated in the airplane with the brakes set. As an additional precaution, chocks may be placed in front of the main wheels. If this is not feasible, the airplane's tail may be securely tied.
When hand propping is necessary, the ground surface near the propeller should be stable and free of debris. Unless a firm footing is available, consider relocating the airplane. Loose gravel, wet grass, mud, oil, ice, or snow might cause the person pulling the propeller through to slip into the rotating blades as the engine starts.
Both participants should discuss the procedure and agree on voice commands and expected action. To begin the procedure, the fuel system and engine controls (tank selector, primer, pump, throttle, and mixture) are set for a normal start. The ignition/magneto switch should be checked to be sure that it is OFF. Then the descending propeller blade should be rotated so that it assumes a position slightly above the horizontal.
The words CONTACT (mags ON) and SWITCH OFF (mags OFF) are used because they are significantly different from each other. Under noisy conditions or high winds, the words CONTACT and SWITCH OFF are less likely to be misunderstood than SWITCH ON and SWITCH OFF.
Mike Hart is an Idaho-based commercial/IFR pilot with 1000 hours, and proud owner of a 1946 Piper J3 Cub. He also is the Idaho liaison to the Recreational Aviation Foundation. He recently said his Cessna 206 and will gladly pay you $50K Tuesday for a $150K Cessna 180 today.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Date:||Apr 1, 2013|
|Previous Article:||Climb considerations: you perform at least one on each flight, but the math may dictate the best efficiency is found by flying much faster than the...|
|Next Article:||Turbo troubles: understanding, diagnosing and handling in-flight turbocharger problems demands some system knowledge and a healthy respect for what...|