Habitat, diet, feeding and resting behaviour of the Korean endemic cobitid Iksookimia hugowolfeldi (Cobitidae, Pisces) in the wild.
The family Cobitidae includes approximately 177 species and 25 genera and is widely distributed throughout Europe and Asia (Nelson 2006). Among the 15 Korean cobitid species in five genera, Iksookimia hugowolfeldi occurs as an endemic freshwater species (Kim 2009). This southern king spined loach lives in very restricted area, including the River Yeongsangang and Tamjingang and smaller valley streams (Nalbant 1993, Kim 1997). The fish are directly or indirectly affected by physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of environment in their habitat preference. The physical characteristics such as water depth, water velocity and bottom substrate are main important factors in maintaining the community and its life cycle (Arthington et al. 2006, Hur et al. 2009). As feeding affects growth, reproduction, and health as well as responses to physiological and environmental stressors and pathogens, it is of ecological importance in fish species (Lall & Tibbetts 2009). Feeding behaviour is closely related to external morphology in fish, such as the position and structure of the mouth, and fin and body shape, and reflects environmental variables such as feeding substrate, water depth, and water flow (Tippets & Moyle 1978, Moyle & Cech 2004, Hildebrand et al. 2013). Resting behaviour after feeding also is related with a micro-refuge to protect them and conserve the energy (Emery 1973). Despite its ecological importance, little is known about the feeding and resting behaviour in the family Cobitidae in the wild. Meanwhile, I. hugowolfeldi is facing drastic population reduction due to artificial disturbances caused by stream reconstruction, water pollution, and dam construction (Ko et al. 2011). Thus, as part of I. hugowolfeldi conservation efforts, insight is needed into feeding and resting behaviour as well as substrates and food items.
The study was conducted from January to December 2015 in the independent stream of Geogeum Island (Eojeon-ri, Geumsan-myeon, Goheung-gun, Jeollanamdo, Korea; 34[degrees]26'15" N, 127[degrees]09'42" E; Figs. 1-2), which has the largest known population of I. hugowolfeldi in Korea. The study site was approximately 2.5 km in length and 10-50 m in width, consisting of riffle, run and pool. Reeds and woody plants inhabited the shoreline, and there were farms and rice fields nearby. The habitat was classified as an Aa-Bb river type with 10-50 m river width and 0.5-3 m water width with repeating pools and riffles. The water depth was about 0.1-0.8 m, and the bottom substrate consisted of 10 % mud (< 0.1 mm), sand (0.1-2 mm, 30 %), gravel (2-16 mm, 20 %), pebbles (16-64 mm, 20 %), cobbles (64-256 mm, 10 %), and boulders (> 256 mm, 10 %). The water velocity was a maximum of 1.5 m/s in the riffle, and a minimum of 0 m/s in the pool (Kani 1944, Cummins 1962).
Material and Methods
Sampling was carried out with a cast net (mesh size, 7 x 7 mm, kick net, 4 x 4 mm and scoop net, 1 x 1 mm), and the identification key for sympatric fishes obtained from the study sites was taken from the classification of Kim & Park (2002). The analysis for phytoplankton was carried by surface water samples collected in the sites and the samples collected by scraping the surface of cobbles and pebbles with a brush, whereas invertebrate insects were sampled by using a kick net and a skimming net in the water, and by collecting those who were on cobbles and pebbles.
Analysis of stomach contents
At the end of each month, 20 fishes were selected and fixed in 10 % neutral-buffered formalin (240 specimens in total). In the laboratory, stomach contents were dissected and identified under a stereoscopic microscope to the lowest possible taxon according to Jeong (1993) and Won et al. (2005). To estimate the importance of food items, the index of relative importance (IRI) was calculated as follows:
IRI = (%N + %W) x %F
%N is the numerical percentage, the number of items in each prey category; %W is the volumetric percentage, the wet weight of a prey category compared to the total weight of stomach contents; %F is the frequency of occurrence percentage, the ratio of stomachs containing a particular prey and expressed as a percentage (Pinkas et al. 1971), and IRI is expressed as a standarized IRI (%IRI; Cortes 1997).
Daily feeding and resting activity
Feeding and resting behaviour were observed for 72 hours using underwater photography equipment (Sony, 420TVL CCD 6LED Outdoor Camera Ip68, Japan) from June 24-26, 2015 during the spawning season, and the video footage obtained was analyzed. Considering the relationship between air and water temperatures, the best time to study feeding behaviour was set as late June. During this period, spawning occurs very actively because of higher air and water temperatures.
Evaluation of the frequency of feeding
From a video clip recorded in the wild, feeding frequency was counted as the number of operculum opening and closing events where food items (substrate) and water were taken into the mouth and passed out via the gills. At two-hour intervals, only five individuals being confirmed exactly on the operculum movement were used for the feeding frequency for three complete days.
Most individuals are found at collective spots where are nearly located at pools being composed of sand and gravel with almost no water flows (Fig. 3). However, some individuals also occurred in riffles with a bottom substrate of sand and gravel as well as pebbles and cobbles with a relatively fast water flow. The collective spots of 0+ years were less than 0.3 m water depth and had almost no water velocity. At the collective spots, the population density was about 30-40 individuals per 50 [cm.sup.2].
The monthly empty stomach rate was the highest in December, whereas it was lowest in August (Fig. 4). The stomach contents appeared to primarily comprise aquatic insects and crustaceans (Table 1). In terms of occurrence rates, they feed mainly on Chironomidae (52.63 %), Phryganeidae (16.13 %), Branchiopoda (15.68 %), Harpacticidae (13.38 %), and Ephemeroptera (1.86 %). Numerical rates were also highest for Chironomidae (42.86 %), followed by Harpacticidae (21.98 %), Branchiopoda (17.58 %), Phryganeidae (8.24 %) and Ephemeroptera (7.69 %). Each dry weight rates are Chironomidae (33.19 %), Phryganeidae (28.33 %), Branchiopoda (17.44 %), Harpacticidae (13.14 %) and Ephemeroptera (6.67 %). Chironomidae had the highest standardized IRI (%IRI) of 70.98 %, indicating that it is the preferred food for I. hugowolfeldi. An onsite survey of a frequency of occurrence of aquatic arthropods at the study site revealed Ephemeroptera 37.64 %, Phryganeidae 22.56 %, Chironomidae 19.28 %, Branchiopoda 8.51 %, Harpacticidae 6.24 %, and Coleoptera 5.77 % (Fig. 5). Compared the fauna of aquatic insects with the stomach contents, the frequency of Ephemeroptera in the habitat is relatively high.
Phytoplankton in the stomach contents consisted mainly of Microcystis sp., Navicula sp., Cymbella sp. and Coconeis sp. (Table 2), whereas the wild flora of the phytoplankton is similar, such as Microcystis sp., Navicula sp., Cymbella sp., Coconeis sp., and Phormidium sp. (Table 2).
Feeding and resting activities
Iksookimia hugowolfeldi is generally active during the day and twilight hours and less active or inactive during the night, although there are individual differences. This fish is a benthic species and they little chase or select prey through active prey search.
Rather, feed on or near the bottom of a body of water, such as sand or gravel. Its behaviour consists of three patterns: resting, zigzag swimming and feeding. All the fish observed exhibited two behaviour types: 1) active (feeding activity, crawling along the bottom or swimming above the bottom), and 2) static (resting). Feeding activity starts with rapid inhalation of water together with small food particles above the bottom through the mouth and rapid exhalation from beneath the operculum. Such activity continues constantly until they swim in a zigzag pattern to another place to feed or rest. Resting involves little movement; fish burrow into or stay motionless on the substrate without any feeding activity.
Daily feeding behaviour
The feeding behavior of I. hugowolfeldi involved the following two main tactics: feeding on sediments in the surface of substrate (sand, cobble) and inside sand (digging, Figs. 6-7). First, most individuals exhibited sand surface filter feeding on the sand bottom, with sand taken into the mouth together with substrate particles and then expelled through the opercular opening. These repeated closing and opening operculum movements are very active. Through such filter feeding as a pump, the sand with particles is pulled into water, which it can be easily observed even outside water. Second, on cobbles or gravel, these fish feed by filtering sand or detritus. Third, it is just looking like diving. Some individuals dig down when feeding on the sand bottom, with the head buried in the sand by about a half of the head length, with the operculum exposed above the sand. The fourth pattern is filter feeding being carried out in between sand and cobbles, sometimes with their mouthparts embedded in the sand. On average, one individual feeds 14 to 61 times per minute. In particular, the most active feeding time is at the highest water temperature of the day at 14:00 to15:00, with up to 61 feeding events (vs. 8-18 times at 0:00 to 02:00 at below 21 [degrees]C water temperature, Fig. 8). As the water temperature decreases after sunset, the frequency of feeding also decreases.
Seasonal feeding behaviour
From late October, the average monthly air and water temperatures drop drastically below 14 [degrees]C from 24.6 [degrees]C and below 15.6 [degrees]C from 23.7 [degrees]C, and continue to decrease until February, which has a minimum 5.1 [degrees]C air temperature and a minimum 8.7 [degrees]C water temperature (Fig. 11). Under such environmental conditions, this fish is rarely seen swimming or moving about the bottom. In particular, under air temperatures less than 8 [degrees]C water temperatures under 10 [degrees]C, they hide or burrow into the substrate of the bottom such as sand and cobble. In Fig. 4, a higher empty stomach rate of 40-50 % (vs. 22-40 %) was seen from November to February, particularly in December.
Without showing any feeding activity such as swimming to seek out food or dynamic movement (opening and closing) of the operculum, resting involves remaining motionless except for breathing. Resting comes after feeding activity is finished. In the day time (sunrise to sunset), they rest predominantly on the surface of the sand and the cobbles, staying inactive or quiescent. Interestingly, some prefer to be buried in the sand with the anterior parts including the head and the pectoral fin or about the anterior half of its body exposed, with the rest being hidden.
At night, the resting pattern is the same as in the day. The duration of resting differed by individual, ranging from 10 seconds to more than an hour. After sunset, the resting time was longer and then I. hugowolfeldi is getting into the substrate (Figs. 9-10).
Iksookimia hugowolfeldi has been thought to prefer gravel and pebble bottoms with rapids (Choi 2003) in the upper-middle portion of streams. Rather than such a substrate, however, it was confirmed that they inhabit pools with more sand than other substrates with a water velocity that is low or more or less stagnant. These preferences are similar to I. yongdokensis, Cobitis choii, and C. tetralineata, and differing from other cobitis fish such as Koreocobits naktongensis, K. rotundicaudata, I. koreensis, I. pumila, I. longicorpa, C. lutehri and C. pacifica, which inhabit pebble and cobble bottoms (Kim 1978, Kim & Lee 1984, Kim & Park 2002, Kim & Ko 2005, Kim et al. 2006, Byeon 2007, Choi & Byeon 2009, Ko et al. 2009, Hong et al. 2011, Ko 2015). This is a benthic species and they rarely chase or select prey through active prey search. But, it feeds by filtering sand or pebble bottoms (Kim & Park 2002). Based on stomach content analysis, insects swimming in the surface layer were not fed on (Won et al. 2005), whereas benthic macroinvertebrates were common in this fish's diet, indicating that they are a typical detritus feeder. Among other Korean cobitids, I. koreensis feeds on Rotifera (22.5 %), Chironomidae (22.1 %) and algae (Ko et al. 2009), and I. pacifica on aquatic insects, especially Chironomidae (76.7 %, Kim & Lee 1984, Ko 2015). Meanwhile, Amoebozoa and Chironomidae are the most common prey items for I. longicorpa (25.1 % and 24.4 %, respectively) and C. tetralineata (30 % and 21.3 %, respectively) (Kim & Ko 2005, Kim et al. 2006). K. naktongensis feeds mainly on Chironomidae (72.02 %) and Ephydridae (26.87 %, Hong et al. 2011). Among Korean cobitids, I. hugowolfeldi showed higher food selectivity toward Chironomidae than I. koreensis, I. longicorpa and C. tetralineata, but this was similar to I. pacifica and K. naktongensis. These results may be due to changes in the composition and appearance of food organisms (Baek et al. 2002, Choi 2002), and in the growth, the feeding behaviour of fish changes (Wootton 1976, Kim 1996). We confirmed that there is a slight difference between the occurrence of prey items in the habitat and the preference for prey in stomach contents. Such difference between invertebrate fauna appearing in stomach contents and natural habitat may be due to it's a small bottom-facing mouth, which is fit for eating more or less small preys on the bottom.
With regard to feeding activity, I. longicorpa, I. pacifica and Cobitis tetralineata are diurnal fishes (Kim & Ko 2005, Kim et al. 2006, Ko 2015). These findings, however, involved only simple observation carried during field work on fish fauna, without any elaboration or detailed information. Our study focused on feeding activity and revealed that I. hugowolfeldi swims actively to seek food between sunrise and sunset, and that at night they show little movement while buried into or remaining motionless on the substrate of the bottom without any feeding activity.
In I. hugowolfeldi, the timing of studying feeding behaviour was peak spawning in late June (June 24-26) for three complete days. This condition is typically closely related to feeding intensity, with increased feeding to obtain energy in preparation for spawning. In teleost fishes, water temperature and the light have an effect on growth, reproduction and feeding (Jonsson 1991). Hildebrand et al. (2013) described that mouth position and structure are closely related to feeding behaviour, especially for suction and filter feeding. Houlihan et al. (2001) explained that feeding behaviour is linked to feeding habits, food preferences and mechanisms of food detection. The feeding behaviour of I. hugowolfeldi is likely related to its mouth position at the bottom of the head and the barbels that carry tactile and chemosensory receptors (Kim et al. 2001). The feeding behaviour of Korean cobitis fishes has previously been described as filtering bottoms consisting of such substrates as sand and or cobbles, and by digging and gulping (Kim & Park 2002, Kim & Ko 2005, Kim et al. 2006, Ko 2015). The European species C. taenia takes food by filtering small organisms and detritus from the substrate while passing it through the mouth and out via the gills (Robotham 1982). The Japanese species Misgurnus anguillicaudatus has two feeding behaviours, digging in the bottom substrate and gulping sand by feeding crawl and twist (Watanabe & Hidaka 1983); however, that study was not performed in a natural feeding environment, but an experimental one.
This species rests predominantly on the surface of the sand and the cobbles, staying inactive or quiescent, sometimes buried in the substrate. The resting duration is from 10 seconds to more than an hour and varies between individuals. Such feeding and resting behaviours have not been described previously in the wild or in captive experiments. Fish rest to conserve energy (Emery 1973). Moyle & Cech (2004) also suggested that fishes move to safer shelters to rest, and resting patterns also appear to vary between species.
Meanwhile, during the winter season, late November to February, the average air and water temperatures are below 10 [degrees]C and 8 [degrees]C, respectively, and fish hide or burrow into the substrate. Due to these actions, it is likely that few individuals are moving around in the water, which leads to less participation in feeding behaviour. Fish thus have great difficulty seeking detritus under such conditions. Moreover, the empty stomach rate was higher than in other seasons. In the winter, other cobitid fishes rarely feed on prey to conserve energy (Kim et al. 2006). On exposure to low ambient temperature, the brown bullhead (Ictalurus nebulosus) and the largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) exhibit winter dormancy, a sleep-like state that leads to metabolic shutdown (Crawshaw 1984).
Based on field research, I. hugowolfeldi, a benthic filter feeder, has specific behaviours closely related to its habitat, including bottom substrate, and showed various types of feeding and resting behaviours. These approaches for this fish may play a fundamental role in protection from water pollution and reckless artificial development of the habitat.
Arthington A.H., Bunn S.E., Poff N.L. & Naiman R.J. 2006: The challenges of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystem. Ecol. Appl. 16: 1311-1318.
Baek H.M., Song H.B., Sim H.S. et al. 2002: Habitat segregation and prey selectivity on cohabitation fishes, Phoxinus phoxinus and Rhynchocypris kumgangensis. Korean J. Ichthyol. 14: 121-131. (in Korean with English summary)
Byeon H.K. 2007: Ecology of Koreocobitis rotundicaudata (Cobitidae) in the Naerin Stream, Korea. Korean J. Ichthyol. 19: 299-305. (in Korean with English summary)
Choi E.K. 2003: Biology of the southern spined loach, Iksookimia hugowolfeldi (Pisces, Cobitidae). Dissertation, Chonbuk National University, Republic of Korea: 23-24. (in Korean)
Choi J.K. & Byeon H.K. 2009: Ecological characteristics of Cobitis pacifica (Cobitidae) in the Yeongok Stream, Korea. Korean J. Limnol. 42: 26-31. (in Korean with English summary)
Choi J.S. 2002: Ecological studies of Gobiobotia brevibarba Mori (Cyprinidae). Dissertation, Kangwon National University, South Korea: 74. (in Korean with English summary)
Cortes E. 1997: A critical review of methods of studying fish feeding based on analysis of stomach contents; application to elasmobranch fishes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54: 726-738.
Crawshaw L.I. 1984: Low-temperature dormancy in fish. Am. J. Physiol. 246: R479-R486.
Cummins K.W. 1962: An evolution of some techniques for the collection and analysis of benthic samples with special emphasis on lotic waters. Am. Midl. Nat. 67: 477-504.
Emery A.R. 1973: Preliminary comparisons of day and night habits of freshwater fish in Ontario lakes. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 30: 761-774.
Hildebrand M., Bramble D.M., Liem K.F. & Wake D.B. 2013: Functional vertebrates morphology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Hong Y.K., Yang H. & Bang I.C. 2011: Habitat, reproduction and feeding habit of endangered fish Koreocobitis naktongensis (Cobitidae) in the Jaho Stream, Korea. Korean J. Ichthyol. 23: 234-241. (in Korean with English summary)
Houlihan D., Boujard T. & Jobling M. 2001: Food intake in fish. Blackwell Science Ltd., London.
Hur J.W., Park J.W., Kang S.U. & Kim J.K. 2009: Estimation of fish fauna and habitat suitability index in the Geum river basin. J. Korean Soc. Civ. Eng. 23: 516-527. (in Korean with English summary)
Jeong J. 1993: Illustration of the freshwater algae of Korea. Academy Publishing Company, Seoul. (in Korean)
Jonsson N. 1991: Influence of water flow, water temperature and light on fish migration in rivers. Nord. J. Freshw. Res. 66: 20-35.
Kani T. 1944: Ecology of torrent-inhabiting insects. In: Furukawa H. (ed.), Insect, vol. I. Kenkyu-sha, Tokyo: 171-317. (in Japanese)
Kim B.J. 1996: The bionomics and life history of the freshwater eleotrid fish, Hypseleotris swinhonis (Gunther). Dissertation, Chonbuk National University. (in Korean with English summary)
Kim I.S. 1978: Ecological studies of cobitid fish, Cobitis koreensis in Jeonju-cheon Creek, Jeonrabug-do province, Korea. Korean J. Ecol. 2: 9-14. (in Korean with English summary)
Kim I.S. 1997: Illustrated encyclopedia of fauna and flora of Korea, vol. 37. Freshwater fishes. Ministry of Education, Yeongi, Korea. (in Korean)
Kim I.S. 2009: A review of the spined loaches, family Cobitidae (Cypriniformes) in Korea. Korean J. Ichthyol. 21: 7-28.
Kim I.S., Kim S.Y. & Park J.Y. 2001: Histological observation of the barbell in the spined loach, Iksookimia longicorpa (Cobitidae). Korea J. Ichthyol. 13: 24-27. (in English with Korean summary)
Kim I.S. & Ko M.H. 2005: Ecology of Iksookimia longicorpa (Cobitidae) in the Seomjin River, Korea. Korean J. Ichthyol. 17: 112-122. (in Korean with English summary)
Kim I.S., Ko M.H. & Park J.Y. 2006: Population ecology of Korean sand loach Cobitis teralineata (Pisces; Cobitdae) in the Seomjin River, Korea. J. Ecol. Field Biol. 29: 277-286. (in Korean with English summary)
Kim I.S. & Lee W.O. 1984: Morphological and ecological aspects on the population of Cobitis koreensis Kim (Pisces: Cobitidae) in the Begchon Stream, Puan-gun, Cholla-bugdo, Korea. Korean J. Ecol. 7: 10-20. (in Korean with English summary)
Kim I.S. & Park J.Y. 2002: Freshwater fishes of Korea. Kyo-hak Publishing Company, Ltd., Seoul. (in Korean)
Ko M.H. 2015: Habitat characteristics and feeding ecology of the Korean endemic species, Iksookimia pacifica (Pisces: Cobitidae) in the Bukcheon (stream), Korea. Korean J. Ichthyol. 27: 275-283. (in Korean with English summary)
Ko M.H., Kim K.Y., Park J.Y. et al. 2011: Red Data Book of endangered fishes in Korea. National Institute of Biological Resources, Incheon. (in Korean)
Ko M.H., Park J.Y. & Kim S.H. 2009: Habitat environment and feeding habitat of Iksookimia koreensis and Cobitis lutheri (Pisces: Cobitidae) in the Mangyeong River, Korea. Korean J. Ichthyol. 21: 253-261. (in Korean with English summary)
Lall S.P. & Tibbetts S.M. 2009: Nutrition, feeding, and behavior of fish. Vet. Clin. North Am. Exot. Anim. Pract. 12: 361-372.
Moyle P.B. & Cech J.J. 2004: Fishes: an introduction to ichthyology. Prentice Hall, Inc., New Jersey: 164-175.
Nalbant T.T. 1993: Some problems in the systematics of the genus Cobitis and its relative (Pisces: Ostariophysi, Cobitidae). Rev. Roum. Biol. Anim. 38: 101-110.
Nelson J.S. 2006: Fishes of the world-Family Cobitidae. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken: 146-147.
Pinkas L., Oliphant M.S. & Iverson I.L.K. 1971: Food habits of albacore, bluefin tuna, and bonito in California waters. University of California, State of California the Resources Agency Department of Fish and Game, Fish Bulletin 152: 1-105.
Robotham P.W.J. 1982: An analysis of a specialized feeding mechanisms of the spined loach, Cobitis taenia. J. Fish Biol. 20:173-181.
Tippets W. & Moyle P.B. 1978: Epibenthic feeding by rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) in the McCloud River, California. J. Anim. Ecol. 47: 549-559.
Watanabe K. & Hidaka T. 1983: Feeding behaviour of the Japanese loach, Misgurnus anguillicaudatus (Cobitidae). J. Ethol. 1: 86-90.
Won D.H., Kwon S.J. & Jeon Y.C. 2005: Aquatic insects of Korea. Korean Ecosystem Service Co., Ltd., Korea. (in Korean)
Wootton R.J. 1976: The biology of the sticklebacks. Academic Press, London.
Cheol-Woo PARK (1), Jae-Goo KIM (1), Seung-Woon YUN (1), Hyun-Tae KIM 1(1), Jong-Sung PARK (1), Wung-Sun CHOI (1), Yun-Jeong CHO (1), Yong-Joo LEE (2) and Jong-Young PARK (1*)
(1) Faculty of Biological Science and Institute for Biodiversity, College of Natural Sciences, Chonbuk National University, Baekjedae-ro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do 54896, Korea; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
(2) Department of Science Education, Jeonju National University of Education, Seohak-ro, Wansan-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do 55101, Korea
(*) Corresponding Author
Received 25 September 2017; Accepted 26 April 2018
Table 1. The stomach contents in percentage by frequency of occurrence, number, dry weight and values of the standardized IRI in Iksookimia hugowolfeldi. Prey organism Occurrence Number Dry weight IRI (%) (%) (%) (%) Phryganeidae 16.13 8.24 28.33 10.46 Chironomidae 52.63 42.86 33.19 70.98 Branchiopoda 15.68 17.58 17.44 9.74 Harpacticidae 13.38 21.98 13.14 8.33 Ephemeroptera 1.86 7.69 6.67 0.47 Others 0.32 1.65 1.23 0.02 Table 2. Phytoplankton found in stomach contents and in the river. Frequency Species Stomach Habitat contents Cyanophyceae Cosmarium sp. + Chroococcus sp. ++ Microcystis sp. +++ +++ Bacillariophyceae Navicula sp. +++ +++ Cymbella sp. +++ +++ Gomphonema sp. + Pinullaria sp. + + Synedra sp. + + Fragilaria sp. ++ ++ Coconeis sp. +++ +++ Melosira sp. ++ ++ Chlorophyceae Scenedesmus sp. + + Oscillatoriaceae Phormidium sp. ++ +++ Oscillatoria sp. + Chaetophoraceae Cloniophora sp. + Euglenophyceae Euglena sp. + Desmidiaceae Closterium sp. + +: 1~50 individuals, ++: 50~100 individuals, +++: more than 150 individuals.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Park, Cheol-Woo; Kim, Jae-Goo; Yun, Seung-Woon; Kim, Hyun-Tae; Park, Jong-Sung; Choi, Wung-Sun; Cho,|
|Date:||Aug 1, 2018|
|Previous Article:||The Mammals of the World--Vol. 7, Rodents II.|
|Next Article:||Older is better? Age-related variation in ornamental and breeding traits in bluethroats, Luscinia s. svecica.|