Printer Friendly

Guidelines on giving: foundations are pressed to reveal donor names.

Should the names of those who give to universities' foundations be made public to all? Or should their names and gift amounts be kept secret in the spirit of discretion? The answers aren't easy. Sometimes there is fear that those making donations to a foundation have undue influence on a university. There is only one way to find out if they do, and that is to know who they are and what they give.

On the other hand, some donors truly want anonymity. Some foundation directors fear that full disclosure will discourage generosity.

A number of IHEs have grappled with these questions in recent months. Iowa State University Foundation has written a new policy, effective May 1, that calls for disclosure of all donors' names, a range of their dollar gifts, and specifics on whether the gift is designated for certain expenses. The information will be kept confidential only if a donor makes a pointed request that it be so.

The impetus for the policy change was a 2002 Lawsuit filed by two people who wanted the foundation to provide more details about the gift of a 240-acre farm. ISU's foundation sold the land and used the proceeds. The plaintiffs claimed the donor's initial wishes were that the Land be maintained in her late husband's name. This particular Legal issue will be settled in court at a Later date.

The University of Louisville Foundation recently went through a similar situation involving disclosure of its corporate donors List. In this case, court rulings called for the foundation to release its records. The Kentucky State Supreme Court said that foundation records should be disclosed because such institutions perform a government function. The Colorado University Foundation agreed to allow the state auditor to examine its records after it was questioned about its spending. A Legal bill requiring disclosure has since been introduced by a state representative, but no new Legislation was passed by press time.

Meanwhile, several higher education associations are trying to make sense of these controversies. The Council for Advancement and Support of Education (www.case.org) and the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges (www.agb.org) produced a "memorandum of understanding" that gives guidelines on foundations, universities and the type of relationship that should exist between them. While this is not meant to be a document that will cover every contingency, it does delve deeply into proper legal wording on fund raising and management. A free download can be obtained through the CASE website.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Professional Media Group LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:UPDATE
Publication:University Business
Date:May 1, 2005
Words:417
Previous Article:More loans, more debt: despite higher loan amounts, monthly debt burden remains for graduates.
Next Article:New SAT writing section under fire: some IHEs are ignoring the new SAT writing scores.


Related Articles
Community foundations offer many useful tax advantages.
Effective fund-raising for non-profit camps.
Creative philanthropy: A donor advised fund of your own. (Finance).
Deferred charitable giving options.
Gifts with strings attached: restricted giving doesn't have to leave an institution in a tangle.
Americans gave nearly $250 billion in 2004: tsunami relief is a drop in the bucket of overall giving.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters