Printer Friendly

Growth rate and ring width variability of teak, Tectona granais (Verbenaceae) in an unmanaged forest in East Timor.

Teak (Tectona granais L.f.) is known world wide. It is one of the most important tree species in tropical regions and probably the most highly-valued hardwood due to the quality, attractiveness and durability of its heartwood (Bishop 1999).

Teak is a large deciduous or semi-deciduous tree depending on climate seasonality, growing in a wide range of climatic and edaphic conditions e.g. mean annual temperature 14-36[degrees]C and annual rainfall 600-4 000mm, but preferring contrasting dry and wet seasons (Orwa et al. 2009).

Teak is native to the Asia-Pacific region, covering an area of about 23 million hectares in India, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand and Indonesia (Bhat & Ok Ma 2004). It has also been introduced into many tropical countries, e.g. Togo (Kokutse et al. 2004), Kenya (Jacoby 1989), Nigeria (Akachuku & Abolarin 1989), Costa Rica (Bermejo et al. 2004), Brazil (Nogueira et al. 2006), Panama (Posch et al. 2004), Venezuela (Kammesheidt 2001) and Australia (Robertson & Reilly 2004).

East Timor ("Timor Leste" in Portuguese), an island in Southeast Asia, is characterized by tropical and subtropical moist mountain forests of approximately 507 000ha that represent 34.3% of the land area (FAO 2005). East Timor is the Eastern part of Timor island (08[degrees]20'09[degrees]37' S - 123[degrees]59'-127[degrees]19' E), while the Western part is Indonesian. East Timor was a colony under Portuguese jurisdiction until 1974, when it was annexed by Indonesia, after which a long guerilla war led to independence in 2002. The country is now struggling to achieve a livelihood for its population, and forests are considered one of the strong drivers for economic development since they include some valuable timber species, particularly teak.

There is general agreement in the literature that teak growth varies according to location (Priya & Bhat 1997) but most of the available data comes from Asian countries, especially India (Ram et al. 2008, 2010). Tree ring width is one of the most important variables for studying tree growth and climate influence (Tian et al. 2009), and growth rate helps to clarify forest dynamics, an important factor in the sustainable management of forest resources (e.g. Jacoby 1989, Fritts 1976, Priya & Bhat 1997, Pant 2003). Ring width is also considered a good anatomical indicator of age (Priya & Bhat 1998, Bhat et al. 2001), and T. grandis is one of the tropical species that shows clear growth rings and suitable for climatic analysis (Chowdhury 1964, Detienne 1989, Bhattacharyya & Shah 2009).

Teak is widely cultivated mainly for sawn wood and veneer (Bhat et al. 2001). There is no information on teak growth in East Timor, where the species is also found and where it is an important asset for the forest economy.

The main objectives of this study are to describe T. grandis growth in the Northeast region of East Timor using ring width analysis and annual and cumulative growth curves. Heartwood proportion and sapwood width variation along the tree stem were also evaluated. These are the first exploratory results published on teak growth from East Timor and we hope the data will be useful for designing a sustainable forest economy in spite of the limitations that the country's political and economic situation imposed on field observation and sampling.


Sample collection and preparation: The study area is located in the Northeast of East Timor, in the Lautem district between Los Palos and Fuiloro (08[degrees]30' S - 126[degrees]59' E, altitude 380m). It experiences a tropical climate with distinct wet and dry seasons determined by monsoon influence. The average yearly temperature is 23.8[degrees]C and rainfall is 1 923.9mm. Peak rainfall occurs from May to June, and the dry season is August-October (mean monthly rainfall under 32mm), while July and November are transition months (125mm and 94mm respectively).

The wood samples were collected in October-November 2003, at the end of the dry season, in a pure teak stand of 3.76ha with 4mx2m spacing established in the period 1940-1950 (under the Portuguese administration). The stand has now a mean tree density of 165 trees/ ha. The soils are of medium texture and pH 7.2, and the site has a declivity of less than 5%. No further records on stand establishment and management practices are available. Sampling was done in four circular 1 000[m.sup.2] permanent plots with mean basal area of 2.34[m.sup.2] (ranging from 2.06-2.59[m.sup.2]), mean tree height of 25.0m (mean height ranged in the plots from 22.025.6m), dominant tree height of 29.1m (ranging from 26.2-32.9m) and mean diameter at breast height (DBH) of 42.5cm (ranging from 37.5-43.1cm).

Teak harvesting is illegal in East Timor and special authorization was requested from the Ministry of Agriculture. Authorization was given to harvest only three trees. Selection of trees was done based on DBH diameter class (40cm) i.e. dominant trees (one per plot), stem straightness and no apparent defects. The mean diameter at breast height of the harvested trees was 46.8cm and mean tree height was 26.8m. From each tree stem discs of 5cm thickness were taken at 1.7m, 9.5m and 18.7m of stem height corresponding to the lower, medium and upper part of the stem. In addition increment cores of 5mm in diameter were also taken at 1.3m (DBH) from 12 living trees, by selecting three trees per plot (two cores per tree in opposite directions) as follows: one with diameter approximated to the average plot diameter, and the other two corresponding to the mean diameter plus and minus the standard deviation. Tree characteristics are shown in table 1.

For observation and measurement the transverse surfaces of the discs and cores were polished with sandpaper.

Sample measurements and growth analysis: Ring width measurement and ring counting were done using Leica QWin Stantard image analysis software. Core cross sections were first digitized using a scanner (Epson expression[TM] 1680), at 1 200 dpi. Disc cross sections were observed under a simple microscope (Olympus SZH10) at x30 magnification. Three randomly selected radii were analyzed in each disc. Ring counting on the stem discs followed the "broken radius" concept described by Worbes (2002). All ring width measurements were performed perpendicular to ring boundaries.

The distinction between heartwood and sapwood was performed macroscopically by colour difference, and heartwood radius and sapwood width were measured. The relationship between stem and heartwood radius was studied for each disc and heartwood percentage by radius was determined.

Radial ring width curves are presented as raw data for the different axial positions within the stem, and ring width variability was analyzed. Growth rates were calculated, i e the mean annual increment was determined for each tree at one height level by dividing average tree radius by average tree ring count. Age-radius relationships were estimated using cumulative growth curves that were calculated for each tree over its lifetime and averaged to obtain mean growth curves.

Analysis of variance and t-Student tests were performed to determine the significant level in the variation of ring width. Statistical calculations were carried out with SPSS 15.0 software, for a significant level of 95%.


The teak stem discs showed irregular shapes and eccentric growth was frequent, especially in the lower part of the stem. Pith eccentricity was greater at 9.5m, as shown by the difference in radii (Table 2), while in the upper part of the stem, at 18.7m, greater circularity of the stem cross-section was evident.

Growth rings were distinct and ring boundaries marked by one (usually) or more lines of wide vessels and banded parenchyma. Earlywood could be distinguished from latewood by its wider vessels and parenchyma and thinner-walled fibres (Fig. 1A, B). At 1.7m the number of rings varied from 44 to 47 in the stem cross-sections of the harvested trees (Table 2) and in the cores taken at DBH from 42 to 54 (Table 3).

The frequent occurrence of eccentric rings led to a considerable ring width variation in the radius and around the circumference. Some of the rings were very narrow, especially in the outer part of the stem and regardless of direction, and therefore measurement of sapwood rings was in general more difficult.


Wedging rings occurred in the lower part of the stem. This was an important factor of ring width variation around the circumference and meant that rings were missing or indistinct in certain regions of the cross-section. No relation with direction was observed. Figures 2A-D show examples of wedging and indistinct rings, which were more frequent in the discs at 1.7m and 9.5m stem height and practically absent at 18.7m. The maximum difference in number of rings along the three radii in the disc samples was large in the lower part of the stem (Table 2): at 1.7m ring counts differed by 14 in tree 1, by 5 in tree 2 and by 7 in tree 3, while at the top (18.7m) it varied only by 1 ring in tree 1, none in tree 2 and 2 in tree 3.


Mean ring width was 3.6mm and 4.3mm in discs (at 1.7m) and cores (at 1.3m) respectively (Tables 2 and 3).

Observation of stem discs showed that ring width was highly variable along the radius and between radii (Table 2). Growth rings went from extremely narrow to very wide, ranging from 0.2 to 23.0mm. No significant differences between trees were found and average ring width was 3.6 [+ or -] 0.5mm, 3.6 [+ or -] 0.8mm and 3.6 [+ or -] 0.7mm in tree 1, tree 2 and tree 3 respectively.

In spite of the considerable year-to-year radial variation of growth ring width, a radial pattern was observed, with a decrease in ring width from the pith towards the periphery. The widest rings were found within approximately the innermost 18 rings.

The axial variation of ring width was small and no longitudinal trend was observed. Average ring width varied from 3.1 to 4.4mm, 3.0 to 4.0mm and 3.0 to 4.4mm respectively at 1.7m, 9.5m and 18.7m. Fig. 3 shows an example of the radial variation of ring width for tree 1 at the three height levels.

Tree height level and radius were not statistically significant factors of variation but tree x height level and tree x radius x height level interactions were significant (p<0.001). Cambial age was a highly significant factor of variation (p<0.001), accounting for most of the total ring width variability.

The results obtained for ring width measurement in cores taken at DBH are summarized in table 3. The year-to-year variation was high, as shown by the high standard deviations and interval ranges obtained. The radial variation of ring width shows the same tendency to decrease along the radius from the inner part towards the periphery (Fig. 4)



Mean tree ring width was not significantly different between trees. Cambial age was a highly significant factor (p<0.001), accounting for most of total ring width variability.

In general the trees with the greatest growth had the highest initial growth rate. Growth was faster in the first years of tree age and slowed thereafter, but some trees showed a pronounced initial growth. Figure 5 (A, B) shows the cumulative radial growth for the studied teak trees at 1.7m (Fig. 5A) and at 1.3m (Fig. 5B). There were differences in absolute growth and in growth dynamics. For instance, for a total growth period corresponding to 40 rings the radial length varied from 132.5 to 230.7mm.


The measurements made on the stem discs enabled growth rates to be calculated for different age periods (Table 4). The mean growth rate was higher for the initial years, corresponding to 4.5mm/year, 4.4mm/year and 7.3mm/year during the first 20 years, and 3.3 mm/year, 3.6 mm/year and 5.2 mm/year from 30 years onwards for tree 1, tree 2 and tree 3, respectively.

The golden brown heartwood, often streaked grey or black, was clearly distinct from the yellowish-white sapwood (Fig. 2A). As shown in table 5, at 1.7m and 9.5m heartwood accounted for 90% of the stem radius and at 18.7m it varied between 66% and 85%.

Sapwood width was regular along the stem circumference and longitudinally within the stem, measuring on average 18 [+ or -] 7mm and corresponding to 9 [+ or -] 2 rings. In the tree cores sapwood width was on average 24 [+ or -] 9mm and included 8 [+ or -] 2 rings.


The growth rings in the studied Tectona grandis trees from East Timor were in general distinct with boundaries marked by lines of wide vessels and banded parenchyma, which are indicative of a ring-porous wood. T. grandis has been classified as a ring-porous wood species (Freitas 1958, 1963, Priya & Bhat 1997, 1998, Bhat et al. 2001, Worbes 2002, Shah et al. 2007), although references have also been made to ring to semi-ring porosity variation (Bhattacharyya et al. 1992), and semi-ring porosity (Detienne 1989). The growth ring distinctiveness confirms previous statements about T. grandis rings (e.g. Worbes 2002, Morataya et al. 1999) and was also reported for Indian (Kumar et al. 2002) and African teak (Detienne 1989). In spite of the overall good ring definition, narrow and faint rings were observed, particularly in the outer sapwood region, suggesting the presence of wedging or false rings. The occurrence of false rings and the indistinctiveness of sapwood rings were also reported in teak from India (Kumar et al. 2002) and Thailand (Pumijumnong et al. 1995).

Formation of wedging rings is generally related to poor light conditions and tree competition and to buttresses if located in the outer part of the stem (Worbes 2002). Since no silvicultural management practices (e.g. thinning) were applied and the stand is characterized by its homogeneity e.g. regarding slope, the wedging rings observed in our samples were probably related to tree competition leading to eccentricity in ring formation although others factors may be considered i.e. site quality. The effects of competition on teak growth have been reported in many regions, e.g. Puerto Rico (Devall & Parresol 2003), Costa Rica (Mora taya et al. 1999), Australia (Robertson & Reilly 2004) and India (Ram et al. 2010).

The few extreme 25 to 35mm wide rings that were observed appeared to be associated with knots or wound tissue inducing anomalously high or low growth in the surrounding area (Fritts 1976).

The dimensions of these 50-60 year-old teak trees in East Timor (with mean DBH of 38-43cm and height of 22-29m) are comparable to other teak trees from other locations. An example of teak trees with high growth given by very favourable conditions in India reported diameters around 48cm and heights around 31m at 40 years of age (Priya & Bhat 1999).

T. grandis in India showed rapid initial growth, slowing down after 15 or 20-25 years, which corresponds to the juvenile stage (Priya & Bhat 1998, Bhat et al. 2001, Kumar et al. 2002). Growth decrease is rapid from 25 to 30 years and is then slower up to 60 years (Bhat et al. 2001). Kumar et al. (2002) found that in Indian teak growth rates in the juvenile phase converged after 20 years. Teak growth periodicity is influenced by tree age, with 6.6mm wide rings in juvenile wood and 2.5 mm rings in mature wood (Priya & Bhat 1999, Bhat et al. 2001). Therefore mean growth rate is higher in young trees below 21 years than in 65-year-old mature trees (Bhat & Priya 2004).

The age-related growth variation with more rapid initial growth was observed in the East Timor teak trees (Fig. 4 and 5). In general, the duration of this phase was about 20 years, which is in agreement with Bhat & Priya (2004). Overall the first 20 rings from East Timor teak were considerably wider than rings grown from 30 years onwards (6.1 mm/ year, 5.6mm/year and 4.0mm/year for the periods 0-20, 20-30 and 30-45 years respectively, table 4). The wider growth rings of East Timor teak showed considerably more latewood than earlywood which is in agreement with other authors, e.g. Priya & Bhat (1998, 1999), who stated that the wider rings are generally related to greater formation of latewood, whereas early-wood width remains more or less constant.

Ring width of T. grandis from East Timor compared favourably with teak growth in other regions such as India, Australia and Java, over the same growth period. For example, the initial growth was higher than the reported data from India for 7-year-old and 13-year-old trees, which showed a variation in ring width from 1.9 to 5.8mm and 2.4 to 5.4mm, respectively (Priya & Bhat 1999). In trees from Costa Rica the mean annual increment found at DBH was higher at around 20mm at the age of 10 years and decreasing to 15mm at 45 years (Perez 2008).

The radial variation of ring width was the main source of variation for East Timor teak. This is in agreement with Worbes (1989), who identified the lack of radial uniformity as the variation factor in growth rings of tropical trees. Besides the age factor, stem eccentricity and deviations from circularity were also a significant factor for ring width variation. By contrast, the axial variation of ring width was small. Height variability was high for teak grown in Nigeria (Akachuku & Abolarin 1989). In addition to differences in soil characteristics, tree competition would influence stem development and ring width, resulting in between-tree differences.

Although there were no records on the past history of the studied teak stand in East Timor, it is probable that tree competition was a factor affecting growth and ring width. The growth curves suggest a more favourable growth environment with a reduced competition at about 35 years of age, leading to a subsequent short period of increased growth rate. This highlights the need to manage teak stands in relation to tree density by appropriate thinning practices, strengthened by the recent studies of Kokutse et al. (2010) in young teak plantations.

For economic reasons teak rotations of 20-30 years are now preferred to the traditional rotations of 50-70 years (Bhat & Ok Ma 2004), and this raises the question of heartwood dynamics with age. The evaluation of heartwood content and its vertical development is important since heartwood is the valued timber component of teak stems.

In the studied trees heartwood represented 87% of the stem radius for tree mean diameter of 37cm at 40-60 years of age. Sapwood contained 6-11 rings, indicating that the formation of heartwood begins early in teak. A large heartwood proportion is therefore achieved early, as reported for Indian teak in which heartwood attained 90% of 15-20cm diameters during the juvenile stage (Okuyama et al. 2000). In 11-13-year-old teak plantations in Togo about 30% of the wood surface was already heartwood, but greater formation of heartwood was reported in Asian teak compared to African teak (Kokutse et al. 2004). In Costa Rica the highest heartwood proportion of total tree volume was 61% in 47 year-old trees (Cordero & Kanninen 2003). Perez & Kanninen (2005) suggested that moderate and heavy thinnings yielded the highest percentage of heartwood volume while no clear relationship was found between heartwood volume and stand density.

Heartwood-formation in teak is more diameter- than age-dependent (Cordero & Kanninen 2003, Kokutse et al. 2004, Perez & Kanninen 2005), as also reported for other species, e.g. Acacia melanoxylon (Knapic et al. 2006), Eucalyptus globulus (Gominho & Pereira 2000, 2005) and Pinus sylvestris (Bjorklund 1999).

Sapwood proportion (area) in teak from Costa Rica remained constant till 70% of tree height (Cordero & Kanninen 2003).

Regarding other wood quality parameters, also wood mechanical and physic properties of teak from East-Timor were similar to those reported for plantations of other origins, showing density variation of low magnitude (Miranda et al. 2011).

In summary, the tree growth characteristics and heartwood development of teak in East Timor confirmed the potential commercial importance of this species for the economy of the region. Growth performance was good with a high initial growth rate and comparable to Indian teak, with a large proportion of heartwood forming at an early stage. The age-related variation of ring width and the occurrence in the lower part of the tree stems of eccentricity and wedging rings highlights the importance of appropriate stand management, particularly regarding thinning and basal density distribution over time, whenever optimized timber production is envisaged.


Wood sampling and transport were thanks to the assistance of PADRTL (Programme for the Support of Rural Development in East Timor) of the Portuguese government, and we appreciate all the help from the local field team. We thank the East Timor authorities, who granted permission for the harvesting of three teak trees. The authors are indebted to Fernando Abreu (Instituto Superior de Agronomia) for providing climatic data. Financial support for the scholarships of Paulo Maio and Filipe Boeyen Suspiro and for laboratorial analysis was provided by research funding from Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT) for Centro de Estudos Florestais (CEF).


Akachuku, A.E. & D.A.O. Abolarin. 1989. Variations in pith eccentricity and ring width in teak (Tectona grandis L. f.). Trees Struct. Funct. 3: 111-116.

Bermejo, I., I. Canellas & A. San Miguel. 2004. Growth and yield models for teak plantations in Costa Rica. Forest Ecol. Manag. 189: 97-110.

Bishop, P. 1999. 100 Woods: A guide to popular timbers of the world. The Crowood, London, England.

Bjorklund, L. 1999. Identifying heartwood-rich stands or stems of Pinus sylvestris by using inventory data. Silva Fennica 33: 119-129.

Bhat, K.M. & H. Ok Ma. 2004. Teak grower's unite. ITTO Tropical Forest Update 14: 3-5.

Bhat, K.M. & P.B. Priya. 2004. Influence of provenance variation on wood properties of teak from the Western Ghat region in India. IAWA J. 25: 273-282.

Bhat, K.M., P.B. Priya & P. Rugmini. 2001. Characterization of juvenile wood in teak. Wood Sci. Tech. 34: 517-532.

Bhattacharyya, A. & S.K. Shah. 2009. Tree-ring studies in India past appraisal, present and future prospects. IAWA J. 30: 361-370.

Bhattacharyya, A., R.R. Yadav, H.P. Borgaonkar & G.B. Pant. 1992. Growth-ring analysis of Indian tropical trees: dendroclimatic potential. Curr Sci. 62: 737-741.

Cordero, L.D.P. & M. Kanninen. 2003. Heartwood, sapwood and bark content, and wood dry density of young and mature teak (Tectona grandis) trees grown in Costa Rica. Silva Fennica 37: 45-54.

Chowdhury, K.A. 1964. Growth rings in tropical trees and taxonomy. J. Indian Bot. Soc. 43: 334-342.

Detienne, P. 1989. Appearance and periodicity of growth rings in some tropical woods. IAWA Bull. n.s. 10: 123-132.

Devall, M.S. & B.R. Parresol. 2003. A Dendrochronolo gical study of Teak (Tectona grandis L. f., Verbenaceae). Peechi, India.

FAO. 2005. State of the world's forests. FAO, Rome, Italy.

Freitas, M.C. 1958. Estudo das madeiras de Timor. II contribuicao. Ministerio do Ultramar. Memorias da Junta de Investigacoes do Ultramar, Lisboa, Portugal.

Freitas, M.C. 1963. Madeiras da India Portuguesa. Memorias da Junta de Investigacoes do Ultramar, Lisboa, Portugal.

Fritts, H.C. 1976. Tree rings and climate. Academic, London, England.

Gominho, J. & H. Pereira. 2000. Variability of heartwood content in plantation-grown Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Wood Fiber Sci. 32: 189-195.

Gominho, J. & H. Pereira. 2005. The influence of tree spacing in heartwood content in Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Wood Fiber Sci. 37: 582-590.

Jacoby, G.C. 1989. Overview of tree-ring analysis in tropical regions. IAWA Bull. n.s. 10: 99-108.

Kammesheidt, L., A.T. Lezama, W. Franco & M. Plonczak. 2001. History of logging and silvicultural treatments in the Western Venezuelan plain forests and the prospect for sustainable forest management. Forest Ecol. Manag. 148: 1-20.

Knapic, S., F. Tavares & H. Pereira. 2006. Heartwood and sapwood variation in Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. trees in Portugal. Forestry 79: 371-380.

Kokutse, A.D., H. Bailleres, A. Stokes & K. Kokou. 2004. Proportion and quality of heartwood in Togolese teak (Tectona grandis L.f.). For. Ecol. Manage. 189: 37-48.

Kokutse, A.D., A. Stokes, N.K. Kokutse & K. Kokou. 2010. Which factors most influence heartwood distribution and radial growth in plantation teak? Ann. Forest Sci. 67: 407-417.

Kumar, A.N.A., Y.B. Srinivasa & S.S. Chauhan. 2002. Growth rate convergence in teak (Tectona grandis L.). Curr. Sci. 83: 808-809.

Miranda, I., V. Sousa & H. Pereira. 2011. Wood properties of teak (Tectona grandis) from a mature unmanaged stand in East Timor. J Wood Sci. DOI: 10.1007/ s10086-010-1164-8.

Morataya, R., G. Galloway, F. Berninger & M. Kanninen. 1999 Foliage biomass- sapwood (area and volume) relationships of Tectona grandis L.F. and Gmelina arborea Roxb.: silvicultural implications. Forest Ecol. Manag. 113: 231-239.

Nogueira, G.S., H.G. Leite, J.C.C. Campos, F.H. Takizawa & L. Couto. 2006. Avaliacao de um modelo de distribuicao diametrica ajustado para povoamentos de Tectona grandis submetidos a desbaste. Rev. Arv. 30: 377-387.

Okuyama, T., H. Yamamoto, I. Wahyudi, Y.S. Hadi & K.M. Bhat. 2000. Growth stresses and some wood quality attributes in planted teak. Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.

Orwa, C., A. Mutua, R. Kindt, R. Jamnadass & A. Simons. 2009. Agroforestree Database: a tree reference and selection guide version 4.0. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya. (Downloaded: March 2010,

Pant, G.B. 2003. Long-term climate variability and change over monsoon Asia. J. Ind. Geophys Union 7: 125-134.

Posch, B., G. Wegener, D. Grosser & L. Wagner. 2004. Physical and mechanical investigations on teakwood (Tectona grandis L.f.) from plantations in Panama. Holz Roh Werkst. 62: 31-35.

Perez, D. 2008. Growth and volume equations developed from stem analysis for Tectona grandis in Costa Rica. J. Trop. Forest Sci. 20: 66-75.

Perez, D. & M. Kanninen. 2005. Effect of thinning on stem form and wood characteristics of teak (Tectona grandis) in a humid tropical site in Costa Rica. Silva Fennica 39: 217-225.

Priya, P.B. & K.M. Bhat. 1997. Wood anatomical changes associated with insect defoliation in juvenile teak. IAWA J. 18: 307-313.

Priya, P.B. & K.M. Bhat. 1998. False ring formation in teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) and the influence of environmental factors. Forest Ecol. Manag. 108: 215-222.

Priya, P.B. & K.M. Bhat. 1999. Influence of rainfall, irrigation and age on the growth periodicity and wood structure in teak (Tectona grandis). IAWA J. 20: 181-192.

Pumijumnong, N., D. Eckstein & U. Sass. 1995. Tree-ring research on Tectona grandis in Northern Thailand. IAWA J. 16: 385-392.

Ram, S., H.P Borgaonkar & A.B. Sikder. 2008. Tree-rings analysis of teak (Tectona grandis L.F.) in central India and its relationship with rainfall and moisture index. J. Earth Syst.117: 637-645.

Ram, S., H.P. Borgaonkar & A.B. Sikder. 2010 Varying strength of the relationship between tree-rings and summer month moisture index (April- September) over Central India: a case study. Quatern. Internat. 212: 70-75.

Robertson, R.M. & D.F. Reilly. 2004. Performance of a 16-year-old stand of teak (Tectona grandis L) in the Darwin area in relation to that in other trials in the Northern Territory. Queensland, Australia.

Shah, K.S., A. Bhattacharyya & V. Chaudhary. 2007. Reconstruction of June-September precipitation based on tree-ring data of teak (Tectona grandis L.) from Hoshangabad, Madhya Pradesh, India. Dendrochronologia 25: 57-64.

Tian, Q., X. Gou, Y. Zang, Y. Wang & Z. Fan. 2009. MayJune mean temperature reconstruction over the past 300 years based on tree rings in the Qilian mountains of the Northeastern Tibetan Plateau. IAWA J. 30: 421-434.

Worbes, M. 1989. Growth rings, increment and age of trees in inundation forests, savannas and a mountain forest in the neotropics. IAWA Bull.10: 109-122.

Worbes, M. 2002. One hundred years of tree-ring research in the tropics-a brief history and an outlook to future challenges. Dendrochronologia 20: 217-231.

Vicelina B. Sousa (1), Sofia Cardoso (1), Teresa Quilho (2) & Helena Pereira (1)

(1.) Centro de Estudos Florestais, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade Tecnica de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal;,,

(2.) Centro de Florestas e Produtos Florestais, Instituto de Investigacao Cientifica Tropical, Tapada da Ajuda, 1347- 017 Lisboa, Portugal;

Received 12-X-2010. Corrected 07-V-2011. Accepted 02-VI-2011.
Characteristics of teak trees from East Timor in the Northeast
region between Los Palos and Fuiloro

Tree        1 *      2 *      3 *       4        5

DBH (cm)    50.0     42.0     48.3     46.3     29.1
H (m)       23.1     29.6     26.8      25      24.2

Tree         6        7        8        9        10

DBH (cm)    38.6     43.2     45.4     36.3     43.4
H (m)       23.8     22.7     29.7     22.5     30.3

Tree         11       12       13       14       15

DBH (cm)    48.5     39.2     56.7     31.5     43.9
H (m)       26.5     29.4     24.5     26.0     30.6

* = harvested trees.

Growth ring quantitative data of T. grandis wood at 1.7 m, 9.5 m
and 18.7 m stem height levels

                                Tree 1
height        Radius           Number of           Ring width
(m)            (mm)              rings                (mm)

1.7      188 [+ or -] 58     47 [+ or -] 8    3.05 [+ or -] 1.75
9.5      138 [+ or -] 81     34 [+ or -] 9    3.97 [+ or -] 1.86
18.7      74 [+ or -] 19     17 [+ or -] 0    3.81 [+ or -] 1.97

                                Tree 2
height        Radius            Number
(m)            (mm)            of rings         Ring width (mm)

1.7      158 [+ or -] 18     44 [+ or -] 3    3.25 [+ or -] 1.95
9.5      127 [+ or -] 21     39 [+ or -] 2    2.99 [+ or -] 1.74
18.7      89 [+ or -] 36     18 [+ or -] 0     4.41[+ or -] 1.76

                                Tree 3
height        Radius           Number of        Ring width (mm)
(m)            (mm)
1.7      209 [+ or -] 32     45 [+ or -] 4    4.39 [+ or -] 4.23
9.5      156 [+ or -] 50     43 [+ or -] 3    3.31 [+ or -] 2.53
18.7      83 [+ or -] 3      24 [+ or -] 1    2.98 [+ or -] 1.89

Mean of three radii per disc [+ or -] standard deviation and as
minimum-maximum values in parentheses. Note that wedged and false
rings are included.

Growth ring quantitative data of T. grandis wood at DBH

Tree         Radius       Number              Ring width (mm)
              (mm)       of rings

4              201          50         3.95 [+ or -] 2.14 (0.73-9.9)
5              111          49         2.22 [+ or -] 1.54 (0.29-6.97)
6              168          39         4.21 [+ or -] 4.42 (0.73-20.07)
7              188          47         3.92 [+ or -] 2.17 (0.6-10.74)
8              235          51         4.53 [+ or -] 2.21 (0.31-10.01)
9              164          53         3.04 [+ or -] 1.68 (0.73-8.27)
10             164          44         3.64 [+ or -] 2.87 (0.7-14.96)
11             267          46         5.69 [+ or -] 3.15 (0.44-15.07)
12             179          46         3.81 [+ or -] 2.62 (0.83-11.03)
13             266          45         5.80 [+ or -] 5.48 (0.8-20.98)
14             151          40         3.67 [+ or -] 3.15 (0.64-13.49)
15             232          44         5.16 [+ or -] 5.24 (0.38-31.3)

Mean [+ or -] standard deviation and minimum-maximum values
in parentheses. Note that wedged and false rings are included.

T. grandis mean annual growth (mm) (at 1.7 m of stem height) for
different growth periods

                          Mean annual growth (mm)
            0-10 yr              10-20 yr             20-30 yr

1      4.54 [+ or ] 0.86    4.61 [+ or ] 0.21    3.96 [+ or ] 0.22
2      6.40 [+ or ] 0.79    4.82 [+ or ] 0.38    3.79 [+ or ] 0.24
3      7.42 [+ or ] 1.47    8.67 [+ or ] 0.79    6.17 [+ or ] 0.64

               Mean annual growth (mm)
            30-45 yr             0-45 yr

1      3.34 [+ or ] 0.14    3.07 [+ or ] 0.06
2      3.58 [+ or ] 0.13    3.29 [+ or ] 0.04
3      5.14 [+ or ] 0.25    4.51 [+ or ] 0.11

Mean and standard deviation of three radii.

Sapwood (SW) width and heartwood (HW) percentage of stem radius
of T. grandis at 1.7m, 9.5m and 18.7m heights

Stem                                Tree 1
(m)            Radius                 SW                    HW
                (mm)                 (mm)                  (%)

1.7       188 [+ or -] 58      22.3 [+ or -] 8.6    88.4 [+ or -] 1.4
9.5       138 [+ or -] 81      14.0 [+ or -] 11.3   90.4 [+ or -] 2.6
18.7       74 [+ or -] 19      25.7 [+ or -] 8.1    65.5 [+ or -] 2.3

Stem                                Tree 2
(m)            Radius                 SW                    HW
                (mm)                 (mm)                  (%)

1.7       158 [+ or -] 18      18.7 [+ or -] 4.0    88.2 [+ or -] 2.0
9.5       127 [+ or -] 21      17.7 [+ or -] 3.1    86.1 [+ or -] 0.3
18.7       89 [+ or -] 36      29.7 [+ or -] 11.1   66.3 [+ or -] 1.4

Stem                                Tree 3
(m)            Radius                 SW                    HW
                (mm)                 (mm)                  (%)

1.7       209 [+ or -] 32       9.0 [+ or -] 1.7    93.3 [+ or -] 1.6
9.5       156 [+ or -] 50       9.7 [+ or -] 1.5    93.3 [+ or -] 2.6
18.7       83 [+ or -] 3       12.3 [+ or -] 4.5    85.0 [+ or -] 5.5

Mean and standard deviation of three radii per disc.
COPYRIGHT 2012 Universidad de Costa Rica
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:articulo en ingles
Author:Sousa, Vicelina B.; Cardoso, Sofia; Quilho, Teresa; Pereira, Helena
Publication:Revista de Biologia Tropical
Date:Mar 1, 2012
Previous Article:A method for seedling recovery in Jatropha curcas after cryogenic exposure of the seeds.
Next Article:Germination and seedling morphology of four South American Smilax (Smilacaceae).

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters