Printer Friendly

Growth and yield of anthurium in response to sawdust mulching/Crescimento e producao de anturio em resposta a cobertura do solo com serragem de madeira.


Anthurium, for its exquisiteness, durability, and long vase-life stands out among most cultivated tropical flowers (GANTAIT & MANDAL, 2010). This flower belongs to the largest genus of Araceae family that encompasses over 1500 species, of which 600 species are from Tropical America (VENKAT et al., 2014). Anthurium andreanum Linden ex Andre (anthurium) is the most known, which plays a significant role in the global floriculture trade. Is a slow-growing perennial which requires warm, shady, humid conditions, as well as soil with good water retention capacity and good drainage (COLLETTE et al., 2004).

In soil management, appropriate mulching provides environmental and agronomical advantages such as preventing weed growth (SINKEVICIENE et al., 2009), controlling diurnal/seasonal fluctuations in soil temperature, protecting soil from erosion (JAFARI et al., 2012) or increasing water use efficiency by reducing evaporation (JUN et al., 2014). Organic mulching and its skillful application can lead to improved soil organic matter contents (YOUNIS et al., 2012), recovering other soil characteristics as aggregation, water holding capacity (MUPANGWA et al., 2013), and nutrients content (JUN et al., 2014). As consequence, in general, increase the economic productivity of horticultural crops.

The usefulness of different mulching materials to different floriculture crops is well accepted (YOUNIS et al., 2012). Organic matter also can serve as good medium to anchor adventitious roots for anthurium (HIGAKI et al., 1995). However, limited research had been done with use of mulches. The objectives of the study were to analyze the effect of sawdust mulch on the: (1) soil characteristics; (2) growth and flower yield of the anthurium cv. 'Apalai'.


The experiment was conducted on a flower farm in the municipality of Pariquera-Acu SP, Brazil, 24[degrees]36'31" S and 47[degrees]53'48" W, at 25m above MSL. According to Koppen, the region's climate is tropical humid without a well-defined dry season (Af). The accumulated rainfall during the experimental was 1573mm [year.sup.-1] and the average minimum and maximum temperatures were 25.9[degrees]C and 16.7[degrees]C, respectively. The soil of the area was Oxisols, typic Hapludox (SOIL SURVEY STAFF, 2010), with 39% of clay, 16% of silt and 45% of sand.

Plant material was Anthurium andraeanum cv. 'Apalai' (IAC NK 130), which is vigorous and productive with rounded spathe, red and white spadix with yellow apex, widely cultivated and marketed in Sao Paulo with good acceptance. The micropropagated seedlings were transplanted for beds measuring 1.20m, spaced at 0.40 x 0.40m intervals in width, laid out in the nursery area covered at a height of three meters with a black netting to provide 70% shade. The experiment was installed out with plants adult, about 22 months after transplantation, in a totally randomized design, subdivided into plots, with five treatments and eight replications. The treatment consisted of five volumes of sawdust 0, 20, 40, 60 and 80L [m.sup.-2] distributed over the bed every three months. Sawdust was first applied in July 2011, or rather, at the start of the harvest of marketable flower stalks, twelve months after transplanting. The final sawdust application occurred in April 2013. Analysis of mulching material had the following average characteristics: N: 0.26%; P: 0.03%; Ca: 0.27%; Mg: 0.05%; Na: 150mg [kg.sup.-1]; Cu: 6mg [kg.sup.-1]; Fe: 135mg [kg.sup.-1]; Mn: 24mg [kg.sup.-1]; Zn: 4mg [kg.sup.-1]; pH: 5.10; moisture: 53%; total C 25%; C/N ratio 96/1. Fertilization was maintained with 20g of NPK per plant, at 10-10-10, every two months. The lateral buds were eliminated and only one plant per clump was maintained. Plants did not receive any irrigation or leaf trimming.

Upon application of sawdust, the leaves were counted and their dimensions taken. Total leaf area was estimated by equation established by MODENESE-GORLA DA SILVA et al. (2008). Inflorescence commercial harvest point (1/2 to 3/4 of open flowers on the spadix) were evaluated every week. Further, inflorescence was harvested to determine its dimension (size of flower stalk, width and length of spathe and length of spadix).

The temperature of soil was determined every 15 days at a depth of 15cm. Fortnightly also, soil samples were collected to quantify water content by the gravimetric method (EMBRAPA, 1997). Undisturbed soil samples of a 5.1cm length and a 5cm diameter were collected on days 210, 570 and 720 after sawdust implementation to determine the capacity of water retention at different tensions (FREITAS JUNIOR & SILVA, 1984). Moisture and water potential values observed were adjusted by the equation of Van GENUCHTEN (1980), through the SWRC software version 2.0 (DOURADONETO et al., 2000).

Sampling and measures were always performed in triplicate. Temperature and precipitation data were collected daily from the weather station. Experimental data were subjected to analysis of variance (F test) and differences between treatment means were compared by Tukey's test. Regression analysis determined the most appropriate volume of sawdust and correlation between variables was determined by Pearson's coefficient.


Average minimum and maximum temperatures during the experimental period were 16.8 and 26.3[degrees]C respectively. Absolute temperatures ranged between 5.0 and 39.2[degrees]C, exceeding on some days the maximum daytime limit of 35[degrees]C and nigh time minimum threshold of 18[degrees]C (DUFOUR & GUERIN, 2003). Total accumulated rainfall was 3080.2mm.

Temperature monitoring of soil revealed a linear behaviour of the variable which depended on the volume of sawdust (Figure 1A), displaying an average minimum temperature of 20.61[degrees]C in the absence of coverage and maximum of 22.85[degrees]C when 80L m'2 of sawdust were applied. The above data demonstrates that soil cover elevated soil temperature by 2.24[degrees]C, perhaps due to the decomposition of material used and to the heat generated by the metabolism of microorganisms.

Soil temperature also varied as a function of time after the application of the sawdust (Figure 1B). This reflected the effect of the physical protection of the soil but also the climatic conditions to which the crop canopy and soil were submitted. Similar behaviour was reported (Figure 1B) when air temperature, soil without cover and protected by sawdust were related to the time. Air temperature tended to be lower than that of the soil during the colder months regardless of the presence of cover. Positive correlation between soil temperature, with or without cover, and the air temperature was observed (Figure 1C) and between organic matter content and temperature (Figure 1D). Increased soil temperature observed in the mulched plots also agreed with the findings of RAMAKRISHNA et al. (2006). Under straw mulch, ZHANG et al. (2009) and JUN et al. (2014) also observed that soil temperature decreased in the warmer period and increased in the colder period when compared to those of non-mulched soil.

Soil moisture showed a linear behaviour according to the volume of sawdust applied (Figure 1A), with initial and final rates respectively at 37% and 71% confirming that the sawdust contributed towards high moisture rates. Soil moisture of the bed as a function of time after the start of treatment did not show a characteristic behaviour to be described by a regression model. When comparing soil moisture in absence and presence of sawdust, the moisture of soil covered was always higher than in the absence of sawdust. Straw mulch and gravel mulch both enhanced soil water content at the 15cm depth (JUN et al., 2014).

Considering the whole experimental period, it was also not possible to establish a correlation between accumulated rainfall and soil moisture (Figure 1D). However, in the period with low cumulative rainfall (400-460 days), the soil moisture without cover decreased linearly with decreasing precipitation, response that did not occur in the soil with cover (Figure 1D), probably due to reduction in water evaporation from the surface and to an increase in the amount of infiltrated water. Soil profile moisture content, water infiltration rate and hydraulic conductivity in soil with mulching were significantly higher, than without cover (KUOTSU et al., 2014). Retention of residues on the soil surface also reduced water evaporation (ZHANG et al., 2009; KUOTSU et al., 2014).

The sawdust mulching changed the shape of the soil water retention curve at 210 days after the implementation (Figure 2A). The treatment without sawdust registered the lowest water contents at several tensions at 210 and 570 days, while the application of sawdust provided greater retention of water (Figure 2B). After 570 days, the application of 40L [m.sup.-2] had the highest water contents in all applied tensions. At 720 days (Figure 2C) the highest water retention occurred in the soil at tensions below 10kPa in soil that received 40L [m.sup.-2]. However, at higher tensions the soil with 20L m-2 of sawdust retained more water. Although based on water retention curves, it was not possible to establish the best volume of sawdust, even though there was no doubt on the benefits of cultural practice. In fact, it provided improvements in the physical conditions and the rise of the soil's organic matter levels in proportion to the amount invested (Figure 1E). Higher average rates of soil moisture in plots with cover (Figure 1D) corroborate with water retention curves obtained (Figure 2). Such a response can also be supported by significant correlations between organic matter and soil moisture (Figure 1F), bulk density and porosity or retained water content (Figure 2D). In other words, treatments with sawdust showed higher average rates of soil moisture due to greater water retention. Regardless of the volume, soil with sawdust showed a soil bulk density decrease (Figure 1E), with mean value of 1.45[+ or -]0.10g [cm.sup.-3], whereas the soil without sawdust averaged 1.60[+ or -]0.08g [cm.sup.-3]. Mulching reduced soil bulk density through promotion of aggregation and pore development in the soil system as the residues decomposed (MULUMBA & LAL, 2008; MUPANGWA et al., 2013).There was also a reduction of bulk density due to the volume of sawdust. MULUMBA & LAL (2008) also established no linear relationship between mulch rate and soil bulk density. There was a linear correlation between organic matter content and soil characteristics, temperature, moisture and density (Figure 1G).

Despite the increase in level organic matter in soil, no changes in nutrient content of leaf due to applied sawdust volume occurred. Regardless of treatments, the average content of macronutrients in the leaves to N, 25.1, P, 2.78, K, 41.1, Ca, 18.8, Mg, 6.89g [kg.sup.-1] and micronutrients, B, 65.2, Cu, 13.5, Fe, 160.4, Mn, 437.9, Zn, 79.1mg [kg.sup.-1]. N, K, Ca, S, B, Fe, Mg and Cu contents were at an adequate level in the leaves, with Mn very much higher than required (TOMBOLATO et al., 2002). Nevertheless, there were no phytotoxicity symptoms.

Since the plants total leaf area increased as a function of time, the soil-climate conditions were favourable to growth. Increase in leaf area owing to anthurium development complies with the fact that plant in juvenile stage has smaller leaves and larger ones in the adult stage (DUFOUR & GUERIN, 2003). In fact, a linear response in the growth for plants of all treatments was obtained when the total leaf area was correlated with the volume of sawdust (Figure 3A). The number of flower stalks, flowering interval, flower stalk length and spathe length were also affected by the volume of sawdust applied and contrastingly to the leaf area, there was a quadratic growth response to soil cover (Figure 3B and 3C). Average flower stalks produced in soil with and without sawdust were respectively 5.44 and 6.56 [years.sup.-1], very close to averages reported by NOMURA et al. (2011). However, despite very similar production, soil protection promoted plant growth when mean rates of the size of the flower stalk were compared (Figure 3C). In fact, it contributed towards an increase in the quality. When quality is taken into account, soil cover induced longer flower stalks and only flower stalks harvested from plants grown with 80L [m.sup.-2] of sawdust reached the average minimum length of 60cm. This is an important feature for classification, although Brazilian domestic consumer market accepts shorter flower stalks (TOMBOLATO et al., 2002).

Soil cover also reduced flower mortality during the experimental period, or rather, a 2% average in plants cultivated with sawdust-covered bed when compared to a 10% average in plants growing without any sawdust cover. No difference occurred between treatments with regard to defective inflorescences harvested (deformity) and spathe defects (blemish, deformity, disease or pest attack) which together constituted 5% of harvested flowers. Spathes with a regular red colour were observed in plants from different treatments.

Increase of flower stalks, decrease in flowering interval, length increase of flower stalk and spathe confirmed that sawdust over 40L [m.sup.-2] provided the most appropriate condition for cultivation. There was a linear correlation between organic matter content of soil and the growth characteristics of the plant, total leaf area (Figure 3D), production as number of flower stalks [plant.sup.-1] and flowering interval and quality, as flower stalk length (Figure 3E) and spathe length (Figure 3F). Other studies reported that the quality of ornamental plants and the yield can be improved through application of mulch (BLAZEWICZ-WOZNIAK et al., 2011; YOUNIS et al., 2012; LASKOWSKA et al., 2012).


The sawdust mulching is an asset to anthurium cultivation by improving the soil's organic matter content, stimulating plants growth and yield when compared results with bare soil. The application of 40L [m.sup.-2] of sawdust every three months is recommended.


To Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) for the research grant given to the second author (2011/20193-2).


BLAZEWICZ-WOZNIAK, M. et al. Flowering of bear garlic (Allium ursinum L.) cultivated in the field at varied nitrogen nutrition and mulching. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, v.10, n.3, p.133-144, 2011. Available from: < FullTextPDF/2011/20113290071.pdf>. Accessed: Mar. 31, 2015.

COLLETTE, V.E. et al. Temporal and spatial expression of flavonoid biosynthetic genes in flowers of Anthurium andraeanum. Physiologia Plantarum, v. 122, n.3, p.297-304, 2004. Available from: < doi/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2004.00402.x/full>. Accessed: Jul. 24, 2014. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2004.00402.x.

DOURADO-NETO, D. et al. Software to model soil water retention curves (SWRC, version 2.00). Scientia Agricola, v.57, n.1, p. 191-192, 2000. Available from: <http://www.scielo. br/scielo.php?pid=S0103-90162000000100031&script=sci_ arttext>. Accessed: Jul. 24, 2014. doi: 10.1590/S0103 90162000000100031.

DUFOUR, L; GUERIN, V. Growth, developmental features and flower production of Anthurium andreanum Lind. in tropical conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, v.8, n.1, p.25-35, 2003. Available from: < pii/S0304423802001966>. Accessed: Jul. 24, 2014. doi: 10.1016/ S0304-4238(02)00196-6.

EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA EMBRAPA. Manual de metodos de analises de solo. 2 ed. Rio de Janeiro, 1997. 212p. Available from: <http://www.agencia. k02wx5ok0q43a0ram31wtr.pdf>. Accessed: Jan. 3, 2012.

FREITAS JUNIOR, E.; SILVA, E.M. Uso da centrifuga para determinacao da curva de retencao de agua do solo, em uma unica operacao. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, v.19, n.11, p.1423-1428, 1984. Available from: < php/pab/article/view/16199/10375>. Accessed: Jul. 24, 2014.

GANTAIT, S.; MANDAL, N. Tissue culture of Anthurium andreanum: a significant review and future prospective. International Journal of Botany, v.6, n.3, p.207-219, 2010. Available from: <>. Accessed: Mar. 27, 2015. doi: 10.3923/ijb.2010.207.219.

HIGAKI, T. et al. Anthurium culture in Hawaii. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, 1995. 23p. (HITAHR Research Series, 152).

JAFARI, M. et al. Mulching impact on plant growth and production of rainfed fig orchards under drought conditions. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, v.10, n.1, p.428-433, 2012. Available from: < journals/2012-issue_1/a45.pdf>. Accessed: Mar. 27, 2015.

JUN, F. et al. Mulching effects on water storage in soil and its depletion by alfalfa in the Loess Plateau of northwestern China. Agricultural Water Management, v.138, n.31, p.10-16, 2014. Available from: < S037837741400064X>. Accessed: Mar. 27, 2015.

KUOTSU, K. et al. Land forming and tillage effects on soil properties and productivity of rainfed groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)-rapeseed (Brassica campestris L.) cropping system in northeastern India. Soil & Tillage Research, v.142, p.15-24, 2014. Available from: < article/pii/S016719871400083X>. Accessed: Mar. 28, 2015.

LASKOWSKA, H. et al. The effect of bulb planting time and type of mulch on the yield of Allium aflatunense B. Fedtsch. Acta Agrobotanica, v.65, n.4, p.117-122, 2012. Available from: <>. Accessed: Mar. 31, 2015. doi: 10.5586/aa.2012.028.

MODENESE-GORLA DA SILVA, S.H. et al. Estimativa da area foliar de anturio com funcoes de regressao. Ciencia Rural, v.38, n.1, p.243-246, 2008. Available from: < scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782008000100040>. Accessed: Jul. 24, 2014. doi: 10.1590/S0103-84782008000100040.

MULUMBA, L.N.; LAL, R. Mulching effects on selected soil physical properties. Soil & Tillage Research, v.98, n.1, p.106-111, 2008. Available from: < article/pii/S0167198707001985>. Accessed: Mar. 27, 2015.

MUPANGWA, W. et al. Cumulative effects of reduced tillage and mulching on soil properties under semi-arid conditions. Journal of Arid Environments, v.91, p.45-52, 2013. Available from: <http://>. Accessed: Mar. 27, 2013.

NOMURA, E.S. et al. Crescimento e producao de anthurium submetido a diferentes intensidades de desfolha. Ciencia Rural, v.41, n.4, p.602-607, 2011. Available from: < scielo.php?pid=S0103-84782011000400009&script=sci_arttext>. Accessed: Jul. 24, 2014. doi: 10.1590/S0103-84782011005000043.

RAMAKRISHNA, A. et al. Effect of mulch on soil temperature, moisture, weed infestation and yield of groundnut in northern Vietnam. Field Crops Research, v.95, n.2-3, p.115-125, 2006. Available from: < pii/S0378429005000560>. Accessed: Mar. 28, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.030.

SINKEVICIENE, A. et al. The influence of organic mulches on soil properties and crop yield. Agronomy Research, v.7, sp. issue I, p.485-491, 2009. Available from: vol07Spec1/p7sI53.pdf Accessed: Jul. 24, 2014. doi: 10.1111/ j.1475-2743.2000.tb00196.x.

SOIL SURVEY STAFF. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11.ed. Washington: USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2010. 346p.

TOMBOLATO, A.F.C. et al. O cultivo de anturio: producao comercial. Campinas: Instituto Agronomico, 2002. 47p. (Serie Tecnologica APTA, Boletim Tecnico IAC, n.194).

VAN GENUCHTEN, M.T. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, v.44, p.892-898, 1980.

VENKAT, S.K. et al. The genetic linkage maps of Anthurium species based on RAPD, ISSR and SRAP markers. Scientia Horticulturae, v.178, p.132-137, 2014. Available from: <http://>. Accessed: Mar. 27, 2015.

YOUNIS, A. et al. Effect of different types of mulching on growth and flowering of Freesia alba cv. 'Aurora'. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, v.49, n.4, p.429-433, 2012. Available from: <>. Accessed: Mar. 28, 2015.

ZHANG, S. et al. Effects of mulching and catch cropping on soil temperature, soil moisture and wheat yield on the Loess Plateau of China. Soil & Tillage Research, v.102, n.1, p.78-86, 2009. Available from: < S0167198708001244>. Accessed: Mar. 28, 2015. doi:10.1016/j. still.2008.07.019.

Juliana Domingues Lima (I) * Samara Zanetti (I) Edson Shigueaki Nomura (II) Eduardo Jun Fuzitan (II) Danilo Eduardo Rozane (I) Piero Iori (I)

(I) Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Campus Experimental de Registro, Rua Nelson Brihi Badur, 430, Vila Tupy, 11900-000, Registro, SP, Brasil. E-mail: * Corresponding author.

(II) Agencia Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegocios (APTA), Pariquera-Acu, SP, Brasil.

Received 08.13.14 Approved 08.17.15 Returned by the author 11.14.15 CR-2014-1192.R1
COPYRIGHT 2016 Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:produccion de cultivos; texto en ingles
Author:Lima, Juliana Domingues; Zanetti, Samara; Nomura, Edson Shigueaki; Fuzitani, Eduardo Jun; Rozane, Da
Publication:Ciencia Rural
Date:Mar 1, 2016
Previous Article:Number of days and degree-days between panicle initiation and panicle differentiation in irrigated rice cultivars/Numero de dias e de graus-dia entre...
Next Article:Spatial variability of grain yield of irrigated corn and its correlation with explanatory plant variables/Variabilidade espacial da produtividade de...

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters