Printer Friendly

Growth and gastrointestinal indices in Nile tilapia fed with different diets/Crescimento e indices gastrintestinais de tilapia do Nilo alimentadas com diferentes dietas.

Introduction

The activity of aquiculture has increased through a process of professionalization, where the producer is closer to the used management and inputs (FILHO et al., 2010). According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO, 2009), fish farming business increases more than other animal production enterprise and Brazil now ranks sixth, among the world's leading producers of tilapia, accounting for 3.3% of total production.

Hatchery is of fundamental importance for raising quality animals, and proper nutrition plays an important role in ensuring the success of subsequent stages of farming. The use of artificial diets as the only source of food may not bring good results for most fish species in their early stages of development, and live food can bring more satisfactory effects (BOSCOLO et al., 2001). The microalgae contain high concentrations of soluble fiber and fatty acids of omega-3 series and can contribute positively for the aquatic organisms feeding (AZAZA et al., 2007). According to Faria et al. (2001) certain species confer a greater survival for post-larvae of Nile tilapia and can be used as a food alternative source. The tilapia shifts from visually feeding on zooplankton when juveniles to mostly filter feeding on phytoplankton when adults. When reared using an appropriate ration in intensive aquaculture systems, also consume algal-based detritus (GILLES et al., 2008). Lu et al. (2004) used the microalgae S. platensis, Euglena gracilis and Chlorella vulgaris as food supplementation during the post-larval period of Nile tilapia. The authors evaluated the rates of ingestion (IT) for each microalgae and concluded that S. platensis was the most efficient of the species tested, with ingestion rates of 80%.

However, the Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, does not vitally depend on this combination (MEURER et al., 2002). The meal ration can be utilized without damage on performance, survival, or sexual reversal efficiency, during sex reversion phase (BOMBARDELLI et al., 2004). Tachibana et al. (2004) observed that Nile tilapia fed with only commercial diet during sex reversal phase showed 92.86% survival. The body composition of fish is influenced by diet and, if it does not meet the species requirements or result in low intake of essential nutrients, can lead to visceral fat deposition (REIDEL et al., 2010).

Knowledge on the species biology used in fish farming, is a requirement for the proper development, as an understanding of its anatomy and physiology (ROTTA, 2003). In fish, the gastrointestinal system presents large and numerous adaptive variations, due to several feeding habits of the different species (RODRIGUES; MENIN, 2008). Among its components, the buccopharyngeal cavity has attracted great attention among researchers, as it is intrinsically related to the selection, capture, directing and preparation of the food to be swallowed (LOURES; LIMA, 2001). There is a close interdependence between nutrition, habitat, and the organization of the digestive tract, which is particularly apparent in the various adaptations and modifications (MEURER et al., 2002).

The aim of this study was to determine the growth of the Nile tilapia fed different diets, and to morphometrically characterize the gastrointestinal tract of this species.

Material and methods

The experiment lasted 100 days and was carried out at the Professor Raimundo Saraiva da Costa Fish Farming Station of the Fishing Engineering Department of the Agrarian Sciences Center, Federal University of Ceara. Three-hundred post-larvae (pl's) of Nile tilapia, was obtained at the above institution, with an average weight and length of 0.01 [+ or -] 0.01 g and 1.03 [+ or -] 0.01 cm, respectively.

The experimental design was completely randomized, with three treatments and five repetitions each. The treatments consisted of three diets: ([D.sub.1]) natural food, ([D.sub.2]), commercial feed and ([D.sub.3]) commercial feed + natural food. In the first 40 days (first phase), the 20 fish were kept in outdoor polyethylene tanks (12L: 12D photoperiod) with a useful volume of 80 L and fed (treatments [D.sub.2] and [D.sub.3]) with powder commercial ration (1.0 mm) containing 55% of crude protein. After this period, individuals were transferred to outdoor polyethylene reservoirs (12L: 12D photoperiod) containing 800 liters of water, where they were raised for a further 60 days (second phase) and fed (treatments [D.sub.2] and [D.sub.3]) with an extruded commercial ration (1.7 mm) with 45% of crude protein.

Initially, treatments [D.sub.1] and [D.sub.3] received "green water" (with phyto- and zooplankton) from a pre-established farming of Nile tilapia in 3,000 L (3 x 1 x 1 m) concrete reservoirs and, after 20 days of experiment, the natural food had blossomed naturally in the farming units, whereas the fish in treatment [D.sub.2] were farmed in clear water with no natural food. To prevent proliferating plankton in this treatment, the sunlight was blocked of the boxes cultivation through polyethylene caps.

In treatments [D.sub.2] and [D.sub.3], the daily amount of commercial feed was adjusted to 10% of the stored biomass every 20 days. In all three treatments, the water was renewed on a weekly basis - 50% in the first phase of the experiment and 10% in the second phase. In relation to culture water, the physical and chemical parameters, dissolved oxygen, pH and temperature were measured daily, while total ammonia, nitrite, carbon dioxide, general and carbonate hardness were evaluated weekly. Fish were weighted every 20 days for performance analyses, according to the following formulas: weight gain (%) = (final weight - initial weight /initial weight) x 100; length gain (cm) = final length - initial length; and survival rate (%) = (final number of animals /initial number of animals) x 100, according to the method of Candido et al. (2006).

Quantification of natural food in the water of treatments [D.sub.1] and [D.sub.3] was performed using a linear regression from the strong correlation observed between the dry algal biomass (g [L.sup.-1]) and the optical density of the reservoir water at a wavelength of 680 nm ([DO.sub.680nm]). At the beginning of the experiment, green water was first filtered in 100 [micro]m mesh plankton net to separate the macrozooplankton, and then in a 30 [micro]m mesh net to obtain concentrated phytoplankton sample. From the concentrated sample, four serial dilutions were placed in a spectrophotometer for the [DO.sub.680nm] reading. Each sample was then centrifuged at 3,000 x g for 5 minutes, washed twice with deionized water and centrifuged again. Subsequently, the samples were filtered through filter paper, previously weighed on a centesimal scale (0.01 g), oven dried at 105[degrees]C for 16 hours, and weighed again on a centesimal scale (TAKAGI et al., 2006). Finally, the linear correlation between [DO.sub.680nm] of each sample and its respective dry biomass (g [L.sup.-1]) was established to determine the linear regression equation (XU et al., 2006).

Qualitative analysis of live food was performed through three monthly samplings of water from the pre-established farming of tilapia, all performed at 10 o'clock in the morning. The water (50 L) of each sample was filtered through a 60 pm mesh plankton net, and the retained material was stored in a 400 mL glass container and fixed with 4% formaldehyde neutralized with sodium tetraborate (30 g [L.sup.-1]). After this procedure, aliquots of sediments in the glass container were examined under a binocular microscope with phase contrast, and the organisms were identified to genus level with the aid of identification keys (BOLTOVSKOY, 1981; BICUDO; MENEZES, 2006).

At the end of the farming process, five individuals from each repetition were sacrificed by lethal anesthesia using menthol (500 mg [L.sup.-1]) and necropsied. Stomachs and intestines were carefully dissected using surgical instruments, weighed on a centesimal scale and measured with a caliper to obtain the following parameters: gastro-somatic index (iGas) = (stomach weight/total weight of the individual)*100; entero-somatic index (iEns) = (intestine weight/total weight of the individual)*100 and intestinal quotient (Qi) = intestine length/total length of the individual, according to the method of Pereira and Mercante (2005).

Data were submitted to single-factor analysis of variance at 5% of statistical significance. When statistically significant difference was found, the averages were compared in pairs, by Tukeyf s test. In cases where the assumptions for the parametric tests were not reached, the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn nonparametric tests were used to replace the parametric ones. All analyses were performed using the software BioEstat 4.0. An angular transformer (arcsine square root) was used to homogenize the variances of percentage values, but the figures were presented in their original form.

Results and discussion

The average physical and chemical parameters of the water in the treatments remained within the levels considered suitable for tilapia farming (VINATEA, 2004) and showed no significant difference (p > 0.05) (Table 1).

There is little information available about the importance of phytoplankton in the tilapia hatchery (LU et al., 2004). However, these fish are important primary consumers (BWANIKA et al., 2006; SEMYALO et al., 2011). According to Loures et al. (2001), tilapia has preference for artificial feed, followed by phytoplankton, which is constantly consumed. Fish performance (weight and length gain) in the treatments that included commercial feed showed no significant difference (p > 0.05), while in the treatment with only natural food, performance was significantly lower (p < 0.05) (Table 2, Figures 1 and 2). Survival rate in treatments [D.sub.2] and [D.sub.3] did not differ significantly, and were similar (90% on average) to the values of around 97.5% found by Meurer et al. (2003). Turker et al. (2003b) cultured tilapia in algal-rich water dominated by green algae (i.e., Scenedesmus and Ankistrodesmus) and cyanobacteria (i.e., Microcystis and Merismopedia) to determine filtration rates. The cell counts of phytoplankton in water filtered by tilapias indicated significant reduction in green algae and cyanobacteria. Lu et al. (2006) examined the effect of Spirulina on larval tilapia at different growing stages during the development. Tilapias could efficiently assimilate and utilize the ingested marine microalgae from the onset of exogenous feeding. The use of moist marine microalgae offered directly or encapsulated in copepods results in better growth of tilapia (MOREIRA et al., 2010). Moreira et al. (2011a), examining the final of sex reversal phase, found total average growth of 1.64 [+ or -] 0.10 g, when fed to tilapia S. platensis. The sex reversal phase of tilapia, supplemented with S. platensis can also be successfully carried out in water with high levels of salinity (MOREIRA et al., 2011b).

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

Water absorbance and natural food dry weight values showed a strong positive linear correlation (r = 0.891). Thus, monitoring the absorbance of water revealed a greater amount of natural food in treatment [D.sub.3], which may be due to the introduction of commercial feed, providing to this environment the essential nutrients for the development of natural food. In treatment [D.sub.2], the absorbance values were almost zero throughout the experiment. Probably this was due to water changes and isolation of the system from sunlight, hindering the development of phytoplankton. Qualitative analysis of phytoplankton showed the higher contribution of the genus Chlorella, followed by Scenedesmus, and in smaller amounts, Staurastrum (Figure 3). Turker et al. (2003a) demonstrated that water from Nile tilapia farming was dominated by phytoplankton, mainly Scenedesmus sp. Analysis of the zooplankton community (Figure 4) revealed a higher number of rotifer of the genus Brachionus, followed by the Calanoida, Calanus sp. In Nile tilapia reservoir water, the high amount of rotifers is due to the great diversity of phytoplankton (SUN et al., 2009). Corgosinho and Pinto-Coelho (2006) reported that Cladocera and Cyclopoida were the most abundant zooplanktonic groups in eutrophic stations of their study, while Calanoida were prevalent in more oligotrophic sites, in freshwater reservoirs. Uddin et al. (2009) investigated the growth of tilapia and freshwater prawn in a polyculture system, and identified 29 genera of algae and 9 genera of zooplankton from the pond water.

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]

Gastro-somatic (iGas) and entero-somatic (iEns) indices, and intestinal quotient (Qi) were higher in the treatments using natural food, compared with treatments using only commercial feed (Table 2). This fact is directly related to the use of natural food, which results in an increased contact surface of the stomach and intestine, enabling greater absorption of nutrients. The gastro-somatic index (iGas), being quantitative in nature, provides more accurate information about the feeding habit (HAHN; DELARIVA, 2003).

The iGas obtained from fish fed only natural food did not differ significantly from that found in animals fed with natural food and commercial feed. However, comparisons between [D.sub.1] and [D.sub.2] (commercial feed only) and [D.sub.2] and [D.sub.3] evidenced statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).

Single-factor analysis of variance pointed statistically significant differences in the enterosomatic indices (iEns) of the fish submitted to the three treatments (p < 0.05) and the Tukey's test showed that the iEns of fish fed only with natural food ([D.sub.1]) was higher than that of the animals of treatment [D.sub.3] (natural food and commercial ration), which in turn, was higher than that of fish fed only with commercial ration ([D.sub.2]).

With respect to the intestinal quotient (Qi), the single-factor analysis of variance also indicated a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) among the three treatments, and the Tukey's test revealed that fish fed only with natural food ([D.sub.1]) had a greater Qi than those of treatment [D.sub.3], which in turn, was higher than that of fish fed only with [D.sub.2]. These results contrast with those found by Costa et al. (2008), in which the characterization of gastrointestinal indices showed no significant differences for common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fed with teosinte grass (Euchlaena mexicana) supplemented with commercial ration. In fish farming, to optimize feeding efficiency, it is necessary to integrate factors such as: physiological characteristics, feeding habits, nutritional requirements, chemical composition, and availability of nutrients in the ingredients selected in the preparation of a complete commercial ration (LANNA et al., 2004). Further studies will require an analysis of the anatomy of the organs of the digestive system of tilapia, through histological studies, as this will enable a better understanding of the impact of natural and artificial feeding on the physiology of the individuals.

Conclusion

Nile tilapia fed only with natural food does not reach commercial size in a short time, making it necessary to complement with commercial feed. The combination of both types of food results in significant weight gain and growth, and therefore, a higher survival rate. Intake of natural food and/or commercial ration is directly related to the development of gastrointestinal indices, highlighting that these indicators may undergo changes caused by the type of food.

Doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v34i3.13327

Acknowledgements

The Brazilian Office for Higher Education Improvement (CAPES), the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq) and the Foundation for Scientific Support and Development of Ceara (FUNCAP), for the financial assistance provided over the research. Ind. e Com. de Alimentos Desidratados Alcon Ltda. (Camboriu - SC) and Guabi Nutricao Animal by providing inputs from the partnership with our research institution.

References

AZAZA, M. S.; MENSI, F.; KSOURI, J.; DHRAIEF, M. N.; BRINI, B.; ABDELMOULEH, A.; KRA, M. M. Growth of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) fed with diets containing graded levels of green algae ulva meal (Ulva rigida) reared in geothermal waters of Southern Tunisia. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, v. 24, n. 2, p. 202-207, 2007.

BICUDO, C. E.; MENEZES, M. A. Generos de algas continentais do Brasil: chave para identificacao e descricoes. 2. ed. Sao Carlos: Rima, 2006.

BOMBARDELLI, R. A.; HAYASHI, C.; MEURER, F.; FORNARI, D. C. Avaliacao de racoes fareladas e micropeletizadas para larvas de tilapia do Nilo (Oreochromis niloticus) - desempenho e efetividade da reversao sexual. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, v. 26, n. 2, p. 197-201, 2004.

BOLTOVSKOY, D. Atlas del Atlantico Suddocidental y metodos de trabajo con el zooplancton marino. Mar del Plata: Inidep, 1981.

BOSCOLO, W. R.; HAYASHI, C.; SOARES, C. M. Desempenho e caracteristicas de carcaca de machos revertidos de tilapias do Nilo (Oreochromis niloticus), linhagens tailandesa e comum, nas fases iniciais e de crescimento. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 30, n. 5, p. 1391-1396, 2001.

BWANIKA, G. N.; CHAPMAN, L. J.; KIZITO, Y.; BALIRWA, J. Cascading effects of introduced Nile Perch (Lates niloticus) on the foraging ecology of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Ecology of Freshwater Fish, v. 15, n. 1, p. 470-481, 2006.

CANDIDO, A. S.; MELO JUNIOR, A. P.; SANTOS, C. H. A.; COSTA, H. J. M. S.; IGARASHI, M. A. Policultivo do camarao marinho (Litopenaeus vannamei) com tilapia do Nilo (Oreochromis niloticus). Arquivos de Ciencias Veterinarias e Zoologia, v. 9, n. 1, p. 9-14, 2006.

CORGOSINHO, P. H. C.; PINTO-COELHO, R. M. Zooplankton biomass, abundance and allometric patterns along an eutrophic gradient at Furnas Reservoir (Minas Gerais, Brazil). Acta Limnologica Brasileira, v. 18, n. 2, p. 213-224, 2006.

COSTA, M. L.; RADUNZ NETO, J.; LAZZARI, R.; LOSEKANN, M. E.; SUTILI, F. J.; BRUM, A. Z.; VEIVERBERG, C. A.; GRZECZINSKI, J. A. Juvenis de carpa capim alimentados com capim teosinto e suplementados com diferentes taxas de arracoamento. Ciencia Rural, v. 38, n. 2, p. 492-497, 2008.

FAO-Food and Agriculture Organization. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Roma: FAO, 2009. FARIA, A. C. E. A.; HAYASHI, C.; SOARES, C. M.; FURUYA, W. M. Dinamica da comunidade fitoplanctonica e variaveis fisicas e quimicas em tanques experimentais submetidos a diferentes adubacoes organicas. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, v. 23, n. 2, p. 291-297, 2001.

FILHO, J. D. S.; FRASCA-SCORVO, C. M. D.; ALVES, J. M. C.; SOUZA, F. R. A. A tilapicultura e seus insumos, relacoes economicas. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 39, supl. Especial, p. 112-118, 2010.

GILLES, S.; LACROIX, G.; CORBIN, D.; BA, N.; LUNA, C. L.; NANDJUI, J.; OUATTARA, A.; OUE'DRAOGO, O.; LAZZARO, X. Mutualism between euryhaline tilapia Sarotherodon melanotheron heudelotii and Chlorella sp.-- Implications for nano-algal production in warmwater phytoplankton-based recirculating systems. Aquacultural Engineering, v. 39, n. 2-3, p. 113-121, 2008.

HAHN, N. S.; DELARIVA, L. Metodos para avaliacao da alimentacao natural de peixes: o que estamos usando? Interciencia, v. 28, n. 2, p. 100-104, 2003.

LANNA, E. A. T.; PEZZATO, L. E.; FURUYA, W. M.; VICENTINI, C. A.; CECON, P. R.; BARROS, M. M. Fibra bruta e oleo em dietas praticas para alevinos de tilapia do Nilo (Oreochromis niloticus). Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 33, n. 5, p. 2177-2185, 2004.

LOURES, B. R. R.; LIMA, S. Anatomia de Peixes. In: MOREIRA, H. L. M.; VARGAS, L.; RIBEIRO, R. P.; ZIMMERMANN, S. (Ed.). Fundamentos da moderna aquicultura. Canoas: Ulbra, 2001. p. 17-22.

LU, J.; TAKEUCHI, T.; SOTOH, H. Ingestion and assimilation of three species of freshwater algae by larval tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture, v. 238, n. 1-4, p. 437-449, 2004.

LU, J.; TAKEUCHI, T.; SATOH, H. Ingestion, assimilation and utilization of raw Spirulina by larval tilapia Oreochromis niloticus during larval development. Aquaculture, v. 254, n. 1-4, p. 686-692, 2006.

MEURER, F.; HAYASHI, C.; BOSCOLO, W. R.; SOARES, C. M. Lipideos na alimentacao de alevinos revertidos de tilapia do Nilo (Oreochromis niloticus L.). Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 31, n. 2, p. 566-573, 2002.

MEURER, F.; HAYASHI, C.; WILSON, W. R. Influencia do processamento da racao no desempenho e sobrevivencia da tilapia do Nilo, durante a reversao sexual. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 32, n. 2, p. 262-267, 2003.

MOREIRA, R. L.; COSTA, J. M.; QUEIROZ, R. V.; MOURA, P. S.; FARIAS. W. R. L. Utilizacao de Spirulina platensis como suplemento alimentar durante a reversao sexual de tilapia do Nilo. Revista Caatinga, v. 23, n. 2, p. 134-141, 2010.

MOREIRA, R. L.; MARTINS, R. R. O.; FARIAS, W. R. L. Utilizacao de Spirulina platensis como suplemento alimentar durante a reversao sexual da tilapia do Nilo (var. chitralada) em agua salina. Ciencia Animal Brasileira, v. 12, n. 1, p. 76-82, 2011a.

MOREIRA, R. L; DA COSTA, J. M.; MOURA, P. S.; FARIAS, W. R. L. Salinidade da agua e suplementacao alimentar com microalga marinha no crescimento e masculinizacao de Oreochromis niloticus, tilapia do Nilo. Bioscience Journal, v. 27, n. 1, p. 116-124, 2011b.

PEREIRA, L. P. F.; MERCANTE, C. T. J. A amonia nos sistemas de criacao de peixes e seus efeitos sobre a qualidade da agua: uma revisao. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca, v. 31, n. 1, p. 81-88, 2005.

REIDEL, A.; ROMAGOSA, E.; FEIDEN, A.; BOSCOLO, W. R.; COLDEBELLA, A.; SIGNOR, A. A. Rendimento corporal e composicao quimica de jundias alimentados com diferentes niveis de proteina e energia na dieta, criados em tanques-rede. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 39, n. 2, p. 233-240, 2010.

RODRIGUES, S. S.; MENIN, E. Anatomia do tubo digestivo de Salminus brasiliensis (Cuvier, 1817) (Pisces, Characidae, Salminae). Biotemas, v. 21, n. 2, p. 65-75, 2008.

ROTTA, M. A. Aspectos gerais da fisiologia e estrutura do sistema digestivo dos peixes relacionados a piscicultura. Corumba: Embrapa Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuaria do Pantanal; Ministerio da Agricultura, Pecuaria e Abastecimento, 2003.

SEMYALO, R.; ROHRLACK, T.; KAYIIRA, D.; KIZITO, Y. S.; BYARUJALI, S.; NYAKAIRU, G.; LARSSON, P. On the diet of Nile tilapia in two eutrophic tropical lakes containing toxin producing cyanobacteria. Limnologica, v. 41, n. 1, p. 30-36, 2011.

SUN, W.; DONG, S.; ZHAO, X.; JIE, Z.; ZHANG, H.; ZHANG, L. Effects of zooplankton refuge on the growth of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and plankton dynamics in pond. Aquaculture International, v. 18, n. 4, p. 647-655, 2009.

TACHIBANA, L.; CASTAGNOLLI, N.; PEZZATO, L. E.; BARROS, M. M.; BARROS VALLE, J. B.; SIQUEIRA, M. R. Desempenho de diferentes linhagens de tilapia do Nilo (Oreochromis niloticus) na fase de reversao sexual. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, v. 26, n. 3, p. 305-311, 2004.

TAKAGI, M.; KARSENO; YOSHIDA, T. Effect of salt concentration on intracellular accumulation of lipids and triacylglyceride in marine microalgae Dunaliella cells. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, v. 101, n. 3, p. 223-226, 2006.

TURKER, H.; EVERSOLE, A. G.; BRUNE, D. E. Comparative Nile tilapia and silver carp filtration rates of Partitioned Aquaculture System phytoplankton. Aquaculture, v. 220, n. 1-4, p. 449-457, 2003a.

TURKER, H.; EVERSOLE, A. G.; BRUNE, D. E. Filtration of green algae and cyanobacteria by Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, in the Partitioned Aquaculture System. Aquaculture, v. 215, n. 1-4, p. 93-101, 2003b.

UDDIN, M. S.; AZIM, M. E.; WAHAB, M. A.; VERDEGEM, M. C. J. Effects of substrate addition and supplemental feeding on plankton composition and production in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) polyculture. Aquaculture, v. 297, n. 1-4, p. 99-105, 2009.

VINATEA, L. Principios quimicos de qualidade da agua em aqucultura. Florianopolis: UFSC, 2004.

XU, H.; MIAO, X. L.; WU, Q. Y. High quality biodiesel production from a microalga Chlorella protothecoides by heterotrophic growth in fermenters. Journal of Biotechnology, v. 126, n. 4, p. 499-507, 2006.

Received on May 5, 2011.

Accepted on June 28, 2011.

Ricardo Lafaiete Moreira *, Lucas Pinheiro Silveira, Erivania Gomes Teixeira, Antonio Glaydson Lima Moreira, Placido Soares de Moura and Wladimir Ronald Lobo Farias

Departamento de Engenharia de Pesca, Centro de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidade Federal do Ceara, Av. Mister Hull, s/n, 60356-000, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil. * Author for correspondence. E-mail: ricardolafaiete@hotmail.com
Table 1. Culture water physical and chemical parameters (mean
[+ or -] standard error) of Nile tilapia fed different diets.

Physical and                            Treatments
chemical parameters
                                        * [D.sub.1]

Dissolved oxygen (mg [L.sup.-1])    8.92 [+ or -] 0.30
pH                                  8.33 [+ or -] 0.35
Temperature ([degrees]C)            29.17 [+ or -] 0.10
Total ammonia (ppm)                 0.50 [+ or -] 0.12
Nitrite (ppm)                       < 0.3 [+ or -] 0.10
Carbon dioxide (mg [L.sup.-1])      0.60 [+ or -] 0.71
General hardness                     2.5 [+ or -] 0.30
Carbonate hardness                  5.80 [+ or -] 0.10

Physical and                             Treatments
chemical parameters
                                        ** [D.sub.2]

Dissolved oxygen (mg [L.sup.-1])     7.50 [+ or -] 0.10
pH                                   7.32 [+ or -] 0.50
Temperature ([degrees]C)             28.67 [+ or -] 0.2
Total ammonia (ppm)                  0.45 [+ or -] 0.21
Nitrite (ppm)                       < 0.45 [+ or -] 0.14
Carbon dioxide (mg [L.sup.-1])       0.53 [+ or -] 0.30
General hardness                     2.5 [+ or -] 0.25
Carbonate hardness                   4.00 [+ or -] 0.12

Physical and                             Treatments
chemical parameters
                                        *** [D.sub.3]

Dissolved oxygen (mg [L.sup.-1])     8.84 [+ or -] 0.12
pH                                   7.96 [+ or -] 0.33
Temperature ([degrees]C)            28.40 [+ or -] 0.20
Total ammonia (ppm)                  0.50 [+ or -] 0.13
Nitrite (ppm)                       < 0.25 [+ or -] 0.10
Carbon dioxide (mg [L.sup.-1])       0.57 [+ or -] 0.32
General hardness                     2.80 [+ or -] 0.21
Carbonate hardness                   6.00 [+ or -] 0.20

* [D.sub.1] = Natural food; ** [D.sub.2] = Commercial feed and
*** [D.sub.3] = Commercial feed + natural food.

Table 2. Growth, survival rate and gastrointestinal indices (mean
[+ or -] standard error) of Nile tilapia fed different diets.

                                              Treatments

Growth and gastrointestinal                   * [D.sub.1]
indices
Initial weight (g)                        0.01 [+ or -] 0.01
Weight gain (g)                         15.23 [+ or -] 0.62 (a)
Initial length (cm)                       1.03 [+ or -] 0.01
Length gain (cm)                        14.05 [+ or -] 0.32 (a)
Survival rate (%)                        25 [+ or -] 3.12 (a)
(1) (iGas) Gastro-somatic indice (%)    3.09 [+ or -] 0.20 (a)
(iEns) Entero-somatic indice (%)        9.43 [+ or -] 0.42 (a)
(Qi) Intestinal quotient (%)            7.22 [+ or -] 0.10 (a)

                                              Treatments

Growth and gastrointestinal                   ** [D.sub.2]
indices
Initial weight (g)                        0.01 [+ or -] 0.01
Weight gain (g)                         60.08 [+ or -] 0.92 (b)
Initial length (cm)                       1.03 [+ or -] 0.01
Length gain (cm)                        20.81 [+ or -] 0.16 (b)
Survival rate (%)                        89 [+ or -] 6.74 (b)
(1) (iGas) Gastro-somatic indice (%)    1.39 [+ or -] 0.21 (b)
(iEns) Entero-somatic indice (%)        4.75 [+ or -] 0.34 (b)
(Qi) Intestinal quotient (%)            4.80 [+ or -] 0.01 (b)

                                              Treatments

Growth and gastrointestinal                  *** [D.sub.3]
indices
Initial weight (g)                        0.01 [+ or -] 0.01
Weight gain (g)                         72.52 [+ or -] 0.64 (b)
Initial length (cm)                       1.03 [+ or -] 0.01
Length gain (cm)                        24.65 [+ or -] 0.12 (b)
Survival rate (%)                        91 [+ or -] 5.67 (b)
(1) (iGas) Gastro-somatic indice (%)    2.45 [+ or -] 0.11 (a)
(iEns) Entero-somatic indice (%)        6.95 [+ or -] 0.48 (c)
(Qi) Intestinal quotient (%)            6.32 [+ or -] 0.41 (c)

* [D.sub.1] = Natural food; ** [D.sub.2] = Commercial feed;
*** [D.sub.3] = Commercial feed + natural food. Identical letters in
the rows indicate no significant difference (p < 0.05). (1) Gastro-
somatic indice (iGas) found for the three treatments did not show
normal distribution or homoscedasticity, then the values were
submitted to the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests.
COPYRIGHT 2012 Universidade Estadual de Maringa
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Moreira, Ricardo Lafaiete; Silveira, Lucas Pinheiro; Teixeira, Erivania Gomes; Moreira, Antonio Glay
Publication:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (UEM)
Date:Jul 1, 2012
Words:4411
Previous Article:Mathematical modeling for digestible energy in animal feeds for tilapia/Modelagem matematica para energia digestivel de ingredientes de origem animal...
Next Article:Superovulatory response, production and quality of embryos of cows fed on linseed or canola seed supplemented diets/Resposta super ovulatoria,...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters