Printer Friendly

Group actions, orbit spaces, and noncommutative deformation theory/Ruhmatoimed, orbiitruumid ja mittekommutatiivne deformatsiooniteooria.

1. INTRODUCTION

Consider the action of a group G on an ordinary commutative k-variety X = Spec (A). We define the category of A-G-modules, Definition 2.1, and their deformation theory. We then prove that this deformation theory is equivalent to the deformation theory of modules over the noncommutative k-algebra A[G] = A#G. Thus the noncommutative moduli of the one-sided A[G]-modules can be computed as the noncommutative moduli of A-modules with A commutative, invariant under the (dual) action of the group G, which simplify the computations significantly. The orbit closure of x [member of] X corresponds to an A [G] -module [M.sub.x] = A/[a.sub.x], so that the classification of closures of orbits can be studied locally by deformation theory of [M.sub.x] as an A-G-module. Finally, we work through an example of the noncommutative blowup of cyclic surface singularities.

2. MODULES WITH GROUP ACTIONS

Let k be an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0. Let G be a finite dimensional reductive algebraic group acting on an affine scheme X = Spec A, A a finitely generated (commutative) k-algebra. Let [a.sub.x] be the ideal of the closure of the orbit of x and let G [right arrow] [Aut.sub.k](A) sending g to [[nabla].sub.g] be the induced action of G on A. Then, as the ideal ax is invariant under the action of G on A, we get an induced action on A/ax. The skew group algebra over A is denoted A[G]. It consists of all formal sums [summation over (g[member of]G) [a.sub.g]g with product defined by

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII].

For later use notice that this definition extends the definition of the group algebra over k, k[G]. Now, the action of A[G] on [M.sub.x] given by (ag)m = a[[nabla].sub.g](m) defines [M.sub.x] as an A[G]-module because

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII].

Thus the classification of orbits is the classification of the corresponding A[G]-modules [M.sub.x]. The main issue of this section is the following definition and the lemma proved by the argument above:

Definition 2.1. An A-G-module is an A module with a G-action such that the two actions commute, that is

[[nabla].sub.g](am) = [[nabla].sub.g](a)[[nabla].sub.g](m).

Lemma 2.1. The category of A-G-modules and the category of A[G]-modules are equivalent.

3. DEFORMATION THEORY

For A a not necessarily commutative k-algebra, V = {[V.sub.i]}.sup.r.sub.r=1] a swarm of right A-modules (which means that [dim.sub.k][Ext.sup.1.sub.A]([V.sub.i]; [V.sub.j]) < [infinity] for 1 [less than ore equal to] i, j [less than or equal to] r), there exists a well-known deformation theory, see [3]. Let [a.ksub.r] be the category of r-pointed artinian k-algebras. It consists of the commutative diagrams

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

such that rad(R) = ker(p) fulfills rad[(R).sup.n] = 0 for some n. Generalizing the commutative case, we set [[??].sub.r] equal to the category of complete r-pointed k-algebras [??] such that [??]/rad[([??]).sup.n] is in [a.sub.r] for all n. Letting [R.sub.ij] = [e.sub.i][Re.sub.j], it is easy to see that R is isomorphic to the matrix algebra ([R.sub.ij]). The noncommutative deformation functor [Def.sub.V] : [a.sub.r] [right arrow] Sets is given by

[Def.sub.v] (R) = {R [[cross product].sub.k] [A.sup.op]-modules [V.sub.r]|[V.sub.r] [[congruent to].sub.R] ([R.sub.ij] [[cross product].sub.k] [V.sub.j]), [k.sub.i] [[cross product].sub.R] [V.sub.R] [[congruent to].sub.R] [V.sub.i}/ [[congruent to].sub.R].

Let [V.sub.R] [member of] [Def.sub.V] (R). The left R-module structure is the trivial one, and the right A-module structure is given by the morphisms [[sigma].sup.R.sub.a] : [V.sub.i] [right arrow] [R.sub.ij] [[cross product].sub.k] [V.sub.j]. As in the commutative case, an (r-pointed) morphism [phi] : S [??] R is small if ker [phi] x rad(S) = rad(S) x ker [phi] = 0, and for such morphisms, lifting the [[sigma].sup.R] directly to S, the associativity condition gives the obstruction class o([phi], [V.sub.R]) = ([[sigma].sup.S.sub.ab] - [[sigma].sup.S.sub.b]) [member of] I [[cross product].sub.k] [HH.sup.2](A, [Hom.sub.k]([V.sub.i], [V.sub.j])) where I = ([I.sub.ij]) = ker [phi], such that [V.sub.R] can be lifted to [V.sub.S] if and only if o([V.sub.R], [phi]) = 0, see [3] or [1] for details and complete proofs. Obviously, computations are much easier if A is a commutative k-algebra. This is possible to achieve when working with G-actions and orbit spaces. For a family V = [{[V.sub.i]}.sup.r.sub.i=1] of A-G-modules, we put

[Def.sup.G.sub.V](R) = {[V.sub.R] [member of] [Def.sub.V](R)|[there exists]A - G-structure [nabla] : G [right arrow] End ([V.sub.R])} [[subset].bar] [Def.sub.V](R).

In [2,3] Laudal constructs the local formal moduli of A-modules. In [5,6] applications in the commutative case are given, and in [7] an easy noncommutative example is worked through. In these cites we start with the k-algebra k[[epsilon]] = k[[epsilon]]/[epsilon].sup.2] and use the tangent space

[Def.sub.V] (k[[epsilon]]) [congruent to] ([HH.sup.1] (A, [Hom.sub.k] ([V.sub.i], [V.sub.j]))) [congruent to] [Ext.sup.2.sub.A]([V.sub.i], [V.sub.j])

as dual basis for the local formal moduli [??]. The relations among the base elements are given by the obstruction space

[HH.sup.2] (A, [Hom.sub.k] ([V.sub.i], [V.sub.j])) = ([Ext.sup.2.sub.A] ([V.sub.i], [V.sub.j])).

4. GENERALIZED MATRIX MASSEY PRODUCTS (GMMP)

Let [{[V.sub.i]}.sup.r.sub.i=1] be a given swarm of A-modules. For each i, choose free resolutions [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]. We write

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]

and we can prove Lemma 4.1 following the proof in [6] step by step:

Lemma 4.1. Let [V.sub.S] G [Def.sub.V](S) and let [phi] : R [right arrow] S be a small surjection. Then there exists a resolution [L.sup.S.sub..] = (S [[cross product].sub.k] L., [L.sup.S]) lifting the complex L., and to give a lifting [V.sub.R] of [V.sub.S] is equivalent to lift the complex [L.sup.S.sub..] to [L.sup.R.sub..]

Proof. Generalized from the commutative case, [M.sub.R] [[congruent to].sub.R] ([R.sub.ij] [[cross product].sub.k] [M.sub.j]) is equivalent with [M.sub.R] R-flat. Using this, and tensoring the sequence 0 [right arrow] I [right arrow] R [right arrow] S [right arrow] 0 with [M.sub.R] over R, gives the sequence 0 [right arrow] I [[cross product].sub.k] M [right arrow] [M.sub.R] [right arrow] [M.sub.S] [right arrow] 0. Ordinary diagram chasing then proves that the resolution of [M.sub.S] can be lifted to an R- complex [L..sup.R] given the resolution [L..sup.R] of [M.sub.S]. Conversely, given a lifting [L..sup.R] of the complex [L..sup.S] of [M.sub.S], the long exact sequence proves that this complex is a resolution, and that [M.sub.R] = [H.sup.0]([L..sup.R]) is a lifting of MS. []

If M is an A-G-module where G acts rationally on A and M is a rational G-module, finitely generated as an A-module, then an A-free (projective) resolution of M can be lifted to an A-G-free resolution, that is a commutative diagram

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

This proves that Lemma 4.1 is a particular case of the same lemma with [Def.sub.V](S) replaced by [Def.sup.G.sub.V](S). In [7] we give the definition of GMMP. The tangent space of the deformation functor is [Def.sup.G.sub.V](E) [congruent to] ([Ext.sup.1.sub.A-G]([V.sub.i], [V.sub.j])), where E is the noncommutative ring of dual numbers, i.e. E = k < [t.sub.ij] > /[([t.sub.ij]).sup.2]. For computations we note that when G is reductive and finite dimensional, [Hom.sub.A-G]([V.sub.i], [V.sub.j]) [congruent to] [Hom.sub.A][([V.sub.i], [V.sub.j]).sup.G] and [Ext.sup.1.sub.A-G]([V.sub.i], [V.sub.j]) = [Ext.sub.A][([V.sub.i], [V.sub.j]).sup.G], G acting by conjugation. Given a small surjection [phi] : R [right arrow] S, with kernel I = ([I.sub.ij]), lift [d..sup.S] on S [[cross product].sub.k] L. to [d..sup.R] on R [[cross product].sub.k] L. in the obvious way. Then o([phi], [V.sub.S]) = [{[d.sup.R.sub.i] [d.sup.R.sub.i-1]}.sub.i[greater than or equal to]1] [member of] ([I.sub.ij] [[cross product].sub.k] [Ext.sub.A-G]([V.sub.i], [V.sub.j])). By the definition of GMMP in [7], these can be read out of the coefficients of a basis in the obstruction space above.

5. THE MCKAY CORRESPONDENCE

Let

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]

act on [A.sup.2.sub.C] by [tau](a, b) = (-a, -b). Our goal is to classify the G-orbits, and to find a compactification [[??].sub.G] [??][P.sup.2.sub.C] of the orbit space [M.sub.G]. The existing partial solution is

[M.sub.G] = Spec(k[[x.sup.2], xy, [y.sup.2]]) = Spec([A.sup.G]), A = k[x, y].

This is an orbit space, but not moduli. Consider the point P = (a, b) = ([square root of w, t], [square root of w]), w [not equal to] 0. Then

o(P) = {([square root of w, t] [square root of w]), ( -[square root of w], -t [square root of w])} = Z([I.sub.t]),

where [I.sub.t] = ([x.sup.2] - w, y - tx). We compute the local formal moduli of the A-G-module [M.sup.t] = A/[I.sub.t] from the diagram

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

where the upper row is a resolution, we see that in general, [Ext.sup.A.sub.1] ([M.sub.t], [M.sub.t]) [congruent to] [Hom.sub.A] ([I.sub.t] / [I.sup.2.sub.t], A/[I.sub.t]) with the action of G given by conjugation, that is the composition given in the sequence

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII].

We get

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]

so that [phi] = ([alpha], [beta]x) = [alpha](1, 0) + [beta](0, x) is invariant under the action of G. Writing this up in complex form, we get

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII].

We find [[xi].sub.1.sup.1] [[xi].sub.2.sup.1] = [[xi].sub.1.sup.2] [[xi].sub.2.sup.2] = [[xi].sub.1.sup.2] [[xi].sub.2.sup.2] = [[xi].sub.1.sup.1] [[xi].sub.2.sup.2] + [[xi].sub.1.sup.2] [[xi].sub.2.sup.1] = 0, which means that all cup-products are identically zero. Thus [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] with algebraization [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]. Because the particular point [0.bar] = (0,0) corresponds to [M.sub.[0.bar]] = k[x, y]/(x, y) with [Ext.sup.1.sub.A-G]([M.sub.[0.bar]], [M.sub.[0.bar]]) = 0, we understand that [M.sub.[0.bar]] is a singular point, so that the modulus is [M.sub.G] = ([A.sup.2] - {[0.bar]}) [union] {pt}. At least in this case, resolving the singularity is a process of compactifying. Given a family V = [{[V.sub.i]}.sup.r.sub.i=1] of simple A-modules, an A-module E with composition series E = [E.sub.0] [contains] [E.sub.1] [contains] ... [contains] [E.sub.i] [contains] [E.sub.i-1] [contains] ... [contains] [E.sub.r] [contains] 0, where [E.sub.k] /[E.sub.k-1] = [V.sub.ik], is called an iterated extension of the family V, and the graph [GAMMA](E) of E (the representation type) is the graph with nodes in correspondence with V and arrows [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] connecting the nodes [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII], identifying arrows if the corresponding extensions are equivalent. In [3] Laudal solves the problem of classifying all indecomposable modules E with fixed extension graph [GAMMA]. He proves that for every E there exists a morphism [PHI] : H(V) [right arrow] k[[GAMMA]] such that E [congruent to] [??] [[cross product].sub.[phi]] k[[GAMMA]], where [??] is the versal family, resulting in a noncommutative scheme Ind([GAMMA]). In [4], he then proves that the set [Simp.sub.n](A) of n-dimensional simple representations of A with the Jacobson topology has a natural scheme structure. He also proves that when [GAMMA] is a representation graph of dimension n = [[summation].sub.V[member of][GAMMA]] [dim.sub.k]V, then the set Simp([GAMMA]) = [Simp.sub.n](A) U Ind(r) has a natural scheme structure with the Jacobson topology, which is a compactification of [Simp.sub.n](A). In our present example, we let r be the representation type of the regular representation k[G]. We construct the composition series k[G] [congruent to] k[[tau]]/([[tau].sup.2] - 1) [contains] ([tau] - 1)/([[tau].sup.2] - 1) [contains] 0. Thus we get [V.sub.0] = k[[tau]]/([tau] - 1) [congruent to] k, [V.sub.1] = ([tau] - 1)/([[tau].sup.2] - 1) [congruent to] k and the action [[nabla].sup.i.sub.[tau]] of [tau] on [V.sub.i] is given by [[nabla].sup.i.sub.[tau]] = [(-1).sup.i] From the sequence [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] we immediately see that [Ext.sup.1.sub.A-G]([V.sub.i], [V.sub.j]) = [alpha](1, 0) + [beta](0, 1) when i [not equal to] j, 0 if i = j. Writing up the corresponding diagram and multiplying as in the previous example, we get

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII].

The versal family is given as the cokernel of the morphism

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII].

Now, as [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] sends both [t.sub.21](1) and [t.sub.21](2) to 0. The isomorphism classes of indecomposable A [G]-modules with representation type r are thus given by

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII].

The inherited group action is [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] on [k.sup.2]. To find Simp([GAMMA]), we start by computing the local formal moduli of the (worst) module [V.sub.t], following the algorithm in [2]. We find

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]

by using (in particular) the fact that xy = yx in A. Then H[([V.sub.t]).sup.com] = k[v, w] with versal family [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII], computed by again using the fact that xy = yx in A. While w = 0 gives the indecomposable module [V.sub.v+t], w [not equal to] 0 gives a simple two-dimensional A-G-module given by [x.sup.2] = w, xy = (t + v)w, [y.sup.2] = [(t + v).sup.2]w. This gives an embedding [A.sup.G] = k[[s.sub.0], [s.sub.1], [s.sub.2]]/([s.sub.0][s.sub.1] - [s.sup.2.sub.2]) = k[[x.sub.2], xy, [y.sub.2]] [??] k[v, w] inducing the morphism [Simp.sub.[GAMMA]] [right arrow] Spec([A.sub.G]) which is the ordinary blowup of the singular point. The exceptional fibre is [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII].

doi: 10.3176/proc.2010.4.16

REFERENCES

[1.] Eriksen, E. An introduction to noncommutative deformations of modules. Lect. Notes Pure Appl. Math., 2005, 243(2), 90-126.

[2.] Laudal, O. A. Matric Massey products and formal moduli I. In Algebra, Algebraic Topology and Their Interactions (Roos, J.-E., ed.). Lecture Notes in Math., 1183, 218-240. Springer Verlag, 1986.

[3.] Laudal, O. A. Noncommutative deformations of modules. Homology Homotopy Appl., 2002, 4(2), 357-396.

[4.] Laudal, O. A. Noncommutative algebraic geometry. Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana, 2003, 19(2), 509-580.

[5.] Siqveland, A. The method of computing formal moduli. J. Algebra, 2001, 241 292-327.

[6.] Siqveland, A. Global Matric Massey products and the compactified Jacobian of the E6-singularity. J. Algebra, 2001, 241, 259-291.

[7.] Siqveland, A. A standard example in noncommutative deformation theory. J. Gen. Lie Theory Appl., 2008, 2(3), 251- 255.

Arvid Siqveland

Buskerud University College, PoBox 235, 3603 Kongsberg, Norway; arvid.siqveland@hibu.no

Received 14 April 2009, accepted 21 October 2009
COPYRIGHT 2010 Estonian Academy Publishers
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2010 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:MATHEMATICS
Author:Siqveland, Arvid
Publication:Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:4EXNO
Date:Dec 1, 2010
Words:2808
Previous Article:On the non-Koszulity of ternary partially associative operad/Koszuli tingimuse rikkumine ternaarses osaliselt assotsiatiivses operaadis.
Next Article:Finding a class of 2-groups/Uhe 2-ruhmade klassi leidmine.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters