Going, going ... Exotic species are decimating America's native wildlife.
Meanwhile, wolves are native to the same mountains of Olympic National Park, but don't expect to hear their nocturnal howls anytime soon. Neighbors objected when rangers proposed reintroducing the park's missing predator a few years ago. To some, it's simple: alien goats, OK; native wolves, not OK.
In the opposite corner of the country, native animals of the Florida Keys face a public relations problem of their own. At the tony Ocean Reef Resort in Key Largo, hundreds of feral cats are fed by residents at two dozen designated feeding stations--yet the cats are helping kill off the endangered Key Largo cotton mouse. Farther `down the island chain, the federal government has forced builders to stop projects in the path of the endangered Lower Keys marsh rabbit. But the feds are virtually powerless when it comes to protecting the rabbits from residents' free-ranging house cats, dogs and those ubiquitous suburban freeloaders, raccoons, which are among the rabbits' other threats, according to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
And while the world s 800 remaining tiny endangered Key deer certainly score as high as Bambi in public appeal, people may love them too much. Illegal feedings cause deer to lose their fear of people and look for food in neighborhoods, where some deer are attacked and killed by dogs. What is wrong with this picture?
Throughout the country, it's a similar story: Whether we're aware of it or not, we subtly--and sometimes not so subtly--change the natural world by our choices of which animals we like and don't like. Explorer Hernando DeSoto liked hogs and brought 13 with him to Florida in 1539; by 1993 more than two million feral hogs were uprooting untold acres of plants in 23 states and preying on forest birds, yet delighting game hunters, according to federal reports. Fans of the hog in Louisiana have gone so far as to establish the Wild Boar Conservation Association, which encourages the establishment of boar breeding programs.
Collector Eugene Schieffelin is believed to have set free a few dozen starlings in New York's Central Park in March 1890 to introduce the nation to the birds he read about in Shakespeare. Now, their descendents snack at backyard bird feeders and aggressively evict flickers, bluebirds and other natives from their nests across the nation--just as house sparrows, introduced in 1853, harass native robins and displace bluebirds, purple martins and cliff swallows from their nesting sites, according to a 1999 Cornell University report.
Indeed, as the human population grows and people move into new areas, they help transform the landscape by bringing along backyard bird feeders and favorite companions: cats, dogs, reptiles and exotic fish (some of which end up in canals and lakes when aquarium enthusiasts tire of them). Meanwhile, creatures that benefit from living around people follow them into disturbed areas, including opossums, raccoons, pigeons and dumpster-diving rats.
White-tailed deer and coyotes spread into new areas as they take advantage of the disappearance of animals people don't like, such as wolves and grizzly bears. Coyotes now live in every state except Hawaii, and they even snack at outdoor pet-food bowls in cities such as Denver, Los Angeles, Phoenix and New York. Coyotes can eat "doughnuts and sandwiches, pet cats and cat food, pet dogs and dog food, carrion and just plain garbage," according to a 2001 U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) report. More coyotes now exist than before the U.S. Constitution was signed, due to an amazingly adaptable scavenger diet and the disappearance of competing wolves.
The nation's big predators are largely gone, notes John Morrison, acting director of the World Wildlife Fund's (WWF) conservation science program. "We, Homo sapiens, have arrived and marked our territory well," says Harvard biologist E.O. Wilson in his latest book, The Future of Life. People have "reshaped the U.S. because somehow we as a species wanted it that way. We chose starlings and gypsy moths and honeybees just as clearly as we chose the Grand Coulee Dam and the Sears Tower," Kim Todd argues in Tinkering with Eden: A Natural History of Exotics in America.
Upset upon learning in 1995 that the ivorybill woodpecker had gone extinct after being reduced to the few remaining primeval swamps of Louisiana, Florida and South Carolina, Wilson laments what we are doing to the landscape. "Winners of the Darwinian lottery ... we are chipping away the ivory-bills and other miracles around us. As habitats shrink, species decline wholesale in range and abundance," Wilson notes. "Being distracted and self-absorbed, as is our nature, we have not yet fully understood what we are doing."
Biologists are noticing, however, and seven out of 10 say we are in the midst of a "mass extinction" of living things, according to a 1998 survey of 400 biologists commissioned by New York's American Museum of Natural History. One in eight known bird species around the world face a high risk of extinction in the near future, according to the authoritative 2000 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species. That means entire species of birds face the same odds of disappearing from the planet for good as a woman in the U.S. does of developing breast cancer sometime in her lifetime. Mammals have it worse: One in four known mammals worldwide face a high risk of extinction in the near future.
Not since dinosaurs vanished 65 million years ago have so many species disappeared so quickly. And this time, it's mainly due to human activity and not natural phenomena like a comet smashing into the planet, say the polled biologists. They consider biodiversity loss a more serious environmental problem than global warming, pollution or depletion of the ozone layer. In the world's 4.5 billion years, there have been five mass extinctions. The sixth--and fastest--is under way, say biologists.
It may seem like no big deal to lose Florida's humble Ponce de Leon beach mouse, which has vanished due to "real estate development, and perhaps predation by domestic cats," as the IUCN Red List put it. But these very factors--habitat loss and introduction of exotic species--are among the main causes of our current global extinction crisis, biologists say.
"Many wonderful creatures will be lost in the first few decades of the 21st century unless we greatly increase levels of support, involvement and commitment to conservation," says Russell A. Mittermeier, president of Conservation International. Though most of those species live in more biologically diverse regions near the equator, the fact remains that about 280 out of 808 known extinctions have occurred in the U.S., WWF's Morrison points out.
And 42 percent of the nation's threatened or endangered species--both animals and plants--face trouble primarily because of competition with and being killed by non-native species, according to a 1999 Cornell University report. The report's lead author, David Pimentel, says he has found no reason for optimism since 1999. "More foreign species arrive each year," says Pimentel, professor of insect ecology and agricultural sciences. "I do not believe that we are winning the war on exotic species because of increased trade, increased number of people traveling, and the growing human population in the U.S. and world."
What Was Lost
To get a sense of what is being lost, let's look at the continent that explorers Meriweather Lewis and William Clark saw when they took their arduous journey up the Missouri River to the Pacific Ocean, starting in 1804. Fewer people lived in the entire nation in 1804 than currently live in New York City alone. "It's a marvelous example to show how things have changed," says Chris Dionigi, assistant director for Domestic Policy, Science and Cooperation for the National Invasive Species Council. And it's also a dramatic illustration of humankind's ability to remake the land, scape, usually to its detriment.
The explorers saw their first American bison, also known as buffalo, in June 1804 at the mouth of the Kansas River, near today's Missouri/Kansas state border. Clark couldn't believe the number of buffalo he saw feeding on the plain near the mouth of the White River in current-day South Dakota.
Bison were so plentiful above the Milk River in current-day Montana that "the men frequently throw sticks and stones at them to drive them out of their way." At the mouth of the Yellowstone River, "The whole country was covered with herds of buffaloe, Elk & Antelopes," the wowed explorers reported, according to The Way to the Western Sea by David Lavender. "The bald Eagle are more abundant here than I ever observed them," Lewis wrote in April 1805.
Grizzly bears occasionally scared the wits out of the explorers in current-day Montana and the Dakotas, and Lewis hotfooted for safety as a badly wounded grizzly pursued him for 70 yards near the mouth of the Yellowstone River.
Clark was impressed when a team member later shot what he thought must be "the largest Bird of North America." It proved to be a California condor (today, among the world's rarest birds). Throughout their trek, the men saw lots of otter, raccoon and birds such as trumpeter swans (today, the world's rarest swan). They became the first naturalists to describe several animals, including the coyote, kit fox, Oregon bobcat and the wolf of the plains, according to Burroughs.
What Lewis and Clark found on their historic trek has filled entire volumes, but at least two things are clear. The West obviously changed since 1804, as cities sprang up, railroads ferried hunters within easy shooting distance of trophy buffalo, and grizzlies and wolves were pushed into smaller and smaller areas. Secondly, and more surprisingly: Even in 1804, the explorers saw signs that man already had tinkered with the natural world.
The horses that galloped past them descended from horses brought over by Spanish conquistadors. North America's native horse went extinct 10,000 years ago. Dogs, meanwhile, weren't just companions for Native Americans, they were food. Hungry and fatigued, the explorers resorted to buying Native American dogs. "Clark, at least, could not overcome a sense of revulsion at being obliged to eat them," Burroughs wrote.
By the 1940s, red and gray wolves--once found throughout most of North America--vanished from most of the lower 48 states. Grizzlies--which once roamed the western half of North America--today number around 1,000 in the contiguous U.S. They're gone from the Bitterroot Mountains, where Lewis and Clark found healthy populations, but they remain in mountains in Wyoming, Washington, Montana and Idaho, according to the National Wildlife Federation. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was poised to return grizzlies to the Selway-Bitteroot region of central Idaho and northwestern Montana, to the delight of conservationists who pushed for the plan. But Interior Secretary Gale Norton overturned that decision last year.
Fast-forward to today, and more than 50,000 species of exotic animals and plants now live in the United States, Pimentel reports, including about 20 introduced mammals such as dogs and cats (population 66 million and 73 million, respectively). Clearly, we can't recreate the North America that Lewis and Clark found. We've not only introduced new animals and plants, but we've also inalterably paved and built on vast expanses of former wilderness. The nation's human population now approaches 280 million--overwhelming numbers when compared to the roughly six million who lived here during Lewis and Clark's trip.
Still, we're going to have to decide together how to manage these changes, and ask ourselves: Are we trying to return the natural order, and especially our wildlife, to as close to pre-Pilgrim days as possible? Are we trying to bring back the "good species" and repress the "bad species"? Do we have a moral obligation to preserve as many native animals as possible? If so, what changes could that mean to our daily habits, and are we ready to try them?
Flushable cat litter, for instance, may be killing California sea otters, according to a February 2001 report in The Scientist. As the waste goes down the toilet and eventually ends up in the ocean, so can go Toxoplasma gondii, a parasite whose only known hosts are felines, including housecats, bobcats, cougars and stray cats. Another parasite under suspicion for otter deaths is Sarcocystis neurona, whose only definitive host is the opossum. Close to 40 percent of otter deaths are blamed on diseases such as these. Only about 2,000 otters remain. "It's a serious issue," says marine biologist Jim Curland, a marine program associate for Defenders of Wildlife. "It says what we're doing on land can have some serious repercussions for animals in the ocean."
Around the country, there are other skirmishes that pit native creatures against what may be your favorite animals. In Hawaii, cats and dogs as well as the imported mongoose have seriously affected nesting waterbirds and two seabirds--the dark-rumped petrel and Newell's shearwater, according to the National Biological Service. Several new projects aim to curb predators, ,and more baby petrels have survived since a program began in the nesting areas at Haleakala National Park on Maui.
Elsewhere, dogs accompanied by their owners happily ran leash-free along a vast expanse of beach at San Francisco's Fort Funston park--that is, until officials determined that one of California's two Bank Swallow coastal communities used 10 acres of the beach. The Golden Gate National Recreation Area dosed the 10 acres to dogs to protect the swallow. That prompted a lawsuit from a dog-loving group called Fort Funston Dog Walkers.
Free-roaming cats, thought to live in a newly constructed subdivision in California's Marin County, are showing up at Cemetery Marsh, a 50-acre spot used as a nesting area and over-wintering site by belted kingfishers and snowy egrets, according to the Marin Audubon Society, which is encouraging residents to keep cats indoors. Feral cats, meanwhile, are pitted against California Quail at Bidwell Park in Chico, California, and against rare ground-nesting birds such as California black rail and Western snowy plover at California's East Bay Regional Park District. Animal rights activists object to euthanizing stray and feral cats at either place. In what is viewed as a success story, Chico residents started the Chico Cat Coalition, removed at least 440 cats, found homes for most and sent about 50 cats unsuitable for adoption to live out their days in an enclosed barn on private property. California quail are once again seen at the park, and it's unusual to see a stray cat, according to the American Bird Conservancy, which since 1997 has run a national Cats Indoors! campaign.
Exactly how many animals are killed by cats is hotly contested. Based on studies in Wisconsin and Virginia, Pimentel extrapolated that each free-roaming cat nationally kills five birds per year. So, his report estimates that about 465 million birds are killed nationally each year. Nonsense, counters groups such as Alley Cat Allies, a national feral-cat organization that maintains habitat destruction--not cats--is a far bigger problem. More than 60 studies on feral cats from various continents make three points, according to Alley Cat Allies: Cats are opportunistic and eat what is most easily available. Cats can prey on animals without destroying them. And "cats are rodent specialists. Birds make up a small percentage of their diet when they rely solely on hunting for food."
"It gets really sensitive when you start talking about cats and dogs and things like that. But feral cats and dogs can cause quite a problem," says the Invasive Species Council's Dionigi. If Bruce Coblentz had his way, feral cats would be killed, period. "If it didn't have a tag and it didn't have a home, I'd kill it in a heartbeat. It'd be no different than stepping on a cockroach. It's not to say I'm a cat hater," says Coblentz, a cat owner and professor of wildlife ecology at Oregon State University.
Cats are sort of a "third rail" topic among cat lovers, says WWF's Morrison. Some animal rights groups favor feral cat colonies--designated areas where feral cats are returned after neutering, spaying and vaccinations so they can live out their days outside.
But Morrison and Coblentz say it isn't humane for the native animals killed by feral cats. "You would think people would be advocating for the safety and well-being of native species," Morrison says.
In the end, we're left with troubling questions about how to try to reverse the world's fastest extinction rate of animals and plants since dinosaurs roamed the Earth. Is it more humane to kill every last feral hog or round up every feral cat in order to help natives? Or is it more humane to let them live at the expense of natives, such as the Key Largo cotton mouse? The danger is that instead of pondering difficult questions and coming up with our own solutions, we may opt to play a game of cat and mouse with the truth. CONTACT: Alley Cat Allies, (202) 667-3630, www.alleycatallies.org; American Bird Conservancy, (202) 452-1535, www.abcbirds.org; International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, www.redlist.org.
RELATED ARTICLE: Monkeying with nature.
Pink flamingos are synonymous with Florida, just as tumbleweeds say "Nevada." But did you know both are foreign species? Yup. Don't assume everything you see in the wild belongs there, even if it does become a state bird like the ring-necked pheasant in South Dakota.
"I'm fascinated by the way so many exotic species become interwoven with our ideas of `America,'" says Kim Todd, author of Tinkering With Eden: A Natural History of Exotics in America. She believes we all can do our part to keep foreign plants and animals from overtaking natives by exploring the origins of our garden plants and the insects on our windowsills. "All the effort up front to keep new species out, though it seems like an exercise in futility, is nothing compared with the difficulty of getting rid of a species once it has started to take root."
Amen, say those who have tried mightily to evict such intruders as:
* NUTRIA. The man behind the Tabasco sauce company, E.A. McIlhenny, thought he'd start a fur farm on Louisiana's Avery Island, so in the 1930s he released into the wild six pair of beaver-like South American rodents called nutria. A hurricane in 1940 pushed all 150 nutria onto the mainland--and the rest is history. The nation now harbors more than 10 million nutria, according to a report by James McCann of the National Biological Service. Nutria ended up along the Eastern Seaboard, in Texas and at least as far as Oregon, in some cases because they simply went there, in others through importation for fur farms and (failed) biological controls against plants like cattails. When Texas imported nutria to go after water lilies, the munching critters "eradicated the targeted plants and everything else in the area. In a short time, the lakes were changed into denuded potholes that were not even suitable habitat for the nutria," according to McCann's report. Nutria also compete with native muskrat and waterfowl.
* CANADA GEESE. Remember when it was cool--a rarity--to see a Canada goose? It still may be cool for fans like the New York-based Coalition to Prevent the Destruction of Canada Geese. But other people, vexed by goose droppings, notice that neither lasers, nor dogs, nor scare guns seem to send all of the widespread suburban Canada geese back to their native frosty North. It's considered a nuisance by some people, but don't blame the goose. Well-intentioned people caused the problem: After the migrating Canada goose almost went extinct due to hunting and commercial harvesting, people got excited in the 1960s when small groups of Canada geese were rediscovered at some refuges, according to the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). So they relocated eggs and birds to new areas and coddled them. The geese didn't learn the migratory pathways, so they stayed year-round. Why leave? Wide lawns and big ponds, HSUS says, are "perfect goose habitats."
* MONKEYS. Lore has it that the Tarzan film crew left behind the free-roaming rhesus monkeys that for years delighted tourists taking boat tours at the Silver Springs attraction in central Florida. In reality, the monkeys arrived before actor Johnny Weissmuller ever swung through those vines, In 1938, the attraction's then-owner--a man who's given name was "Colonel Tooey"--imported monkeys to live on an island he dredged in the river. Imagine his surprise when he released them onto the island--and moments later saw them swim to the other side and disappear into the distant woods. Tooey didn't know they could swim! Undaunted, he imported more, having seen how tourists loved watching him entice the monkeys to river's edge with food. A movement to remove the breeding troops of monkeys prompted a protest petition signed by more than 25,000 area residents in 1993. Most monkeys since were relocated, but, according to the Ocala Star Banner, "There are still occasional sightings of the rhesus in areas around Silver Springs and the [Ocala National] forest."--S.D
Seattle-based freelance writer SALLY DENEEN is a frequent contributor to E.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Article Type:||Statistical Data Included|
|Date:||May 1, 2002|
|Previous Article:||Heavy metal harm: the fight against highly toxic mercury in the environment has just begun.|
|Next Article:||Glowing in the dark; baby teeth studies reveal childhood radiation exposure. (Your Health).|