Printer Friendly


Cold Spring, NY

* What led you to give so much space to Danny Postel's attack on the very interesting British writer John Gray, professor at the London School of Economics and author of a dozen books or so? ["Gray's Anatomy," Dec. 22] Postel, a man of no credentials, has an ax to grind but never gets it sharpened.

Postel seems to think he has summed up Gray by saying he is a conservative and guilty of "a right-wing ontology of alterity," whatever that gobbledygook may mean. That doesn't come close to describing him, and it is not, whatever Postel may believe, a sufficient label of condemnation. Gray is, in short, a deep-ecology "collapsist," pessimistic to the core about the human future, and I for one am right with him.

Postel is also absurdly wrong to think that Lovelock's Gaia theory is in disrepute and no longer a useful ecological analysis and to believe it and overpopulation are no longer issues of utmost importance to the environmental movement. He thinks Gray's use of these ideas is "downright embarrassing," but it is The Nation that should be embarrassed.

COPYRIGHT 2004 The Nation Company L.P.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Letters
Author:Sale, Kirkpatrick
Publication:The Nation
Date:Feb 9, 2004
Previous Article:Senator Paul Simon.
Next Article:The new American century.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters