Printer Friendly

Gastrointestinal helminths of wild Humboldt penguins Spheniscus humboldti (Meyen, 1834) from the south-central coast of Chile.

The Humboldt penguin Spheniscus humboldti (Meyen, 1834) is an endemic oceanic seabird from the west coast of South America. It is distributed from Foca Island (5[degrees]12'S, 81[degrees]12'W), in northern Peru to Isla Metalqui (42[degrees]12'S; 74[degrees]10'W) on the west coast of Chiloe Island, Chile (De la Puente et al., 2013). S. humboldti lives mostly coastal islands and nest in a variety of sites including caves burrows, under vegetation and rocks. The International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) classifies this species as vulnerable since it has undergone extreme population size fluctuations at major colonies and there is probably an on-going, underlying rapid decline in numbers (BirdLife International, 2017).

Since the available information regarding species parasitizing S. humboldti derives mainly from the incidental capture or analysis of dead specimens of this penguin, its parasites have been poorly studied until now (Mann, 1992; Gonzalez-Acuna et al., 2008; Yanez et al., 2012). In this sense, because it provides information of the host such as diet, migratory routes, feeding areas (Gardner & Campbell, 1992; Marcogliese & Price, 1997), the study of parasitism in S. humboldti is relevant. Furthermore, it provides information regarding the role played by parasites in infectious processes in these animals.

From January 2006 to June 2015, the National Fisheries Service of Chile (SERNAPESCA), rescued a total of 156 specimens of S. humboldti from various places on the south-central Chile (36[degrees]37'S-38[degrees]20'S) and sent them to the Veterinary Clinical Hospital of San Sebastian University, Concepcion. Of this total, 102 arrived alive to the veterinary clinic. Whether if they arrived alive or dead, S. humboldti specimens were identified considering the morphological characteristics indicated by Goodall et al. (1951). Morphometric characters of each specimen were recorded according to Zavalaga & Paredes (1997) (Table 1).

The health condition of the alive birds was evaluated through clinical examinations which, in most cases, revealed general weakening, malnutrition, persistent diarrhea and lack of attention to environmental stimuli, requiring the hospitalization and the application of emergency clinical procedures in many of them. Despite the efforts, 31 specimens died during the treatment. Animals which satisfactorily recovered their health (71) were released on the south-central Chile.

A coproparasitic analysis was carried out on 71 live specimens to determine the gastrointestinal parasitic fauna. On the floor of the cage of each bird, polyethylene was placed to collect fresh stool samples, and the fecal matter placed in 50 mL plastic bottles containing 10 mL of PAF preservative (PhenolAlcohol-Formalin) and processed using the Burrows sedimentation technique (Munoz et al., 1984). Three microscopic preparations of each sample were studied using a Zeiss Stemi DRC microscope and 100X and 400X magnifications to search for helminths and protozoa, respectively.

Necropsy was performed to the 85 dead birds according to the protocol of Work (2000). This procedure revealed the presence of numerous parasite specimens in the gastrointestinal tract, adhered to the mucosa or free in the intestinal lumen. The intestinal content was extracted using saline solution and sieved using a 0.50 mm sieve. Material retained by the sieves was examined utilizing a stereoscopic microscope (Zeiss Stemi DRC) to separate the parasites, which were fixed in 70% ethanol. Nematodes were cleared in lactophenol or in 25% glycerine alcohol. Previously to staining, cestodes and trematodes were discolored, dehydrated and diaphanized and then stained using Harris' hematoxylin and mounted in Canada balsam. The taxonomic identification of each parasite was made at the Parasitology Laboratory (Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Concepcion, Chile) using optical microscopy (Motic, BA 310). Parasites were identified according to Anderson & Wong (1981), Hoberg (1994), Fagerholm & Overstreet (2008), and Diaz et al. (2010). Prevalence in alive and dead specimens and the mean intensity in dead specimens were calculated according to Bush et al. (1997).

Of the total penguins analyzed by coproparasitic methods, 29.57% were positive to some parasitism, being protozoan elements absent. In the group of penguins subjected to necropsy, 51.76% were positive for some parasitism. The difference in prevalence between the techniques used (Table 2) becomes explained when considering that necropsy, being a procedure that contemplates the in extenso revision of the digestive tract, allows finding all the parasites present. However, the diagnostic approach through coproparasitic methods has the advantage to be carried out on live specimens, allowing investigating the parasitic condition of threatened fauna. In both, live and dead birds, the presence of adults and larvae of third and fourth stage of the nematode Contracaecum pelagicum (Johnston & Mawson, 1942), adult stages of the nematode Cosmocephalus obvelatus (Creplin, 1825), complete specimens and gravid proglottids (fragments) of the tapeworm Tetrabothrius eudyptidis (Lonnberg, 1896), and adult and juvenile specimens of the trematode Cardiocephaloides physalis (Lutz, 1926), were identified.

None of the identified species has been reported as zoonotic. Besides, larvae of the third stage of Anisakis Type I (Berland, 1961) were isolated from the stomach in some birds, but not included as results of this report because, since they are not attached to the tissue of the host, they could correspond to parasitism of the prey (see below). The prevalence, mean intensity of infection and anatomical location of the parasites found in specimens subjected to necropsy are detailed in Table 3. The majority of infections considering live and dead birds (57%) were monospecific, while the rest of the penguins were parasitized by at least two species, with the combination of C. pelagicum and T. eudyptidis being the most frequent. The type material and other reference specimens are deposited in the Museum of Parasitology of the Universidad de Concepcion (MPUDEC), with the registration number PH1-12.

All the parasites identified in the analyzed specimens corresponded to genera already informed in birds of aquatic environments of Chile, including S. humboldti (Torres et al., 2000; Hinojosa & Gonzalez, 2005). However, the number of species and prevalence of the parasitofauna of S. humboldti reported in this work was different from what has been previously described for this species (Mann, 1992; GonzalezAcuna et al., 2008), perhaps reflecting the particular ontogeny of the specimens analyzed (Table 3). The richness of the S. humboldti parasitic fauna was lower than that reported for other species of penguins (Brandao et al., 2014), perhaps caused by the reduced feeding spectrum of the Humboldt penguin, mainly piscivorous with a reduced diversity of prey-items. Considering that all the parasites isolated in this study could be transmitted to the host by the consumption of infected preys, the quantitative and qualitative variations of these parasitic taxa would represent the composition of their diet (Campbell et al., 1980). Their diet is mainly composed of fishes such as anchovy (Engraulis ringens), Araucanian herring (Strangomera bentincki) and silverside (Odontesthes regia) although the common hake (Merluccius gayi), Inca scad (Trachurus murphyi), garfish (Scomberesox saurus scombroides), South American pilchard (Sardinops sagax) and various crustaceans and cephalopods have been reported as well (Herling et al., 2005). Besides, characteristics of the host (phylogeny and ecology, among others) and the type of relationship it establishes with the parasite could also determine the structure and quantitative characteristics of the parasitic fauna (George-Nascimento, 1987; Rohde, 2005).

Although the majority of the life cycles of the parasites identified in this study are unknown, it is recognized that they are heteroxene with the participation of S. humboldti as definitive host and various species of fish and invertebrates as intermediate and/or paratenic hosts. In this way, in the life cycle of Contracaecum, penguins release the eggs of the parasite with their feces into the sea from where larvae of the third stage hatch and are eventually ingested by crustaceans, probably copepods, which could serve as intermediaries. Fish, when ingesting infected invertebrates, become infected and, thus, as intermediate/ paratenic hosts in whose tissues larvae are encapsulated. When penguins and other seabirds consume fish, the third larval stage develops and generates the fourth larval stage which, subsequently, advances into the adult stage (Bartlett, 1996; Fagerholm & Overstreet, 2008). Also, infective Contracaecum larvae have recently been found in E. ringens (George-Nascimento & Moscoso, 2013), the primary prey of the Humboldt penguin's diet (Herling et al., 2005). Azuma et al., (1988) indicated that piscivorous birds and penguins might become infected when they ingest Cosmocephalus infected fish acting as intermediate hosts of this parasite (Kim et al., 2015). The life cycle of Cardiocephaloides physalis is unknown although it could be similar to the congeneric parasite C. longicollis where gastropods and fish (Sparidae and Scombresocidae) participate as intermediate hosts, with the gulls Larus argentatus and Larus ridibundus being the definitive hosts (Prevot & Bartoli, 1981; Abdel-Aal et al., 2004). Also, the probable role of the Argentine anchoveta Engraulis anchoita as the intermediate host of C. physalis has been proposed because the metacercaria of this parasite has been described in specimens captured in waters of Argentina and Uruguay (Timi et al., 1999; Horne et al., 2011). Although it is recognized that Tetrabothrius is one of the most frequently found genera of parasites in birds, its life cycle is mostly unknown, with the participation of teleost fish or cephalopod mollusks as the second intermediate and/or paratenic host (Hoberg, 1994).

The main causes of rescue of penguins considered in this study were entanglement in fishing nets, severe injuries and oiling events. This fact might be linked to the finding that the weight of the penguins analyzed in the present study was lower than that previously reported for other S. humboldti populations (Zavalaga & Paredes, 1997) or perhaps are the consequence of long term undernourished, parasitized or sick birds. In the light of the results presented, questions can be raised about what is the role of parasites as predisposing factors or determinants of alteration of the health in the eventual hosts. Since most of the hospitalized penguins presented nonspecific parasitic symptoms, it was not possible to establish a correlation between the health of each animal and its parasitic fauna. On the other hand, necropsies revealed emaciation in birds with a high parasitic load. The death of these birds, favored or determined by parasites, could be correlated with heavy parasitic loads in birds which are under stress conditions due to environmental contamination, immunodepressors, anorexia and/or secondary bacterial infections (Fagerholm & Overstreet, 2008).

The pathogenicity of Contracaecum could be related to its capacity to cause inflammatory processes and to inflict ulcerative damage on the gastric and intestinal mucosa, which in cases of intense parasitism might cause severe anemia episodes. Likewise, specimens of Contracaecum, and to a lesser extent Cosmocephalus, could also compete with their host for the same nutrients, causing, in cases of intense parasitism, nutrient deficiencies and malnutrition, as previously mentioned (Fagerholm & Overstreet, 2008; Yanez et al., 2012). On the other hand, in some necropsies performed on penguins heavily parasitized by C. physalis, we observed severe damage to the intestinal mucosa, coinciding with reports in other bird hosts (Baer, 1969). It has been pointed out that C. physalis could affect intestinal digestion and absorption of nutrients, which could cause the death of Spheniscus demersus chicks in southern Africa (Randall & Bray, 1983; Horne et al., 2011). Finally, in penguins heavily parasitized by T. eudyptidis we did not find evidence of intestinal obstruction, although we verified that these specimens were emaciated, an observation in agreement with that of Housse (1945) who reported that high loads of the T. lutzi congeneric species caused the thinning and death of magellanic penguins (S. magellanicus), also inhabitants of the coast of Chile.

Being S. humboldti a vulnerable species, we consider that it is necessary to continue parasitological studies in this penguin to clarify the role of parasites in the health of this bird.

DOI: 10.3856/vol47-iosue1-fulltext-25


We are thankful to SERNAPESCA and its personnel, particularly to those of the Bio Bio Region, for providing the S. humboldti specimens analyzed in this work. This study was funded by GRANT 216.036.0431.0IN, Vicerrectoria de Investigacion y Desarrollo (VRID), Universidad de Concepcion, Concepcion, Chile.


Abdel-Aal, A., Solimar, M. & Shalaby, I. 2004. Surface ultrastructure of Cardiocephalus longicollis (Digenea: Strigidae) from herring gulls, Larus argentatus, and its associated pathological lesion. Helminthologia, 41: 175-178.

Anderson, R.C. & Wong, P.L. 1981. Redescription of Cosmocephalus obvelatus (Creplin, 1825) (Nematoda: Acuarioidea) of Larus delawarensis ORD (Laridae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 59: 1897-1902.

Azuma, H., Okamoto, M., Ohbayashi, M., Nishine, Y. & Mukai, T. 1988. Cosmocephalus obvelatus (Creplin, 1825) (Nematoda: Acuariidae) collected from the esophagus of rockhopper penguin, Eudyptes crestatus. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Research, 36: 73-77.

Baer, J. 1969. Un trematode du cormoran Phalacrocorax bougainvilleii (Less.) des lies Guanape, Perou. Parazitologicheskii Sbornik, 24: 7-15.

Bartlett, C.M. 1996. Morphogenesis of Contracaecum rudolphii (Nematoda, Anisakidae), a parasite of fisheating birds. Parasite, 3(4): 367-376.

Berland, B. 1961. Nematodes from some Norwegian marine fishes. Sarsia, 2: 1-50.

BirdLife International. 2017. Spheniscus humboldti (amended version of 2016 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T22697817A 111228184. [ 2017-1.RLTS.T22697817A111228184.en.]. Reviewed: 27 September 2018.

Brandao, M., Moreira, J. & Luque, J. 2014. Checklist of Platyhelminthes, Acanthocephala, Nematoda, and Arthropoda parasitizing penguins of the world. Check List, 10(3): 562-573.

Bush, A.O., Lafferty, K.D., Lotz, J.M. & Shostak, A.W. 1997. Parasitology meets ecology on its terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology, 83(4): 575-583.

Campbell, R., Haedrich, R. & Munro, T. 1980. Parasitism and ecological relationships among deep-sea benthic fishes. Marine Biology, 57: 301-313.

De la Puente, S., Bussalleu, A., Cardena, M., Valdes-Velasquez, A., Majluf, P. & Simeone, A. 2013. Humboldt Penguin (Spheniscus humboldti). In: Garcia, P. & Boersma, P.D. (Eds.). Penguins, natural history and conservation. University of Washington Press, Seattle, pp. 265-283.

Diaz, J.L., Cremonte, F. & Navone, G.T. 2010. Helminths of the Magellanic penguin, Spheniscus magellanicus (Sphenisciformes), during the breeding season in Patagonian coast, Chubut, Argentina. Comparative Parasitology, 77(2): 172-177.

Fagerholm, H.P. & Overstreet, R. 2008. Ascaridoid nematodes: Contracaecum, Porrocaecum and Baylisascaris. In: Atkinson, C.T., Thomas, N.J. & Hunter, D.B. (Eds.). Parasitic diseases of wild birds Atkinson. Wiley-Blackwell, Iowa, pp. 413-433.

Gardner, S.L. & Campbell, M.L. 1992. Parasites as probes for biodiversity. Journal of Parasitology, 78(4): 596-600.

George-Nascimento, M. 1987. Ecological helminthology of wildlife animal hosts from South America: a literature review and a search for patterns in marine food webs. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 60: 181-202.

George-Nascimento, M. & Moscoso, D. 2013. Variacion local y geografica de las infracomunidades de parasitos de la anchoveta Engraulis ringens en Chile. Revista de Biologia Marina y Oceanografia, 48(1): 207-212.

Gonzalez-Acuna, D., Kinsella, J., Lara, J. & ValenzuelaDellarossa, G. 2008. Parasitos gastrointestinales en pinguino de Humboldt (Spheniscus humboldti) y pinguino de Magallanes (Spheniscus magellanicus) en las costas del centro y sur de Chile. Parasitologia Latinoamericana, 63: 58-63.

Goodall, J.D., Johnson, A.W. & Philippi, R.A. 1951. Las aves de Chile, su conocimiento y sus costumbres. Ediciones Platt Establecimientos Graficos, Buenos Aires.

Herling, C., Culik, B. & Hennicke, J. 2005. Diet of the Humboldt penguin (Spheniscus humboldti) in northern and southern Chile. Marine Biology, 147: 13-25.

Hinojosa, A. & Gonzalez, D. 2005. Estado actual del conocimiento de helmintos en aves silvestres de Chile. Gayana, 69(2): 241-253.

Hoberg, E.P. 1994. Order Tetrabothriidea Baer, 1954. In: Khalil, L.F., Jones, A. & Bray, R.A. (Eds.). Keys to the cestode parasites of vertebrates. CAB International, London, pp. 295-304.

Horne, E., Bray, R. & Bousfield, B. 2011. The presence of the trematodes Cardiocephaloides physalis and Renicola sloanei in the African Penguin Spheniscus demersus on the east coast of South Africa. Ostrich, 82(2): 157-160.

Housse, R. 1945. Las aves de Chile, su vida y sus costumbres. Editorial de la Universidad de Chile, Santiago. Santiago, 390 pp.

Kim, S., Park, B., Jung, B. & Kim, H. 2015. First record of Cosmocephalus obvelatus (Acuariidae) in common gulls (Larus canus) from Gangneung, Korea. The Korean Journal of Parasitology, 53(1): 101-104.

Mann, A. 1992. Fauna parasitaria en el pinguino de Humboldt (Spheniscus humboldti), en la zona central de Chile. Memoria, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, 67 pp.

Marcogliese, D.J. & Price, J. 1997. The paradox of parasites. Global Biodiversity, 7: 7-5.

Munoz, V., Dorn, L. & Reyes, H. 1984. Examen coproparasitologico. Evaluacion de algunas modifica ciones al metodo de Burrows (PAF). Parasitologia al Dia, 8: 107-111.

Prevot, G. & Bartoli, P. 1981. Demonstration de l'existence d'un cycle marin chez les Strigeides: Cardiocephalus longicollis Szidat, 1928 (Trematoda: Strigeidae). Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparee, 55: 407-425.

Randall, R. & Bray, R. 1983. Mortalities of jackas penguin Spheniscus demersus chicks caused by trematode worms Cardiocephaloides physalis. South African Journal of Zoology, 18(1): 45-46.

Rohde, K. 2005. Marine Parasitology. CABI publishing, Wallingford, 565 pp.

Timi, J., Martorelli, S. & Sardella, N. 1999. Digenetic trematodes parasitic on Engraulis anchoita (Pisces: Engraulidae) from Argentina and Uruguay. Folia Parasitologica, 46: 132-138.

Torres, P., Valdivieso, J., Schlatter, R., Montefusco, A., Revenga, J., Marin, F., Lamilla, J. & Ramallo, G. 2000. Infection by Contracaecum rudolphii (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in the Neotropical cormorant Phalacrocorax brasilianus, and fishes from the estuary of the Valdivia River, Chile. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 35(2): 101-108.

Work, T.M. 2000. Manual de necropsia de aves marinas para biologos en refugios o areas remotas. U.S. Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center Hawaii Field Station, Hawaii, pp. 9-26.

Yanez, F., Fernandez, I., Campos, V., Mansilla, M., Valenzuela, A., Gonzalez, H., Rodriguez, C., Rivas, M., Alveal, K. & Oyarzun, C. 2012. First pathological report of parasitic gastric ulceration in Humboldt penguin (Spheniscus humboldti) along the coast of south-central Chile. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research, 40(2): 448-452.

Zavalaga, C. & Paredes, R. 1997. Sex determination of adult Humboldt penguins using morphometric characters. Journal of Field Ornithology, 68(1): 102-112.

Corresponding editor: Sergio Palma

Received: 13 June 2018; Accepted: 29 October 2018

Italo Fernandez (1), Ruben Moraga (2), Francisco Yanez (1), Miguel Mansilla (3) Carlos Smith (1) & Victor Campos (1)

(1) Departamento de Microbiologia, Facultad de Ciencias Biologicas Universidad de Concepcion, Concepcion, Chile

(2) Laboratorio de Microbiologia, Facultad de Recursos Naturales Renovables Universidad Arturo Prat, Iquique, Chile

(3) Hospital Clinico Veterinario, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias Universidad San Sebastian, Concepcion, Chile

Corresponding author: Italo Fernandez (
Table 1. Morphometric data of 156 Humboldt penguins (Spheniscus
humboldti) from south-central Chile, n: number of specimens, SD:
standard deviation, X: average. Body mass is in kilograms, other
measurements are in cm. Range is given in parentheses.

Variable              Pooled (n = 156)       Males (n = 62)
                     [bar.x] [+ or -] SD   [bar.x] [+ or -] SD

Body mass             3.00 [+ or -] 0.7    2.95 [+ or -] 0.73
Length of the head   12.90 [+ or -] 0.87   13.34 [+ or -] 0.68
Width of the head    4.87 [+ or -] 0.30    5.02 [+ or -] 0.24
Bill length          6.14 [+ or -] 0.30    6.39 [+ or -] 0.32
Bill depth           2.07 [+ or -] 0.45    2.13 [+ or -] 0.46
Flipper length       15.32 [+ or -] 0.63   15.58 [+ or -] 0.40

Variable              Females (n = 94)
                     [bar.x] [+ or -] SD

Body mass            3.02 [+ or -] 0.67
Length of the head   12.67 [+ or -] 0.88
Width of the head    4.77 [+ or -] 0.30
Bill length          5.98 [+ or -] 0.13
Bill depth           2.03 [+ or -] 0.45
Flipper length       15.15 [+ or -] 0.70

Table 2. Prevalence (P) of infection by helminth
gastrointestinal parasites in 156 penguins from south-
central Chile diagnosed by Burrows test and/or necropsy.
n: number of penguins analyzed.

Parasitic         n         Results          P (%)
diagnosis test         Positive   Negative
Burrows          71       21         50      29.57
Necropsy         85       44         41      51.76
Total            156      65         91      41.66

Table 3. Parasites, including those reported in this study, so
far listed in necropsied Spheniscus humboldti from Chilean
waters. (n) Number of parasites; (P) Prevalence of infection;
(MI) Mean intensity of infection

Parasitic taxa               n     P (%)   MI

Cosmocephalus oblevatus      1     3.33    1.00

(Creplin, 1825)              48    8.24    6.86

Contracaecum pelagicum       29    40.00   2.41

(Johnston & Mawson, 1942)    30    100     10.00

                             477   42.35   13.25
Tetrabothrius eudyptidis     13    16.60   2.60

(Lonnberg, 1896)             12    33.33   12.00

                             118   24.70   5.62

Cardiocephaloides physalis   43    30.00   4.70

(Lutz, 1926)                 361   22.35   19.00

Parasitic taxa               Area of collection (latitude)

Cosmocephalus oblevatus      Central (32[degrees]31'S-
(Creplin, 1825)              South-central (36[degrees]37'S-
Contracaecum pelagicum       Central (32[degrees]31'S-
(Johnston & Mawson, 1942)    South-central (33[degrees]35'S-
                             South-central (36[degrees]37'S-
Cestoda                      38[degrees]20'S)
Tetrabothrius eudyptidis     Central (32[degrees]31'S-
(Lonnberg, 1896)             South-central (33[degrees]35'S-
                             South-central (36[degrees]37'S-
Cardiocephaloides physalis   Central (32[degrees]31'S-
(Lutz, 1926)                 South-central (36[degrees]37'S-

Parasitic taxa               Reference

Cosmocephalus oblevatus      Mann (1992)

(Creplin, 1825)              Present study

Contracaecum pelagicum       Mann (1992)

(Johnston & Mawson, 1942)    Gonzalez-Acuna et al. (2008)

                             Present study
Tetrabothrius eudyptidis     Mann (1992)

(Lonnberg, 1896)             Gonzalez-Acuna et al. (2008)

                             Present study

Cardiocephaloides physalis   Mann (1992)

(Lutz, 1926)                 Present study
COPYRIGHT 2019 Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso, Escuela de Ciencias del Mar
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2019 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Short Communication
Author:Fernandez, Italo; Moraga, Ruben; Yanez, Francisco; Mansilla, Miguel; Smith, Carlos; Campos, Victor
Publication:Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research
Date:Mar 1, 2019
Previous Article:Breaking strength evaluation of biodegradable twines to reduce ghost fishing in the pot and trap fisheries of Chile.
Next Article:Bio-mitigation based on integrated multi-trophic aquaculture in temperate coastal waters: practice, assessment, and challenges.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |