Printer Friendly

GIB's $4 billion euro medium-term note programme rated 'BBB+/A-2'.

Byline: (Staff Writer)

The ratings on the program me (for senior notes) are equali s ed with the counterparty credit ratings on GIB, reflecting our view that the notes will rank pari passu with GIB's other senior unsecured debt.

The ratings on GIB reflect the bank's strong ownership structure, adequate asset quality (although assets are geographically concentrated), and improved liquidity and capitali s ation following the sale of impaired and high-risk assets. The ratings on the bank are constrained by its weak profitability, reliance on short-term wholesale funding, and challenges regarding the bank's future strategy. The bank intends to amend its business model and improve its funding profile but has yet to demonstrate its ability to achieve this.

The long-term rating on GIB is two notches above the bank's stand-alone credit profile to reflect Standard & Poor's view that there is a moderately high likelihood of extraordinary government support from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (AA-/Stable/A-1+). Since the asset sale in March 2009, the Saudi Arabia Monetary Agency (SAMA, the central bank) and Public Investment Fund (PIF), two public institutions in Saudi Arabia, together own a 98 per cent stake in GIB. We consider GIB as a government -related entity (GRE) under our methodology, whereas we classify Saudi Arabia as interventionist toward its banking sector.

2009 CPI Financial. All rights reserved.

Provided by an company
COPYRIGHT 2009 Al Bawaba (Middle East) Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:CPI Financial
Date:Nov 24, 2009
Previous Article:Pharos Financial Advisors Launches Private Equity Agriculture Fund.
Next Article:KFH-Turkey receives Islamic bank licence in Dubai.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters