Printer Friendly

GIANT INTRA-ABDOMINAL LIPOMA- AN ENIGMA.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 59-year-old gentleman presented with the chief complaint of generalised abdominal distension for the last 2 years. It had achieved an uncomfortable size, which was disturbing his day-to-day activities. It was not associated with any pain, obstructive or compressive symptoms and no history of low- grade fever, night sweats and anorexia or weight loss.

Patient's nutritional status was good, had mild pallor and bilateral pedal oedema.

On examination, the abdomen was found to be hugely distended with an inverted umbilicus (girth 160 cm). No venous engorgement or pigmentation were noted. A diffuse firm lump was palpated in all quadrants of the abdomen, non- tender, non-mobile, no organomegaly and no evidence of ascites. Routine investigations were within normal limits.

CT scan and USG revealed a lobulated mass with predominantly fat content and areas of soft tissue occupying most of the abdomen. It had fine septations, tiny calcifications measuring 39.4 by 36.9 by 29.1 cm (Fig. 1, 2).

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES

The possible differential diagnoses of the lump is-

a. Retroperitoneal sarcoma.

b. Mesenteric cyst.

c. Omental cyst.

CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS

Based on the clinical findings and investigations, a diagnosis of a retroperitoneal neoplasm was made.

DISCUSSION OF MANAGEMENT

DJ stenting of both ureters was done 3 days before the operation.

The abdomen was opened by a midline incision. After opening the peritoneum, a solid, yellowish, encapsulated lesion (15 * 10 * 10 cm) was seen in the central part of abdomen along with 2 - 3 similar larger masses (30 * 15 * 15) beneath it with very evident cleavage planes (Fig. 3). The small bowel was pushed towards the right hypochondrium.

The lesions were separated from the colon, kidney, ureter, inferior vena cava and abdominal aorta by very evident cleavage planes. No invasion of any major organ was noted. Mesentery was free. The capsule had adherence to the retroperitoneal tissue and had small calibre vessels on its surface.

After the major 3 lesions were removed, smaller masses were dissected out. Total weight was 15.5 kg (Fig. 4). Postoperative period was uneventful.

PATHOLOGICAL DISCUSSION

It showed mature adipose tissues arranged in lobules with intervening septae of vascularised collagenous tissue (Fig. 5). Secondary changes in the form of haemorrhage and spindle cells were also noted.

DISCUSSION

The exact prevalence of lipomas is an enigma due to rather asymptomatic nature of the lesion. Intra-abdominal lipomas are the rarest of them all. [1,2] Such tumours occur commonly in the age group above 50 yrs. and have been seen more among women. [3]

Literature search reveals around 30 such documented cases. Pathogenesis is rather unknown with possible factors could be obesity, diabetes mellitus, elevation of serum cholesterol, radiation, familial tendency and chromosomal abnormalities. [4,5]

Malignant change of lipoma to liposarcoma is almost never seen. These benign lesions may grow to large proportions and numbers, but generally do not mutate. [6] Deep lipomas are noted only when they grow in larger proportions to their size, but clinical manifestations are rather rare.

Ultrasonography depicts these intra-abdominal lipomas as well-defined homogeneous, echogenic masses. Computed tomography reveals these masses with low attenuation similar to adipose tissue. [7]

In most of the cases complete surgical excision is easily performed, because the capsule that surrounds the tumour presents a very evident cleavage plane. [8]

Liposarcoma of low-grade malignancy (Grade 1) can have a similar appearance and are denominated lipomas like. [9] As liposarcoma is a possibility in these lesions, so a complete surgical excision is the treatment of choice. [10] Recurrence rate is less than 5% and is seen only due to incomplete excision of the mass. [8]

Other possible diagnoses like lipoblastoma, lymphangioma, liposarcoma or lymphangiolipoma should be considered. [9]

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

The final diagnosis of the case was that of a giant intra- abdominal lipoma.

REFERENCES

[1] Ilhan H, Tokar B, Iciksoy S, et al. Giant mesenteric lipoma. J Pediatr Surg 1999;34(4):639-40.

[2] Signer RD, Bregman D, Klausner S. Giant lipoma of the mesentery: report of an unusual case and review of the literature. Am Surg 1976;42(8):595-7.

[3] Cavazza A, Giunta A, Pedrazzoli C, et al. Extrarenal retroperitoneal angiomyolipoma: description of a case and review of the literature. Pathologica 2001;93(1):44-9.

[4] Weiss SW, Goldblum JR. Enzinger and Weiss's soft tissue tumors. 5th edn. St Louis, MO: Mosby 2007.

[5] Enzinger FM, Weiss SW. Soft tissue tumors. 3rd edn. St. Louis, MO: Mosby 1995:384-405.

[6] Munk PL, Lee MJ, Janzen DL, et al. Lipoma and liposarcoma: evaluation using CT and MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169(2):589-94.

[7] Eresue J, Philippe JC, Casenave P, et al. La tomodensitometrie des lipomes et liposarcomes abdominaux de l'adulte. A propos de 9 cas. J Radiol 1984;65:145-9.

[8] Tani T, Abe H, Tsukada H, et al. Lipomatosis of the ileum with volvulus: report of a case. Surg Today 1998;28(6):640-2.

[9] Lucas DR, Nascimento AG, Sanjay BK, et al. Well- differentiated liposarcoma. The Mayo Clinic experience with 58 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 1994;102(5):677-83.

[10] Sato M, Ishida H, Konno K, et al. Mesenteric lipoma: report of a case with emphasis on US findings. Eur Radiol 2002;12(4):793-5.

Bikram Haldar (1), Sahid Khondaker (2), Bitan Kumar Chattopadhyay (3)

(1) Postgraduate Trainee, Department of General Surgery, IPGME and R, Kolkata.

(2) Postgraduate Trainee, Department of General Surgery, IPGME and R, Kolkata.

(3) Professor and HOD, Department of General Surgery, IPGME and R, Kolkata.

'Financial or Other Competing Interest': None.

Submission 19-12-2017, Peer Review 13-01-2018, Acceptance 18-01-2018, Published 29-01-2018.

Corresponding Author: Dr. Bikram Haldar, #1C1-25/5, Pranyik Housing Complex, Thakurpukur. Kolkata-700104.

E-mail: Bikramhaldar6883@gmail.com

DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2018/157

Caption: Figure 1. CT Scanogram of the Patient showing Hugely Distended Abdomen with Displaced Intestinal Loops

Caption: Figure 2. CECT Scan showing the Huge Intra-abdominal Lobulated Mass

Caption: Figure 3. Intraoperative Picture showing an Encapsulated Lobule of the Mass

Caption: Figure 4. Entire Excised Specimen made of 3 Well-Encapsulated Lobules

Caption: Figure 5. Histopathological Analysis showing Mature Adipocytes arranged in Lobules with Vascularised Collagenous Septae
COPYRIGHT 2018 Akshantala Enterprises Private Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Case Report
Author:Haldar, Bikram; Khondaker, Sahid; Chattopadhyay, Bitan Kumar
Publication:Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences
Article Type:Clinical report
Date:Jan 29, 2018
Words:1014
Previous Article:FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF COMMINUTED INTRAARTICULAR DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURES TREATED WITH FRAGMENT SPECIFIC FRACTURE FIXATION.
Next Article:PRIMARY HYDATID CYST OF BROAD LIGAMENT.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters