GASB issues reporting model proposal.
"The proposal is intended to make governments' external financial reports easier to understand and more useful to citizens, investors, creditors and legislative bodies," said GASB Chairman Tom L. Allen. He said governments currently disclose their finances based only on fund accounting. "There is a general fund, which typically is used to account for things such as police and fire protection in local government and public assistance in state government," said Allen. "But a government can have virtually an unlimited number of other funds, and it often is difficult for users to understand how all the funds add up."
Under the dual perspective, governments would continue to disclose detailed information about funds and would be required to present an entitywide perspective to show in one place all of the government's operations--for example, police, fire, water and sewage. The entitywide financial statements would be prepared on the accrual basis of accounting, similar to that used by most businesses.
The MD&A supplement would give readers, especially users who are less familiar with government financial reports, a brief, objective and easy-to-read analysis of the government's financial performance for the year and its financial position at yearend. Dianne K. Mitchell, technical manager in the Division of State Audit in Nashville, Tennessee, and a member of the Governmental Accounting Standards Advisory Council, told the Journal that a "plain English" MD&A would be most helpful to nontraditional users of government financial statements, such as local legislative bodies, citizen and taxpayer groups and members of the media.
What's needed to comply?
"If the proposed reporting model is finalized, most governments would have to implement a considerable education process and there likely would be some systems changes," said Mitchell. She said the education process could be most difficult at the local government level where city councils and county executives may not be as informed as legislators at the state level.
How popular is the new model?
Mitchell said the biggest problem that faced the GASB as it developed the new reporting model was the number of different groups affected by changes in the financial reporting process, including the traditional users (such as the financial and creditor communities), nontraditional users, preparers and auditors. "Users who supported reporting aggregated information wanted the model to have the entitywide perspective while those who supported reporting disaggregated information wanted only the fund perspective," said Mitchell. "The GASB compromised by putting both perspectives together in one reporting model."
The GASB expects to issue an exposure draft this spring on a new reporting model for colleges and universities as well as one on nonexchange transactions. Six public hearings on the EDs will be held in June, July and August; the proposed effective date for the new government agencies' model is for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. One copy of each proposal is available from the GASB order department by calling 203-847-0700, ext. 555.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Governmental Accounting Standards Board|
|Publication:||Journal of Accountancy|
|Date:||Apr 1, 1997|
|Previous Article:||FASAB issues MD&A proposal.|
|Next Article:||IRS offers some QDRO help.|