Printer Friendly

Future Security of the Global Arctic: State Policy, Economic Security and Climate.

FUTURE SECURITY OF THE GLOBAL ARCTIC: STATE POLICY, ECONOMIC SECURITY AND CLIMATE. Edited by LASSI HEININEN. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. ISBN 978-1-137-46824-6. xv + 141 p., 7 contributors, index. Hardbound. US$47.50.

Security, sovereignty, and resources--these are the most prominent themes that tend to dominate discussions about politics in the Arctic region.

Throughout the last two decades, interest in Arctic international relations has grown significantly, particularly interest in the evolving security dynamics in the circumpolar region. Predominant narratives focus on the role of Russia's Arctic policy in increasing tensions in the Arctic, the responses of other Arctic states to Russian behaviour, the increased interest from the United States in the region, the interest being shown by non-Arctic states such as China, and the emerging global governance architecture embodied mainly in the Arctic Council. Nevertheless, scholars of international relations and global politics have been slow to engage with the dynamics in the Arctic, so we have comparatively few resources to aid analysis of the political and security issues that have arisen in the North.

It is in this context that noted Arctic politics expert Lassi Heininen provides a brief, yet important, intervention. Heininen's volume, which is derived from a 2013 conference that focused on Arctic security, assembles a solid roster of contributors to analyze how security is conceptualized in the Arctic and the limitations of prevailing Arctic security narratives. Chapter topics in the book provide insight into a broader Arctic security agenda that includes climate change, economics, subnational actors, diplomacy, development, and science as important, but often overlooked variables with impact on the Arctic security equation. From the outset, Heininen makes it clear that the purpose of the book is to frame Arctic security in the context of human security rather than traditional state security in order to capture what he sees as a more accurate portrayal of Arctic affairs:
   ... the coexistence of several concepts of security in
   the Arctic is not a surprise, but a logical outcome of
   the transformation from traditional, military and state-controlled
   security to human security with an emphasis
   on the environment, and a recognition of the Anthropocene,
   or economic development and security, and that
   they are closely related to each other making "Arctic
   security" a special kind of phenomenon to influence the
   region and its geopolitics, (p. 9)


Heininen et al. are quite correct to note the often myopic view of security in the Arctic, which is not isolated to international political analyses of Arctic affairs, but is also a dominant issue in the field of international relations more broadly. Heininen notes that much of the prevailing narrative about Arctic militarism and interstate security is perpetuated by the media, and that popular discourses on Arctic security need not only to be broadened, but also to be presented more accurately:
   When analyzing the state of Arctic security, as well as
   changes in that, based on the different stages and special
   features, it is possible to conclude that since the 1980s
   there has been a clear shift from traditional security to
   [a] comprehensive one, much influenced by local and
   regional nonstate actors, (p. 29)


Despite being based on a thesis focused on viewing the Arctic through a human security lens rather than a state security lens, the book also engages with arguments about Arctic militarism and how so-called "traditional" ideas of security relate to Heininen's claims about a transformation in Arctic security. Michal Luszczuk's chapter provides a useful commentary on how military cooperation in the Arctic, affected by human security issues, is indispensable for continued Arctic cooperation, though Luszczuk notes that the ongoing tensions in Ukraine and the application of sanctions against Russia by the West may influence Arctic cooperation in the future. The book also deals with other important questions of security, including how subnational actors influence Russian Arctic policy, U.S. Arctic policy, the relationship between sovereignty and development using Canada as a test case, and the Anthropocene.

Taken together, the chapters provide an interesting and novel analysis of core Arctic security questions and engage the actors that contribute to this security in new ways. Providing a brief overview of key issues in accessibly written format, though with certain grammatical awkwardness, the book makes a compelling case for first, being skeptical of the prevailing narratives around Arctic security and militarism; second, noting the need for a humancentric approach to Arctic security; and third, identifying the limitations of traditional approaches to Arctic security.

The book does, however, have two noteworthy limitations of which readers should be aware. The first is the overt effort by Heininen to prove himself correct in his ongoing skepticism of Arctic militarism and conflict theses. He says the discussions on Arctic conflicts sound like a normal academic or political debate, but can be misleading: in fact, he adds, those (like Heininen himself) who would not accept a phenomenon for which they saw no evidence, were right (p. 6). It is unusual to see an author so interested in such self-congratulatory behaviour in a scholarly volume, and it seems that the book was organized specifically to lend itself to Heininen's own viewpoints about security and Arctic affairs rather than giving voice to a broad collection of experts from across the theoretical spectrum. The second limitation is the book's commentary on state versus human security. The human security agenda is by no means new in international politics, though the book treats it as such. Given that the UN created the Commission on Human Security in 2001, it would be more appropriate for the book to argue that applying the tenets of human security to the Arctic may be a recent development. However, there is little reference to the human security literature that exists in the field, which is an unfortunate limitation of the book's argument.

Despite the fact that the Arctic is not immune from the wider trends in geopolitics and international security, Heininin et al. provide unique insight into the benefits of broadening our understanding of security in a general sense and of applying a humancentric approach to security in the Arctic.

Robert W. Murray

Dentons Canada LLP

2900 Manulife Place, 10180-101 Street

Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3V5, Canada

robert.murray@dentons.com
COPYRIGHT 2016 Arctic Institute of North America of the University of Calgary
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Murray, Robert W.
Publication:Arctic
Article Type:Book review
Date:Dec 1, 2016
Words:1029
Previous Article:Utkuhiksalingmiut Uqauhiitigut Uqauhiliurut. Dictionary of Utkuhiksalingmiut Inuktitut Postbase Suffixes.
Next Article:Baffin Island: Field Research and High Arctic Adventure, 1961-1967.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters