Printer Friendly

Furniture was over a year late - now maker threatens to repossess it all; IN ASSOCIATION WITH.

QI PLACED a PS6,783 bedroom furniture order in February, 2016, with a local retailer, to be finished in eight weeks.

Eighteen months later, the work remains uncompleted.

Now I am told the design I chose (needed for the last part) is no longer available.

Most problems took three months to resolve, including unanswered phone calls, emails and visits. Wardrobes had to be rebuilt. Doors did not fit.

I finally told the shop that, due to serious breaches of contract - timescale, poor quality workmanship and zero customer service, I wanted a PS900 discount. The retailer offered PS750, which I rejected, as the work would cost PS500 at least to rectify.

The retailer then threatened that, as I had contravened his terms and conditions, the goods remain his until paid for in full. He says he will take the goods from my home this month or call in debt collectors.

What do you think? Malcolm R AYOU have been far too patient. You do not supply the retailer's identity, so this advice is general, but it does seem absurd an eight-week job is uncompleted 18 months later.

When you have work carried out on your home, it's best to have a proper contract - there are downloadable templates, including the Joint Contracts Tribunal Minor Works contract.

The contract should specify stage payments, how long it will take, and penalty clauses for late delivery. You can get someone else to finish the work if the original contractor messes around or goes bust.

The retailer's threats are bluster. By failing to deliver remotely on schedule, he has contravened his own terms and conditions and would not get far in court. If you have not paid, you might as well tell him to collect all the stuff.

You could involve a credit card company, if you used one, under the Consumer Credit Act.

It's absurd that his offer and your demand remain close, but unresolved. The problem is whether you have any trust left in this shop to deliver either the work or an agreed discount.

| Send your questions to askwhich@which.co.uk

COPYRIGHT 2017 MGN Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Features
Publication:Liverpool Echo (Liverpool, England)
Date:Nov 3, 2017
Words:349
Previous Article:WHEN Monarch Airlines went bust last month, wade through these finer points - and it; TRICIA PHILLIPS looks at contract pitfalls to beware of.
Next Article:Beauty rose from the horror; MY CITY.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters