# Funnel's fluctuations in dyonic case: intersecting D1-D3 branes.

The fluctuations of funnel solutions of intersecting D1 and D3 branes are quite explicitly discussed by treating different modes and different directions of the fluctuation at the presence of world volume electric field. The boundary conditions are found to be Neumann boundary conditions.1 Introduction

D-branes described by Non-abelian Born-Infeld (BI) action [1] have many fascinating features. Among these there is the possibility for D-branes to morph into other D-branes of different dimensions by exciting some of the scalar fields [2, 3]. It's known in the literature that there are many different but physically equivalent descriptions of how a D1-brane may end on a D3-brane. From the point of view of the D3 brane the configuration is described by a monopole on its world volume. From the point of view of the D1-brane the configuration is described by the D1-brane opening up into a D3-brane where the extra three dimensions form a fuzzy two-sphere whose radius diverges at the origin of the D3-brane. These different view points are the stringy realization of the Nahm transformation [4, 5]. Also the dynamics of the both bion spike [2, 6] and the fuzzy funnel [5, 7, 8] were studied by considering linearized fluctuations around the static solutions.

The present work is devoted to study the fluctuations of funnel solutions in the presence of a world-volume electric field. By discussing the solutions and the potentials for this particular case we end by the system D1[perpendicular to]D3 branes gets a special property because of the presence of electric field; the system is divided to two regions corresponding to small and large electric field. Consequently, the system has Neumann boundary conditions and the end of open string can move freely on the brane which is agree with its dual discussed in [9] considering Born-Infeld action dealing with the fluctuation of the bion skipe in D3[perpendicular to]D1-case.

The paper is organized as follows: In section 2, we start by a brief review on D1[perpendicular to]D3 branes in dyonic case by using the non-Born-Infeld action. Then, we discuss the fluctuations of the fuzzy funnel in section 3 for zero and high modes. We give the solutions of the linearized equations of motion of the fluctuations for both cases the overall transverse and the relative one. We also discuss the solutions and the potential depending on the presence of electric field which is leading to Neumann boundary conditions as special property of the system. Then the waves on the brane cause the fuzzy funnel to freely oscillate.

2 D1[perpendicular to]D3 branes with electric field swished on

In this section, we review in brief the funnel solutions for D1[perpendicular to]D3 branes from D3 and D1 branes points of view. First, using abelian BI action for the world-volume gauge field and one excited transverse scalar in dyonic case, we give the funnel solution. It was showed in [10] that the BI action, when taken as the fundamental action, can be used to build a configuration with a semi-infinite fundamental string ending on a D3-brane [11]. The dyonic system is given by using D-string world-volume theory and the fundamental strings introduced by adding a U(1) electric field. Thus the system is described by the following action

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (1)

in which [F.sub.ab] is the field strength and the electric field is denoted as [F.sub.09] = E[I.sub.ab], ([I.sub.ab] is N x N matrix). [[sigma].sup.a] (a = 0, ..., 3) denote the world volume coordinates while [[phi].sub.i] (i = 4, ..., 9) are the scalars describing transverse fluctuations of the brane and [lambda] = 2 [pi] [l.sup.2.sub.s] with [l.sub.s] is the string length. In our case we excite just one scalar so [[phi].sup.i] = [[phi].sup.9] [equivalent to] [phi]. Following the same process used in the reference [10] by considering static gauge, we look for the lowest energy of the system. Accordingly to (1) the energy of dyonic system is given as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (2)

then if we require [nabla][phi] + [??] + [??] = 0, [??] reduces to [??] [??] 0 and we find

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (3)

as minimum energy. By using the Bianchi identity [nabla] x B = 0 and the fact that the gauge field is static, the funnel solution is then

[phi] = [N.sub.m] + [N.sub.e] / 2r, (4)

with [N.sub.m] is magnetic charge and [N.sub.e] electric charge.

Now we consider the dual description of the D1[perpendicular to]D3 from D1 branes point of view. To get D3-branes from D-strings, we use the non-abelian BI action

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (5)

where [Q.sub.ij] = [[delta].sub.ij] + i[lambda][[[phi].sub.i], [[phi].sub.j]]. Expanding this action to leading order in [lambda] yields the usual non-abelian scalar action

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]

The solutions of the equation of motion of the scalar fields [[phi].sub.i], i = 1, 2, 3 represent the D-string expanding into a D3-brane analogous to the bion solution of the D3-brane theory [2, 3]. The solutions are

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]

with the corresponding geometry is a long funnel where the cross-section at fixed [sigma] has the topology of a fuzzy two-sphere.

The dyonic case is taken by considering (N, [N.sub.f])-strings. We have N D-strings and [N.sub.f] fundamental strings [5]. The theory is described by the action

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (6)

in which we replaced the field strength [F.sub.ab] by E[I.sub.ab] ([I.sub.ab] is N x N-matrix) meaning that the fundamental string is introduced by adding a U(1) electric field E.

The action can be rewritten as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (7)

then the bound states of D-strings and fundamental strings are made simply by introducing a background U(1) electric field on D-strings, corresponding to fundamental strings dissolved on the world-sheet. By computing the determinant, the action becomes

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (8)

where the following ansatz were inserted

[[phi].sub.i] = [??][[alpha].sub.i]. (9)

Hence, we get the funnel solution for dyonic string by solving the equation of variation of [??], as follows

[[phi].sub.i] = [[alpha].sub.i]/2[sigma][square root of (1-[[lambda].sup.2][E.sup.2])]. (10)

3 Fluctuations of dyonic funnel solutions

In this section, we treat the dynamics of the funnel solutions. We solve the linearized equations of motion for small and time-dependent fluctuations of the transverse scalar around the exact background in dyonic case.

We deal with the fluctuations of the funnel (10) discussed in the previous section. By plugging into the full (N - [N.sub.f]) string action (6, 7) the "overall transverse" [delta][[phi].sup.m]([[sigma].sup.m], ([sigma],t) = = [f.sup.m]([sigma], t) [I.sub.N], m = 4, ..., 8 which is the simplest type of fluctuation with [I.sub.N] the identity matrix, together with the funnel solution, we get

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (11)

where

H = 1 + [[lambda].sup.2]C/4[[sigma].sup.4]

and C = tr [[alpha].sup.i][[alpha].sup.i]. For the irreducible N x N representation we have C = [N.sup.2] - 1. In the last line we have only kept the terms quadratic in the fluctuations as this is sufficient to determine the linearized equations of motion

[((1 - [lambda]E)(1 + [[lambda].sup.2][N.sup.2]-1 / 4[[sigma].sup.4]) [[partial derivative].sup.2.sub.t] - [[partial derivative].sup.2.sub.[sigma]]).sup.fm] = 0. (12)

In the overall case, all the points of the fuzzy funnel move or fluctuate in the same direction of the dyonic string by an equal distance [delta][x.sup.m]. First, the funnel solution is [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] and the fluctuation [f.sup.m] waves in the direction of [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (13)

With this ansatz the equation of motion is

((1 - [lambda]E)H [w.sup.2] + [[partial derivative].sup.2.sub.[sigma]])[PHI]([sigma]) = 0 (14)

then the problem is reduced to finding the solution of a single scalar equation.

Thus, we remark that the equation (14) is an analog one-dimensional Schrodinger equation and it can be rewritten as

(-[[partial derivative].sup.2.sub.[sigma]] + V([sigma]))[PHI]([sigma]) = [w.sup.2] (1 - [lambda]E)[PHI]([sigma]), (15)

with

V([sigma]) = [w.sup.2]([lambda]E - 1)[[lambda].sup.2][N.sup.2] - 1/4 [[sigma].sup.4].

We notice that, if the electric field dominates E [??] 1, the potential goes to [w.sup.2][[lambda].sup.3] E [N.sup.2]/4[[sigma].sup.4] for large N and if E [??] 1 we find V = - [w.sup.2] [[lambda].sup.2] [N.sup.2]/4[[sigma].sup.4]. This can be seen as two separated systems depending on electric field so we have Neumann boundary condition separating the system into two regions E [??] 1 and E [??] 1.

Now, let's find the solution of a single scalar equation (14). First, the equation (14) can be rewritten as follows

(1/[w.sup.2](1 - [lambda]E) [[partial derivative].sup.2.sub.[sigma] + 1 + [[lambda].sup.2][N.sup.2]/4[[sigma].sup.4]) [PHI]([sigma]) = 0, (16)

for large N. If we suggest [??] = [w [square root of (1 - [lambda]E)][sigma] the latter equation

([[partial derivative].sup.2.sub.[??]] + 1 + [[kappa].sup.2]/[[??].sup.4]) [PHI]([??]) = 0, (17)

with the potential is

V([??]) = [[kappa].sup.2]/[[??].sup.4], (18)

and [kappa] = [lambda]N[w.sup.2]/2 (1 - [lambda]E). This equation is a Schrodinger equation for an attractive singular potential [varies] [[??].sup.-4] and depends on the single coupling parameter k with constant positive Schrodinger energy. The solution is then known by making the following coordinate change

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (19)

and

[PHI] = [(1 + [[kappa].sup.2]/[[??].sup.4]).sup. -1/4] [??]. (20)

Thus, the equation (17) becomes

(- [[partial derivative].sup.2.sub.[chi]] + V ([chi])) [??] = 0, (21)

with

V ([chi]) = 5[[kappa].sup.2]/[([[??].sup.2] + [[kappa].sup.2]/[[??].sup.2]).sup.3] (22)

Then, the fluctuation is found to be

[PHI] = [(1 + [[kappa].sup.2]/[[??].sup.4]).sup.-1/4] [e.sup.[+ or -]i[chi]([??])]. (23)

This fluctuation has the following limits; at large [sigma], [PHI] ~ [e.sup.[+ or -]I[chi]] and if [sigma] is small [PHI] = [square root of ([kappa] / [??]] [e.sup.[+ or -i([??])]. These are the asymptotic wave function in the regions [chi] [right arrow] [+ or -] [infinity], while around [chi] ~ 0; i.e. [??] ~ [square root of ([kappa])], [f.sup.m] ~ [2.sup.-1/4] [e.sup.-iwt] [delta][x.sup.m] (Fig. 1).

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

The potential (22) in large and small limits of electric field becomes (Fig. 2):

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

* E [??] 1, V ([chi]) ~ -5[lambda][N.sup.2]/E[[sigma].sup.6];

* E [??] 1, V ([chi]) ~ 5[[lambda].sup.2][N.sup.2][w.sup.2]/4[[sigma].sup.2]).

At the presence of electric field we remark that around [sigma] ~ 0 there is a symmetric potential which goes to zero very fast and more fast as electric field is large ~ -1 E[[sigma].sup.2]. As discussed above, again we get the separated systems in different regions depending on the values of electric field. Also if we have a look at the fluctuation (23) we find that [f.sup.m] in the case of E [??] 1 is different from the one in E [??] 1 case and as shown in the Fig. 1 the presence of electric field causes a discontinuity of the fluctuation wave which means free boundary condition. Contrarily, at the absence of electric field the fluctuation wave is continue. Then, this is seen as Neumann boundary condition from non-Born-Infeld dynamics separating the system into two regions E [??] 1 and E [??] 1 which is agree with its dual discussed in [9].

The fluctuations discussed above could be called the zero mode l = 0 and for high modes l [??] 0, the fluctuations are

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]

with [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] are completely symmetric and traceless in the lower indices.

The action describing this system is

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (24)

Now the linearized equations of motion are

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (25)

Since the background solution is [[phi].sup.i] / [varies] [[alpha].sup.i] and we have [[alpha].sup.i], [[alpha].sup.j]] = 2i[[member of].sub.ij[kappa][alpha].sup.[kappa], we get

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (26)

To obtain a specific spherical harmonic on 2-sphere, we have

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]. (27)

Then for each mode the equations of motion are

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]. (28)

The solution of the equation of motion can be found by taking the following proposal. Let's consider [[phi].sup.m.sub.l] = [f.sup.m.sub.l]([sigma])[e.sup.iwt][delta][[??].sup.m] in direction m with [f.sup.m.sub.l] ([sigma]) is some function of [sigma] for each mode l.

The last equation can be rewritten as

[-[[partial derivative].sup.2.sub.[sigma]] + V([sigma])][f.sup.m.sub.l] = [w.sup.2] (1 + [lambda]E [f.sup.m.sub.l] ([sigma]), (29)

with

V([sigma]) = [-w.sup.2](1 + [lambda]E)[[lambda].sup.2][N.sup.2]/4[[sigma].sup.4] - [[lambda].sup.2]l(l + 1)/ 6[sigma].sup.4]) + + (1 - [[lambda].sup.2][E.sup.2]) l(l+1)/[[sigma].sup.2].

Let's write the equation (29) in the following form

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (30)

and again as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (31)

We define new coordinate [??] = w [square root of (1 + [lambda]E)] [sigma] and the latter equation becomes

[[[partial derivative].sub.[??]] + 1 + [[kappa].sup.2]/[[??].sup.4] + [eta]/[[sigma].sup.2]] [f.sup.m.sub.l]([sigma]) = 0, (32)

where

[[kappa].sup.2] = [w.sup.2] (1 + [lambda]E) [([[lambda].sup.2] [N.sup.2]-1/4 - [[lambda].sup.2]l(l+1/6(1+[lambda]E)).sup.1/2],

[eta] = -(1 - [[lambda].sup.2][E.sup.2])l(l + 1)

such that

N > [square root of (2l(l+1)/3(1+[lambda]E) + 1].

For simplicity we choose small o, then the equation (32) reduced to

[[partial derivative].sup.2.sub.[??]] + 1 + [[kappa].sup.2]/[[??].sup.4] [f.sup.m.sub.l]([sigma]) = 0 (33)

we did in zero mode, we get the solution by using the steps (19-22) with new [kappa]. Since we considered small [sigma] we get

V([chi]) = 5[[??].sup.6]/[[kappa].sup.4],

then

[f.sup.m.sub.l] = [??] [square root of ([kappa])] [e.sup.[+ or -]i([chi])]. (34)

This fluctuation has two different values at large E and small E (Fig. 3) and a closer look at the potential at large and fixed N in large and small limits of electric field leads to

* E [??] 1, V([chi]) ~ 20[w.sup.2]E[[sigma].sup.6]/[chi][N.sup.2];

* [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII].

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

The potential in the first case is going fast to infinity than the one in the second case because of the electric field if [sigma] [??] 1 (Fig. 4).

[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]

For large [sigma] the equation of motion (30) of the fluctuation becomes

[-[[partial derivative].sup.2.sub.[sigma]] + [??]([sigma])][f.sup.m.sub.l]([sigma]) = [w.sup.2](1 + [lambda]E)[f.sup.m.sub.l]([sigma]), (35)

with [??] ([sigma])= (1 - [[lambda].sup.2][E.sup.2]) l(l + 1) / [[sigma].sup.2] and [f.sup.m.sub.l] is now a Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue problem (Fig. 3). We found that the fluctuation has discontinuity at the presence of electric field meaning free boundary condition. Also we remark that the potential has different values in the different regions of electric field E [??] 1 and E [??] 1 and this time for large o. In this side, the potential drops with opposite sign from one case to other and as shown in (Fig. 4). The presence of E is changing the potential totally to the opposite in both cases zero and high modes.

Consequently, by discussing explicitly the fluctuations and the potential of intersecting D1-D3 branes in D1-brane world volume theory we found that the system has Neumann boundary conditions and the end of the string can move freely on the brane for both zero and high modes of the overall transverse fluctuations case.

3.1 Relative Transverse Fluctuations

Now if we consider the "relative transverse" [delta][[phi].sup.i]([sigma], t) = = [f.sup.i] ([sigma], t) [I.sub.N], i = 1, 2, 3 the action is

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII], (36)

with [Q.sup.ij.sub.*] = [Q.sup.ij] + i[lambda]([[phi].sub.i], [delta][[phi].sub.j] + [[delta][[phi].sub.j] + [[delta][[phi].sub.i], [delta][[phi].sub.j]). As before we keep only the terms quadratic in the fluctuations and the action becomes

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]. (37)

Then the equations of motion of the fluctuations are

([MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]. (38)

If we write [f.sup.i] = [[PHI].sup.i]([sigma]) [e.sup.-iwt][delta][[??].sup.i] in the direction of [x.sup.i], the potential will be

V([sigma]) = - 1-[lambda]E/1+[lambda]E [[lambda].sup.2] [N.sup.2]-1/4[[sigma].sup.4] [w.sup.2].

Let's discuss the cases of electric field:

* E [??] 1, V([sigma]) ~ - [[lambda].sup.2] - [N.sup.2]-1/4[[sigma].sup.4] [w.sup.2];

* E [??] 1, V([sigma]) ~ [[lambda].sup.2] [N.sup.2]-1/4[[sigma].sup.4] [w.sup.2].

Also in the relative case, this is Neumann boundary condition (Fig. 5) which can be also shown by finding the solution of (38) for which we follow the same way as above by making a coordinate change suggested by WKB. This case is seen as a zero mode of what is following so we will treat this in general case by using this coordinate change for high modes.

[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]

Now let's give the equation of motion of relative transverse fluctuations of high l modes with (N - [N.sub.f]) strings intersecting D3-branes. The fluctuation is given by

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]

with [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] are completely symmetric and traceless in the lower indices.

The action describing this system is

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (39)

The equation of motion for relative transverse fluctuations in high mode is as follows

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (40)

By the same way as done for overall transverse fluctuations the equation of motion for each mode is

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (41)

We take [delta][[phi].sup.i.sub.l] = [f.sup.i.sub.l][e.sup.-iwt][delta][[??].sup.i] then the equation (41) becomes

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (42)

To solve the equation we choose for simplicity the boundaries of [sigma]; For small [sigma], the equation is reduced to

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (43)

which can be rewritten as follows

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (44)

We change the coordinate to [??] = [square root of [square root of (1-[lambda]E/1+[lambda]E)] w[sigma] and the equation (44) becomes

[[[partial derivative].sup.2.sub.[??]] + 1 + [[kappa].sup.2]/[[??].sup.4] [f.sup.i.sub.l]([??]) = 0, (45)

with

[[kappa].sup.2] = [w.sup.4][[lambda].sup.2] 3[(1-[lambda]E).sup.2]([N.sup.2]-1)-2(1- [[lambda].sup.2][E.sup.2])l(l+1)/12[(1+[lambda]E).sup.2].

Then we follow the suggestions of WKB by making a coordinate change;

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (46)

and

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (47)

Thus, the equation (45) becomes

(-[[partial derivative].sup.2.sub.[beta]] + V([beta]))[[??].sup.i] = 0, (48)

with

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]. (49)

Then

[f.sup.i.sub.l] = [(1 + [[kappa].sup.2]/[[??].sup.4]).sup.-1/4] [e.sup.[+ or -]i[beta]([??])]. (50)

The discussion is similar to the overall case; so the obtained fluctuation has the following limits; at large [sigma], [f.sup.i.sub.l] ~ [e.sup.[+ or -]i[beta]([??])] and if [sigma] is small [f.sup.i.sub.l] = [square root of [kappa].sub.[??]] [e.sup.[+ or -]i[beta]([??])]. These are the asymptotic wave function in the regions [beta] [right arrow] [+ or -] [infinity], while around [beta] ~ 0; i.e. [??] ~ [square root of [kappa]], [f.sup.i.sub.l] ~ 2 - 1/4.

Then let's have a look at the potential in various limits of electric field:

* E ~ 1 / [lambda], V ([beta) ~ 0;

* [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII], then [sigma] ~ 0 [??] V ([beta]) ~ 5[[??].sup.6]/[[kappa].sup.4.sub.+];

* [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]; for this case we get [sigma] ~ 0 [??] V ([beta]) ~ 5[[??].sup.6]/[[kappa].sup.4.sub.-];

this means that we have a Neumann boundary condition with relative fluctuations at small [sigma] (Fig. 6).

[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]

Now, if [sigma] is too large the equation of motion (42) becomes

[-[[partial derivative].sup.2.sub.[sigma]] + (1 - [lambda]E l(l+1)/[[sigma].sup.2]] [f.sup.i.sub.l] = 1- [lambda]E/1+[lambda]E [w.sup.2] [f.sup.i.sub.l]. (51)

We see, the associated potential V ([sigma]) = (1 - [lambda]E) l(l+1)/[[sigma].sup.2] goes to - [epsilon] in the case of E [??] 1 and to + [epsilon] if E [??] 1 since [sigma] is too large with [epsilon] ~ 0, (Fig. 6). We get the same remark as before by dealing with the fluctuations for small and large [sigma] (50) and solving (51) respectively, at the presence of electric field that we have two separated regions depending on the electric field (Fig. 7).

[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]

We discussed quite explicitly through this section the fluctuation of the funnel solution of D1[perpendicular to]D3 branes by treating different modes and different directions of the fluctuation. We found that the system got an important property because of the presence of electric field; the system has Neumann boundary condition.

4 Conclusion

We have investigated the intersecting D1-D3 branes through a consideration of the presence of electric field. We have treated the fluctuations of the funnel solutions and we have discussed explicitly the potentials in both systems. We found a specific feature of the presence of electric field. When the electric field is going up and down the potential of the system is changing and the fluctuations of funnel solutions as well which cause the division of the system to tow regions. Consequently, the end point of the dyonic strings move on the brane which means we have Neumann boundary condition.

The present study is in flat background and there is another interesting investigation is concerning the perturbations propagating on a dyonic string in the supergravity background [12, 5] of an orthogonal 3-brane. Then we can deal with this important case and see if we will get the same boundary conditions by treating the dyonic fluctuations.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the Arab Fund for Economic and Social Development.

Submitted on March 07, 2007

Accepted on March 12, 2007

References

[1.] Polchinski J. Tasi lectures on D-branes. arXiv: hep-th/ 9611050; Leigh R. Mod. Phys. Lett., 1989, v. A4, 2767.

[2.] Callan C. G. and Maldacena J. M. Nucl. Phys. B, 1998, v. 513, 198; arXiv: hep-th/9708147.

[3.] Gibbons G.W. Nucl. Phys. B, 1998, v. 514, 603; arXiv: hep-th/ 9709027; Howe P. S., Lambert N. D. and West P. C. Nucl. Phys. B, 1998, v. 515, 203; arXiv: hep-th/9709014; Banks T., Fischler W., Shenker S. H. and Susskind L. Phys. Rev. D, 1997, v. 55, 5112; arXiv: hepth/9610043; Kabat D. and Taylor W. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 1998, v. 2, 181; arXiv: hep-th/9711078; Rey S. arXiv: hep-th/9711081; Myers R. C. JHEP, 1999, v. 9912, 022; arXiv: hep-th/9910053.

[4.] Brecher D. Phys. Lett. B, 1998, v. 442, 117; arXiv: hep-th/ 9804180; Cook P., de Mello Koch R. and Murugan J. Phys. Rev. D, 2003, v. 68, 126007; arXiv: hep-th/0306250; Barrett J. K. and Bowcock P. arXiv: hep-th/0402163.

[5.] Constable N. R., Myers R. C. and Tafjord O. Phys. Rev. D, 2000, v. 61, 106009; arXiv: hep-th/9911136.

[6.] Rey S.-J. and Yee J.-T. Nucl. Phys. B, 1998, v. 52, 229; arXiv: hep-th/9711202; Lee S., Peet A. and Thorlacius L. Nucl. Phys. B, 1998, v. 514, 161; arXiv: hep-th/9710097; Kastor D. and Traschen J. Phys. Rev. D, 2000, v. 61, 024034; arXiv: hep-th/ 9906237; Rey S.-J. and Yee J.-T. Eur. Phys. J. C, 2001, v. 22, 379; arXiv: hep-th/9803001.

[7.] Bhattacharyya R. and de Mello Koch R. arXiv: hep-th/ 0508131; Papageorgakis C., Ramgoolam S. and Toumbas N. JHEP, 2006, v. 0601, 030; arXiv: hep-th/0510144; Bak D., Lee J. and Min H. Phys. Rev. D, 1999, v. 59, 045011; arXiv: hep-th/9806149.

[8.] Castelino J., Lee S. and Taylor W. Nucl. Phys. B, 1998, v. 526, 334; arXiv: hep-th/9712105; Grosse H., Klimcik C. and Presnajder P. Commun. Math. Phys., 1996, v. 180, 429; arXiv: hepth/9602115.

[9.] Savvidy K. G. and Savvidy G. K. Nucl. Phys. B, 1999, v. 561, 117; arXiv: hep-th/9902023.

[10.] Constable N. R., Myers R. C. and Tafjord O. JHEP, 2001, v. 0106, 023; arXiv: hep-th/0102080.

[11.] Gibbons G.W. Nucl.Phys. B, 1998, v. 514, 603-639; arXiv: hep-th/9709027.

[12.] Lee S., Peet A. and Thorlacius L. Nucl. Phys. B, 1998, v. 514, 161; arXiv: hep-th/9710097; Kastor D. and Traschen J. Phys. Rev. D, 2000, v. 61, 024034; arXiv: hep-th/9906237.

Jamila Douari * and Arafa H. Ali * ([dagger])

* Center for Advanced Mathematical Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon [dagger]Department of Physics, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea

All correspondence should be made to A. H. Ali. E-mail: arafa16@yahoo.com Permanent address: Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Beni-suef University, Egypt

Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback | |

Author: | Douari, Jamila; Ali, Arafa H. |
---|---|

Publication: | Progress in Physics |

Geographic Code: | 1USA |

Date: | Jul 1, 2007 |

Words: | 4357 |

Previous Article: | Phase-variation enhancement on deuteron elastic scattering from nuclei at intermediate energies. |

Next Article: | On the possibility of nuclear synthesis during orthopositronium formation by [[beta].sup.+]-decay positrons in deuterium. |

Topics: |