Printer Friendly

Functional and Structural Plasticity of Brain in Elite Karate Athletes.

1. Introduction

Sports performance seems to be directly related to the advances gained throughout the life. The performance differences observed between athletes who have similar physical fitness levels can be explained with the structural and functional plasticity occurred in their brain tissue. In the last decade, with the advancements in the brain imaging technology, neuroplasticity that occurred due to motor learning or training has been investigated in a large number of studies. For instance, it has been shown that cortical thickness of motor area increases after a complex balance task that lasts for an hour [1]. Nevertheless, most of the studies aimed to identify the changes caused by long-term motor training. For handball players, the volume of gray matter (GM) was found to be increased in hand control areas while for ballet dancers, a similar result was obtained in foot areas [2]. And yet, contrary findings as decrements of GM volume in motor cortex and superior frontal gyrus have been reported by Hanggi et al., where elite dancers were compared with nondancers [3]. Besides this, variations in neural matter density have been observed in segmented images of motor cortex due to motor skill learning [4, 5, 6]. For instance, voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis exhibited gray matter density increments in right and medial cerebellar areas for badminton players [4] as well as in thalamus and precentral gyrus for divers [7]. Moreover, white matter (WM) density changes in frontal and in parietal lobes were shown to be related with the motor learning [5, 8]. As an index of white matter density, decreased fractional anisotropy (FA) values of black belt karate players in superior cerebellar peduncles and primary motor cortex were exhibited when compared with the control subjects [9].

In addition to structural changes, motor skill learning has an effect on the functioning of the brain [10]. It can be thought that the changes of the underlying structure should have an effect on the functionality. To investigate this idea, among the functional brain imaging modalities, with a superior spatial resolution, as a noninvasive technique, fMRI has been widely used to monitor the dynamics of the brain by means of blood oxygenation. Resting state measurements are seen as the most suitable technique to determine the differences that are caused by the gained experience or learning. Due to its nature, resting state measurements do not require any motor movement or performing a cognitive task. Among the RSNs, alterations in frontoparietal and cerebellar networks were shown to be caused by motor learning [11].

To become an elite athlete, several hours of training is one of the requirements that is needed to be accomplished. It has been shown that changes can occur in brain tissue with respect to repetitive performance of the motor exercise lasting in years [12]. Moreover, resting state functional responses of the brain can vary even after a single aerobic exercise session [13].

Up to our knowledge, morphometric differences between elite karate players and control subjects have not been investigated by means of gray matter distribution. In the concept of this study, it is aimed to determine the morphometric differences as well as the resting state networks differences between elite karate players and control subjects.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants. Twenty-six subjects participated in the study (13 elite karate athletes and 13 control group volunteers). Elite karate athlete group members (6 females and 7 males) have an average age of 22.3 ([sigma] = 4.6), while it was 26.7 ([sigma] = 5.8) for age and gender matched healthy control subjects. Elite subject group members reported that they had practiced karate sports at least 10 years, and they are performing at least fifteen hours' training program weekly. Each elite karate player had attended the European or World Karate championships and achieved more than three medals. Karate athletes hold the karate black belt for 8 years on average. On the other hand, control group subjects had not experienced regular sports training programs.

Subjects suffering from a neurological disorder were excluded from the study. Data were acquired at the MR Imaging center of Hulusi Behcet Life Sciences Center, Istanbul University, Istanbul Medical School using a 3T Philips Achieva Scanner. The measurements were conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by Marmara University Health Institute Review Board with the document number 09.2016.414(15.07.2016). The subjects have been informed about the MR measurements, and written informed consent was read and signed by all participants prior to measurements.

2.2. Anatomical and Resting State fMRI. By the advanced technology, anatomical structure of the brain tissue can be characterized in a volume having less than one millimeter cube size. The volumetric distribution of the gray and white matter tissue exhibits the neuroplasticity occurred in localized regions. T1-weighted MR images are obtained with a slice thickness of 1 mm and 0.97 mm resolution in the xy plane. 180 slices are formed for each volume (TR 8.74 ms, TE 3.9 ms).

Vascular and metabolic responses increase with respect to a stimulus or during the implementation of a task. However, in the absence of a task or stimulus, there is still a demand of resources for internal processing. fMRI, as a noninvasive neural activity imaging technique, uses variation of the deoxyhemoglobin in venous blood in order to monitor the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) contrast. In this study, functional images were acquired using a gradient echo, echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence for a duration of 7 minutes in eyes closed condition (transverse orientation, TR 2 s, TE 30 ms, 77[degrees] flip angle, 36 slices, and 4.0 mm slice thickness with a voxel size of 1.86 mm in x and y space).

2.3. Image Processing Pipeline. In this study, VBM was used to exert the possible anatomical differences of the brain between groups of subjects in the voxel level [14]. VBM requires the input images to be in the same spatial space. Thus, spatial normalization of the anatomical images is required in order to compare the groups of subjects. Normalization procedure is used to transform all of the subjects' images to a common template [15,16]. The average template image of the Montreal Neurologic Institute (MNI 152) has been used as the reference template [17]. Afterwards, normalized T1-weighted anatomical images were segmented into gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tissues. Segmentation and normalization procedure were carried out using Diffeomorphic Anatomical Registration Through Exponentiated Lie Algebra (DARTEL) [6, 18]. After the implementation of preprocessing steps, a general linear model was used to form the statistical parameter maps. Age of the subjects, their intracranial volume, and gender information were used as covariates in the design of the GLM, both for GM and WM tissues, separately. All of these analyses had been carried out using statistical parametric mapping (SPM8) software [19]. After the implementation of the GLM, since a huge amount of statistical tests were being computed, multiple comparison correction was performed. Family-wise error (FWE) correction was performed using p < 0.05 with an extend threshold of 20 voxels. The GM and WM differences deduced with respect to elite > control contrast are given in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.

After the anatomical measurements, resting state functional images were obtained. During fMRI measurements, in each time instance, a 2d image has been reconstructed while the whole brain consists of several of these maps. The state-of-the-art approach to the preprocessing of the functional images consists of slice timing, realignment, normalization, and smoothing operations [20]. Slice timing process was used to correct the order of the fMRI acquisition to avoid timing mismatches [21]. Then, realignment process was applied for motion correction by coregistering each 3d image to a reference volume. Spatial normalization procedure was applied to warp each subject's brain into a common reference space (MNI 152). This procedure enables us to compare the changes observed between groups of subjects.

Finally, the normalized volumes were smoothed to increase the signal-to-noise ratio. After the smoothing operation, each voxel had the weighted average values of the neighbouring voxels based on a Gaussian function. The smoothed 3d images were further used to determine the independent components which were assigned as the intrinsic connectivity networks. Spatial independent component analysis has been performed in order to identify several spatial components with their time courses using GIFT toolbox developed by Calhoun et al [22]. fMRI was performed during resting condition for seven minutes. Thus, the minimum frequency content that can be observed in the BOLD time series is less than 0.005 Hz. Low-frequency oscillation in the 0.01 to 0.08 Hz range was thought to be the source of RSNs.

Each component deduced by the GIFT toolbox was checked with respect to findings reported in the literature. As a result, somatomotor, dorsal attention, visual, and default mode network (DMN) had been identified. The network maps of each subject were back reconstructed, and t-test statistics were applied for each network map set in order to exhibit the differences between the elite and control group. Second-level GLMs were used to implement the statistics using the subjects' intracranial volume, age, and gender values as regressors. SPM8 was used to perform the GLM analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Voxel-Based Morphometry Differences. There were no significant differences of whole GM and WM volumes between groups. The mean volume of GM for the elite group was 737.02 ([sigma] = 62.79) [cm.sup.3] while it was 708.78 ([sigma] = 58.92) [cm.sup.3] for the control group (p = 0.249). The elite group had an average of 514.74 ([sigma] = 51.42) [cm.sup.3] WM while the control group had 487.71 ([sigma] = 41.44) [cm.sup.3] (p = 0.191). GM and WM volume values of all participants are summarized in Table 3.

Parametric statistical tests have been performed in a voxel-wise manner while multiple comparisons were corrected based on random field theory. Extend threshold was set as 20 voxels, and FWE-corrected results are demonstrated for the GM differences between elite and control subject groups (Figure 1 and Table 1). Compared with the control group, the elite group had increased GM volume in right (R) inferior temporal sulcus, premotor cortex (R), temporal pole superior (R), cerebellum, and lateral occipital sulcus.

On the other hand, WM increments have been obtained in caudate nucleus, left insula, mammillary region, and hypothalamus for the elite karate athletes as summarized in Figure 2 and Table 2.

3.2. Functional Results. Resting state functional images are used to obtain intrinsic connectivity networks by the use of group independent component analysis. The mean spatial distribution of the auditory, somatomotor, visual, DMN, and dorsal attention networks over subjects are shown in Figure 3 using threshold Z > 2. Remaining components have not been taken into consideration for further analysis since these were mostly artefacted components.

For each functional network, the differences between groups are investigated by the use of a second-level SPM analysis. Error probability was set to p < 0.001 uncorrected for multiple comparisons since none of the voxels survived when FWE correction was imposed with p < 0.05.

Cuneus area as a part of visual network was observed to be more activated for the karate players when compared with the control subjects. In addition to this, medial frontal gyrus and superior temporal gyrus which are known to be part of the DMN were shown to have higher activation values for the karate players.

Increased intrinsic activity in postcentral gyrus, superior frontal gyrus, left inferior frontal gyrus, and cerebellum has been observed for elite karate players as summarized in Table 4.

The significant findings of the present study were reported using the contrast elite players > control subjects. When the contrast of control subjects > elite players was used, none of the brain areas was found to have significant greater intrinsic activation pattern.

4. Discussion

4.1. Anatomical Differences between Elite and Control. Existing literature points out that right inferior temporal and occipital cortex GM volume values decrease in professional video game players and in the patients suffering from addiction of online games when compared with healthy controls [23]. This volume loss might be related with the long-term exposure of harmful visual stimuli received from the online computer games. The inferior temporal cortex acts as a gateway for visual perception and memory [24]. In the concept of this study, unlike to the effects of the harmful visual stimuli presentation, increased gray matter volume had been deduced for elite karate players in the right inferior temporal area which is a part of the visual movement perception. It is thought that the neuroplasticity of this area can be formed via motor learning [25].

If a subject is classified as an elite karate athlete, he or she should have higher motor coordination capacity and should perform training for a long term. Since we do not have the brain images of the elite karate athletes prior to sports training, it is not possible to conclude that the differences observed in the brain anatomy is just affected by the long-term training period. However, it has been shown that aerobic capacity is a major component to achieve high karate performance [26]. Thus, GM increments in the premotor cortex of the elite karate players can be thought to be partly originated from the advances gained through the several years of training.

Nevertheless, GM increments of the premotor cortex were observed in the period of a whole body balancing task training parallel to the improvement of the performance [7]. For all trained athletes, premotor cortex gray matter increments should be observed since the most of the physical exercises require the control of body orientation.

Moreover, it has been shown that the subjects having lesions in premotor cortex and supplementary motor area experienced difficulties when they need to recall movements from their memory as a response to a given stimulus in the form of a sensory cue. Based on these findings, it was thought that sensory conditional motor performance might be related with the premotor cortex and supplementary motor area [27]. Since the karate exercises include the implementation of complex movements that consist of several types of visual stimulation coming from the opponent, it is not an unexpected issue to have premotor gray matter volume increments in the elite karate group when compared with the controls in the concept of our study.

In this study, we found that gray matter density of right temporal pole superior (RTPS) in elite karate players' brain regions was higher than others. In the literature, a VBM study reported the relationship between the GM volume of right temporal pole and perspective taking process [28]. Moreover, the superior temporal pole was shown to have a role in the representation of the social concepts [29].

A person who is trained or skilled in exercises, or learned art, may have an improved capacity of understanding the cognitive and affective profile of the other people [30]. Our finding of the increased GM in RTPS can be associated with the above definition by means of perspective taking.

Visually guided motor tasks activate premotor and inferior parietal cortex [31]. The activity pattern starting from primary visual cortex and passing through ventral surface into the temporal cortex is known as the ventral stream while dorsal stream connects the occipital pattern to parietal cortex through the dorsal surface [32]. Ventral stream is known to be responsible from the perception of visual shapes of the objects while the dorsal stream is thought to be related with the temporally tracking of their spatial location. When we identify a motion process, activity of visual motion area (V5, MT) arises [33]. In our study, the increments of GM in inferior and superior temporal gyrus and premotor cortex might be related with several hours of exercise time spent throughout the life in elite karate players. These exercise sessions consist of phases where an athlete has to predict the movements of his rival.

Dorsal prefrontal cortex plays an important role in the selection and representation of actions, and it projects to cerebellum [34]. In our study, GM density in the cerebellum of elite karate players was found to be larger than the others. In the literature, cerebellum is stated as one of the specialized regions which is responsible for the implementation of learned or automatic movements [35].

In addition to GM differences, in our study, caudate nucleus, left insula, mammillary region, and hypothalamus white matter density values were found to be increased for the elite karate athletes. These regions can be thought to include more myelinated axons that affect the speed of the neural signalling [36]. These findings should be further supported by the DTI measurements to ensure the differences of white matter distribution. In a DTI study, FA values of uncinate fasciculus and cingulum were found to be positively correlated with the aerobic fitness level of the subjects [37]. Moreover, Roberts et al. showed the association between the parameters as motor coordination, the time length of expertise, the age that the karate players started training, and white matter integrity in the cerebellum [8].

4.2. Functional Differences between Elite and Control. RSNs exhibited in this study are compared between two groups of subjects in order to elucidate the functional differences that is thought to be based on the neuroplasticity due to the implementation of long-term exercises. In instance, effects of running were shown as improved performance in cognitive tasks that is thought to be originated from the neuroplasticity in prefrontal cortex [38]. In a recent study, an evidence of the positive influences of short-term exercises (12 weeks) on the cognitive task performance has been associated with the increased functional connectivity during resting state especially in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus [39]. In the concept of our study, these areas were found to have greater connectivity values which are in agreement with the current literature.

In the concept of this study, superior temporal area (posterior parietal cortex, PPC) activation was found to be greater than the corresponding values of the control group. In the literature, PPC and precuneus have been reported to have a role in visual perception, planning as well as execution of reach [40] which are the major features that elite karate players should have.

In the executive control network, cerebellum crus1 was found to have a greater functional connectivity value in karate players. Cerebellum and sensorimotor cortex have a role in the organization of the movements. Additionally, postcentral gyrus is involved in the sensorimotor processing [41].

5. Conclusion

It can be concluded that the GM superiority can be an underlying cause of the differences in RSNs. Moreover, GM differences can be a basis of the neural efficiency gained by the regular long-term karate exercises. However, the WM differences should be analyzed by the use of DTI measurements. Up to our knowledge, this is the first study that investigates the functional neural dynamics using resting state fMRI on elite karate athletes.

The major drawback of this study is the limited number of elite karate athletes. The limited number of karate players is due to the fact that we required difficulty to reach conditions for the definition of elite karate players. It is not an easy process for a karate player to achieve the required conditions even when he holds a black belt.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by Marmara University Health Institute Review Board with the document number 09.2016.414(15.07.2016).


Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


This study was supported by the Ministry of Development, Turkey, project no. 2010K120330.


[1] M. Taubert, J. Mehnert, B. Pleger, and A. Villringer, "Rapid and specific gray matter changes in M1 induced by balance training," Neuroimage, vol. 133, pp. 399-407, 2016.

[2] J. Meier, M. S. Topka, and J. Hanggi, "Differences in cortical representation and structural connectivity of hands and feet between proffessional handball players and ballet dancers," Neural Plasticity, vol. 2016, pp. 1-17, 2016.

[3] J. Hnggi, S. Koeneke, L. Bezzola, and L. Jncke, "Structural neuroplasticity in the sensorimotor network of professional female ballet dancers," Human Brain Mapping, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1196-1206, 2010.

[4] X. Di, S. Zhu, H. Jin et al., "Altered resting brain function and structure in professional badminton players," Brain Connectivity, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 225-233, 2012.

[5] M. Taubert, B. Draganski, A. Anwander et al., "Dynamic properties of human brain structure: learning-related changes in cortical areas and associated fiber connections," Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 35, pp. 11670-11677, 2010.

[6] J. Ashburner, "A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm," NeuroImage, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 95-113, 2007.

[7] G. Wei, J. Luo, and Y. Li, "Brain structure in diving players on MR imaging studied with voxel-based morphometry," Progress in Natural Science, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1397-1402, 2009.

[8] J. Scholz, M. C. Klein, T. E. J. Behrens, and H. J. Berg, "Training Induces Changes in White Matter Architecture," Nature Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1370-1371, 2009.

[9] R. E. Roberts, P. G. Bain, B. L. Day, and M. Husain, "Individual differences in expert motor coordination associated with white matter microstructure in the cerebellum," Cerebral Cortex, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 2282-2292, 2012.

[10] U. Debamot, M. Sperduti, F. Di Rienzo, and A. Guillot, "Expert bodies, expert minds: how physical and mental training shape the brain," Human Neuroscience, vol. 8, p. 280, 2014.

[11] N. B. Albert, E. M. Robertson, and R. C. Miall, "The resting human brain and motor learning," Current Biology, vol. 19, pp. 1023-1027, 2009.

[12] F. S. W. Jacini, G. C. Cannonieri, P. T. Fernandes, L. Bonilha, F. Cendes, and L. M. Li, "Can exercise shape your brain? Cortical differences associated with judo practice," Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 688-690, 2009.

[13] T. B. Weng, G. L. Pierce, W. G. Darling, D. M. Falk, A. Vincent, and M. W. Voss, "The acute effects of aerobic exercise on the functional connectivity of human brain networks," Brain Plasticity, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 171-190, 2017.

[14] J. Ashburner and J. Karl, "Friston, voxel-based MorphometryThe methods," NeuroImage, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 805-821, 2000.

[15] K. J. Friston, J. Ashburner, C. D. Frith, J.-B. Poline, J. D. Heather, and R. S. J. Frackowiak, "Spatial registration and normalization of images," Human Brain Mapping, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 165-189, 1995.

[16] J. Ashburner, "Computational anatomy with the SPM software," Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1163-1174, 2009.

[17] J. B. Maintz and M. A. Viergever, "A survey of medical image registration," Medical Image Analysis, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-36, 1998.

[18] J. Ashburner and K. J. Friston, "Unified segmentation," NeuroImage, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 839-851, 2005.

[19] Statistial Parametric Mapping, 2009, https://www.fil.ion.ucl.

[20] C. Rosazza, L. Minati, F. Ghielmetti, M. L. Mandelli, and M. G. Bruzzone, "Functional connectivity during resting-state functional MR imaging: study of the correspondence between independent component analysis and region-of-interest-based methods," American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 180-187, 2012.

[21] R. Sladky, K. J. Friston, J. Trstl, R. Cunnington, E. Moser, and C. Windischberger, "Slice-timing effects and their correction in functional MRI," Neuroimage, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 588-594, 2011.

[22] V. D. Calhoun, J. Liu, and T. Adali, "A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data," NeuroImage, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. S163-S172, 2009.

[23] D. H. Han, I. K. Lyoo, and P. F. Renshawc, "Differential regional gray matter volumes in patients with on-line game addiction and professional gamers," Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 507-515, 2012.

[24] Y. Miyashita, "Inferior temporal cortex: where visual perception meets memory," Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 245-63, 1993.

[25] A. Engel, M. Burke, K. Fiehler, S. Bien, and F. Rsler, "Motor learning affects visual movement perception," European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 2294-302, 2008.

[26] H. Chaabne, Y. Hachana, E. Franchini, B. Mkaouer, and K. Chamari, "Physical and physiological profile of elite karate athletes," Sports Medicine, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 829-843, 2012.

[27] U. Halsband and H. J. Freund, "Premotor cortex and conditional motor learning in man," Brain, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 207-222, 1990.

[28] A. E. Hillis, "Inability to empathize: brain lesions that disrupt sharing and understanding anothers emotions," Brain, vol. 137, no. 4, pp. 981-997, 2013.

[29] R. Zahn, J. Moll, F. Krueger, E. D. Huey, G. Garrido, and J. Grafman, "Social concepts are represented in the superior anterior temporal cortex," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 104, no. 15, pp. 6430-6435, 2007.

[30] V. Sevdalis and M. Raab, "Empathy in sports, exercise, and the performing arts," Psychology of Sport and Exercise, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 173-179, 2014.

[31] M. P. Young, "Objective analysis of the topological organisation of the primate cortical visual system," Nature, vol. 358, no. 6382, pp. 152-154, 1992.

[32] A. D. Milner and M. A. Goodale, The Visual Brain in Action, Oxford UP, Oxford, UK, 1995.

[33] S. Zeki, J. D. G. Watson, C. J. Lueck, K. J. Friston, C. Kennard, and R. S. J. Frackowiak, "A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex," Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 641-649, 1991.

[34] J. D. Schmahmann and D. N. Pandya, "The cerebrocerellar system," in The Cerebellum and Cognition, J. E. Schmahmann, Ed., p. 3160, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, 1997.

[35] O. Hikosaka, K. Nakamura, K. Sakai, and H. Nakahara, "Central mechanisms of motor skill learning," Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 217-222, 2002.

[36] R. D. Fields, "White matter matters," Scientific American, vol. 298, no. 3, pp. 54-61, 2008.

[37] L. Bonita, D. J. M. Marks, B. Bucur et al., "Role of aerobic fitness and aging in cerebral white matter integrity," Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1097, no. 1, pp. 171-174, 2007.

[38] A. T. Brockett, E. A. LaMarca, and E. Gould, "Physical exercise enhances cognitive flexibility as well as astrocytic and synaptic markers in the medial prefrontal cortex," PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 5, Article ID e0124859, 2015.

[39] T. Jing, J. Liu, N. Egorova et al., "Increased HippocampusMedial prefrontal cortex resting-state functional connectivity and memory function after Tai Chi Chuan practice in elder adults," Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 8, p. 25, 2016.

[40] M. Inouchi, R. Matsumoto, J. Taki et al., "Role of posterior parietal cortex in reaching movements in humans. Clinical implication for "optic ataxia"," Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 124, no. 11, pp. 2230-2241, 2013.

[41] B. Biswal, F. Z. Yetkin, V. M. Haughton, and J. S. Hyde, "Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI," Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 537-541, 1995.

Adil Deniz Duru (iD) and Taylan Hayri Balcioglu

Faculty of Sports Science, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey

Correspondence should be addressed to Adil Deniz Duru;

Received 29 June 2018; Revised 13 September 2018; Accepted 30 September 2018; Published 23 October 2018

Academic Editor: Loredana Zollo

Caption: Figure 1: Significant GM differences are (elite > control) visualized with red blobs on the structural template cortical surface.

Caption: Figure 2: Significant WM differences are (elite > control) visualized with red blobs on the structural template cortical surface.

Caption: Figure 3: Mean RSN maps of the elite athletes and control subjects thresholded by Z > 2. Somatomotor network (a), executive (b), default mode network (c), visual (d), frontoparietal network, and (e) and (f).
Table 1: Voxel-based differences of GM deduced by using the contrast
elite > control subjects exhibiting six significant clusters having
at least 20 clusters are summarized.

Cluster p (FWE)   Cluster k   Peak p (FWE)   Peak T   x (mm)

0.0001               215         0.0002       9.89     58.5
                                 0.0355       6.52     55.5
0.0088               29          0.0008       8.77      28
                                 0.0012       8.56      18
0.0000               242         0.0014       8.42     34.5
                                 0.0017       8.33      33
0.0041               50          0.0024       8.11     46.5
0.0118               22          0.0042       7.76     46.5
0.0118               22          0.0083       7.36    -64.5

Cluster p (FWE)   y (mm)   z (mm)

0.0001            -52.5     -27
                   -48     -40.5
0.0088              20       58
                   19.5    -31.5
0.0000              39      -24
                   31.5     -27
0.0041            -85.5      15
0.0118            -43.5     1.5
0.0118            -61.5      -3

Cluster p (FWE)                       Label

0.0001                      b (inferior temporal, R)
                          e (temporal pole superior, R)
0.0088                       c (premotor cortex, R)

0.0000                          f (cerebellum, R)

0.0041                   a (occipital-temporal v5 mi, R)
0.0118            b (Inferior/superior temporal gyrus, ba20, R)
0.0118                      d (superior temporal, L)

Each cluster is represented with a letter in Figure 1. Cluster level
FWE corrected probability values are reported with the MNI
coordinates with the statistical values of the peak voxel in the
cluster. Peak T value stands for the maximum of t statistic value
for a voxel in a cluster. Peak p (FWE) stands for the voxel level
significance value, where at least one cluster with unspecified
number of voxels is above the threshold (p < 0.05). The number of
voxels above the threshold in a cluster is denoted with cluster k
while the Cluster p (FWE) is the cluster level probability. MNI
coordinates and corresponding anatomical names are represented by x,
y, z and label, variables, respectively.

Table 2: Voxel-based differences of WM deduced by using the contrast
elite > control subjects exhibiting four significant clusters having
at least 20 clusters are summarized.

Cluster p (FWE)   Cluster Equivk   Peak p (FWE)   Peak T   x (mm)

0.0002                 198            0.0000      10.39      -9
0.0006                 141            0.0005       8.76     10.5
                                      0.0156       6.70      15
0.0017                  97            0.0023       7.82      6
0.0097                  33            0.0064       7.21    -37.5

Cluster p (FWE)   y (mm)   z (mm)           Label

0.0002             -7.5    -19.5    Mammillary region (b)
0.0006             -4.5    -16.5      Hypothalamus (a)
                    3      -13.5      Hypothalamus (a)
0.0017             16.5     7.5     Caudate nucleus right
0.0097             25.5     4.5        Left insula (c)

Each cluster is represented with a letter. The location of the
clusters can be seen in Figure 2. Cluster level FWE corrected
probability values are reported with the MNI coordinates with the
statistical values of the peak voxel in the cluster. Peak T value
stands for the maximum of t statistic value for a voxel in a
cluster. Peak p (FWE) stands for the voxel level significance value
where at least one cluster with unspecified number of voxels is
above the threshold (p < 0.05). The number of voxels above the
threshold in a cluster is denoted with the cluster k while the
cluster p (FWE) is the cluster level probability. MNI coordinates
and corresponding anatomical names are represented by x, y, z and
label, variables, respectively.

Table 3: Gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) volume values
([cm.sup.3]) of each participant.

                        GM volume      WM volume
Gender   Participant   ([cm.sup.3])   ([cm.sup.3])

Male       Elite 1        773.48         535.71
Male       Elite 2        843.61         580.24
Male       Elite 3        714.81         497.80
Male       Elite 4        764.12         531.58
Male       Elite 5        809.33         580.41
Male       Elite 6        628.99         424.86
Male       Elite 7        757.61         523.80
Female     Elite 8        690.93         474.24
Female     Elite 9        806.75         602.38
Female    Elite 10        712.94         482.64
Female    Elite 11        719.62         506.68
Female    Elite 12        707.83         491.33
Female    Elite 13        651.28         460.01
Male      Control 1       778.48         548.15
Male      Control 2       809.75         551.04
Male      Control 3       685.72         512.70
Male      Control 4       720.53         487.86
Male      Control 5       710.02         478.28
Male      Control 6       755.10         531.94
Male      Control 7       787.03         514.16
Female    Control 8       651.68         439.27
Female    Control 9       684.17         452.25
Female   Control 10       647.41         458.17
Female   Control 11       645.99         453.02
Female   Control 12       707.55         488.06
Female   Control 13       630.77         425.28

Table 4: Significant differences between elite karate players and
control group deduced by the analysis of the second-level GLM for
each RSN map.

 T      Z     p (unc)    X     7     z               Label

3.72   3.22   <0.001     4    -88    6          Cuneus BA18 (R)
5.21   4.13   <0.0001    2    56    -6     Medial frontal gyrus (R)
5.00   4.01   <0.0001   60    -60   26    Superior temporal gyrus (R)
4.66   3.82   <0.0001   24    -34   72       Postcentral gyrus (R)
3.74   3.24   <0.001    44    -34   58
3.60   3.14   <0.001    22    -4    66    Superior frontal gyrus (R)
4.51   3.73   <0.0001    4    26    50     Superior frontal gyrus,
                                            frontal sup medial (R)
4.22   3.55   <0.001    -42   32    -2      Left inferior frontal
                                                   gyrus (L)
4.15   3.49   <0.001    10    -76   -28      Cerebellum crus1 (R)
COPYRIGHT 2018 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Duru, Adil Deniz; Balcioglu, Taylan Hayri
Publication:Journal of Healthcare Engineering
Date:Jan 1, 2018
Previous Article:Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter.
Next Article:The Effect of Kinesiology Taping on the Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |