Printer Friendly

Functional MRI activation in repetition task using block and event-related design.


Important advances have been made in brain imaging techniques of functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI), as well as in other imaging techniques. Many reports have been published on this topic to date. The task designs of fMRI generally fall into two main categories: event-related design, and block design. A block design is generally composed of task (stimulation) and rest (rest). Event-related design evaluates the activation of a complicated problem that block design can't analyze.

We compared fMRI findings obtained with a repetitive task in block design in normal subjects with those of two patients with Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia who received speech therapy and showed complete recovery (1). Although repetition is simple, it requires three elements of the listening, the memorization and the speaking in the central process. The simplicity of the task for fMRI warrants its trial in aphasic patients.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate fMRI findings obtained from normal subjects with repetition task using block and event-related design. Activation areas were divided into the listening, the memorization speaking in event-related design. The differences in activation manifested by each analysis were compared. Our goal is to discuss how to use this informative method as a clinical index of aphasia treatment.



Subjects: Eleven healthy control men participated in this study. They consisted of healthy right-handed male college students aged 19-22 years (mean [+ or -] s.d. 20.4 [+ or -] 1.55 years). fMRI:

All MRI examinations were performed on a 1.5 T scanner. The head of the subject was immobilized within a circularly polarized head coil. Conventional spin-echo axialoblique T1-weighted images (TE = 2.4 ms, TR = 26 ms, FOV = 240 mm, matrix size 256x256, slice thickness = 2 mm, covering the whole brain) were obtained parallel to the intercommissural line. These images were later used for co-registration with the functional images for accurate anatomical localization of the activated areas. FMRI was performed using an EPI gradient-echo sequence (TE = 90.5 ms, TR = 5000 ms, FOV = 240 mm, flip angle = 60[degrees], matrix size 128x128, slice thickness = 6 mm, and oriented identical to the anatomical images).

Experiment 1 (block design): Each subject underwent fMRI under two different conditions: repetition and rest. The language comprehension paradigm consisted of 6 cycles of two conditions: (1) rest condition, 1 min; and (2) repeat aloud of the sentence heard though earphones, 1 min. In the repetition task, the auditory stimulus was a series of sentences delivered every 5 seconds binaurally through earphones. Then, the subject was instructed to repeat the word aloud.

Experiment 2 (event-related design): Each subject underwent fMRI under four different conditions: listening, memorization, speaking and rest. The language comprehension paradigm consisted of 30 cycles of four conditions: (1) listening of the sentence heard though earphones, 4sec; (2) memorization, 8sec; (3) repeat aloud of the memorized sentence, 4sec; (4) rest condition, 8sec. In the repetition task, the auditory stimulus was a series of sentences not used experiment 1.

The study protocol was approved by the ethics review committees of participating institutions and a signed consent form was obtained from each subject.


Image analysis:

Motion correction was performed using SPM2 (Welcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, London, UK) implemented in MATLAB (Mathworks Inc., Sherbon, USA). Each of the MRI slices was automatically realigned and reoriented along the bi-commissural line to correct for head movements. Statistical maps were overlaid on the Talairach space 9) and the threshold for activation was set at p<0.005 for event-related design and block design.


Three-dimensional images: Figure 1 and 2 show SPM maps of 3D images co-registered with MRI images after normalization of MRI and fMRI data into Talairach space.

Block design (Figure 1, red)

Areas of activation were observed bilaterally in the middle temporal gyrus (BA21) and the inferior frontal gyrus (BA47), the medial frontal gyrus (BA6) of the left hemisphere, the middle frontal gyrus (BA46) and the precentral gyrus (BA6)of the right hemisphere.

Event related design (Figure 2)

Listening: Areas of activation were observed bilaterally in the superior parietal lobule (BA 7), the superior and middle temporal gyrus (BA22), the insula (BA13) and the postcentral gyrus (BA7) of the left hemisphere, in the superior temporal gyrus (BA42) of the right hemisphere. (red color)

Memorization: Areas of activation were observed in the medial frontal gyrus (BA10), the superior frontal gyrus (BA8) of the left hemisphere, the inferior frontal gyrusa(BA47), the superior temporal gyrus (BA22) and the medial tenporal gyrus (BA21). (blue color)

Speaking: Areas of activation were observed bilaterally in the superior frontal gyrus (BA6), and the insula (BA13) and the inferior parietal lobule (BA47), the superior parietal lobule (BA7), the superior temporal gyrus (BA22) and the postcentral gyrus (BA43) of the left hemisphere, the superior temporal gyrus (BA 42, 38) and the precentral gyrus (BA6) of the right hemisphere. (Figure 2, green)


Activation areas observed during block analysis were larger than those observed during event analysis.

As we compare two elements of rest and repeat, there is a tendency in block analysis for more activation bilaterally. This is compared with activation areas that were divided into the listening, the memorization and the speaking in event-related design. However, it was thought previously that the tendency was the same for both designs. There are several reports on this (2,3). In other words, activation can be seen in the anterior and posterior superior temporal gyri, the dorsal surface of the superior temporal gyri, the superior temporal sulci and more ventrally in the middle temporal gyri.

Recently, low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), which can suppress neural activity of a selected brain area, has been introduced as a therapeutic tool for stroke patients with hemiplegia or aphasia (4,5). It is crucial to identify areas compensating for impaired language function when rTMS is therapeutically applied for aphasic patients. Adult patients who recover from aphasia after a lefthemisphere stroke have the following three major changes: 1) recovery of damage in left hemisphere language region, 2) peri-lesional reorganization of the left hemisphere, and 3) a significant shift of activation areas into homologous areas of the right hemisphere. Rather than focusing on the importance of each of the above three mechanisms, it may be more appropriate to envisage a system in which the most effective mechanism operates according to the degree of brain damage and patient's status. In other words, we predict that the index of rTMS can be easily obtained if it can be determined which cerebral hemisphere contributes to the recovery of aphasia (6). FMRI of aphasia plays an important role in assessing language function both for focus analysis and network analysis of the whole brain, and can be a useful guide in medical treatment aimed at effective functional recovery. If the data from fMRI cannot be reflected in the clinical treatment, it is insignificant. However, fMRI results from block analysis of repetition task has the possibility to be an informative method as a clinical index of aphasia treatment.


This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research.


(1.) Abo M. Senoo A. Watanabe S. Miyano S. Sasaki N. Kobayashi al. Language-related brain function during word repetition in Post-stroke aphasics. Neuroreport 2004; 15; 1891-1894.

(2.) McCrory E, Frith U, Brunswick N, Price C. Abnormal functional activation during a simple word repetition task: A PET study of adult dyslexics. J Cogn Neurosci 2000; 12; 753-762.

(3.) Mummery CJ, Ashburner J, Scott SK, Wise RJ. Functional neuroimaging of speech perception in six normal and two aphasic subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1999 ;106;449-57.

(4.) Naeser MA, Martin PI, Nicholas M, et al. Improved naming after TMS treatments in a chronic, global aphasia patient-case report. Neurocase 2005; 11: 182-193.

(5.) Naeser MA, Martin PI, Nicholas M, et al. Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca's area: An open-protocol study. Brain Lang 2005; 93: 95-105.

(6.) Kakuda W, Abo M, Kaito M, Watanabe M. A novel approach for aphasic stroke patients: Functional MRI-based Therapeutic rTMS strategy. [abstract 432]. Stroke 2009.

Masahiro Abo M.D.PhD [1] Kazumi Kasahara [2] Wataru Kakuda M.D [1] Atushi Senoo PhD [2]

[1] Departments of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Nishi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan. [2] Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Human Health Science, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Higashi-Ogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
COPYRIGHT 2009 Therapeutic Solutions LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:magnetic resonance imaging
Author:Abo, Masahiro; Kasahara, Kazumi; Kakuda, Wataru; Senoo, Atushi
Publication:Journal of Applied Research
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:9JAPA
Date:Sep 1, 2009
Previous Article:Plasma lipid profile of experimentally induced hyperlipidemic New Zealand white rabbits is not affected by resveratrol.
Next Article:Penetrability of intravenous biapenem into the peritoneal fluid of laparotomy patients and the peritoneal pharmacodynamics against gram-negative...

Related Articles
Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Brain Reprograms Itself After Stroke.
Brain changes detectable before MCI diagnosis: structural and functional MRI are revealing early changes in patients complaining of cognitive decline.
Functional MRI could become lie detector.
Olfactory deficits seen in early Parkinson's disease.
Magnetic resonance imaging approaches for studying alcoholism using mouse models.
Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of the brain in HIV disease.
Plasticity in MS: from functional imaging to rehabilitation.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters