Printer Friendly

Frugivory by birds on Miconia albicans (Melastomataceae), in a fragment of cerrado in Sao Carlos, southeastern Brazil/Frugivoria por aves em Miconia albicans (Melastomataceae), em um fragmento de cerrado em Sao Carlos, sudeste do Brasil.

1. Introduction

Cerrado is the major tropical savana area in South America (Ratter et al., 1997). This vegetation has been greatly reduced by anthropic action, with only several fragments of cerrado remaining in Sao Paulo state, usually of less than 100 ha each (Sao Paulo, 1997). Studies have demonstrated that aproximately 50% of cerrado woody species show zoochoric dispersal syndrome (Vieira et al., 2002; Neri et al., 2005). Birds and mammals are believed to be the most important seed dispersers (Howe and Westley, 1997).

Fruit-eating birds may be classified as specialised and opportunistic (Howe and Estabrook, 1977). Following this theory, plants whose dispersal agents are specialised birds would produce large fruits of high nutritional quality (elevated protein content), in a small number, but with large seeds. On the other hand, plants that are dispersed mainly by opportunistic birds would produce small fruits with low nutritional quality (high carbohydrates and water levels), in a large number but with small seeds. Specialised and generalised dispersal systems constitute a paradigm (Howe, 1993) that still motivates research on frugivory and seed dispersal (Jordano et al., 2011).

According to Snow (1981), plants adapted for dispersal by opportunistic frugivorous birds are generally shrubs or small trees, typical from secondary vegetation, colonising edge habitats or recently cleared ground. The family Melastomataceae is an important example of these plants. Species of the genus Miconia represent approximately one quarter of the modern Melastomataceae, occuring from the south of Mexico to the north of Argentina and Uruguay (Goldenberg, 2004).

Miconia albicans (Triana) is a treelet that reaches even 3 m in height, occurring in cerrado secondary vegetation, rocky outcrops and coastal formations (Goldenberg, 2004). Its fruits are small and numerous rosy berries that become jade-green during ripening, with high levels of water and carbohydrates (respectively 76.63 and 13.38%) but low protein content (2.17%) (Maruyama et al., 2007). Neri et al. (2005) observed high density of M. albicans occuring in regenerating cerrado areas.

Ecological aspects involved in bird-plant relationships have been used in environmental risk assessments and to create biodiversity conservation arrangements, so as to estimate future impoverishment and reduction of original vegetation (Howe and Miriti, 2000; Silva and Tabarelli, 2000). The present study aimed to characterize the avian guild that consumes fruits of Miconia albicans and the phenology of the plant, in an attempt to better understand the ecological role of this plant in the fragment studied.

2. Material and Methods

The study was carried out in a non urbanised area in the campus of the Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos, Sao Paulo state, southeastern Brazil (21[degrees] 58' S and 47[degrees] 52' W). This is a 124.68 ha area (Paese, 1997) where cerrado vegetation is very compromised by irregular fires and by Brachiaria sp. and Melinis sp. (Poaceae) invasion. The regional climate is Cwa.i--Awi (Koppen's system); with wet summers and dry winters (Tolentino, 2007).

According to Dias, Branco and Francisco (in press), a total of 274 bird species have already been sighted in the campus area, and 33% are believed to consume fruits, at least sporadically (Francisco and Galetti, 2001). In research performed with woody species in the area, M. albicans appears as the fourth most abundant species (Oliveira and Batalha, 2005).


Miconia albicans phenophases (Figure 1) were accompanied every two weeks, between March 2008 and February 2009, following 30 random selected individuals in a pre-existing 800 m trail. Since each treelet has a huge number of flower buds, flowers and/or fruits, it was necessary to estimate the total from an average of direct counting on three inflorescences per individual. Field data was analysed using the Founder intensity percentage (Founder, 1974), in a classificatory scale from 0 (phenophase absent) to 4 (maximum phenophase intensity). The activity index (percentage of individuals that show the phenophase) per month was also estimated, since both methodologies supply complementary data (Bencke and Morellato, 2002).

The survey of birds consuming M. albicans fruits was carried out using the focal tree methodology (Pizo, 1997) between November and December 2008, when a fruiting peak was registered. Eight treelets were observed from a minimum distance of 8-10 m, with 7 x 35 binoculars, trying in this way to avoid behavioural changes by the visitants. The following aspects were registered: visiting species, time and duration of the visit, number of consumed fruits, foraging behaviour, occurence of agonistic encounters and occurrence of defecation and regurgitation. Each treelet was observed for 12 hours, alternating non-consecutive days, totalling 96 observational hours. However, the observations were equally distributed over the day, from 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM, so each time interval was equally sampled in every plant.

Miconia albicans has a very dense crown, which made visualization difficult. So, in order to calculate averages and frequencies for bird visits, only those with recorded duration and fruit consumption were considered. For some species, the total number of visits used to calculate average consumption of fruits per visit is not the same utilised in the calculation of average visit duration.

For correlational analyses, the Spearman correlation coefficient was applied. Body masses and predominant diets were obtained from the literature (Motta-Junior, 1990; Marini et al., 1997; Sick, 1997; Piratelli and Pereira, 2002; Antunes, 2005). Meteorological data is available at Embrapa (2009).

3. Results

Flowering occured between August and October (Figure 2), when an activity peak was observed. September was the only month when flower intensity went over 50%. However, it is important to emphasize the fact that the number of flowers registered is lower than the real number, since they keep open for a few days only, and so could not all be registered on the biweekly surveys. The procedure also explains the mismatching between the low number of flowers in relation to the large number of immature fruits recorded afterwards.


A peak in the activity index and in the Fournier intensity percentage of ripe fruits was observed between October and January. This interval was considered the fruiting period of M. albicans and coincided with the wet season. Morphometric data of the fruits (n = 50) were: diameter 6.3 ([+ or -] 0.587) mm and average weight of 0.14 ([+ or -] 0.034) g. A mean of 19.52 ([+ or -] 6.34) seeds per fruit was found, with average weight of 7.047 mg each (n = 1000). Seeds correspond to approximately 5.06% of the fruit weight.

Only birds were observed consuming M. albicans fruits. A total of 212 visits with fruit consumption were registered, performed by 19 bird species, from eight families (Table 1). Any new species was observed consuming M. albicans fruits after 72 hours of observation. An average frequency of 2.21 [+ or -] 3.48 visits/hour was found, with a peak of 5.4 [+ or -] 6.0 visits/hour registered between 6:00 AM and 7:00 AM. During the day, the frequency of visits decreased, until its minimum value (0.3 [+ or -] 0.5) between 5:00 PM and 6:00 PM.

Species of the family Emberizidae were the most representative in number of visits (34.9%), followed by Thraupidae (19.81%) and Tyrannidae (18.4%) families. In relation to fruit consumption, species of the families Mimidae, Columbidae and Thraupidae were the most responsible, with 23.34, 19.27 and 17.11% respectively of consumption. Many birds with juvenile plumage were observed consuming M. albicans fruits, notably Sporophila caerulescens, Volatinia jacarina and Mimus saturninus.

Although species of family Emberizidae--which has a typical grain diet (Sick, 1997)--had a prominent number of visits, they were seen in the majority of the visits taking the seeds out of the fruits and rejecting pulp and skin. Sporophila caerulescens, Volatinia jacarina and Zonotrichia capensis have already been registered in the same area as granivores (Motta-Junior, 1990) and since mainly seeds are found fragmented in Emberizidae's stomach (Lopes et al., 2005) they are believed not to be great seed dispersers. Aratinga aurea (Figure 3), Tangara cayana and Saltatricula atricollis were observed mandibulating fruits, but degluting them totally. This behaviour may destroy seeds or not (Moermond, 1983) and only germination tests can verify if these species might act as M. albicans seed dispersers.

Regurgitation, defecation and agonistic encounters were insignificant for all species observed. The average fruit consumption per visit varied from 1.5 fruit/visit (Schistochlamys ruficapillus) to 33.14 (Patagioenaspicazuro). A correlation was found between body mass and average fruit consumption per visit (Spearman correlation coefficient: rs = 0.549; p = 0.023) but no significant correlation between average fruit consumption per visit and average visit duration.

Miconia albicans treelets used for focal observations varied from 1.5 to 3.0 m, and hold between 600 and 9000 available fruits (ripe and immature). There is a correlation between tree height and number of visits (Spearman correlation coefficient: rs = 0.753; p = 0.031), but no significant correlation was found between the available fruits and number of visits.

During the survey, the predation of a Tangara sayaca that was consuming M. albicans fruits, by a Callithrix jaccus (Linnaeus) (Cebidae) was observed. At 6:45 AM, three adult marmosets came to a M. albicans treelet and kept inside its crown, that was dense and so hampered visualization. This treelet was being visited by many T. sayaca at that moment. A few minutes later, one marmoset left the plant with the already dead bird in its claws, went to a higher neighbouring tree (about 5 m high) and fed on the bird. The other two marmosets followed the first, but they kept a distance from each other. Then, the group came back to the M. albicans treelet (bringing the bird carcass together), stayed for a few minutes and left.


4. Discussion

Miconia albicans treelets showed a high syncrony, with remarkable phenophases. Synchronised fruit production may be a strategy to increase the attractiveness of the frugivorous species responsible for seed dispersal (Augspurger, 1981). The fruiting period coincides with the wet season, when many fruits of other ornithocoric dispersion syndrome plants are available in the same area, like: Davila rugosa Poiret (Dilleniaceae) (Francisco and Galetti, 2002a), Ocotea pulchella (Nees) Mez (Lauraceae) (Francisco and Galetti, 2002b), Pera glabrata (Schott) Baill (Euphorbiaceae) (Francisco et al., 2007), Rapanea lancifolia (Ruiz and Pavon) Mez (Francisco and Galetti, 2001) and Zanthoxylum rhoifolium Lam. (Rutaceae) (Silva et al., 2008).

Fruit richness in the period and the high abundance of M. albicans in the studied area (Oliveira and Batalha, 2005) may be an explanation for the low frequency of visits observed for M. albicans. In comparison to data from the abovementioned literature, M. albicans showed from similar to a 3 times lower frequency of bird visits, while the number of observed species could be considered high (in a range of 11 species for R. lancifolia to 20 for P. glabrata). However, since there are annual climate variations and different methodologies applied, comparisons must be regarded with caution.

Fruit abundance during M. albicans fruiting season could explain either the absent correlation between available fruits per treelet and number of visits, since M. albicans fruits are of low nutritional quality. These fruits are eaten mainly by birds with generalist diets which seek better protein sources. Only treelet height showed to be a relevant factor for bird attraction. Since safety is not completely associated with perching height (Blumstein et al., 2004), it is the interaction with many other factors that results in the tree choice by the birds: forraging patterns, plant community composition and structure, predation risk (Howe, 1979; Robinson and Holmes, 1982; Levey and Moermond, 1984; Hasui et al., 2007).

Large and cryptic birds are less vulnerable to predators, spending more time on fruiting plants (Pratt and Stiles, 1983; Silva et al., 2008). The heaviest bird observed consuming M. albicans fruits, P. picazuro, showed the largest average visit duration (410,64 [+ or -] 222,48 seconds). The marmoset predation of a small bird consuming M. albicans fruits is a strong example of the importance of predation risk during bird feed. The lack of a correlation between average fruit consumption per visit and average visit duration may be a consequence of variated time spent in state of allertness during the visit, just as of different foraging patterns used by each species or previous consumption of other food sources.

Miconia albicans seed dispersal potential by birds could only be inferred through the behavioural aspects observed in the survey. Short visits (less than 3 minutes) and low defecation rates means that seeds may be carried out far away from the parent-plant (Pratt and Stiles, 1983). Future studies are necessary to verify the dispersive potential of the birds here listed and also know M. albicans germination and seedling characteristics.

Characterised by a generalist dispersal system, M. albicans seeds may be dispersed even in disturbed areas where large frugivores are absent. As a pioneer plant, it is known that M. albicans is able to naturally establish under Eucalyptus sp. plantations (Saporetti et al., 2003). All these attributes suggest M. albicans may be useful in the recovery of degraded areas.

Ackonowledgements--Thanks to Dra. Maria Ines Salgueiro Lima for Melastomataceae identification, and to the biologist Julia Ramos Estevao for helping during field studies. N. Allenspach received a Master's scholarship from CAPES.


ANTUNES, AZ., 2005. Alteracao na composicao da comunidade de aves ao longo do tempo em um fragmento florestal no sudeste do Brasil. Ararajuba, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 47-61.

AUGSPURGER, CK., 1981. Reproductive synchrony of a tropical shrub: experimental studies of effects of pollinators and seed predators in Hybanthusprunifolius (Violaceae). Ecology, vol. 62, no. 3, p. 775-788.

BENCKE, CSC. and MORELLATO, LPC., 2002. Comparacao de dois metodos de avaliacao da fenologia de plantas, sua interpretacao e representacao. Revista Brasileira de Botanica, vol. 25, no. 3, p. 269-274.

BLUMSTEIN, DT., FERNANDEZ-JURICIC, E., LEDEE, O., LARSEN, E., RODRIGUEZ-PRIETO, I. and ZUGMEYER, C., 2004. Avian risk assessment: effects of perching height and detectability. Ethology, vol. 110, p. 273-285.

DIAS, MM., BRANCO, MBC. and FRANCISCO, MR., In press. A avifauna da UFSCar, Campus Sao Carlos, Estado de Sao Paulo: 34 anos de levantamentos. In LIMA, MIS. and PENTEADO-DIAS, MA. Ambientes terrestres do Campus da UFSCar, Sao Carlos, Estado de Sao Paulo.

EMBRAPA. Pecuaria Sudeste, 2009. Servicos--dados meteorologicos. Available from: <>. Access in: 10 mar. 2009.

FRANCISCO, MR. and GALETTI, M., 2001. Frugivoria e dispersao de sementes de Rapanea lancifolia (Myrcinaceae) por aves numa Area de cerrado do Estado de Sao Paulo, Sudeste do Brasil. Ararajuba, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 13-19.

--, 2002a. Consumo dos frutos de Davilla rugosa (Dilleniaceae) por aves numa Area de cerrado em Sao Carlos, Estado de Sao Paulo. Ararajuba, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 193-198.

--, 2002b. Aves como potenciais dispersoras de sementes de Ocotea pulchella Mart. (Lauraceae) numa Area de vegetacao de cerrado do sudeste brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Botanica, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 11-17.

FRANCISCO, MR., LUNARDI, VO. and GALETTI, M., 2007. Bird attributes, plants characteristics, and seed dispersal of Pera glabrata (Schott, 1858), (Euphorbiaceae) in a disturberd cerrado area. Brazilian Journal of Biology, vol. 67, no. 4, p. 627-634.

FOURNIER, LA., 1974. Un metodo cuantitativo para la medicion de caracteristicas fenologicas en arboles. Turrialba, vol. 24, no. 4, p. 422-423.

GOLDENBERG, R., 2004. O genero Miconia (Melastomataceae) no Estado do ParanA, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 927-947.

HASUI, E., MOTA GOMES, VS. and SILVA, WR., 2007. Effects of vegetation traits on habitat preferences of frugivorous birds in atlantic rain forest. Biotropica, vol. 39, no. 4, p. 502-509. http://

HOWE, HF., 1979. Fear and frugivory. American Naturalist, vol. 114, no. 6, p. 925-931.

--, 1993. Specialized and generalized dispersal systems: where does 'the paradigm' stand? Vegetatio, vol. 107-108, p. 3-13.

HOWE, HF. and ESTABROOK, G., 1977. On intraspecific competition for avian dispersers in tropical trees. American Naturalist, vol. 111, p. 817-832.

HOWE, HF. and MIRITI, MN., 2000. No question: seed dispersal matters. Tree, vol. 11, no. 15, p. 434-436.

HOWE, HF. and WESTLEY, L., 1997. Ecology of pollination and seed dispersal. In CRAWLEY, MJ. (Ed.). Plant Ecology. 2nd. ed. London: Blackwell Science. p. 262-283.

JORDANO, P., FORGET, PM., LAMBERT, JE., BOHNING-GAESE, K., TRAVESET, A., WRIGHT, SJ., 2011. Frugivores and seed dispersal: mechanisms and consequences for biodiversity of a key ecological interaction. Biology Letters, vol. 7, p. 321-323. PMid:21084336.

LEVEY, DJ. and MOERMOND, TC., 1984. Fruit choice in neotropical birds: the effect of distance between fruits on preference patterns. Ecology, vol. 65, no. 3, p. 844-850. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/1938058

LOPES, LE., FERNANDES, AM. and MARINI, MA., 2005. Diet of some Atlantic Forest birds. Ararajuba, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 95-103.

MARINI, MA., MOTTA-JUNIOR, JC., VASCONCELLOS, LAS. and CAVALCANTI, RB., 1997. Avian body masses from the cerrado region of central Brazil. Ornitologia Neotropical, vol. 8, p. 93-99.

MARUYAMA, PK., ALVES-SILVA, E. and MELO, C., 2007. Oferta qualitativa e quantitativa de frutos em especies ornitocoricas do genero Miconia (Melastomataceae). Revista Brasileira de Biociencias, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 672-674.

MOERMOND, TC., 1983. Suction-drinking in tanagers and its relation to fruits handling. Ibis, vol. 125, p. 545-549.

MOTTA-JUNIOR, JC., 1990. Estrutura trofica e composicao das avifaunas de tres hAbitats terrestres na regiao central do estado de Sao Paulo. Ararajuba, vol. 1, p. 65-71.

NERI, AV., CAMPOS, EP., DUARTE, TG., MEIRA NETO, JAA., FRANCISCO DA SILVA, A. and VALENTE, GE., 2005. Regeneracao de especies nativas lenhosas sob plantio de Eucalyptus em Area de cerrado na Floresta Nacional de Paraopeba, MG, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 369-376. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/S0102-33062005000200020

OLIVEIRA, FF. and BATALHA, MA., 2005. Lognormal abundance distribution of woody species in a cerrado fragment (Sao Carlos, Southeasthern Brazil). Revista Brasileira de Botanica, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 39-45.

PAESE, A., 1997. Caracterizacao e anAlise ambiental do campus da Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos (UFSCar), Sao Carlos, Brasil. Sao Carlos: Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos. Dissertacao de Mestrado em Ecologia.

PIRATELLI, A. and PEREIRA, MR., 2002. Dieta de aves na regiao leste do Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Ararajuba, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 131-139.

PIZO, MA., 1997. Seed dispersal and predation in two populations of Cabralea canjerana (Meliaceae) in the Atlantic Forest of southeastern Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology, vol. 13, p. 559-578.

PRATT, TK. and STILES, EW., 1983. How long fruit-eating birds stay in the plants where they feed: implications for seed dispersal. American Naturalist, vol. 122, no. 6, p. 797-805. http://

RATTER, JA., RIBEIRO, JF. and BRIDGEWATER, S., 1997. The Brazilian cerrado vegetation and threats to its biodiverisity. Annals of Botany, vol. 80, p. 223-230. anbo.1997.0469

ROBINSON, SK. and HOLMES, RT., 1982. Foraging behavior of forest birds: the relationships among search tactics, diet, and habitat structure. Ecology, vol. 63, no. 3, p. 1918-1931.

Sao Paulo (Estado). Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente - SMA,1997. Cerrado: bases para conservacao e uso sustentAvel das Areas de cerrado do estado de Sao Paulo. Sao Paulo. 113 p.

SAPORETTI JUNIOR, AW., MEIRA NETO, JAL., ALMADO, R., 2002. Fitossociologia de sub-bosque de cerrado em talhao de Eucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden no municipio de Bom Despacho/MG. Revista Arvore, vol. 27, no. 6, p. 905-910.

SICK, H., 1997. Ornitologia brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira. 912 p.

SILVA, IA., FIGUEIREDO, RA. and MATOS, DMS., 2008. Feeding visit time of fruit-eating birds in cerrado plants: revisiting the predation risk model. Brazilian Journal of Biology, vol. 25, no. 4, p. 682-688.

SILVA, JMC. and TABARELLI, M., 2000. Trees species impoverishment and the future flora of the Atlantic flora of Northeast Brazil. Nature, vol. 404, p. 72-74. PMid:10716443.

SNOW, DW., 1981. Tropical frugivorous birds and their food plants: a world survey. Biotropica, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 1-14. http://

TOLENTINO, M., 2007. Estudo critico sobre o clima da regiao de Sao Carlos. Sao Carlos: EdUFSCar. 78 p.

VIEIRA, DLM., AQUINO, FG.; BRITO, MA.; FERNANDES-BULHAO, C. and HENRIQUES, RPB., 2002. Sindromes de dispersao de especies arbustivo-arboreas em cerrado sensu stricto do Brasil Central e savanas amazonicas. Revista Brasileira de Botanica, vol. 25, no. 2, p. 215-220.

Allenspach, N. *, Dias, MM.

Departamento de Ecologia e Biologia Evolutiva--DEBE, Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos--UFSCar, Rod. Washington Luiz, Km 235, CP 676, CEP 13565-905, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil

* e-mail:

Received May 11, 2011--Accepted July 18, 2011--Distributed May 31, 2012 (With 3 figures)
Table 1. Bird species recorded consuming Miconia albicans fruits
during 96 observational hours. a) Number of observations
with complete data of visit duration. b) Number of observations with
complete data of fruit consumption. c) Total
consumed fruits per species. d) Main diet, according Motta-Junior
(1990); Piratelli and Pereira (2002): FRU = frugivore;
INS = insectivore; ONI = omnivore; SE = seed eaters.

                               N           Average
Species              Visits   (a)      visit duration

 Patagioenas           24      11    410.64 [+ or -] 222.48
 Aratinga               2       0              --
 Elaenia sp.            3       3     31.00 [+ or -] 13.45
 Myiarchus sp.          1       1     18.00 [+ or -] 0.00
 Myiodynastes           8       8     81.25 [+ or -] 62.75
 (Statius Muller)
 Pitangus               9       9    136.22 [+ or -] 201.36
 Tyrannus               1       1     74.00 [+ or -] 0.00
 Tyrannus               1       1    151.00 [+ or -] 0.00
 Tyrannus savana       16      15     59.53 [+ or -] 35.55
 Cyanocorax             3       0              --
 Turdus                 9       6   107.67 [+ or -] 139.08
 Mimus                 19      14   127.21 [+ or -] 95.28
 Saltatricula           1       1    49.00 [+ or -] 0.00
 Schistochlamys         2       2    67.50 [+ or -] 61.52
 Tangara cayana         6       6    74.33 [+ or -] 98.21
 Tangara sayaca        33      17   102.94 [+ or -] 71.38
 Sporophila            34      21   108.52 [+ or -] 130.98
 Volatinia             19      11   143.36 [+ or -] 73.97
 Zonotrichia           21      20    98.85 [+ or -] 57.83
  (Statius Muller)
Total                212     147             --

                       N    Consumed   Average    Diet
    Species           (b)    fruit      fruits    (d)
                              (c)      consumed

 Patagioenas            7      232      33.14      FRU
  picazuro                            [+ or -]
  (Temminck)                           24.28
 Aratinga               1       24      24.00      FRU
  aurea                               [+ or -]
  (Gmelin)                              0.00
 Elaenia sp.            3        9       3.00      ONI
                                      [+ or -]
 Myiarchus sp.          1        3       3.00
                                      [+ or -]
 Myiodynastes           8       46       5.75      ONI
  maculatus                           [+ or -]
 (Statius Muller)
 Pitangus               7       27       3.86      ONI
  sulphuratus                         [+ or -]
  (Linnaeus)                            4.06
 Tyrannus               1        8       8.00      INS
  albogularis                         [+ or -]
  Burmeister                            0.00
 Tyrannus               1       13      13.00      INS
  melancholicus                       [+ or -]
  Vieillot                              0.00
 Tyrannus savana       13       79       6.08      INS
  Vieillot                            [+ or -]
 Cyanocorax             0       --       --        ONI
 Turdus                 7       79      11.29      ONI
  leucomelas                          [+ or -]
  (Vieillot)                            6.42
 Mimus                 13      281      21.62      INS
  saturninus                          [+ or -]
  (Lichtenstein)                       24.09
 Saltatricula           1        7       7.00       SE
  atricollis                          [+ or -]
  Vieillot                              0.00
 Schistochlamys         2        3       1.50      ONI
  ruficapillus                        [+ or -]
  (Vieillot)                            2.12
 Tangara cayana         3       35      11.67      ONI
  (Linnaeus)                          [+ or -]
 Tangara sayaca        12      161      13.42      ONI
  (Linnaeus)                          [+ or -]
 Sporophila            20      100       5.00       SE
  caerulescens                        [+ or -]
  (Vieillot)                            4.41
 Volatinia              8       37       4.63       SE
  jacarina                            [+ or -]
  (Linnaeus)                            3.02
 Zonotrichia           12       60       5.00       SE
  capensis                            [+ or -]
  (Statius Muller)                      3.64
Total                120     1204        --        --
COPYRIGHT 2012 Association of the Brazilian Journal of Biology
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Allenspach, N.; Dias, M.M.
Publication:Brazilian Journal of Biology
Date:May 1, 2012
Previous Article:Caudex growth and phenology of Cyathea atrovirens (Langsd. & Fisch.) Domin (Cyatheaceae) in secondary forest, southern Brazil/Crescimento do caudice...
Next Article:First record of Seticornuta Morley (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Metopiinae) from Brazil and description of a new species/Primeiro registro de...

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters