Frozen Section Diagnosis of Ovarian Epithelial Tumors: Diagnostic Pearls and Pitfalls.
This review focuses on the frozen section diagnostic challenges and pitfalls of ovarian epithelial tumors, the most commonly encountered group of ovarian tumors in the frozen section laboratory and in routine pathology practice. Ovarian epithelial tumors also represent one of the most problematic areas on frozen section, and significantly contribute to the reported low frozen section diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity rates among ovarian neoplasms. (1-4) Specifically, mucinous ovarian tumors and borderline tumors in general have been found to have a high false-negative frozen section diagnosis rate, likely, at least in part, because of tumor heterogeneity and nonrepresentative sampling. (5,6) Ovarian carcinomas can show a wide range of morphologic features, some of which overlap with other ovarian neoplasms of sex cord-stromal or germ cell origin, adding to the complexity of frozen section interpretation.
In addition, the ovaries are commonly involved by metastatic carcinomas, accounting for up to 15% of ovarian malignancies in Western countries. (7,8) Whenever possible, the frozen section diagnosis should be specific as for the favored primary tumor site, Mullerian or metastatic, especially in patients with a clinical history of or suspicion for another primary. Comprehensive surgical staging, including total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, and peritoneal biopsies, is typically performed for primary ovarian carcinomas, while gynecologic staging surgery is unnecessary for nongynecologic metastases to the ovary. A conservative, fertility-sparing surgery cystectomy or unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with limited staging, maybe an option for borderline ovarian tumors depending on the patient's age and plans for future fertility. Intraoperative communication between the pathologist and surgeon is essential for obtaining pertinent clinical information on one hand, and also for conveying diagnostic uncertainty and limitations of frozen section interpretation. For borderline tumors showing suspicious or equivocal features for invasion, the term at least borderline tumor may be appropriate. In difficult cases, requesting additional tissue from any peritoneal nodules or extraovarian masses or sending the contralateral ovary for frozen section (in postmenopausal patients) can help in narrowing down the differential diagnosis. A definitive diagnosis may not always be rendered on frozen section, and the diagnosis may be deferred to permanent section evaluations.
CLINICAL HISTORY, INTRAOPERATIVE GROSS EXAMINATION, AND SAMPLING
The 3 cornerstones of intraoperative consultation are the patient's clinical history, gross examination, and microscopic morphologic interpretation. Gathering clinical history and reviewing results of diagnostic imaging studies may be time consuming and may be limited by time pressure during frozen section. Ideally, this information could be prepared in advance in anticipation of a frozen section based on the operating room schedule. It would also allow for retrieving relevant prior biopsy slides from the pathology archives, an invaluable resource in patients with history of prior malignancy for comparison of morphologic features during frozen section.
The most important gross parameters of ovarian epithelial tumors are size, laterality (unilateral versus bilateral), and the appearance of cut surface (cystic versus solid). The vast majority of completely cystic ovarian tumors with a smooth lining and without solid nodules are histologically benign, although benign epithelial tumors may also have a partially or entirely solid cut surface, for example, adenofibromas or benign Brenner tumors. Gross presence of intracystic papillary growth should be noted; it is usually scattered and firm in cystadenofibromas, compared with the more abundant, soft, and friable intraluminal projections of serous borderline tumors (Figure 1, A and B). Conversely, malignant ovarian epithelial tumors tend to be solid, at least partially, and often show a soft, fleshy, and heterogeneous cut surface with necrosis and hemorrhage (Figure 1, C and D). Bilaterality is common in serous ovarian tumors, both benign and malignant; however, bilateral mucinous tumors should always raise suspicion for a metastasis. In addition, tumor size may also be a helpful parameter in the differential diagnosis between primary versus metastatic mucinous carcinoma. The gross quality of cyst contents, serous versus mucoid, may provide a clue to the tumor histologic subtype, but not infrequently it may be misleading, and the tumor classification ultimately has to be based on the overall microscopic appearance and cytoplasmic features of the lining epithelial cells.
Sampling for intraoperative frozen section should be directed toward any gross intracystic papillary or solid areas. Mucinous tumors are notoriously heterogeneous; thus, multiple frozen section blocks may be necessary, especially for larger tumors. Frozen section of the contralateral ovary, even if it appears grossly unremarkable, may be helpful in identifying bilateral involvement. If only one of the ovaries is sent for frozen section, information about the gross appearance of the other ovary may be sought from the surgeon.
MUCINOUS TUMORS--PRIMARY OVARIAN VERSUS METASTATIC
One of the most common diagnostic challenges on frozen sections is distinguishing a primary ovarian mucinous tumor from a metastatic mucinous adenocarcinoma. Metastatic low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm, especially when evaluated in isolation, without the appendix, may be deceptively bland on frozen sections, mimicking an ovarian mucinous cystadenoma or mucinous borderline tumor. Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm typically occurs in patients around 50 years of age, and the presenting clinical symptoms--pelvic mass/pain and increased abdominal girth--are often related to the ovarian metastases and pseudomyxoma peritonei. The average size of the ovarian metastasis is 16 cm, and bilateral ovarian involvement is common. (9,10) Grossly, the ovary shows a multiloculated, cystic cut surface filled with abundant mucinous material (Figure 2, A), and frozen sections typically demonstrate disrupted cystic structures lined by flat or slightly undulating mucinous epithelium surrounded by large areas of paucicellular basophilic mucin dissecting through ovarian stroma (pseudomyxoma ovarii) (Figure 2, B through D). Subepithelial clefts are usually present between the lining epithelium and the stroma. The tumor cells are tall and columnar and show relatively uniform, basally located nuclei with no appreciable mitotic activity and abundant pale eosinophilic or basophilic cytoplasm. Numerous goblet cells are also present. If low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm is considered in the differential diagnosis, the surgical team should be contacted intraoperatively to discuss the findings, and surgical evaluation of the appendix and the contralateral ovary should be recommended. The appendix may appear grossly normal or slightly enlarged with a cystic mass on cut surface of the appendiceal tip, showing abundant mucinous contents and a firm, tan-white cyst wall (Figure 3, A). Frozen sections of the appendix show dense fibrosis with calcifications and abundant extracellular mucin pools with rare strips of bland mucinous epithelium, similar to that seen in the ovary (Figure 3, B).
Ovarian mucinous cystadenoma most often has a gastrointestinal-type--gastric foveolar--or intestinal-type epithelial lining, which may be undulating or may form small, filiform papillae, but lacks significant epithelial proliferation, complexity, and nuclear atypia (Figure 4, A and B). Invagination of epithelial lining into the ovarian stroma is common and by itself should not be interpreted as glandular complexity. Mucinous borderline tumors, on the other hand, show epithelial proliferation with stratification, tufting, intraglandular villous or filiform papillary growth, and fusion of papillae, in addition to mild to moderate nuclear atypia and variable mitotic activity (Figure 4, C and D). Acellular mucin spillage into the ovarian stroma (pseudomyxoma ovarii) may be seen in both benign and borderline mucinous ovarian tumors, although it is typically limited to a few small microscopic foci. Despite the morphologic overlap, some distinct clinical and pathologic features should raise the possibility of a metastatic low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm on frozen section: bilateral ovarian involvement; associated pseudomyxoma peritonei; numerous large, confluent foci of pseudomyxoma ovarii; scalloped glands lined by tall, columnar tumor cells; and presence of subepithelial clefts. (11) However, teratoma-associated primary ovarian mucinous tumors represent a unique exception, as they may have identical morphology and associated pseudomyxoma peritonei. (12-14) Thorough gross examination and sampling can help identify a background dermoid cyst. Communication with the clinical team is essential in gathering information regarding potential bilaterality, pseudomyxoma peritonei, and gross appearance of the appendix. The intraoperative findings in the appendix may be subtle, and many surgeons opt to perform appendectomy if the frozen section shows a mucinous neoplasm, whether benign, borderline, or overtly malignant, in the ovary, even if the appendix appears grossly unremarkable. (15-17)
Pancreatobiliary carcinomas metastatic to the ovary are relatively uncommon, presenting at a mean age of 58 to 59 years, and pose a unique diagnostic challenge on frozen section by having deceptively bland cytologic features, referred to as maturation phenomenon. (18-20) Most cases (>80%) are bilateral, with a mean size of 10 cm. Gross examination of the ovary shows a tan-pink, multiloculated, cystic cut surface, and frozen sections typically demonstrate multiple irregular, variably sized cystic spaces within the ovarian stroma, lined by relatively bland, low columnar epithelium. Most of the tumor may lack significant nuclear atypia or mitotic activity (Figure 5), mimicking an ovarian mucinous cystadenoma or borderline mucinous tumor, especially when the sampling is limited to a few blocks on frozen section. (21,22) However, careful microscopic examination on medium and high magnification helps reveal scattered foci of infiltrating tumor cells forming small clusters and glandular structures in loose, edematous, myxoid stroma. In addition to obtaining information about the clinical history and the surgeon's intraoperative findings, adequate sampling is critical to identify small infiltrative tumor cell nests with desmoplastic stromal reaction and increased nuclear atypia.
Similar to appendiceal and pancreatobiliary primaries, mucinous carcinomas from other primary sites--colon, rectum, stomach, breast, and endocervix--may also spread to the ovary, and are more common than primary ovarian mucinous carcinomas. Metastatic mucinous carcinomas tend to be small (mean diameter of 8 cm) and bilateral, in comparison with primary ovarian mucinous borderline tumors and carcinomas (mean diameter of 18-20 cm). (23) Lee and Young (19) thoroughly evaluated the gross and microscopic features of 50 mucinous carcinomas, 25 primary ovarian and 25 metastatic from pancreas, colon, cervix, and appendix, and found that all primary ovarian carcinomas were unilateral and 88% of them exceeded 10 cm in size. Conversely, 75% of metastatic tumors were bilateral and approximately half of them measured less than 10 cm. Using the 10-cm gross tumor size cutoff and laterality, Seidman et al (24) proposed a simple algorithm designating unilateral mucinous tumors 10 cm or larger as primary ovarian, and all other tumors (bilateral tumors of any size and unilateral tumors <10 cm) as metastatic. After excluding tumors with signet-ring cell features and microinvasion, this approach correctly classified 83% of cases as primary or metastatic. A follow-up study by Yemelyanova et al (25) recommended a modified algorithm to improve the performance by adjusting the tumor size cutoff to 12 or 13 cm. Using a 12-cm cutoff, 100% of primary tumors and 80% of metastases were correctly classified (86% overall), whereas a 13-cm cutoff maintained correct classification for 98% of primary tumors and increased it to 82% of metastases (87% overall). However, it is important to note that metastases from colorectal, endocervical, and appendiceal primaries not uncommonly present an exception to this rule, and may form a large, unilateral ovarian mass. (19,24-26)
The microscopic features in favor of metastatic mucinous carcinoma include ovarian surface and/or hilus involvement, lymphovascular invasion, multinodularity, a predominant infiltrative growth pattern, and single-cell infiltration (Table 1). Primary ovarian mucinous carcinomas may also show focal infiltrative growth with stromal desmoplastic reaction; however, a confluent, expansile growth pattern is more common in these tumors (Figure 6, A and B). Signet ring cells may be present in metastases, especially from gastric, colorectal, breast, and appendiceal primaries, but may also be rarely seen in teratoma-associated primary mucinous carcinomas of the ovary. (14)
Although many of the above-described general gross and microscopic characteristics of metastatic mucinous carcinomas also apply for colorectal and endocervical primaries, they have some unique features warranting additional discussion. Metastases from colorectal primaries represent the most common type of ovarian metastasis, and hence they are frequently encountered on frozen section. The ovarian metastasis may precede the diagnosis of the primary, and in these cases the patients tend to be younger than those with a known colorectal primary. (27) Unlike most other metastatic mucinous carcinomas, nearly half of colorectal metastases are unilateral, and the tumor size exceeds 10 cm in approximately one-quarter of cases. (25) In addition to mimicking a primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma, the differential diagnosis also includes endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EAC) of the ovary and Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor (SLCT) with heterologous elements (Table 2). Metastatic colorectal carcinomas form variably sized, irregular glands, which often contain intraluminal "dirty" necrotic debris--eosinophilic necrotic material with karyorrhectic nuclei (Figure 7, A through D). Cribriform glandular and garland patterns are also common. Destructive infiltrative growth with desmoplastic stromal reaction is present at least focally, and single-cell tumor invasion may also be seen. The tumor cell nuclei show moderate to marked atypia and a variable amount of cytoplasm with scattered mucin-filled goblet cells. Squamous differentiation, a distinctive feature of EAC, is notably absent. During frozen section evaluation, if the possibility of a colorectal primary is suspected, the findings should be communicated to the surgeon, and intraoperative survey of the gastrointestinal tract, intestines, and liver surface should be recommended.
Metastatic endocervical adenocarcinoma of the ovary often presents as a large (mean size, 12.7 cm), unilateral, cystic mass with an intraluminal, expansile tumor growth, simulating a mucinous borderline tumor. (26) The endocervical primary may be small and may lack unequivocal stromal invasion. The tumor forms confluent glandular, cribriform, or villoglandular architectural patterns, the latter with characteristic sharply angulated tips. Careful attention should be paid to identify the most helpful diagnostic features: columnar cells with nuclear crowding, stratification, basal apoptotic bodies, and apical mitotic figures (Figure 8, A through D). Gross and microscopic examination of the uterine cervix at the time of frozen section may be helpful. The immediate clinical impact of the frozen section diagnosis on the surgical staging may depend on the individual case and should be discussed with the surgeon intraoperatively. The staging procedure for ovarian primaries, including borderline tumors, typically includes omentectomy, whereas omentectomy is not performed for endocervical primaries.
SEROUS TUMORS--PROPHYLACTIC SALPINGO-OOPHORECTOMY SPECIMENS
Prophylactic/risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy is an increasingly common procedure in women at genetic risk for ovarian/fallopian tube cancer. The risk of ovarian cancer is estimated to be as high as 46% for BRCA1 and 27% for BRCA2 mutation carriers. (28,29) The rate of occult malignancy in risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy specimens ranges between 5% and 10%, including both in situ and invasive lesions, in most prior studies. (30-33) Intraoperative evaluation of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy specimens in highrisk patients offers a unique opportunity to identify clinically undetected malignancies, allowing for immediate surgical staging, and helps avoid a second surgery. However, it presents several challenges and potential diagnostic pitfalls. Preoperative imaging may be misleading, as it may not correctly identify the origin, uterine/myometrial versus adnexal, of a pelvic mass (Figure 9, A). In addition, a large proportion of patients in this setting have a prior clinical history of breast cancer, and the high index of suspicion for metastatic breast carcinoma may result in favoring a metastasis over an ovarian primary when a morphologically challenging or unexpected neoplasm is encountered on frozen section.
A recent study by Wong et al (34) evaluated the frozen section sampling and diagnostic practices in patients undergoing prophylactic surgery for hereditary gynecologic cancer syndromes and reported a 5.4% incidence of occult malignancy (including 8 high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas, 3 serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas, and 1 adult granulosa cell tumor) among 222 BRCA1/2 patients. None of the patients in this group had ovarian metastases from breast cancer; however, nearly 2% of patients with a strong family and/or personal history of breast/ovarian cancer and no known BRCA1/2 mutations harbored occult metastatic breast cancer involving both ovaries. (34) Rabban et al (31) evaluated 108 risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy specimens from BRCA1/2 patients, nearly 70% of whom had a personal history of breast cancer, and found 1 patient (1%) with metastatic breast cancer. Ovarian metastases from breast cancer are typically bilateral and small (<5 cm), and, despite the higher frequency of ovarian involvement among lobular carcinomas, they most often show ductal phenotype because of the significantly higher overall incidence of invasive ductal carcinoma. (35) Metastatic ductal carcinomas may have solid, micropapillary, cribriform, or glandular patterns, whereas lobular carcinomas show single cells, haphazardly or in linear cords, and may also have signet ring cell features. In most cases the breast cancer diagnosis precedes the ovarian metastasis; the median time from the breast cancer diagnosis is 5 years. (36) It is interesting to note that purely from a statistical standpoint, a new adnexal mass in a breast cancer patient has been found to be 3 times more likely to be an ovarian primary. (37)
High-grade serous carcinoma associated with BRCA mutations has been described to show characteristic solid, pseudoendometrioid, and transitional cell carcinoma-like morphologic features, (38) which may overlap with a cribriform pattern of a metastatic ductal breast carcinoma, further complicating the frozen section evaluation (Figure 9, B through D). In addition, BRCA1 -associated tumors were also found to have a higher mitotic index, geographic or comedo necrosis, and an increased number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes compared with non-BRCA-associated tumors. Other tumor types with a cribriform pattern--EAC, adult granulosa cell tumor, and carcinoid tumor--should also be considered in the differential diagnosis (Table 3). Metastatic tumors from other sites, although less common, may also mimic an ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma, and pose a diagnostic challenge at the time of frozen section (Figure 10, A and B). Thorough review of the patient's clinical history and morphologic comparison with the primary tumor are crucial to avoid a potential pitfall. When in doubt, a conservative approach is generally more favorable, and diagnostic uncertainty should be communicated to the surgeon to avoid an unnecessary extensive staging surgery.
ENDOMETRIOID TUMORS--PITFALLS AND MIMICS
Endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the ovary may show overlapping morphologic features, especially on frozen sections, with several other tumor types, including metastatic colorectal and breast carcinomas and BRCA-associated high-grade serous carcinomas, which have been discussed in detail above. Additionally, a rare histologic variant, sertoliform EAC, further broadens the differential diagnosis of this entity.
Sertoliform EAC typically presents at a mean age of 60 years and may be bilateral in up to 17% of cases. (39,40) Intraoperative gross examination shows a multilobulated, solid, tan-yellow, focally hemorrhagic cut surface (Figure 11, A), and frozen sections reveal relatively uniform, small tumor cells forming tubular glandular structures and cords in a prominent fibromatous stroma (Figure 11, B through D). The tumor cells have mild to moderate nuclear pleomorphism with small nucleoli, abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, and low mitotic activity. Dense eosinophilic material is often present in the lumen of the tubular structures.
The main differential diagnosis of sertoliform EAC is SLCT, a rare ovarian sex cord-stromal tumor, accounting for less than 0.5% of all ovarian tumors. Unlike sertoliform EAC, SLCT is unilateral in more than 98% of cases, and it typically occurs in patients younger than 30 years, although it may also occur after menopause. (41,42) More than half of the patients experience androgenic hormonal manifestations: hirsutism, clitoromegaly, and amenorrhea. The histomorphologic features, biological behavior, and clinical implications of SLCT vary greatly depending on the tumor grade. Well-differentiated SLCTs are benign and are typically easily recognizable by the presence of open Sertoli cell tubules and admixed clusters of Leydig cells in the intervening stroma (Figure 12, A). Intermediate-grade tumors are characterized by diffuse sheets or thin cords of Sertoli cells, admixed with fewer clusters of Leydig cells, compared with well-differentiated SLCTs (Figure 12, B). Poorly differentiated SLCT is composed of diffuse sheets of immature, sarcomatoid Sertoli cells and rare Leydig cell clusters, primarily around the periphery of the tumor (Figure 12, C). Approximately 20% of SLCTs contain heterologous, most often intestinal or gastric-type mucinous epithelial, elements (Figure 12, D), and rare cases show a retiform pattern. Malignant clinical behavior has been reported in 11% of intermediate-grade and in up to 59% of poorly differentiated SLCT. (41,43-45) The presence of heterologous elements and retiform pattern also indicate adverse prognosis. Recognition of Leydig cells on frozen sections can greatly aid the diagnosis, especially in intermediate and poorly differentiated tumors. Leydig cells have round nuclei and abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, containing lipofuscin pigment and Reinke crystals, which are often better preserved on frozen section slides, compared with the formalin-fixed permanent tissue sections (Figure 12, A).
The differential diagnosis of sertoliform EAC should also include Krukenberg tumor, which is often bilateral, may show a predominant tubular pattern, and may also be associated with stromal hormone production, mimicking sertoliform EAC or even SLCT (46,47) (Table 4 and Figure 13, A and B). Struma ovarii with a microfollicular pattern may potentially be difficult to distinguish from EAC of the ovary, especially on frozen section. However, absence of nuclear atypia, intraluminal colloid material, and recognition of calcium oxalate crystals usually resolve the diagnostic uncertainty.
The immediate clinical implication of frozen section diagnosis depends on the grade of the SLCT considered in the differential diagnosis and the patient's age and desire for future fertility. In older patients complete surgical staging is performed for both SLCT (moderately or poorly differentiated) and sertoliform EAC. However, conservative fertility-sparing surgery may be an option for younger patients with stage I SLCT. (43-45)
CLEAR CELL TUMORS
The wide spectrum of morphologic changes and patterns of endometriosis-associated lesions presents yet another challenge on frozen section. Atypical endometriosis, cytologic and/or architectural atypia (similar to that seen in atypical hyperplasia of eutopic endometrium) within an endometriotic cyst, may appear worrisome microscopically; however, by itself, it has been shown to have a benign clinical course and does not require extensive surgery. (48) On the other hand, if atypical endometriosis is identified on frozen section slides, the gross appearance of the ovary should be carefully reviewed to assure the absence of intracystic papillary projections or a solid mass. Any suspicious intraluminal growth should be sampled for frozen section evaluation to rule out the possibility of clear cell carcinoma (Figure 14, A through D).
The strong association between clear cell carcinoma and endometriosis has been well documented in the literature. (49-52) More recently, endometriosis with cytologic atypia has been proposed to be a precursor lesion, based on identical molecular and immunohistochemical alterations, loss of ARID1A and PIK3CA mutations, between clear cell carcinoma and the immediately adjacent foci of atypical endometriosis. (53-55) Interestingly, another endometriosis-associated ovarian tumor, seromucinous/Mullerian-type mucinous borderline tumor, may also mimic clear cell carcinoma, and rarely the 2 tumors may be admixed within the same cystic lesion, further complicating the frozen section interpretation (Figure 15, A through D). Seromucinous/Mullerian-type mucinous borderline tumor typically shows an admixture of Mullerian-type epithelia in variable proportions: mucinous (endocervical-type), serous, eosinophilic, and endometrioid cell types arranged in hierarchical branching papillae. The papillary architecture, tufting, and pale cytoplasm of mucinous cells may resemble the features of clear cell carcinoma; however, only mild nuclear atypia is seen in seromucinous/Mullerian-type mucinous borderline tumor, whereas marked nuclear atypia is present, at least focally, in clear cell carcinoma (Table 5).
Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary may occur in patients in their third to seventh decade, with a mean age of 50 to 55 years. (56) The clinical presentation most often includes a pelvic mass and pain, and rarely paraneoplastic syndromes, that is, thromboembolic events and hypercalcemia. (57,58) The tumor is most often unilateral, with a mean size of 15 cm and shows either a solid, heterogeneous cut surface with foci of hemorrhage and necrosis or a predominantly cystic structure with intraluminal solid growth. Microscopically, various architectural patterns may be observed within the same tumor, including tubulo-cystic, solid, and papillary growth with characteristic hyalinized fibrovascular cores. The degree of nuclear atypia may also vary greatly among different areas of the same tumor. Marked nuclear atypia, often with prominent nucleoli, is a hallmark of clear cell carcinoma, although borderline or benign-appearing adenofibromatous areas may also be present and may have deceptively bland nuclear features (Figure 16, A through D). If such an area is encountered on frozen section, additional blocks should be sampled to rule out clear cell carcinoma, keeping in mind that benign and borderline clear cell ovarian tumors are exceedingly rare. (59,60) Presence of abundant clear or eosinophilic cytoplasm is a helpful feature on permanent sections; however, cytoplasmic clearing may be difficult to appreciate intraoperatively on frozen sections. Other entities with clear cytoplasm to consider in the differential diagnosis, especially in young patients, include yolk sac tumor and dysgerminoma (Table 5). Although malignant germ cell tumors may be treated with fertility-preserving surgery, the potential role of fertility-sparing surgery in the management of young patients with clear cell carcinoma is more controversial. (61,62) Distinction between clear cell carcinoma and other histologic subtypes of ovarian high-grade carcinomas, that is, serous and endometrioid, is typically not crucial on frozen sections, as long as the Mullerian/primary ovarian origin is confirmed and communicated to the surgeon.
Frozen section diagnosis of ovarian epithelial tumors continues to rely on 3 traditional elements: the patient's clinical history, gross examination, and microscopic interpretation. Awareness of the wide range of morphologic patterns and recognition of clinicopathologic diagnostic clues help distinguish among the large number of mimics for each entity. Understanding the detailed clinical context in each case can facilitate the discussion between the surgeon and pathologist and appropriately guide intraoperative patient management.
(1.) Boriboonhirunsarn D, Sermboon A. Accuracy of frozen section in the diagnosis ofmalignant ovarian tumor. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004;30(5):394-399.
(2.) Stewart CJ, Brennan BA, Hammond IG, Leung YC, McCartney AJ. Intraoperative assessment of ovarian tumors: a 5-year review with assessment of discrepant diagnostic cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2006;25(3):216-222.
(3.) Obiakor I, Maiman M, Mittal K, Awobuluyi M, DiMaio T, Demopoulos R. The accuracy of frozen section in the diagnosis of ovarian neoplasms. Gynecol Oncol. 1991;43(1):61-63.
(4.) Medeiros LR, Rosa DD, Edelweiss MI, et al. Accuracy of frozen-section analysis in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors: a systematic quantitative review. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15(2):192-202.
(5.) Acs G. Intraoperative consultation in gynecologic pathology. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2002;19(4):237-254.
(6.) Houck K, Nikrui N, Duska L, et al. Borderline tumors of the ovary: correlation of frozen and permanent histopathologic diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2000,'95(6, pt 1):839-843.
(7.) Ulbright TM, Roth LM, Stehman FB. Secondary ovarian neoplasia: a clinicopathologic study of 35 cases. Cancer. 1984;53(5):1164-1174.
(8.) de Waal YR, Thomas CM, Oei AL, Sweep FC, Massuger LF. Secondary ovarian malignancies: frequency, origin, and characteristics. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19(7):1160-1165.
(9.) Young RH, Gilks CB, Scully RE. Mucinous tumors of the appendix associated with mucinous tumors of the ovary and pseudomyxoma peritonei: a clinicopathological analysis of 22 cases supporting an origin in the appendix. Am J Surg Pathol. 1991;15(5):415-429.
(10.) Seidman JD, Elsayed AM, Sobin LH, Tavassoli FA. Association of mucinous tumors of the ovary and appendix: a clinicopathologic study of 25 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993;17(1):22-34.
(11.) Stewart CJ, Ardakani NM, Doherty DA, Young RH. An evaluation of the morphologic features of low-grade mucinous neoplasms of the appendix metastatic in the ovary, and comparison with primary ovarian mucinous tumors. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2014;33(1):1-10.
(12.) McKenney JK, Soslow RA, Longacre TA. Ovarian mature teratomas with mucinous epithelial neoplasms: morphologic heterogeneity and association with pseudomyxoma peritonei. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(5):645-655.
(13.) Ronnett BM, Seidman J D. Mucinous tumors arising in ovarian mature cystic teratomas: relationship to the clinical syndrome of pseudomyxoma peritonei. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27(5):650-657.
(14.) Vang R, Gown AM, Zhao C, et al. Ovarian mucinous tumors associated with mature cystic teratomas: morphologic and immunohistochemical analysis identifies a subset of potential teratomatous origin that shares features of lower gastrointestinal tract mucinous tumors more commonly encountered as secondary tumors in the ovary. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(6):854-869.
(15.) Moore L, Gajjar K, Jimenez-Linan M, Crawford R. Prevalence of appendiceal lesions in appendicectomies performed during surgery for mucinous ovarian tumors: a retrospective study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016;26(8):1386-1389.
(16.) Lin JE, Seo S, Kushner DM, Rose SL. The role of appendectomy for mucinous ovarian neoplasms. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(1):46.e1-46.e4.
(17.) Rosendahl M, Haueberg Oester LA, Hogdall CK. The importance of appendectomy in surgery for mucinous adenocarcinoma of the ovary. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017;27(3):430-436.
(18.) McCluggage WG, Wilkinson N. Metastatic neoplasms involving the ovary: a review with an emphasis on morphological and immunohistochemical features. Histopathology. 2005;47(3):231-247.
(19.) Lee KR, Young RH. The distinction between primary and metastatic mucinous carcinomas of the ovary: gross and histologic findings in 50 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27(3):281-292.
(20.) Young RH, Scully RE. Differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors based primarily on their patterns and cell types. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2001;18(3):161-235.
(21.) Meriden Z, Yemelyanova AV, Vang R, Ronnett BM. Ovarian metastases of pancreaticobiliary tract adenocarcinomas: analysis of 35 cases, with emphasis on the ability of metastases to simulate primary ovarian mucinous tumors. Am JSurg Pathol. 2011;35(2):276-288.
(22.) Young RH, Hart WR. Metastases from carcinomas of the pancreas simulating primary mucinous tumors of the ovary: a report of seven cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1989;13(9):748-756.
(23.) Riopel MA, Ronnett BM, Kurman RJ. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria and behavior of ovarian intestinal-type mucinous tumors: atypical proliferative (borderline) tumors and intraepithelial, microinvasive, invasive, and metastatic carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999;23(6):617-635.
(24.) Seidman JD, Kurman RJ, Ronnett BM. Primary and metastatic mucinous adenocarcinomas in the ovaries: incidence in routine practice with a new approach to improve intraoperative diagnosis. Am J SurgPathol. 2003;27(7):985-993.
(25.) Yemelyanova AV, Vang R, Judson K, Wu LS, Ronnett BM. Distinction of primaryand metastatic mucinous tumors involving the ovary: analysis of size and laterality data by primary site with reevaluation of an algorithm for tumor classification. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(1):128-138.
(26.) Ronnett BM, Yemelyanova AV, Vang R, et al. Endocervical adenocarcinomas with ovarian metastases: analysis of 29 cases with emphasis on minimally invasive cervical tumors and the ability of the metastases to simulate primary ovarian neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(12):1835-1853.
(27.) Judson K, McCormick C, Vang R, et al. Women with undiagnosed colorectal adenocarcinomas presenting with ovarian metastases: clinicopathologic features and comparison with women having known colorectal adenocarcinomas and ovarian involvement. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2008;27(2):182-190.
(28.) King MC, Marks JH, Mandell JB; New York Breast Cancer Study Group. Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science. 2003;302(5645):643-646.
(29.) Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(5):1117-1130.
(30.) Rabban JT, Krasik E, Chen LM, Powell CB, Crawford B, Zaloudek CJ. Multistep level sections to detect occult fallopian tube carcinoma in risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomies from women with BRCA mutations: implications for defining an optimal specimen dissection protocol. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(12): 1878-1885.
(31.) Rabban JT, Barnes M, Chen LM, Powell CB, Crawford B, Zaloudek CJ. Ovarian pathology in risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomies from women with BRCA mutations, emphasizing the differential diagnosis of occult primary and metastatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(8):1125-1136.
(32.) Finch A, Shaw P, Rosen B, Murphy J, Narod SA, Colgan TJ. Clinical and pathologic findings of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomies in 159 BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;100(1):58-64.
(33.) Powell CB, Chen LM, McLennan J, et al. Risk-reducing salpingooophorectomy (RRSO) in BRCA mutation carriers: experience with a consecutive series of 111 patients using a standardized surgical-pathological protocol. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 ;21(5):846-851.
(34.) Wong S, Ratner E, Buza N. Intra-operative evaluation of prophylactic hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy specimens in hereditary gynaecological cancer syndromes. Histopathology. 2018;73(1):109-123.
(35.) Arpino G, Bardou VJ, Clark GM, Elledge RM. Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: tumor characteristics and clinical outcome. Breast Cancer Res. 2004;6(3):R149-R156.
(36.) Bigorie V, Morice P, Duvillard P, et al. Ovarian metastases from breast cancer: report of 29 cases. Cancer. 2010;116(4):799-804.
(37.) Curtin JP, Barakat RR, Hoskins WJ. Ovarian disease in women with breast cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84(3):449-452.
(38.) Soslow RA, Han G, Park KJ, et al. Morphologic patterns associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 genotype in ovarian carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2012;25(4): 625-636.
(39.) Young RH, Prat J, Scully RE. Ovarian endometrioid carcinomas resembling sex cord-stromal tumors: a clinicopathological analysis of 13 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1982;6(6):513-522.
(40.) Misir A, Sur M. Sertoliform endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary: a potential diagnostic pitfall. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131(6):979-981.
(41.) Young RH, Scully RE. Ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors: a clinicopathological analysis of 207 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1985;9(8):543-569.
(42.) Gressel GM, Buza N, Pal L. Ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors: a single institution experience and review of the literature. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2017; 38(2):214-220.
(43.) Bhat RA, Lim YK, Chia YN, Yam KL. Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor of the ovary: analysis of a single institution database. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013;39(1):305-310.
(44.) Sigismondi C, Gadducci A, Lorusso D, et al. Ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors: a retrospective MITO study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125(3):673-676.
(45.) Gui T, Cao D, Shen K, et al. A clinicopathological analysis of 40 cases of ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;127(2):384-389.
(46.) Bullon A Jr, Arseneau J, Prat J, Young RH, Scully RE. Tubular Krukenberg tumor: a problem in histopathologic diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 1981;5(3):225-232.
(47.) Young RH. From Krukenberg to today: the ever present problems posed by metastatic tumors in the ovary, part I: historical perspective, general principles, mucinous tumors including the Krukenberg tumor. Adv Anat Pathol. 2006;13(5): 205-227.
(48.) Seidman JD. Prognostic importance of hyperplasia and atypia in endometriosis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1996;15(1):1-9.
(49.) Matias-Guiu X, Stewart CJR. Endometriosis-associated ovarian neoplasia. Pathology. 2018;50(2):190-204.
(50.) Orezzoli JP, Russell AH, Oliva E, Del Carmen MG, Eichhorn J, Fuller AF. Prognostic implication of endometriosis in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;110(3):336-344.
(51.) Fukunaga M, Nomura K, Ishikawa E, Ushigome S. Ovarian atypical endometriosis: its close association with malignant epithelial tumours. Histopathology. 1997;30(3):249-255.
(52.) Ogawa S, Kaku T, Amada S, et al. Ovarian endometriosis associated with ovarian carcinoma: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;77(2):298-304.
(53.) Yamamoto S, Tsuda H, Takano M, Tamai S, Matsubara O. Loss of ARID1A protein expression occurs as an early event in ovarian clear-cell carcinoma development and frequently coexists with PIK3CA mutations. Mod Pathol. 2012; 25(4):615-624.
(54.) Ayhan A, Mao TL, Seckin T, et al. Loss of ARID1A expression is an early molecular event in tumor progression from ovarian endometriotic cyst to clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012;22(8):1310-1315.
(55.) Stamp JP, Gilks CB, Wesseling M, et al. BAF250a expression in atypical endometriosis and endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016;26(5):825-832.
(56.) Chan JK, Teoh D, Hu JM, Shin JY, Osann K, Kapp DS. Do clear cell ovarian carcinomas have poorer prognosis compared to other epithelial cell types?: a study of 1411 clear cell ovarian cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109(3):370-376.
(57.) Matsuura Y, Robertson G, Marsden DE, Kim SN, Gebski V, Hacker NF. Thromboembolic complications in patients with clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;104(2):406-410.
(58.) Savvari P, Peitsidis P, Alevizaki M, Dimopoulos MA, Antsaklis A, Papadimitriou CA. Paraneoplastic humorally mediated hypercalcemia induced by parathyroid hormone-related protein in gynecologic malignancies: a systematic review. Onkologie. 2009;32(8-9):517-523.
(59.) Bell DA, Scully RE. Benign and borderline clear cell adenofibromas of the ovary. Cancer. 1985;56(12):2922-2931.
(60.) Roth LM, Langley FA, Fox H, WheelerJE, Czernobilsky B. Ovarian clear cell adenofibromatous tumors: benign, of low malignant potential, and associated with invasive clear cell carcinoma. Cancer. 1984;53(5):1156-1163.
(61.) Kajiyama H, Shibata K, Mizuno M, et al. Fertility-sparing surgery in patients with clear-cell carcinoma of the ovary: is it possible? Hum Reprod. 2011;26(12): 3297-3302.
(62.) Kajiyama H, Shibata K, Suzuki S, et al. Is there any possibility of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with clear-cell carcinoma of the ovary? Cynecol Oncol. 2008;111(3):523-526.
Natalia Buza, MD
Accepted for publication July 5, 2018.
From the Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
The author has no relevant financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.
Presented at the 4th Princeton Integrated Pathology Symposium; April 23, 2017;Plainsboro, New Jersey.
Corresponding author: Natalia Buza, MD, Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 208023, 310 Cedar St, LH108, New Haven, CT 06520-8023 (email: natalia.buza@yale. edu).
Caption: Figure 1. Cut surface of serous cystadenofibroma (A) shows scattered firm intracystic papillary projections (arrows). Serous borderline tumor (B) with numerous friable intraluminal papillary projections on cut surface. High-grade serous carcinoma may be partially cystic with intraluminal growth (C) or solid with a fleshy, heterogeneous cut surface (D).
Caption: Figure 2. Metastatic low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm involving the ovary. Cross examination showed an 8 X 6 X 4-cm ovarian mass with multiloculated, cystic cut surface filled with abundant mucinous material (A). Frozen sections revealed abundant paucicellular mucin pools with rare strips of bland mucinous epithelium (B), pseudomyxoma ovarii, and subepithelial clefts (C). The tumor cells are tall and columnar, displaying small, relatively uniform nuclei and abundant mucinous cytoplasm with occasional goblet cells (D) (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications X20 [B], X100 [C], and X200 [D]).
Caption: Figure 3. Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm. Cross examination shows a 3-cm cystic, mucin-filled mass at the appendiceal tip (A) and frozen sections reveal paucicellular mucin pools with bland mucinous epithelium, similar to that seen in the ovary, with fibrosis and calcifications (B) (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification X40 [B]).
Caption: Figure 4. Gastrointestinal-type mucinous cystadenoma of the ovary with gastric foveolar-type (A) or intestinal-type (B) epithelial lining lacks epithelial proliferation and significant nuclear atypia. Mucinous borderline tumor (intestinal type) shows atypical epithelial proliferation forming complex glandular structures or filiform papillae with invaginations into the ovarian stroma (C and D) (frozen sections, hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications X200 [A and D] and X100 [B and C]).
Caption: Figure 5. Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma involving the ovary. Low magnification shows variably sized cystic spaces, mimicking a benign or borderline ovarian mucinous tumor (A). The tumor cells have relatively bland and uniform nuclei (maturation phenomenon) and variable amount of mucinous cytoplasm (B through D). Rare foci of infiltrative invasion with stromal desmoplastic response (arrows) provide helpful diagnostic clues (frozen sections, hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications X20 [A], X100 [B and C], and X200 [D]).
Caption: Figure 6. Primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma most often shows an expansile growth pattern with confluent glandular proliferation (A and B) (frozen sections, hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications X40 [A] and X100 [B]).
Caption: Figure 7. Metastatic colorectal carcinoma forms variably sized, irregular, often cribriform or garlandlike glands, containing intraluminal "dirty" necrotic debris-eosinophilic necrotic material with karyorrhectic nuclei (A and B). Infiltrative growth with desmoplastic stromal reaction and single-cell tumor invasion is commonly seen (C and D). The tumor cell nuclei show moderate to marked atypia (D) (frozen sections, hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications X100 [A], X200 [B and C], and X400 [D]).
Caption: Figure 8. Metastatic endocervical adenocarcinoma, usual type, presenting as a cystic ovarian mass with an intraluminal expansile proliferation (A and B), mimicking an ovarian borderline tumor. The tumor cells form sharply angulated villoglandular structures (C, arrow). The nuclei are hyperchromatic and crowded, with characteristic apical mitoses (D, arrow) and basal karyorrhectic debris (D, arrowhead) (frozen sections, hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications X40 [A], X100 [B], X200 [C], and X400 [D]).
Caption: Figure 9. High-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary with solid, pseudoendometrioid, and transitional cell carcinoma-like features in a prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy specimen from a BRCA1 mutation carrier. Preoperative imaging showed a pelvic mass, likely representing a leiomyoma. A 6.5-cm nodular mass was identified on intraoperative gross examination, attached to the surface of the right ovary with a solid, tanyellow, fleshy cut surface (A). A predominantly cribriform architecture with relatively uniform nuclei was seen on frozen sections (B and C). Rare microscopic foci demonstrated irregular, slitlike glandular spaces, more typical of high-grade serous carcinoma (D) (frozen sections, hematoxylineosin, original magnifications X100 [B and D] and X200 [C]).
Caption: Figure 10. Metastatic lung adenocarcinoma in the ovary displaying irregular glandular spaces (A) with marked nuclear pleomorphism, hyperchromasia, prominent nucleoli, and frequent mitoses (B), mimicking primary high-grade serous carcinoma on frozen sections (hematoxylineosin, original magnifications X100 [A] and X200 [B]).
Caption: Figure 11. Sertoliform endometrioid adenocarcinoma of bilateral ovaries. Bilateral ovarian masses were sent for intraoperative evaluation, both showing similar solid, tan-yellow, focally hemorrhagic cut surfaces (A). Frozen sections showed relatively uniform, small tumor cells forming compressed tubular structures and cords in a prominent fibromatous stroma (B and C). Note the mild to moderate nuclear pleomorphism with small nucleoli and abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm (D) (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications X40 [B], X100 [C], and X400 [D]).
Caption: Figure 12. Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor (SLCT) of the ovary. Well-differentiated SLCTshows open Sertoli cell tubules admixed with abundant clusters of Leydig cells with intracytoplasmic Reinke crystals (A, arrowheads). Moderately differentiated SLCT with compressed cords of basophilic Sertoli cells and scattered eosinophilic Leydig cells (B). Poorly differentiated SLCT with diffuse sheets of immature Sertoli cells and rare Leydig cell clusters at the periphery of the tumor (C, arrows). Poorly differentiated SLCT with heterologous elements (D). Gastric-type mucinous epithelium is seen on the top of the image, surrounded by immature Sertoli cells and small clusters of Leydig cells (D, arrowheads) (frozen sections, hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications X400 [A], X200 [B], and X100 [C and D]).
Caption: Figure 13. Krukenberg tumor with a predominant tubular pattern and associated stromal hyperplasia may mimic sertoliform endometrioid adenocarcinoma or Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor on frozen sections (A). Scattered signet ring cells can be recognized on higher magnification (B) (frozen sections, hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications X100 [A] and X400 [B]).
Caption: Figure 14. Clear cell carcinoma arising in the background of atypical endometriosis. Cross examination showed a 7 X 5 X 2-cm cystic ovary with a 1.3-cm papillary intraluminal growth (A, arrow). Frozen sections revealed an endometriotic cyst with foci of marked epithelial atypia (B and C) and a small focus of clear cell carcinoma corresponding to the gross area of intracystic mass (B and D) (frozen sections, hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications X100 [B] and X200 [C and D]).
Caption: Figure 15. Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) arising in the background of seromucinous borderline tumor (SMBT). Frozen sections of a multiloculated cystic ovarian mass with a predominant SMBT component show epithelial proliferation and tufting (A). Scattered foci with increased nuclear pleomorphism and hyperchromasia are seen (B, lower portion of image). Nuclear atypia is mild and the nuclear to cytoplasmic (n:c) ratio is low in areas of SMBT (C), whereas marked nuclear atypia, high n:c ratio, and hobnailing are seen in foci of CCC within the same tumor (D) (frozen sections, hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications X100 [A and B] and X400 [C and D]).
Caption: Figure 16. Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) with deceptively benign-appearing adenofibromatous and tubulo-cystic areas. Variably sized cystic or tubulo-cystic glands with hobnailing and minimal cytologic atypia (A and B, right side of image) may be admixed with typical CCC (B, left side of image). The degree of nuclear atypia can vary significantly within the tumor (C): note the gland in the center with nuclear enlargement and prominent nucleoli, surrounded by cytologically bland glands. Other areas of the same tumor showed characteristic, easily recognizable marked nuclear atypia (D) (frozen sections, hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications X100 [A and B] and X200 [C and D]).
Table 1. Gross and Microscopic Features of Primary and Metastatic Mucinous Carcinomas of the Ovary Primary Metastatic Bilaterality Rare Common (a) Size <10 cm Rare Common (a) Surface involvement Rare Common Lymphovascular invasion Rare Common Hilus involvement Rare Common Growth pattern Predominantly Infiltrative expansile Multinodularity Rare Common Single-cell infiltration Rare May be present Signet ring cells Rare (in teratoma- May be present associated tumors) (a) Most common exceptions: colorectal, endocervical, and appendiceal (low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm) primaries. Table 2. Differential Diagnosis of Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma Metastatic Colorectal Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma Adenocarcinoma Age Older than the fifth Fifth-sixth decade decade (median 68 y) (mean 58 y) Bilaterality Common, ~50%-60% Up to 17% of cases of cases Mean tumor Usually <10-12 15 size, cm Clinical Symptoms associated Asymptomatic or symptoms with colonic primary, pelvic mass/pain less commonly pelvic mass/pain Squamous Absent Common differentiation Mucinous Common (with Uncommon differentiation goblet cells) (no goblet cells) Necrosis Common (intraluminal Common dirty necrosis) Sertoli-Leydig Cell Tumor Age Commonly in young patients (mean 25-30 y) Bilaterality Very rare Mean tumor 12-14 size, cm Clinical Hormonal manifestations symptoms common (androgenic > estrogenic) Squamous Absent differentiation Mucinous Rare (gastric- or differentiation intestinal-type heterologous elements) Necrosis May be seen (in poorly differentiated tumors) Table 3. Differential Diagnosis of Ovarian Tumors With Cribriform Architecture High-Grade Serous Metastatic Endometrioid Carcinoma (BRCA Breast Adenocarcinoma Associated With Carcinoma SET Features) Age 50-60 y (younger 50-70 y Fifth-sixth for BRCA- decade associated (mean 58 y) tumors) Bilaterality Common Common Up to 1 7% Mean tumor Variable, <1-20 Usually <5 15 size, cm Clinical Asymptomatic/ Asymptomatic/ Asymptomatic symptoms pelvic mass, rarely pelvic or pelvic pain bloating mass mass/pain Nuclear Marked atypia Moderate to Variable features with prominent marked atypia nuclear nucleoli; (IDC) or atypia; no multinucleated, uniform small grooves bizarre cells nuclei (ILC) may be seen Cytoplasmic Vacuolization Intracytoplasmic Moderate and other may be present; lumens to abundant features psammomatous with "targetoid" cytoplasm; may calcifications secretions or show squamous signet ringlike and mucinous cells (ILC) differentiation Necrosis Common May be seen Common (IDC) Adult Granulosa Cell Carcinoid Tumor Tumor(Primary) Age Most often 14-79 y (mean 53 y) postmenopausal (mean 50-55 y) Bilaterality Very rare Very rare (suspect metastasis if bilateral) Mean tumor 10-12 Variable size, cm Clinical Pelvic mass/pain; May be incidental; symptoms hormonal (estrogenic > one-third of patients androgenic) have carcinoid syndrome manifestations Nuclear Most often uniform, pale Uniform, small, round features nuclei with membrane nuclei with finely folds and grooves stippled chromatin Cytoplasmic Little cytoplasm, cell Moderate amount of and other membrane not well cytoplasm; may show features defined (except mucinous differentiation luteinized tumors) (goblet cell carcinoid) Necrosis May be seen Absent Abbreviations: IDC, invasive ductal carcinoma; ILC, invasive lobular carcinoma; SET, solid, pseudoendometrioid, and transitional cell carcinoma-like. Table 4. Differential Diagnosis of Ovarian Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma With a Sertoliform Pattern Endometrioid Metastatic Signet Ring Cell Adenocarcinoma Carcinoma (Tubular Krukenberg Tumor) Age Fifth-sixth decade Older than the fifth decade (mean 58 y) (median 68 y) Bilaterality Up to 1 7% of cases Common, ~60% of cases Mean tumor 15 Usually <10-12 size, cm Clinical Asymptomatic or Symptoms associated with symptoms pelvic mass/ pain primary, less commonly pelvic mass/pain Squamous Common Absent differentiation Mucinous Uncommon Common (with goblet cells) differentiation (no goblet cells) Necrosis Common Common Sertoli-Leydig Cell Tumor Struma Ovarii (Microfollicular Pattern) Age Most common in young Most common during patients (mean 25-30 y) Bilaterality Very rare Rare Mean tumor 12-14 <10 size, cm Clinical Hormonal manifestations Pelvic mass/pain symptoms common (androgenic > estrogenic) Squamous Absent Absent differentiation Mucinous Rare (gastric- or Absent differentiation intestinal-type heterologous elements) Necrosis May be seen (in poorly Absent differentiated tumors) Table 5. Differential Diagnosis of Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma Clear Cell Carcinoma SMBT Age Third-seventh decade Mean 42 y (mean 50-55 y) Bilaterality Rare Common (up to 40%) Clinical Pelvic mass/pain, Pelvic mass/pain symptoms thromboembolic events, hypercalcemia Background Endometriosis Endometriosis ovary Architectural Variable: papillary, Papillary pattern tubulo-cystic, solid Nuclear atypia Variable;at least Mild focally high grade Necrosis Common Absent Yolk Sac Tumor Dysgerminoma Age Second-third decade Second-third decade (mean 16-19 y) (mean 22 y) Bilaterality Rare 10%-20% Clinical Pelvic mass/pain; increased Pelvic mass/pain; symptoms serum AFP increased serum LDH Background No specific changes Rarely gonadal ovary dysgenesis or gonadoblastoma Architectural Variable: reticular, solid, Solid pattern alveolar-glandular Nuclear atypia Moderate to marked with Uniform nuclear prominent nucleoli enlargement with prominent nucleoli Necrosis Common Common Abbreviations: AFP, a-fetoprotein; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; SMBT, seromucinous borderline tumor.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Publication:||Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine|
|Date:||Jan 1, 2019|
|Previous Article:||Cervical Adenocarcinomas: A Heterogeneous Group of Tumors With Variable Etiologies and Clinical Outcomes.|
|Next Article:||Gestational Trophoblastic Tumors: A Timely Review of Diagnostic Pathology.|