From poster presentation to publication: National Congress of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
A good amount research is planned and their data are shared with scientific environments in Turkey and around the world (I). One of the most important scientific environments is congresses held at the national level (2). In these congresses, data of recent research are reported in the form of an oral or poster presentation. Subsequently, these presentations are published in scientific journals as the natural result of the research process (2).
The desired end point of scientific research is publication of the study. For a presentation presented at a congress to be accepted as valid, reliable, and useful in clinical practice, it is believed that it must be published as a full-text article in peer-reviewed journals (3). The publication rate of presentations which are presented at a scientific congress and subsequently published in peer- reviewed journals reflects the scientific quality of studies and the congress itself (2,4). However; it is observed that many of the presentations presented at congresses in Turkey and abroad have not achieved the goal of publication, and the publication rates of presentations vary from 13% to 74% (1,2,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13). The rate of publication is generally between 40% and 50% (14). Currently, no publications on this issue in the field of child and adolescent psychiatry have been encountered.
The National Congress of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (NCCAP) has been organized regularly since 1991. The congress is one of the important platforms where new methods and practices related to the profession of child and adolescent psychiatry are discussed, professional strategies are determined, and new projects arise, thereby strengthening professional and social associations. Child and adolescent psychiatrists actively participate and present their presentations at NCCAP where an average of 40-70 poster presentations is presented per year.
Based on the poster presentations accepted at NCCAP the aim of this study was to investigate the data of publication rate, time to publication, study design, academic degree of the first author in the published article, journal index, and the relationship of these data with each other
The poster presentations of four congresses held in 2005-2008 were separately investigated in booklets of these congresses (15,16,17,18). Although no oral presentations were included at the 2005, 2006, and 2007 congresses and in the congress booklets, a total of nine oral presentations were presented at the 2008 congress and were found in the 2008 booklet (15,16,17,18). Because only one booklet with a small number of oral presentations was available, oral presentations were excluded from the study The poster presentations were searched by taking into account the first and second author and the title in English and Turkish languages via PubMed and Google Academic databases in March 2013. The databases were screened for the name of the first author If a related publication was not found, screening was continued for the name of the second author The order in which the names were entered was as follows: last name and first name and then last name and the initial of the first name. Subsequently considering their titles, the poster presentations were screened once more. During screening, publications were encountered that were similar but not identical with the poster presentations. Even though the author's name was added or removed, the publications which had the same or a similar title, study protocols, or result reviews with those in poster presentations were considered to be compatible. The type of studies (research and case), the length of time between the poster presentation and publication, the index of the journal which published the article, [Science Citation Index (SCI), Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), Science Citation Index-Expanded (SCIE), national and international peer-reviewed journals], and the academic degree (Professor Associate Professor Assistant Professor Expert, other degree) of the first author at the time of publication were recorded. The pressing date of the article in the journal was considered to be the publication date, and the first author recorded in the published article was accepted as being the first author In the study cases and series of cases in the form of presentations and publications were classified as "case," while all other presentations and publications were accepted as "research" In the study articles in SCI and SSCI journals were evaluated under the title of "SCI," and articles published in national or international peer-reviewed journals not associated with SCI, SSCI, and SCIE were evaluated under the title of "other" The term "other degree" was used to describe researchers who are research assistants or university graduate researchers without an academic degree, such as professor associate professor assistant professor and expert. Expert researchers who were employed by a university at the time of publication were recorded as "expert lecturers." During the screening, no studies published before the congress began were encountered. Because a major portion of the publications took place within 4-5 years and our study included poster presentations, the last year of our study was planned to be 2008.
The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 15.0 program (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL, USA) was used to statistically analyze the data. Data were expressed as mean [+ or -] standard deviation and as percentages. Research and case types for poster presentations, SCI/SCI-E and other journal indexes, and teaching and non-teaching staff for first author degree were used in groups of pairs for the statistical analysis. The distribution of the data was monitored by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov method. The chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables, and the Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare continuous variables. Statistical significance was accepted at the p<0.05 level.
A total of 214 poster presentations which were accepted in NCCAP were evaluated. Of the poster presentations, 65.9% (n=141) were research type and 25.2% (n=54) were published in either national or international peer-reviewed journals. Publication rates were found to be 28.4% for research type presentations and 19.2% for case type presentations. Of the published articles, 74.1% (n=40) were research type and 61.1% (n=33) were published in journals cited by SCI and SCI-E. The greatest number of poster presentations accepted (n=64) and the highest publication rate (29.7%) were determined in the 2006 congress (Table 1). First authors who wrote 23 of the published articles (42.6%) were assistant professors; 16 (69.6%) of those articles were published in journals cited by SCI and SCI-E (Table 2).
No statistical differences were determined with respect to publication rates and journal indexes (p=0.193 and p=0.501, respectively) between research and case type studies published. Research type articles within published poster presentations were published significantly more by teaching staff than by expert and other researchers (p=0.019) (Table 3). No significant difference for articles published in journals cited by SCI and SCI-E was determined between teaching staff and expert and other researchers (p=0.438) (Table 4).
The average time between poster presentation and publishing date was found 30.72 [+ or -] 18.89 (range 4-74) months (Table 5). Of the poster presentations, 48% were published within 2 years, 63% within 3 years, 77.7% within 4 years, and 94.4% within 5 years. No statistical differences for time to publication were determined between research and case type poster presentations, between teaching staff and experts and other researchers, and between articles published in journals cited by SCI or SCI-E and those published in other journals (p=0.828, p=0.368, and p=0.811, respectively) (Table 6).
Our study was the first research which examined the publication rate and time of poster presentations of a congress in the field of mental health and investigated study design, journal index, and academic degree of first authors that could be related to these results. Compared with data from national or international congresses, the publication rate of poster presentations at our congress was similar; however the time to publication was longer With respect to the time to publication, no significant difference was observed irrespective of whether the study design was a research or case type, whether the first author was a teaching staff or not, and whether the journal was cited by indexes or not.
The publication rate of the poster presentations presented at NCCAP held in the years from 2005 to 2008 was found to be 25.2% on PubMed and Google Academic databases. In the field of child and adolescent psychiatry because there has been no study conducted on this issue, our results could not be compared with the results of other congresses. When the publication rates of poster presentations at congresses in other fields of expertise were examined, the rate for international congresses were between 14% and 39% (7,9,10,11,12,19,20) and the rate for those in our country was reported to be between 1.4% and 11.9% (2,21). While the publication rate in our study was similar with the rate of international congresses, this was higher than those of congresses held in our country This situation may be explained by the distribution of the number of case and research type studies in our study being similar to those at international congresses and the fewer number of case studies at national congresses.
Although the publication rate of research poster presentations (28.4%) was higher than case poster presentations (19.2%), no differences between the two groups were found. In the literature, it is stated that the publication rates of research and case type presentations at an international congress are 52% and 5% and for national congresses are 20.6% and 9.7%, 24% and 14.6%, respectively (2,22,23). In studies evaluating the publication rates of both oral and poster presentations at international congresses, the publication rates of case presentations were determined to be 6.7% and 18%, respectively (24,25). Unlike our study publication rates of research type studies were reported to be significantly better than those of case type studies (2,26,27). While Harris et al. (28) reported, similar to our study that the study design did not affect the publication rate, Nader et al. (10) showed that observational case series studies were more likely to be published in international journals. A significant indifference in our study for the publication rates between two types of study design suggests that research and case type poster presentations have similar importance during the publication process.
Of the poster presentations that were published, 61.1% (33/54) and 65% of research type (26/40) were published in SCI and/or SCI-E journals, respectively In our country in a study of Kalyoncu et al. (23) in the field of rheumatology it was reported that except for case poster presentations, 94% of all published poster presentations appeared in indexed journals. The low rate of publication found in our study for SCI and/or SCI-E journals may be due to the smaller number of indexed journals in the field of psychiatry Our study also did not find any differences associated with whether articles published in SCI and/or SCI-E journals were research or case studies or whether the first author was a teaching staff This suggests that presentations in our study are weaker from the aspect of their scope and methodology which makes them difficult to be published in an indexed journal. In addition, it may be thought that authors may have presented their studies and were given special consideration at an international congress.
A significant number of first authors of the articles published were assistant professors and experts, and the rates of being the first author were similar between the two groups (43% and 41%, respectively). Compared to experts and other researchers, teaching staff published more research type poster presentations when they were the first authors of the studies. It may also be thought that both groups show the same motivation and desire for the study planning, writing, and publishing in indexed journals; however, the desire and enthusiasm of teaching staff to publish research type studies was more powerful. The greater number of published case studies authored by experts, research assistants, or university graduate researchers may be explained by the conditions of our country, where they play an active role in outpatient services and are more motivated to evaluate interesting cases that they encounter rather than research planning.
The average length of time between the dates of a poster presentation and its publication was found to be 30.7 months. The length of this period was not affected by whether the study was a research type or not, whether the first author was a teaching staff or not, or whether the publishing journal was indexed or not. The publication times for poster presentations in other studies were reported to be I 8.6 months, 24 months, and 36.01 months (9,12,26). They were found to be 22 months, 22.5 months, 15.4 months, and 1.3 years in other studies, including oral presentations (2,6,8,9). This publication time is generally recognized to be 17-20 months (14). The length of time for publication of poster presentations in our study was longer than those from other congresses. This difference may be attributed to a number of reasons, including rapid preparation of the poster presentation before the congress and subsequent problems that may be encountered during the publication process, heavy workloads, insufficient time for practical research, and small number of journals dedicated to child and adolescent psychiatry. Long length of time for publication is reported to be specifically associated with a lack of sufficient time and the researchers' lack of interest (7). Furthermore, submission of studies in order from high-impact factor journals to low-impact factor journals; time loss in journals to which studies are submitted; and author's insufficient level of English, which is generally the official language of journals, are additional important factors that contribute to extend the period of publication (7,10,29,30,31).
It is reported that the majority of congress presentations are generally published within 2 years, and more than 90% appear in publications within 4 years (7,14,26,32). A meta-analysis of studies showed that a vast number of studies were published within 5 years after presentation at congresses (5). In our study it was found that 48.1% of the articles were published within 2 years, 63% within 3 years, 77.7% within 4 years, and 94.4% within 5 years. No examples of a study that showed publication rate over the years of poster presentation being published were encountered. In studies which evaluated both oral and poster presentations combined, it was revealed that of published articles, 69%-82% were published within the first 2 years, 82%-9 1% within the first 3 years, 93%-97% within the first 4 years, and 91% within the first 5 years (2,11,19,25). In our study the rates for articles published each year were low according to data from these studies and seemed to reach rates of the previous studies after nearly a year This delayed time of publication may be related to the lack of oral presentations at congresses between 2005 and 2007 when it is considered that length of time to publication is shorter for oral presentations than for poster presentations according to these studies. The submission of oral presentations at our congress may contribute to increase the rate of publication as well as to shorten the time to publication (8,13,33).
Despite its many findings, our study did include some limitations. Firstly only PubMed and Google Academic databases were screened for the data. International databases such as EMBASE and Cochrane and national databases such as TUBITAK's National Medical Database and Psychiatry Index Database of The Psychiatric Association of Turkey were not utilized in this study An International database was screened for presentations presented at a national congress. Because of not using a national database available in our country we could have failed to determine some congress poster presentations which were published in our country Secondly the publication status of articles from which the first and second authors had been removed could not have been determined because of screening the study only for these authors. Obtaining the publication data of presentations by contacting the authors could have increased the validity of the study
NCCAP has accepted oral presentations and this has been performed since 2008. In the future, studies including data of conversion to publication for oral and poster presentations presented in NCCAP are required. In addition, this data should be created by examining more comprehensive databases. To interpret contributions of NCCAP to literature in a healthier way, studies including data of publication for presentations submitted to international congresses in the field of child and adolescent psychiatry should be performed.
In conclusion, compared to the studies in literature, the similar rate of publication and the longer time to publication indicate that child and adolescent psychiatrists are experiencing difficulty in navigating the stages necessary in having their presentations published. To shorten the length of time for publishing articles in this field, arrangements such as creating time for research and setting auxiliary units that can provide support throughout all the stages of research (planning, data collection, analysis, writing, and publishing) can be performed. Prizes could be awarded for studies that are presented at a congress and published in an indexed journal. To boost the quality of studies and published articles, an infrastructure for multi-center studies can be established besides integration of case study presentations or studies with joint themes. It is important to create necessary conditions and encourage the researchers to publish poster presentations presented in NCCAP
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.
(1.) Amirhamzeh D, Moor MA, Baldwin K, Hosalkar HS. Publication rates of abstracts presented at pediatric orthopaedic society of North America meetings between 2002 and 2006. J Pediatr Orthop 201 2; 32:6-10. [CrossRef]
(2.) Ozyurt S, Kaptanoglu AR 2004-2008 yillan arasinda iki yilda bin yapilan ulusal dermatoloji kongrelerinde sunulan ozetlerin yayinlanma oranlan. Dermatoz 2012;3:7-11.
(3.) Balasubramanian SP Kumar ID, Wyld L, Reed MW. Publication of surgical abstracts in full text: a retrospective cohort study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006; 88:57-61. [CrossRef]
(4.) Autorino R, Quarto G, Di Lorenzo G, De Sio M, Damiano R. Are abstracts presented at the EAU meeting followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals? A critical analysis. Eur Urol 2007; 51:833-840. [CrossRef]
(5.) Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1994; 272:158-162. [CrossRef]
(6.) Gregory TN, Liu T Machuk A, Arneja JS. What is the ultimate fate of presented abstracts? The conversion rates of presentations to publications over a five-year period from three North American plastic surgery meetings. Can J Plast Surg 2012; 20:33-36.
(7.) Davies MW, Dunster KR, East CE, Lingwood BE. Fate of abstracts published in the proceedings of the first annual Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand Congress in 1997. J Paediatr Child Elealth 2002; 38:501-506. [CrossRef]
(8.) Glick N, MacDonald I, Knoll G, Brabant A, Gourishankar S. Factors associated with publication following presentation at a transplantation meeting. Am J Transplant 2006; 6:552-556. [CrossRef]
(9.) Post RE, Mainous AG 3rd, O'Elare KE, King DE, Maffei MS. Publication of research presented at STFM and NAPCRG conferences. Ann Fam Med 2013; 11:258-261. [CrossRef]
(10.) Nader F, Mousavizadeh K, Ghafourifar P. Annual International Geographic Medicine Congress Meetings in Shiraz, Iran: Publication Rates during 1999-2006. Int J Biomed Sci 2009; 5:44-49.
(11.) Patel AJ, Cherian J, Fox BD, Whitehead WE, Curry DJ, Luerssen TG, Jea A. Publication patterns of oral and poster presentations at the annual meetings of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. J Neurosurg 2011; I 15:1258-1261. [CrossRef]
(12.) Schnatz PR Romegialli A, Abrantes J, Marakovits K, Cunningham D, O'Sullivan DM. The North American Menopause Society: from abstract to publication. Menapouse 2008; 15:996-1001. [CrossRef]
(13.) Smith E4D, Bogenschutz ED, Bayliss AJ, Altenburger PA, Warden SJ. Full-text publication of abstract-presented work in physical therapy: do therapists publish what they preach? Phys Then 2011; 91:234-245. [CrossRef]
(14.) Scherer RW, Langenberg P von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 18:MR000005. [CrossRef]
(15.) 15. Ulusal Cocuk ve Ergen Ruh Sagligi ve Hastaliklari Kongresi Kitapcigi, 21-24 Nisan 2005, Istanbul: Cocuk ve Genclik Ruh Sagligi Dernegi; 2005.
(16.) 16. Ulusal Cocuk ve Ergen Ruh Sagligi ve Hastaliklari Kongresi Kitapcigi, 20-23 Nisan 2006, Antalya: Cocuk ve Genclik Ruh Sagligi Dernegi; 2006.
(17.) 17. Ulusal Cocuk ve Ergen Ruh Sagligi ve Hastaliklari Kongresi Kitapcigi, 19-22 Nisan 2007, Izmir: Cocuk ve Genclik Ruh Sagligi Dernegi; 2007.
(18.) 18. Ulusal Cocuk ve Ergen Ruh Sagligi ve Hastaliklari Kongresi Kitapcigi, 28-30 Nisan 2008, Istanbul: Cocuk ve Genclik Ruh Sagligi Dernegi; 2008.
(19.) Ha TH, Yoon DY, Goo DH, Chang SK, Seo YL, Yun EJ, Moon JH, Lee YJ, Lim KJ, Choi CS. Publication rates for abstracts presented by Korean investigators at major radiology meetings. Korean J Radiol 2008; 9:303-311. [CrossRef]
(20.) Winnik S, Raptis DA, Walker JH, Hasun M, Speer X Clavien PA, Komajda M, Bax JJ, Tendera M, Fox K, Van de Wert F, Mundow C, Luscher TF, Ruschitzka F, Matter CM. From abstract to impact in cardiovascular research: factors predicting publication and citation. Eur Heart J 2012; 33:3034-3045. [CrossRef]
(21.) Kabay B, Teke Z, Erbis H, Kocbil G, Tekin K, Erdem E. Ulusal Cerrahi Kongrelerinde sunulan bildirilerin uluslararasi yayina donusme oranlari. Ulusal Cer Derg 2005; 21:130-134.
(22.) Sivan M, Smith M, Bavikatte G, Bradley L. The academic value of rehabilitation medicine meetings. Disabil Rehabil 2010; 32:1 894-1 896. [CrossRef]
(23.) Kalyoncu U, Qnar M, Demiral MD, Yimaz S, Erdem H, Kiraz S, Pay S, Ertenli i, Ding A. Ulusal Romatoloji Kongrelerinde sunulan bildirilerin irdelenmesi: Neredeyiz? RAED Dergisi 2011; 3:6-1 0.
(24.) Guryel E, Durrant AW, Alakeson R, Ricketts DM. From presentation to publication: the natural history of orthopaedic abstracts in the United Kingdom. Postgrad Med J 2006; 82:70-72. [CrossRef]
(25.) Dahllof G, Wondimu B, Maniere MG. Subsequent publication of abstracts presented at the International Association of Paediatric Dentistry meetings. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008; 18:91-97. [CrossRef]
(26.) Ng L, Hersey K, Fleshner N. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association. BJU Int 2004; 94:7981. [CrossRef]
(27.) Roy D, Sankar V, Hughes JP, Jones A, Fenton JE. Publication rates of scientific papers presented at the Otorhinolaryngological Research Society meetings. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2001; 26:253-256. [CrossRef]
(28.) Harris IA, Mourad M, Kadir A, Solomon MJ, Young JM. Publication bias in abstracts presented to the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2007; 15:62-66.
(29.) loannidis JP. Effect of the statistical significance of results on the time to completion and publication of randomized efficacy trials. JAMA 1998; 279:281 286. [CrossRef]
(30.) Man JP, Weinkauf JG, Tsang M, Sin DD. Why do some countries publish more than others? An international comparison of research funding, English proficiency and publication output in highly ranked general medical journals. Eur J Epidemiol 2004; 19:81 1-817. [CrossRef]
(31.) Weale AR, Edwards AG, Lear PA, Morgan JD. From meeting presentation to peer-review publication--a UK review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006; 88:52-56. [CrossRef]
(32.) Donegan DJ, Kim TW, Lee GC. Publication rates of presentations at an annual meeting of the american academy of orthopaedic surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468:1428-1435. [CrossRef]
(33.) von Elm E, Costanza MG, Walder B, Tramer MR. More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003; 3:12. [CrossRef]
Caner MUTLU , Ebru KAYA MUTLU , Ali Guven KILICOGLU , Ozgur YORBIK 
 Clinic of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Bakirkoy Prof. Dr Mazhar Osman Mental and Neurological Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
 Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Istanbul University, Faculty of Health Sciences, istanbul, Turkey
 Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Maltepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
Correspondence Address: Dr Caner Mutlu, Clinic of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Bakirkoy Prof. Dr Mazhar Osman Mental and Neurological Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey Phone: +90 505 834 37 97 E-mail: email@example.com
Received: 06.09.2013 Accepted: 03.10.2013
Table 1. Distribution of published poster presentations according to study design, years, and journal index SCI SCI-E Other * Number of published poster presentations (%) 2005 Research 3 2 5 10 (27.0) Case 2 -- 1 3 (21.4) Total 5 2 6 13 (25.5) 2006 Research 5 4 5 14 (32.5) Case -- 2 3 5 (23.8) Total 5 6 8 19 (29.7) 2007 Research 3 4 1 8 (21.0) Case 1 2 1 4 (19.0) Total 4 6 2 12 (20.3) 2008 Research 4 1 3 8 (34.8) Case -- -- 2 2 (1 1.8) Total 4 1 5 10 (25.0) 2005-2008 Research 15 11 14 40 (28.4) Case 3 4 7 14 (19.2) Total 18 15 21 54 (25.2) Total number of poster presentations 2005 Research 37 Case 14 Total 51 2006 Research 43 Case 21 Total 64 2007 Research 38 Case 21 Total 59 2008 Research 23 Case 17 Total 40 2005-2008 Research 141 Case 73 Total 214 SCI: Science Citation Index; SCI-E: Science Citation Index-Expanded. * National or international peer-reviewed journals not associated with SCI and SCI-E Table 2. Distribution of academic degrees of first author in published articles according to study design and journal index (n = 54) Study design Journal index Total (%) Research Case SCI SCI-E Other * Professor 1 -- -- -- 1 1 (1.8) Associate 4 -- 2 1 1 4 (7.4) Professor Assistant 20 3 7 9 7 23 (42.6) Professor Expert 3 2 2 -- 3 5 (9.2) lecturers Expert 10 7 6 5 6 17 (3 1.5) Other 2 2 1 -- 3 4 (7.4) degree ** SCI: Science Citation Index; SCI-E: Science Citation Index-Expanded. * National or international peer-reviewed journals not associated with SCI and SCI-E. ** Research assistants or university graduate researchers Table 3. Comparison of study design with publication rate, journal index, and academic degree of first author Research Case n % n % Publication Published 40 28.4 14 19.2 rate presentation Unpublished 101 71.6 59 80.8 presentation Total 141 100 73 100 Journal Index SCI/SCI-E 26 65.0 7 50 Other * 14 35.0 7 50 Total 40 100 14 100 First author Teaching staff 25 62.5 3 27.3 degree Expert and other 15 37.5 1 1 72.7 degree ** Total 40 100 14 100 [chi P square] Publication 1.694 0.193 rate Journal Index 0.452 0.501 First author 5.458 0.019 degree [chi square]: Chi-square test SCI: Science Citation Index; SCI-E: Science Citation Index-Expanded. * National or international peer-reviewed journals not associated with SCI and SCI-E. ** Research assistants or university graduate researchers Table 4. Comparison of academic degrees of first author with journal index SCI/SCI-E Other * P n % n % First author Teaching staff 19 57.6 9 42.8 0.438 degree Expert and other 14 42.4 12 57.2 degree ** Total 33 100 21 100 SCI/SCI-E: Science Citation Index/Science Citation Index-Expanded. * National or international peer-reviewed journals not associated with SCI and SCI-E. ** Research assistants or university graduate researchers Table 5. Mean length of time to publication of research and case poster presentations per year Research (Mean Case (Mean [+ or -] D months; [+ or -] D months; 4-74 months) 7-61 months) 2005 38.80 [+ or -] 23.27 23.67 [+ or -] 18.72 2006 23.50 [+ or -] 16.44 27.00 [+ or -] 16.78 2007 34.38 [+ or -] 15.62 34.38 [+ or -] 15.62 2008 30.25 [+ or -] 18.53 30.25 [+ or -] 18.53 2005-2008 30.85 [+ or -] 18.94 30.36 [+ or -] 19.44 All presentations (Mean [+ or -] D months) 2005 35.31 [+ or -] 22.55 2006 24.42 [+ or -] 16.14 2007 33.83 [+ or -] 18.90 2008 33.00 [+ or -] 18.24 2005-2008 30.72 [+ or -] 18.89 SD: standard deviation Table 6. Comparison of time to publication of poster presentations with study design, academic degree of first author, and journal index (n=54) Number of Time to publication published (Mean [+ or -] SD studies (n) months) Study design Research 40 30.85 [+ or -] 18.94 Case 14 30.36 [+ or -] 19.44 First author Teaching staff 28 32.79 [+ or -] 18.91 degree Expert and other 26 28.50 [+ or -] 18.98 degree ** Journal index SCI/SCI-E 33 29.79 [+ or -] 17.98 Other ** 21 32.19 [+ or -] 20.60 Z P Study design Research -0.217 0.828 Case First author Teaching staff -0.901 0.368 degree Expert and other degree ** Journal index SCI/SCI-E -0.240 0.81 1 Other ** Z: Mann-Whitney U-test, SCI/SCI-E: Science Citation Index/Science Citation Index-Expanded. * Research assistants or university graduate researchers. ** National or international peer-reviewed journals not associated with SCI and SCI-E
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Research Article|
|Author:||Mutlu, Caner; Mutlu, Ebru Kaya; Kilicoglu, Ali Guven; Yorbik, Ozgur|
|Publication:||Archives of Neuropsychiatry|
|Date:||Jun 1, 2015|
|Previous Article:||Up-to-date critical review of the classification of epilepsies and epileptic seizures.|
|Next Article:||What are the predictors of death in patients with cranio-cervical artery dissection?|