Printer Friendly

From fireball to galaxies: making late waves.

From fireball to galaxies: Making late waves

How a universe that started out as a hot, dense fireball developed an intricate structure consisting of galaxies, clusters of galaxies, voids and other large-scale features is one of the major conundrums in cosmology today. Theorists believe that at some point after the Big Bang, fluctuations in the smooth flow of matter and energy served as seeds for galaxy formation. The question is when and how those fluctuations occurred. A new theory postulates that these fluctuations happened much later than suggested by previous models.

All models for generating fluctuations on a cosmological scale require a phase transition -- a change in the fabric of space itself to produce lumps and ripples in the distribution of matter. Such density fluctuations eventually yield the galaxies and galaxy clusters now observed.

David N. Schramm of the University of Chicago and his collaborators suggest that such a phase transition occurred a million or so years after the Big Bang rather than during the first nanosecond of the universe's life. "Before, people always thought phase transitions had to be early, and then they were stuck with a particular mode of thought," Schramm says. "Allowing the phase transition to be late opens up all sorts of new possibilities." He and his colleagues describe their theory in the April COMMENTS ON NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE PHYSICS.

When water freezes to form an ice cube, different parts often freeze at slightly different rates. These separately formed regions of ice don't quite mesh to create a perfect crystal. Consequently, an ice cube often shows internal imperfections, usually seen as fractured lines and planes. Similarly, a phase transition on a cosmological scale would produce "topological" defects in the vacuum of space. The universe's lumpiness would arise much in the same way frosty white planes appear within ice cubes.

Schramm and his colleagues base their arguments for a late phase transition on the possibility that neutrinos -- subatomic particles normally thought to have no mass at all -- may actually have a tiny mass. That mass would manifest itself about a million years after the Big Bang. Such a neutrino mass, about one fifty-billionth that of an electron, would also help account for why the sun produces fewer neutrinos than expected according to conventional theories (SN: 4/30/88, p.277).

The idea of a late phase transition is appealing because such a change occurs after electrons combine with protons to produce hydrogen atoms and the amount of energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation, or photons, stabilizes. This means a late phase transition has practically no effect on the microwave background radiation, which pervades the universe and appears uniform in every direction. Theories in which phase transitions happen earlier have a great deal of difficulty explaining how fluctuations can grow to become seeds for galaxy formation without distorting the microwave background radiation to a greater extent than observed.

"In our model, we avoid making fluctuations in the background radiation while still making fluctuations that would produce galaxies," Schramm says. "The seeds of galaxy formation are created at the time the galaxies need them, not before."

Measurements of any slight distortions in the microwave background radiation would provide one of the best tests of the new model, Schramm says. The less distortion observers detect, the more promising a late-phase-transition model looks.

Computer simulations also provide a useful check on the model. Recently, David N. Spergel of Princeton (N.J.) University and William H. Press of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Mass., investigated one particularly simple case to see if a late phase transition involving neutrinos would evolve into the kind of structures observed in the universe.

"In its simplest form, it doesn't look too promising," Spergel says. "However, many other variations are possible. A lot of work needs to be done to explore the model and see if it provides a viable alternative for galaxy formation."

Furthermore, a neutrino phase transition isn't the only possibility. "Once we recognized that this particular transition could do it, we realized that particle physics offers other possibilities for a late phase transition," Schramm says. "We need to look at other kinds of particle models . . . that can yield the same kind of effect."

"Maybe something crazy is needed," says Princeton astrophysicist P. James E. Peebles. "None of the standard models for formation of galaxies and clusters of galaxies fits very well with all of the data. That could be because we're missing some elementary point in the way we approach the data, or it could be we're missing something big, like a late-time phase transition. I certainly wouldn't dismiss [that possibility], because we're getting a little desperate."
COPYRIGHT 1989 Science Service, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1989, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Peterson, I.
Publication:Science News
Date:Apr 29, 1989
Words:776
Previous Article:Scientists form-fit diamond-like cloak.
Next Article:Global smog: newest greenhouse project.
Topics:


Related Articles
Facing galaxies head-on; 'deprojecting' images of galaxies enables scientists to view them face-to-face for the first time.
Cosmic evidence of a smooth beginning.
An x-ray background for star formation.
Ringing in an estimate of a galaxy's mass.
Seeding the universe: how did matter assemble itself into the giant filaments, clusters, bubbles and walls of galaxies that now fill the universe?
Galactic magnetism on a gigantic scale.
Galaxies far and wide.
Radio waves may trace distant clustering.
Magnetic studies may pose cosmic puzzle.
Sound waves may drive cosmic structure.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters