# Fringe waves in an impedance half-plane.

1. INTRODUCTIONPhysical optics (PO) is based on the integration of surface currents which are induced by the incident fields. This concept is valid and accurate for metallic scatterer surfaces and gives exact geometric optics (GO) waves in the high frequencies. There are lots of studies in the literature about the application of the PO method [1-3]. The edge diffracted fields which are found from the contribution of the PO surface integral are not correct. In addition PO currents just consider the illuminated part of the scatterer and ignore the shadow regions. The physical theory of diffraction (PTD) method was proposed by Ufimtsev to overcome the first defeat [4]. The PTD consists of two main parts. The first part is the uniform part which is obtained from the PO and the second part is the contribution of the non-uniform or fringe part. The fringe part is the result of the fringe currents. It is pointed out that the fringe currents are obtained by dividing the induced surface currents into two parts. The fields, radiated by the fringe currents, can be found by subtracting of uniform part from the exact solution. The method is widely used in the literature for investigation of the scattering problems [5-8]. Using the uniform fringe fields instead of the non-uniform version is more reliable. Non-uniform fringe fields can be obtained by the subtraction of asymptotic

PO fields from asymptotic exact solutions. Similarly, uniform fringe fields can be obtained by subtraction of uniform PO fields from uniform exact solutions of the related geometry. Umul showed in a study by making comparison that the values used by Ufimtsev were quite large and not giving the correct results for the fringe fields. According to Umul's work, approximate expressions are not valid in the transition regions. Therefore, the solutions that are represented by the Fresnel functions must be used for the scattering problems [9]. Syed and Volakis derived PTD formulation for investigation of radar cross section (RCS) and they presented their formulation for impedance and coated structures [10]. Although PTD results for different impedance structures were presented by Syed and Volakis, fringe field expressions were not studied analytically and numerically. In addition, the work does not include the uniform version of the fringe field expressions and results were analyzed in terms of the total fields. In the literature, there are lots of applications on the diffraction analysis for impedance surfaces such as land-sea transition, solar cell panels on satellites and edges of high performance antennas [11-14]. The aim of this paper is to investigate the uniform fringe field expressions for impedance half-plane. Although the diffraction from a half-plane was studied by many researchers according to our knowledge, there is no study on the application of the PTD method to an impedance-half plane. Moreover, uniform expressions of fringe fields were not examined for an impedance half-plane. It is first examined in this study. Additionally, uniform and non-uniform expressions were also derived and compared numerically. Differences were examined according to the distribution of fringe field.

The time factor of exp(j[omega]t) is assumed and suppressed throughout the paper where [omega] is the angular frequency.

2. THEORY

In this section the PO expression for the half plane geometry will be obtained from the Huygens-Kirchhoff integral with the impedance boundary condition. The geometry of the half plane is given in Figure 1. The half plane is lying on the surface {x [member of] [0, [infinity]], y = 0, z [member of] [-[infinity], [infinity]]}.

We consider the ^-polarization case for the incident field in this study. The method can also be applicable for the H-polarization case. The half-plane is illuminated by the plane-wave of

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (1)

where the [u.sub.0] is the complex amplitude factor and [u.sub.i] is any component of the electric field. The total field can be written as

[u.sub.t] = [u.sub.i] + [u.sub.r] (2)

where [u.sub.r] is the reflected field from the surface. The PO takes the reflected fields as a geometric optics (GO) fields so the reflected field can be described as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (3a)

where [GAMMA] is the reflection coefficient and equal to

[GAMMA] = sin [[phi].sub.0] - sin [theta]/sin [[phi].sub.0] + sin [theta] (3b)

according to [15]. When taking into account the reflection coefficient which is given in Equation (3b), the angle [theta] determines the surfaces polarization case. When sin [theta] take the values between one and infinity electric polarization case is observed and if sin [theta] take the values between zero and one magnetic polarization case is observed.

Equation (2) is rearranged according to Equation (1) and Equations (3a), (3b) and redefined on the scattering surface as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]. (4)

The impedance boundary condition for the Cartesian coordinates is defined as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (5)

where s is the y = 0 plane, n the unit normal vector of the scattering surface, sin [theta] equal to [Z.sub.0]/Z, and [Z.sub.0] the impedance of the vacuum and Z is the impedance of the scatterer. According to Equation (4) and Equation (5) derivative of the field expression is written as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (6)

For the 2-D case if the geometry is symmetric according to the z' coordinates a further expression of the Huygens-Kirchhoff integral can be given by

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (7)

where P is the observation point and G the Green's function. The 2-D Green's function is given as

G = [[pi]/j] [H.sup.(2).sub.0] (kR). (8)

The PO integral is constructed as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (9)

according to Equations (4), (6), (7) and the geometry of the problem. The term [partial derivative]G/[partial derivative]y' can be found from the chain rule as

[partial derivative]G/[partial derivative]y' [congruent to] [[pi]/j] [partial derivative][H.sup.(2).sub.0](kR)/[partial derivative]R [[partial derivative]R/[partial derivative]y' (10)

where R is the ray path and equal to [[[(x - x').sup.2] + [(y - y').sup.2]].sup.1/2]. The derivative operation of the ray path according to the normal vector is written as

[partial derivative]R/[partial derivative]y' [|.sub.y'=0] = -y/R (11)

where -y/R is written as -sin [beta] from the geometry of the problem. Equation (9) is obtained

[partial derivative]G/[partial derivative]y' [congruent to] [k[pi]/j] [H.sup.(2).sub.1] (kR)sin[beta] (12)

with inserted Equation (11) into Equation (10) and the derivative operation [partial derivative][H.sup.(2).sub.0](kR)/[partial derivative]R equal to -k[H.sup.(2).sub.1](kR). Hence the PO integral which is given in Equation (9) is reconstructed as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (13)

where [R.sub.1] is the ray path and equal to [[[(x - x').sup.2] + [y.sup.2]].sup.1/2]. Debby asymptotic expansion of the Hankel function is written as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (14)

where k[R.sub.1] [much greater than] 1. As a result, Equation (13) yields

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (15)

where [R.sub.1] is equal to [[[(x - x').sup.2] + [y.sup.2]].sup.1/2]. The integral expression can be transformed into

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (16)

by using [16] for separately investigation of the incident and reflected diffracted fields with using the trigonometric relation of sin(a - b) = sin a cos b - cos a sin b. The incident and reflected diffracted fields can be written as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (17a)

and

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (17b)

respectively. The asymptotic evaluation of Equation (17a) can be found by using the edge point technique. The edge point technique is given as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (18)

where the detailed explanation can be found in [16]. The phase function of Equation (17a) is written as

g(x') = x' cos [[phi].sub.0] - [R.sub.1] (19)

The first derivative of the phase function can be found as

g'(x') = cos [[phi].sub.0] + x - x'/[R.sub.1]. (20)

The stationary phase values of the phase functions are found as

g([x.sub.e]) = -[rho] (21)

and

g'([x.sub.e]) = cos [[phi].sub.0] + x/[R.sub.1] (22)

where x/[R.sub.1] is written as - cos [[beta].sub.e] from the geometry of the problem and keep in mind that 5e which is the reflection angle's value at the edge is equal to [pi] - [phi]. The amplitude function can be written as

f([x.sub.e]) = (sin [[beta].sub.e] - sin [theta]) cos [[[beta].sub.e] + [[phi].sub.0]/2] sin [[[beta].sub.e] - [[phi].sub.0]/2] 1/[square root of k[rho]] (23)

at the edge. Hence the asymptotic incident diffracted PO field is obtained as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (24)

with using the edge point method. Equation (24) is simplified as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (25)

with using the trigonometric relation of cos a + cos b = 2 cos a + b/a cos a - b/2. The diffracted field, in Equation (25) is not uniform since it approaches to infinity at the shadow and reflection boundaries. The uniform theory is based on the asymptotic relation of

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (26)

for x [much greater than] 1 [17,18]. The sign(x) is the signum function equal to 1 for x > 0 and -1 for x < 0. The F[x] is the Fresnel function and can be defined by the integral of

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]. (27)

In order to obtain the uniform version of the diffracted fields two new parameter are introduced as

[[xi].sub.-] = -[square root of 2k[rho]] cos [phi] - [[phi].sub.0]/2 (28)

[[xi].sub.+] = -[square root of 2k[rho]] cos [phi] - [[phi].sub.0]/2 (29)

for using instead of x in Equation (26). Hence the uniform version of Equation (25) can be obtained as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]. (30)

The same procedure is valid for the reflected diffracted field so the uniform version of the reflected diffracted field is directly written as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (31)

If the scattering geometry is symmetric according to the z' coordinate, the generalized PO integral for an arbitrary impedance surface is written as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (32)

from [19] where [alpha] is the incident angle and [beta] the reflection angle. According to Figure 1, Equation (32) can be rewritten as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (33)

where g([[phi].sub.0], [pi] - [beta]) is the compositions of the Maliuzhinetz function and equal to

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (34)

where [psi](x) is written as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (35)

and the term [[psi].sub.[pi]](x) is the Maliuzhinetz function and can be described as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (36)

Hence using Debby asymptotic form of the [H.sup.(2).sub.0] (kR) which is equal to

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (37)

the scattering integral takes the form

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (38)

where [R.sub.1] is the ray path and equal to [[[(x - x').sup.2] + [y.sup.2]].sup.1/2]. The phase function and the amplitude function of Equation (38) are written as

g(x') = x' cos [[phi].sub.0] - [R.sub.1] (39)

f(x') = q([[phi].sub.0], [pi] - [beta]) 1/[square root of k[R.sub.1]] (40)

The first derivative of the phase function is derived as

g'(x) = cos [[phi].sub.0] - d[R.sub.1]/dx' (41)

where d[R.sub.1]/dx' can be found x - x'/[R.sub.1] and this expression is written as - cos [beta] from the geometry of the problem. The edge point contribution of Equation (38) can be obtained as

[u.sub.M](P) = [u.sub.0] [[e.sup.-j[[pi]/4]/[square root of 2[pi]] q ([[phi].sub.0], [pi] - [[beta].sub.e])[1/[square root of k[rho]] 1/cos [[phi].sub.0] - cos [[beta].sub.e]] [e.sup.-jk[rho]] (42)

with using the edge point technique which is given in Equation (18). The reflection angle [beta] takes the [[beta].sub.e] value in the edges and equal to [pi] - [phi]. Equation (42) is rewritten as

[u.sub.M](P) = [u.sub.0][[e.sup.-j[[pi]/4]/[square root of 2[pi][[q([[phi].sub.0], [phi])/cos [[phi].sub.0] + cos [phi]][[e.sup.-jk[rho]]/[square root of k[rho]]]. (43)

Equation (43) can be separated into incident and reflected diffracted part with using the trigonometric relation which is previously given. After the trigonometric separation operation Equation (43)'s uniform version can be written as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (44)

and

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (45)

with using Equation (26) and Equation (27). According to the PTD, fringe fields can be obtained with subtracting the PO fields from the exact solution so the total fringe field expression can be obtained as

[u.sub.f](P) = [u.sub.M](P) - [u.sub.PO](P) (46)

where the [u.sub.M](P) is the exact edge diffracted fields expression from the impedance half plane and formed as

[u.sub.M](P) = [u.sup.id.sub.M](P) + [u.sup.rd.sub.M](P) (47)

with addition of Equations (44), (45). Also u[(P).sub.PO] is the edge contribution of the PO method and formed as

[u.sub.PO](P) = [u.sup.id.sub.PO](P) + [u.sup.rd.sub.PO](P) (48)

with addition of Equations (30), (31). The expressions of the incident and reflected diffracted fringe fields can be written as

[u.sup.id.sub.f] (P) = [u.sup.id.sub.M](P) - [u.sup.id.sub.PO](P) (49a)

and

[u.sup.rd.sub.f](P) = [u.sup.rd.sub.M](P) - [u.sup.rd.sub.PO](P) (49b)

respectively taking into account Equations (30), (31), (44) and Equation (45). Equation (46) is valid for obtaining the asymptotic fringe field expression. In the beginning asymptotic PO contribution can be obtained from the evaluation of Equation (15) according to Equation (18). After this evaluation asymptotic PO field can be found as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (50)

The asymptotic fringe field expression can written as

[MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] (51)

with using the subtraction of Equation (50) from Equation (43).

3. NUMERICAL ANALYSIS

In this section fringe field expressions will be analyzed numerically. In order to investigate the far field radiation, the observation distance is taken reasonably away from the scatterer. The high frequency asymptotic techniques can be used under the condition of k[rho] [much greater than] 1 where [rho] and k are the observation distance and wave numbers respectively. The wave number k is equal to 2[pi]/[lambda] where [lambda] is the wavelength. The observation distance [rho] was taken as 6[lambda] in our computations. In this case, the high frequency condition is found as 12[pi] [much greater than] 1. Hence, it is satisfied by the distance 6[lambda]. The angle of incidence [[phi].sub.0] was taken as 60[degrees] and the sin [theta] term was taken as 4. Although in trigonometry the function sin [theta] is defined in the range of [-1, 1], in the literature for impedance boundary condition, it can take values from zero to infinity. It should not be confused with trigonometry. It has been used in this way in the literature by Maliuzhinetz [20]. Figure 2 shows the diffracted fringe fields whose expressions were given in Equations (46), (49a) and Equation (49b). It can be seen that a minor lobe occurs between the reflection and shadow boundaries. Amplitudes at the reflection (120[degrees]) and shadow (240[degrees]) boundaries are zero. The major radiation is observed in the illuminated and the shadow regions. The amplitude variations of the incident diffracted fringe fields go to zero at the 240[degrees] whereas the amplitude variation of the reflected diffracted fringe fields go to zero at the 120[degrees]. Furthermore, it can be observed from Figure 2 that incident diffracted fringe fields concentrate in the shadow regions so compensate the incident fields in the illuminated regions. Similarly, reflected diffracted fringe fields concentrate in the illuminated regions so compensate the reflected fields in the shadow regions.

Figure 3 shows that the uniform and asymptotic fringe fields. The asymptotic fringe field was computed according to the expression given in Equation (51). Although the amplitudes are equal in the illuminated and shadow regions, they are different in the transition regions. The amplitude of asymptotic fringe field is different than zero at the 120[degrees] and 240[degrees] on contrary to the uniform fringe field. It is a predicted scene for the asymptotic fringe fields for an impedance structures. The reason of the enhancement at 120[degrees] is the result of the asymptotic expression which is given in Equation (51). This behavior was explained in Figure 4. According to the PTD, asymptotic expression of fringe field can be obtained by the subtraction of PO asymptotic expression from exact asymptotic solution. The values of asymptotic expressions become infinity at the transition regions and cause an uncertainty in the result of the subtraction process. However, it yields finite field values. Although the fields compensate each other in all direction of observation, the fields cannot compensate at the reflection boundary. Therefore, the enhancement at 120[degrees] is observed. Figure 4 shows the variation of the asymptotic fringe field amplitude with respect to the observation angle. In Figure 4, the amplitude takes a reasonable value at the 120[degrees] (reflection boundary). This behavior is related to the reflection coefficient. Incident diffracted fields do not depend on the surface reflection coefficient. Therefore, there is no amplitude change at the 240[degrees].

In the reflection coefficient when sin [theta] approaches to infinity in Equation (51), surface acts as a perfectly conducting surface. It can be observed from Figure 4 that reflected diffracted fringe field amplitude go to equal point with respect to the incident diffracted fringe field. Hence, at the 120[degrees] and 240[degrees] amplitudes take equal values. The amplitude values for all plots were found as expected because diffracted fields compensates the deficiencies of GO fields in the transition regions and takes half of the amplitude value of GO fields.

4. CONCLUSION

In this study, uniform and asymptotic fringe field expressions were derived for a half plane with the impedance boundary conditions by using the method of PTD. First of all, the contributions of the PO fields were derived by integrating the fields in the given surface. Then, the field expression which had been obtained from the surface integral was subtracted from the exact solution in order to obtain the asymptotic form of the fringe fields. The asymptotic fringe fields were transformed into the uniform fringe fields by using the method which is given in Refs. [17,18].

The derived uniform fringe fields were found to be more reliable than the asymptotic forms because asymptotic expressions gives wrong field values in the transition regions. It was observed that the separated fringe fields compensate the reflected and incident fields in the shadow regions. Numerical analysis showed that the uniform fringe fields are in harmony with the theory. We observed that amplitudes of the asymptotic fringe field are finite for all direction of observation and nearly consistent with the uniform fringe fields except for the reflection and shadow boundaries. In this respect, when compared to Ufimtsev's works, it appears that Ufimtsev's amplitude values were exaggerated [4,21]. In Chapter 4, Figure 4.2 of [4], amplitude values of asymptotic fringe field components take equal value with GO fields [4]. However, it is noticeable that diffracted fields amplitude values have to be half of the GO amplitude values in the shadow and reflection regions. The more rigorous expressions were presented and numerically analyzed in this work.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The author is grateful to Prof. Dr. Yusuf Ziya UMUL for his guidance to this study.

REFERENCES

[1.] Li, J., B. Wei, Q. He, L.-X. Guo, and D.-B. Ge, "Time-domain iterative physical optics method for analysis of EM scattering from the target half buried in rough surface: PEC case," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 121, 391-408, 2011.

[2.] Chin, H., J.-H. Yeom, H.-T. Kim, and K.-T. Kim, "Improvement of iterative physical optics using previous information to guide initial guess," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 124, 473-486, 2012.

[3.] Wu, Y., L. Jiang, and W. C. Chew, "An efficient method for computing highly oscillatory physical optics integral," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, Vol. 127, 211-257, 2012.

[4.] Ufimtsev, P. Y., Fundamentals of the Physical Theory of Diffraction, Wiley, New Jersey, 2004.

[5.] Ufimtsev, P. Y., "Elementary edge waves and the physical theory of diffraction," Electromagn., Vol. 11, 125-160, 1991.

[6.] Griesser, T. and C. Balanis, "Backscatter analysis of a corner reflector using GTD and PTD," IEEE Antennas Propogat. Soc. Symp., Vol. 23, 435-438, 1985.

[7.] Michaeli, A., "A closed form physical theory of diffraction solution for electromagnetic scattering by strips and 90[degrees] dihedrals," Radio Sci., Vol. 19, 609-616, 1984.

[8.] Skyttemyr, S., "Cross polarizations in dual reflector antennas--A PO and PTD analysis," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propogat., Vol. 34, 849-853, 1986.

[9.] Umul, Y. Z., "Fringe waves radiated by a half-plane for the boundary conditions of Neumann," Appl. Phys. B, Vol. 93, 885-889, 2008.

[10.] Syed, H. and J. L. Volakis, "PTD analysis of impedance structures," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propogat., Vol. 44, 983-988, 1996.

[11.] Casciato, M. D. and K. Sarabandi, "Scattering from a land-sea transition," IEEE Antennas Propogat. Soc. Symp., Vol. 1, 452-455, 2001.

[12.] Casciato, M. D., "Radio wave diffraction and scattering models for wireless channel simulations," Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Michigan, 2001.

[13.] Corona, P., G. D'Ambrosio, and G. Franceschetti, "Scattering properties of satellite-borne solar cell panels," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propogat., Vol. 27, 496-499, 1979.

[14.] Bucci, O. M. and G. Franceschetti, "Electromagnetic scattering by a half-plane with two face impedance," Radio. Sci., Vol. 11, 49-59, 1976.

[15.] Stutzman, W. and A. Thiele, Antenna Theory and Design, Wiley, New York, 1998.

[16.] Umul, Y. Z., "Modified theory of physical optics," Opt. Exp., Vol. 12, 4959-4972, 2004.

[17.] Umul, Y. Z., "Uniform version of the modified theory of physical optics based boundary diffraction wave theory," J. Mod. Opt., Vol. 55, 2797-2804, 2008.

[18.] Umul, Y. Z., "Uniform theory of the boundary diffraction wave," Opt. Laser Technol., Vol. 41, 285-288, 2009.

[19.] Umul, Y. Z., "Physical optics theory for the diffraction of waves by impedance surfaces," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Vol. 28, 255-262, 2011.

[20.] Maliuzhinetz, G. D., "Das sommerfeldsche integral und die losung von beugungsaufgaben in winkelgebieten," Ann. Phys., Vol. 461, 107-112, 1960.

[21.] Hacivelioglu, F., L. Sevgi, and P. Y. Ufimtsev, "Electromagnetic wave scattering from a wedge with perfectly reflecting boundaries: Analysis of asymptotic techniques," IEEE Antennas Propogat. Mag., Vol. 53, 232-253, 2011.

Husnu D. Basdemir *

Electronic and Communication Department, Engineering Faculty, Cankaya University, Eskisehir Road 29.km, Yenimahalle, Ankara 06810, Turkey

Received 4 March 2013, Accepted 2 April 2013, Scheduled 4 April 2013

* Corresponding author: Husnu Deniz Basdemir (basdemir@cankaya.edu.tr).

Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback | |

Author: | Basdemir, Husnu D. |
---|---|

Publication: | Progress In Electromagnetics Research |

Article Type: | Report |

Geographic Code: | 7TURK |

Date: | Jun 1, 2013 |

Words: | 3900 |

Previous Article: | An extended Inverse Chirp-Z transform algorithm to process high squint SAR data. |

Next Article: | Design of a compact quad-band hybrid antenna for Compass/WiMAX/WLAN applications. |

Topics: |